Purpose and Need Report

Similar documents
I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Public Information Workshop

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Chapter 7: Corridor Visions

PUBLIC MEETING. Bear Creek Park Community Center. January 24, :30 pm to 7:30 pm

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Corridor Sketch Summary

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E. Deputy Executive Director

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

MAP OR PHOTO. Public Meeting & Open House July 23, Project Roadway Limits From: FM 1957 To: FM 471. Counties Bexar & Medina

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

PORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

2 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE WEST JOG ELIMINATION AT HUNTINGTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Interchange Justification Report

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

ATTACHMENT [B] PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUESTED CITY OF LOS ANGELES ACTIONS

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Existing 100 Block Michigan Avenue Northeast Westbound

RURAL ROAD MAINTENANCE POLICY

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

residents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

DIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

Traffic Engineering Study

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

Safety Evaluation of Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT or J-Turn) Projects in Louisiana

New Mexico Traffic Crash Annual Report 2016

2016 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report Las Vegas

Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 44 at Grand Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS

2014 Community Report Las Vegas

F:\PROJ\ \dwg\Alt-bridge-alignments.dwg, 17-2, 11/12/ :22:17 PM, saamhu, Acrobat PDFWriter

Kentucky Highway District 1

2016 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Aztec

Needs and Community Characteristics

Citizens Committee for Facilities

FUTURE MOBILITY IN WYOMING:

2014 Community Report Aztec

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Benefit-Cost Analysis Technical Memo

GATTIS SCHOOL RD / SH 130 SUBDIVISION

High Risk Rural Road Program Road Safety Audit Report

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Public Meeting. SD Highway 28 From US81 W 11 miles through Lake Norden Hamlin County PH 0028(37)329 PCN 04JY

2015 Community Report White Rock

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

2014 Community Report Portales

2016 Community Report Torrance County

2015 Community Report Torrance County

2014 Community Report Luna County

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

2016 Community Report Portales

2016 Community Report De Baca County

Interchange Modification Justification Study. I-90/Timberline Road Interchange, Exit 402 SIOUX FALLS MPO

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Transcription:

Purpose and Need Report State Highway (SH) 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 Williamson County, Texas (CSJ: 0337-02-045) Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. Date: November, 2015 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.

1.0 INTRODUCTION The Austin District of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is conducting a feasibility study on a portion of State Highway (SH) 29 extending from Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 in Williamson County, Texas. Figures 1 and 2 provide the project location and study area on county and U.S. Geological Survey maps. The purpose of the study is to identify potential roadway improvements for the SH 29 corridor within the study limits. The study includes identification of existing and future traffic projections, safety improvements, engineering constraints, environmental constraints, and public input. The purpose of this technical report is to identify the Purpose and Need for the project and provide supporting documentation. 2.0 EXISTING FACILITY The existing SH 29 facility usually consists of two 12 foot travel lanes (one in each direction) with variable width paved shoulders, and turn lanes at various locations. The right-of-way width varies, but is usually 80 feet and there are intermittent sidewalks between Southwestern Boulevard and east of Northeast Inner Loop. There are three major water crossings within the project limits, which are the San Gabriel River, Smith Branch and Mileham Branch. 3.0 PROJECT SETTING The project is located in the central portion of Williamson County, east of Interstate Highway 35 in a rapidly developing area. Currently, the western end of the project is partially located within the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction of the City of Georgetown and exhibits urban development with residential subdivisions. SH 130 crosses SH 29 approximately 1.7 miles east of Southwestern Boulevard. East of SH 130, adjacent land use is generally rural and used for or agricultural and livestock practices. The Figure 1 provides the project location map on a Williamson County base map and Figure 2 projects the project location on 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle maps. 4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED The Purpose and Need statement for a project is essential for establishing a reasonable range of alternatives for the project and establishing the identification of a preferred alternative. The Purpose statement defines the fundamental reasons why the project is being proposed. The Needs statement describes the problems that the proposed action is intended to address and explains the underlying causes of those problems. For the SH 29 project, the following Purpose statement has been identified: The purpose of the proposed project is to accommodate existing and projected traffic volumes and to improve the safety of the existing facility by either upgrading the roadway to meet current design standards or constructing a new location alignment between SH 130 and SH 95, or a combination of the two. Various segments of SH 29 are located within the floodplain of Smith Branch, Mileham Branch, and the San Gabriel River. The eastern end of the project is located within in the floodway of the San Gabriel River and in some locations, the top of the Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 1

road is five feet below the base flood elevation. TxDOT staff have reported that this portion of SH 29 frequently experiences overtopping and road closures even during relatively minor storm events. Moving the roadway out of the floodplain is one of the goals of the project. The following Need statement describes why the proposed improvements are necessary: Improvements to the facility are needed to accommodate increased traffic volumes resulting from the past and future projected population growth in the City of Georgetown and Williamson County. The original SH 29 facility was constructed between 1932 and 1934. Since that time, only routine maintenance or operational improvements have been made to the facility. The existing facility does not meet current design standards for the volume of traffic the facility currently carries and the projected future traffic volumes. This increase in traffic volumes has led to an above average rate on the facility when compared to the statewide average crash rate for roadways of similar functional class and traffic volume. For this facility type the average statewide crash rate for a rural two lane, two-way roadway in the year 2013 was 105.15 percent. The SH 29 facility had a crash rate of 112.97 percent in 2013. In addition, portions of the existing SH 29 facility are located within the 100 year floodplain and the roadway is occasionally overtopped by flood waters; therefore, improvements to SH 29 are needed to minimize the frequency at which the roadway is overtopped. The information below provides documentation supporting the Purpose and Need for the project. 5.0 POPULATION GROWTH According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population of Williamson County was approximately 249,967 in the year 2000. In 2010, the population was estimated at 422,679, a growth rate of approximately 69 percent. In 2000, the population of the City of Georgetown was estimated at 28,339 and by 2010, the population had reached 47,400 a growth rate of approximately 67 percent. According to Texas Water Development Board the population of Williamson County is expected to reach approximately 987,495 by the year 2040 and the City of Georgetown is expected to reach approximately 114,220 by 2040. 6.0 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH According to the Rural Capital Headlight newsletter (http://ruralcapitalheadlight.com/chart_forms/ cewall/) employment growth for all industries in Williamson County increased approximately 81.8 percent between the years 2000 and 2013, while the employment growth for all industries in the United States only increased approximately 3.1 percent for the same years. 7.0 TRAFFIC DATA As can be seen in Table 1 below, traffic volumes on the facility have remained relatively constant over the past five years. In 2009, the average daily traffic (ADT) volume near Southwestern Boulevard was approximately 11,000 vehicles per day (VPD) and in 2013; the ADT had increased to approximately 11,657 near Southwestern Boulevard. East of SH 130, the ADT was Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 2

approximately 6,200 VPD and in 2009, and in 2013, the ADT had increased to approximately 6,687 VPD. In 2009, the ADT was approximately 3,300 VPD west of SH 95 and in 2013 the ADT had decreased to approximately 2,806 VPD. Table 1. SH 29 ADT 2009 through 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Near Southwestern Blvd. 11,000 12,000 11,500 11,200 11,657 East of SH 130 6,200 6000 5,400 4,900 6,687 West of SH 95 3,300 3,100 2,600 2,600 2,806 Source: TxDOT, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 However, as indicated in the Table 2 below, traffic volumes are expected to increase over the next 30 years. In 2015, the ADT is expected to reach approximately 13,900 VPD near Southwestern Boulevard and in 2045, the VPD is anticipated to exceed 22,000 VPD near Southwestern Boulevard. East of SH 130, the ADT is expected to reach 8,000 VPD in 2015 and reach approximately 12,800 VPD in 2045. In 2015, the ADT is anticipated to be 3,800 VPD west of SH 95 and in 2045, the ADT is expected to reach 6,000 VPD. Table 2. SH 29 Projected ADT 2015 2035 2045 Near Southwestern Blvd 13,900 19,499 22,100 East of SH 130 8,000 11,300 12,800 West of SH 95 3,800 5,300 6,000 Source: TxDOT, 2015 8.0 SAFETY According to the TxDOT-maintained Crash Records Information System (CRIS), there have been a total of 79 crashes reported within the project limits between the years 2011 and 2013. As of November 20, 2014, the total number of crashes had not been reported for 2014. As can be seen in Table 3 those crashes resulted in one fatality between the years 2011 and 2013 and two additional fatalities in 2014 (partial reporting data for 2014). In addition, seven incapacitating injuries occurred between 2011 and 2013 and an additional five have been reported in 2014. Between 2011 and 2013, approximately 39 percent were rear end collisions and approximately 27 percent involved runoff road, fixed object, or overturn vehicle accidents (Table 4). Table 3. Crash by Severity Non-Injury or Property Year Damage Only (PDO) Possible Injury Non- Incapacitating Injury) Incapacitating Injury Fatal Total 2011 13 3 7 1 0 24 2012 13 7 5 2 1 28 2013 13 6 4 4 0 27 Total 39 16 16 7 1 79 % 49.4% 20.3% 20.3% 8.9% 1.3% 100.0% 2014YTD 19 5 2 5 2 - Source: TxDOT, 2014 Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 3

Table 4. Crashes by Major Type of Collision Head Run Off Road/Fixed Sideswipe Year On Object/Overturn Rear Left End Turn Angle Other Total 2011 0 9 1 11 1 2 0 24 2012 2 5 2 8 3 8 0 28 2013 1 7 1 12 3 2 1 27 Total 3 21 4 31 7 12 1 79 % 3.8% 26.6% 5.1% 39.2% 8.9% 15.2% 1.3% 100.0% 2014YTD 2 12 2 13 1 3 - - Source: TxDOT, 2014 In 2011, there were a total of 24 crashes resulting in a crash rate of 108.09, which was 25.43 above the statewide average of 82.66 for a rural state highway. In 2012, there were a total of 28 crashes resulting in a crash rate of 122.98, which was 32.69 above the statewide average of 90.29 and in 2013, there were a total of 27 crashes and a crash rate of 112.97; 19.58 above the statewide average. See Table 5. Table 5. Crash Rates with Comparison to Statewide Averages Year Total Crash Statewide Average - Statewide Average - ADT Crashes Rate Rural State Highway Rural 2 Lane, 2 Way 2011 24 4710 108.09 82.66 93.34 2012 28 4830 122.98 90.29 103.21 2013 27 5070 112.97 93.39 105.15 NOTES: Information contained in this summary represents reportable data collected from Texas Peace Officer Crash Reports (CR-3). Only reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes were queried for this summary. A reportable motor vehicle traffic crash is defined as: Any crash involving a motor vehicle in transport that occurs or originates on a traffic way, results in injury to or death of any person, or damage to the property of any one person to the apparent extent of $1,000. Source of data is the TxDOT-maintained Crash Records Information System (CRIS) as of 11-20-14. Crash data from the current year (2014YTD) is considered preliminary and may be incomplete; it has not been finalized or certified. All crash rate figures given in number of crashes per 100 million vehicle miles. Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 4

Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 1

Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 2

This report was written on behalf of the Texas Department of Transportation by Purpose and Need Report SH 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 3