Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/ Klausurteil 30 Punkte, 60 Minuten, ohne Unterlagen. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME

Similar documents
Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME. Date:

Aircraft Design in a Nutshell

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

Flying Low and Slow. (and the Tools for its Calculation) Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

Systems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada Mail:

The Airplane That Could!

Aircraft Design Conceptual Design

AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT

FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (1) MASS AND BALANCE

This Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT.

Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

AIAA UNDERGRADUATE TEAM DESIGN COMPETITION PROPOSAL 2017

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Estimation of Critical Performance Parameters. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Fall 2015

INVESTIGATION OF ICING EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRCRAFT AT TSAGI

Preface. Acknowledgments. List of Tables. Nomenclature: organizations. Nomenclature: acronyms. Nomenclature: main symbols. Nomenclature: Greek symbols

The Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis

blended wing body aircraft for the

ECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT. ISSN: International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 1, Issue 2, August 2012

A Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing. The Big Guys. by Valerio Viti. Valerio Viti, AOE4984, Project #1, March 22nd, 2001

EAS 4700 Aerospace Design 1

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)

Aeronautical Engineering Design II Sizing Matrix and Carpet Plots. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Spring 2014

Welcome to the Airbus A380 Basic Manual for Virtual Air Cadet Airlines.

Environmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study

AAE 451 Conceptual Design Review

Chapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics

PAC 750XL PAC 750XL PAC-750XL

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Tip-Mounted Engines

3. What is the total fuel capacity with normal tanks? Usable? 4. What is the total fuel capacity with long range tanks? Usable?

Classical Aircraft Sizing II

LOW BOOM FLIGHT DEMONSTRATOR (LBFD)

Preliminary design of Aircraft Landing Gear Strut

1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS

OPTIMAL MISSION ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING FOR ENGINE AGING AND EMISSIONS

2008/2009 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design

TEAM Four Critical Design Review. Kai Jian Cheong Richard B. Choroszucha* Lynn Lau Mathew Marcucci Jasmine Sadler Sapan Shah Chongyu Brian Wang

Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR

7. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A SINGLE AISLE MEDIUM RANGE AIRCRAFT

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

European Aviation Safety Agency

Design of Ultralight Aircraft

XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF UTM 4-SEATER HELICOPTER. Mohd Shariff Ammoo 1 Mohd Idham Mohd Nayan 1 Mohd Nasir Hussain 2

Approche novatrice pour la conception et l exploitation d avions écologiques, sous incertitudes.

State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

@AIRBUS A /-600 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING

Optimum Seat Abreast Configuration for an Regional Jet

TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE ground roll

Typical Reserve Policy

CHAPTER 10. WEIGHT AND BALANCE

THE ANALYSIS OF WING PERFORMANCE FOR RECONNAISSANCE UAV ZULKIFLI BIN YUSOF UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG

I. DISPATCH PLANNING & AIRCRAFT EXTERIOR CHECK

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport

EGLIN AERO CLUB C-172 OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Apr Total usable fuel capacity for the aircraft with long range tanks is:

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE INTERCEPTOR (UAV-Ip)

EWADE th European Workshop on Aircraft Design Education - Naples 2011

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

European Aviation Safety Agency

An Integrated Approach to the Design-Optimization of an N+3 Subsonic Transport

Ultralight airplane Design

DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test. Cessna - 182

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT

Chapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view drawing - 2 Topic

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

Team 2. AAE451 System Requirements Review. Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney

AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition. RFP: Cruise Missile Carrier

Ember Aviation LAT-1

Electric Flight Potential and Limitations

DUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE

I. DISPATCH PLANNING & AIRCRAFT EXTERIOR CHECK

Small Fixed Wing Aircraft Operational Weight and Balance Computations

JetBiz. Six and Eight Passenger Business Jets

A SOLAR POWERED UAV. 1 Introduction. 2 Requirements specification

AE 452 Aeronautical Engineering Design II Installed Engine Performance. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering March 2016

North American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-86F Sabre DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1

ME 408 Aircraft Design Final Report for Team FSLAP Four-Seat Light Airplane

General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

High aspect ratio for high endurance. Mechanical simplicity. Low empty weight. STOVL or STOL capability. And for the propulsion system:

Answer Key. Page 1 of 10

Gyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter)

Environautics EN-1. Aircraft Design Competition. Presented by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The new Raisbeck/Hartzell C90 Swept Blade Turbofan Propeller

Power Estimation for a Two Seater Helicopter

B737 Performance. Takeoff & Landing. Last Rev: 02/06/2004

INCORPORA:1EO. PO Box Shannon Lane Priest River, FAA APPROVED

The new Raisbeck/Hartzell C90 Swept Blade Turbofan Propeller

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

Conceptual Design Review

Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

1 b. Definition and Discussion of the Intrinsic Efficiency of Winglets. Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

European Aviation Safety Agency

Missile Interceptor EXTROVERT ADVANCED CONCEPT EXPLORATION ADL P

The BUGATTI 100P Replica Propeller(s) By Jan Carlsson January 2012

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

PA-28R 201 Piper Arrow

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/11 Bearbeitungszeit: 180 Minuten Name: Matrikelnummer.: Vorname: Punkte: von 68 Note: Datum: 31.01.2011 1. Klausurteil 30 Punkte, 60 Minuten, ohne Unterlagen 1.1) Please translate to German. Please write clearly! Unreadable text causes substraction of points! 1. ferry range 2. galley 3. tail-aft configuration 4. baggage 5. canard 6. dihedral 7. take-off field length 8. preliminary sizing 9. T-tail 10. payload 11. flight manual 12. discontinued approach 1.2) Please translate to English! Please write clearly! Unreadable text causes substraction of points! 1. Spannweite 2. Verkürzte Flugzeugversion 3. Gang (in der Kabine) 4. Sitzschiene 5. Betriebsleermasse 6. Essenswagen 7. Bugfahrwerk 8. Triebwerk 9. Pfeilung 10. Schulterdecker 11. Drei-Flächen-Flugzeug 12. Flugzeug mit verbundenen Flügeln Seite 1 von 9 Seiten

1.3) Shown is a Boeing 727-200F. Please name 4 Pros and Cons or name things that change flight operation! 1.4) An aircraft for 205 passengers is planned. How many seats for flight attendants have to be put onboard? 1.5) What about the "range with maximum payload", is it bigger, smaller or the same as the "range with maximum fuel"? 1.6) Please name 5 requirements for a civil passenger aircraft that determine the design point! 1.7) Please name the equation used to calculate MTOW from payload m PL, operating weight moe mf empty ratio and fuel mass ratio! m m MTO MTO 1.8) Which of the certification rules FAR Part 25 or CS-25 has more stringent requirements for the climb gradient after a missed approach.? Please name the requirement? 1.9) Estimate the cabin length for an aircraft with 120 passengers seated in the fuselage depicted here! 1.10) How many emergency exits are required for an aircraft for a maximum of 350 passengers? Minimum a) in the cabin and b) for the whole aircraft. 1.11) Please explain, how it could happen to have "pitch up" for an aircraft with wings swept back! 1.12) Consider a conventional landing gear with nose and main gear. How do you have to arrange the main gear with respect to the center of gravity? How is the rule formulated? 1.13) How are related: Zero lift drag coefficient C D0 and induced drag coefficientc Di if you fly with maximum glide ratio E? max 1.14) Why do some high winged aircraft have a brace? Which pros and cons can you describe? 1.15) How does the tank volume change of a wing, if the aspect ratio is increased (all other parameters are considered to be fixed)? 1.16) How does the mass of the wing change, when the aspect ration of the wing is increased (all other parameters are considered to be fixed)? 1.17) Which three possibilities exist, to increase the static roll stability of an aircraft? Seite 2 von 9 Seiten

1.18) When flaps are down the moment changes. In which sense? 1.19) Make a sketch of the diagram used to determine the size of the horizontal tail. Please give also the names of the axis! 1.20) Please write down the equation to estimate the zero lift drag coefficient! Calculation is based on the equivalent skin friction coefficient C, the wetted area of the plane S wet and the reference wing area S ref = S W. 1.21) Equipment costs 10000. The equipment is written off in 4 years. The residual value is 20%. What is the depreciation (per year)? fe Questions to the evening lectures 1.22) Which three features symbolize the current less efficient European Air Traffic Management system? 1.23) What will be introduced in Europa with an aim to defragment the currently fragmented European Air Traffic Management system? 1.24) Please describe the landing gear of the Solar Impulse HB-SIA! 1.25) Make a sketch of the so called ADHF (Adaptive Dropped-Hinge Flap) of the A350-XWB. Show the positions of Flap, Hinge, Spoiler and Wing! Seite 3 von 9 Seiten

2. Klausurteil Name: 38 Punkte, 120 Minuten, mit Unterlagen und Laptop Aufgabe 2.1 (18 Punkte) The task to make a preliminary redesign the short and medium range Airbus A320. This should be done with help of the spread sheet from the lecture. These are the requirements for the aircraft: Payload: 150 passengers with baggage for a flight as given below. Additional cargo: 6,05 t. Range 1500 NM with the payload given above (Reserves as given in FAR Part 121 domestic, distance to alternate: 200 NM). Take-off field length s TOFL 2200 m (ISA, MSL). Landing field length slfl 1700 m (ISA, MSL). Furthermore the requirements from FAR Part 25 121(b) (2. Segment) and FAR Part 25 121(d) (missed approach) shall be met. For you calculation: Maximum lift coefficient of the aircraft in landing configuration C L, max, L = 2,9. Correlation factor for landing k L according to the lecture. Maximum lift coefficient of the aircraft in take-off configuration C L, max, TO = 2,07. Find: Glide ratio E in take-off configuration and glide ratio E in landing configuration. With: Aspect ratio A = 9,5, C D,0 = 0,02 and Oswald factor e = 0,7. The maximum glide ratio in cruise: E max 17,88. Oswald factor in cruise: e = 0,85. Mach number in cruise: 0,76. The ratio of cruise speed and speed for minimum drag V CR /V md has to be determined so that a favorable matching chart results (determine the ratio to the accuracy of figures after the decimal point)! The ratio of maximum landing mass and maximum take-off massis m ML /m MTO = 0,878. The operating empty weight ratio m OE / m MTO is assumed to be 55 %. The by-pass ratio (BPR) of the two CFM-56 engines is µ = 6; their thrust specific fuel consumption in cruise and loiter is assumed to be c = 16 mg/(ns). USE THESE VALUES as Mission-Segment Fuel Fractions: Engine Start: 0,999; Taxi: 0,996; Take-Off: 0,993; Climb: 0,993; Descent: 0,992; Landing: 0,992. Calculate: cruise altitude maximum take-off mass maximum landing mass wing area required thrust of one of the two engines required tank volume Enter your results in the form attached (including all intermediate results that are asked for in the form)! Plot the matching chart! Seite 4 von 9 Seiten

Ergebnisse zu Aufgabe 2.1 Please insert your results here! Do not forget the units! Wing loading from landing field length: Thrust to weight ratio from take-off field length: Glide Ratio in 2. Segment: Glide Ratio during missed approach maneuver: Thrust to weight ratio from climb requirement in 2. Segment: Thrust to weight ratio from climb requirement during missed approach maneuver: V CR /V md : Design point o Thrust to weight ratio : o Wing loading: Cruise altitude (FL,e.g. 210, 220, 230, ): maximum take-off mass in kg: maximum landing mass in kg: wing area in m 2 : thrust of one engine in N: required tank volume in m 3 : Seite 5 von 9 Seiten

Seite 6 von 9 Seiten

Aufgabe 2.2 (7 Punkte) Page 9 shows a boxwing based on the Airbus A320. The boxwing was designed from the wing area of the A320 that was split into two wings with equal area. Span remained unchanged. a) Calculate the aspect ratio of the total aircraft (based on the total wing area) and calculate the aspect ratio of each separate wing. b) Under idealized assumptions: The wings do not interact: What is the ratio of the induced drag of the A320 (ref) and the induced drag of the idealized boxwing (BW)? Hence calculate D D i, BW i, ref! c) The closer the two wings come together, the less is the advantage calculated in b). This is shown in the diagram. Height from one wing to another h and span b is given, resulting in a ratio D D i, BW i, ref. The equation for x = h/b is printed in the upper right hand corner of the diagram. calculated the ratio of the induced drag of the A320 (ref) and the induced drag of the box wing shown on page 9! d) We assume that the reference aircraft will fly in cruise with maximum glide ratio. What is the ratio of the glide ratios of boxwing and reference aircraft? Find i) Calculate this for the ideal case (as in b)! ii) Calculate this for the case of the boxwing as given on page 9 (as in c)! E E BW ref! Assume: The mass of the two aircraft (ref und BW) is the same. Seite 7 von 9 Seiten

Aufgabe 2.3 (3 Punkte) Compare boxwing versus reference aircraft. Find the ratio of the lift curve slope of the wing at takeoff! The Mach number at take-off is about M 0. The sweep angel at 50% chord line is CL, α, BW C L, α, ref 20. Use an equation from the lecture. Which other values depend on the lift curve slope? Aufgabe 2.4 (3 Punkte) Compare boxwing versus reference aircraft. Find the ratio of the tank volume of the wing Use an equation from the lecture. Argue your case carefully! V V tank, BW tank, ref! Aufgabe 2.5 (3 Punkte) Compare boxwing versus reference aircraft. Find the ratio of the wing mass Use an equation from the lecture. Argue your case carefully! m m W, BW W, ref! Assume: The vertical connection of the wing of the boxwing will not reduce the loads and does not contribute mass to the wing. Aufgabe 2.6 (2 Punkte) The boxwing has a forward swept wing and an aft swept wing. Talk about the stall characteristics including "pitch up". Argue your case carefully! Aufgabe 2.7 (2 Punkte) The boxwing from page 9 shows only one possibility for engine integration. Show other variants. Discuss pros and cons of your variants? Argue your case carefully! Seite 8 von 9 Seiten

Seite 9 von 9 Seiten