MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN UJI VALIDITAS

. Enter. Model Summary b. Std. Error. of the. Estimate. Change. a. Predictors: (Constant), Emphaty, reliability, Assurance, responsive, Tangible

UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILIAS VARIABEL KOMPENSASI

TRY OUT 25 Responden Variabel Kepuasan / x1

Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif

TRY OUT 30 Responden Variabel Kompetensi/ x1

HASIL OUTPUT SPSS. Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

LAMPIRAN I FORMULIR SURVEI

Lampiran 1. Data Perusahaan

SEM over time. Changes in Structure, changes in Means

Getting Started with Correlated Component Regression (CCR) in XLSTAT-CCR

DATA SAMPEL TAHUN 2006

Universitas Sumatera Utara

LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD

Daftar Nama Perusaahan. yang ada di Industri Consumer Goods periode

Lampiran i Jadwal Penelitian

DATA PENELITIAN 1. CAR CAR (%)

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

Rata-Rata Nilai Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) Perusahaan Otomotif yang 0, ,97 0, ,44 1,9 1,6 1,4 1,7 1,65

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION. 1. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not negatively affect

LAMPIRAN I Data Perusahaan Sampel kode DPS EPS Ekuitas akpi ,97 51,04 40,

Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP

Perusahaan Consumer Goods yang Terdaftar di BEI ( ) Nama Perusahaan Perusahaan 1

: ( .

a. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 7 citra tahun 2001 b. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 4 citra tahun 2006

LAMPIRAN DAFTAR SAMPEL PENELITIAN. Kriteria No. Nama Perusahaan. Sampel Emiten

Stat 301 Lecture 30. Model Selection. Explanatory Variables. A Good Model. Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables

Regression Models Course Project, 2016

Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

LAMPIRAN A. Tabulasi Data Perusahaan Sample

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Pertambangan. 4 BORN Borneo Lumbung Energy & Metal, Tbk

The influence of age and gender of student motorcycle riders on traffic violations and accidents using a structural equation model

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1 Data Sampel Penelitian

Industry Classification/Stock Name

Index 793. identification problems, 431 Image, 205, 206 Impact, 422, 424

Stat 401 B Lecture 31

LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL PERIODE

Author s Accepted Manuscript

Data Nama Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI.

Bayes Factors. Structural Equation Models (SEMs): Schwarz BIC and Other Approximations

Lampiran 1. Penjualan PT Honda Mandiri Bogor

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Data deviden untuk menghitung economic performance tahun

From Developing Credit Risk Models Using SAS Enterprise Miner and SAS/STAT. Full book available for purchase here.

Level of service model for exclusive motorcycle lane

5. CONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT-FOR-LENGTH AND WEIGHT-FOR- HEIGHT STANDARDS

Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model

Structural Equation Modeling On the Calculation of Motorcycle Ownership Index Using Amos Software

THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)

Preface... xi. A Word to the Practitioner... xi The Organization of the Book... xi Required Software... xii Accessing the Supplementary Content...

Performance of the Mean- and Variance-Adjusted ML χ 2 Test Statistic with and without Satterthwaite df Correction

Stat 301 Lecture 26. Model Selection. Indicator Variables. Explanatory Variables

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

tool<-read.csv(file="d:/chilo/regression 7/tool.csv", header=t) tool

Lampiran 1 DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN (Menyajikan Laporan Keuangan Secara Berturut-turut)

Daftar Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property

Modeling Ignition Delay in a Diesel Engine

Antonio Olmos Priyalatha Govindasamy Research Methods & Statistics University of Denver

APPENDIX A. A.1 Sample of Indian MFIs

R-Sq criterion Data : Surgical room data Chap 9

Lecture 2. Review of Linear Regression I Statistics Statistical Methods II. Presented January 9, 2018

Robust alternatives to best linear unbiased prediction of complex traits

Lampiran 1. Uji Validitas dan Reliability Variabel Kualitas Pelayanan

Drilling Example: Diagnostic Plots

AIC Laboratory R. Leaf November 28, 2016

WLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class

Cluster Analysis. Presented by: Lauren Franklin and Maria Bakarman COM 631. April 2017

fruitfly fecundity example summary Tuesday, July 17, :13:19 PM 1

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROAD TRAFFIC CRASHES IN ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA: ACCIDENT PREDICTION MODELING USING REGRESSION APPROACH

LAMPIRAN 1. Tabel 1. Data Indeks Harga Saham PT. ANTAM, tbk Periode 20 Januari Februari 2012

Basic SAS and R for HLM

MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT MODEL ON THE ROAD SECTION OF HIGHLANDS REGION BY USING GENELARIZED LINEAR MODEL

Stat 401 B Lecture 27

The PRINCOMP Procedure

Motor Trend Yvette Winton September 1, 2016

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behaviour of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS)

Design and Calibration of the Jaguar XK Adaptive Cruise Control System. Tim Jagger MathWorks International Automotive Conference 2006

The Session.. Rosaria Silipo Phil Winters KNIME KNIME.com AG. All Right Reserved.

EXST7034 Multiple Regression Geaghan Chapter 11 Bootstrapping (Toluca example) Page 1

Reliability and Validity of Seat Interface Pressure to Quantify Seating Comfort in Motorcycles

Lampiran 1. Tabel Sampel Penelitian

Improvement Curves: Beyond The Basics

Appendices for: Statistical Power in Analyzing Interaction Effects: Questioning the Advantage of PLS with Product Indicators

Accelerating the Development of Expandable Liner Hanger Systems using Abaqus

Appendix B STATISTICAL TABLES OVERVIEW

sweetgum1.r: AIC(m1.t5,m2.t5,m3.t5,m4.t5,m5.t5,m6.t5,m7.t5) summary(m3.t5)

female male help("predict") yhat age

Development of Traffic Accident Prediction Models to Improve Traffic Safety and to Reduce Traffic Accident Severity and Rate in Jordan

Professor Dr. Gholamreza Nakhaeizadeh. Professor Dr. Gholamreza Nakhaeizadeh

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO WHEELER INDUSTRY IN INDIA

Lampiran 1 Tabel 3.1 Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan Sumber : didownload tanggal 13 November 2016 (data diolah)

delivery<-read.csv(file="d:/chilo/regression 4/delivery.csv", header=t) delivery

Motor Trend MPG Analysis

Component Mass Study Statistical Benchmarking

DEFECT DISTRIBUTION IN WELDS OF INCOLOY 908

DOT HS Summary of Statistical Findings November Statistical Methodology to Make Early Estimates of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

SAN PEDRO BAY PORTS YARD TRACTOR LOAD FACTOR STUDY Addendum

Oil Palm Ripeness Detector (OPRID) and Non-Destructive Thermal Method of Palm Oil Quality Estimation

COMPARING THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PLS AND COVARIANCE MODELS

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

The Degrees of Freedom of Partial Least Squares Regression

Transcription:

MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD PUSAT KAJIAN DAN PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT JURUSAN MANAJEMEN UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA 2018

1) 2) ANALISA JALUR 1) LMK = 27,209 3,599IPK + 1,749 x 10-7 US + 0,019JR 1,516LT + 1,074LB + e P 1 = -0,508; P 2 = 0,034; P 3 = 0,027; P 4 = -0,830; P 5 = 0,358 E 1 = 1 0,932 = 0,068 Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1,966 a,932,923,624 a. Predictors: (Constant), IPK, Jarak Rumah, Uang Saku, Lama Belajar, Lama Tidur ANOVA a

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 182,743 5 36,549 93,913,000 b Residual 13,232 34,389 Total 195,975 39 a. Dependent Variable: Lama Mencari Kerja b. Predictors: (Constant), IPK, Jarak Rumah, Uang Saku, Lama Belajar, Lama Tidur Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 27,209 2,217 12,271,000 Uang Saku 1,749E-7,000,034,635,530 Jarak Rumah,019,036,027,541,592 Lama Tidur -1,516,316 -,830-4,806,000 Lama Belajar 1,074,484,358 2,217,033 IPK -3,599,878 -,508-4,101,000 a. Dependent Variable: Lama Mencari Kerja 2) IPK = 2,218 + 9,315 x 10-8 US 0,010JR + 0,142LT + 0,142LB +e P 6 = 0,128; P 7 = -0,102: P 8 = 0,550; P 9 = 0,334 E 2 = 1 0,871 = 0,129 Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1,933 a,871,856,12015 a. Predictors: (Constant), Lama Belajar, Jarak Rumah, Uang Saku, Lama Tidur ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 3,404 4,851 58,950,000 b Residual,505 35,014 Total 3,909 39 a. Dependent Variable: IPK

b. Predictors: (Constant), Lama Belajar, Jarak Rumah, Uang Saku, Lama Tidur Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 2,128,230 9,250,000 Uang Saku 9,315E-8,000,128 1,839,074 Jarak Rumah -,010,007 -,102-1,550,130 Lama Tidur,142,056,550 2,543,016 Lama Belajar,142,090,334 1,571,125 a. Dependent Variable: IPK US P 6 P 2 JR P 3 P 7 IPK P 1 LMK LT P 8 P 4 LB P 9 P 5 e2 e 1

SEM Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label IPK <--- UangSaku,000,000 1,941,052 par_1 IPK <--- JarakRumah -,010,006-1,637,102 par_2 IPK <--- LamaTidur,142,053 2,685,007 par_3 IPK <--- LamaBelajar,142,085 1,658,097 par_4 LamaMencariKerja <--- UangSaku,000,000,680,496 par_11 LamaMencariKerja <--- JarakRumah,019,033,579,563 par_12 LamaMencariKerja <--- LamaTidur -1,516,295-5,147 *** par_13 LamaMencariKerja <--- LamaBelajar 1,074,452 2,375,018 par_14 LamaMencariKerja <--- IPK -3,599,819-4,392 *** par_15 Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate IPK <--- UangSaku,128 IPK <--- JarakRumah -,102 IPK <--- LamaTidur,550 IPK <--- LamaBelajar,334 LamaMencariKerja <--- UangSaku,034

Estimate LamaMencariKerja <--- JarakRumah,027 LamaMencariKerja <--- LamaTidur -,830 LamaMencariKerja <--- LamaBelajar,358 LamaMencariKerja <--- IPK -,508 CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS Observed Variable Laten Variable Korelasi Variable Assesment Normality Assessment of normality (Group number 1)

Variable min max skew c.r. kurtosis c.r. Z6 2,000 5,000 -,240-1,386 -,927-2,675 Z5 2,000 5,000 -,350-2,023-1,110-3,203 Z1 2,000 5,000-1,090-6,294 1,173 3,386 Z2 2,000 5,000 -,132 -,764 -,490-1,415 Z3 2,000 5,000 -,013 -,073 -,955-2,757 Z4 2,000 5,000 -,068 -,395 -,811-2,341 Y11 3,000 5,000 -,384-2,218-1,068-3,082 Y12 2,000 5,000 -,876-5,058 1,769 5,108 Y13 2,000 5,000 -,251-1,446 -,454-1,310 Y14 3,000 5,000 -,235-1,355 -,662-1,911 X31 2,000 5,000 -,771-4,452,296,854 X32 2,000 5,000 -,744-4,295 -,170 -,491 X33 2,000 5,000 -,674-3,890 -,163 -,472 X34 2,000 5,000-1,051-6,067,809 2,335 X35 2,000 5,000-1,289-7,441 1,001 2,890 X36 2,000 5,000-1,019-5,884,785 2,267 X37 2,000 5,000 -,883-5,097,429 1,237 X11 2,000 5,000-1,441-8,322 2,541 7,334 X12 3,000 5,000,004,020 -,206 -,595 X13 3,000 5,000 -,323-1,865 -,661-1,909 X14 3,000 5,000 -,257-1,485 -,695-2,006 X15 3,000 5,000,022,127 -,387-1,119 X16 3,000 5,000 -,222-1,280 -,608-1,755 X17 3,000 5,000 -,078 -,448 -,369-1,065 Multivariate 64,071 12,824 Outlier detection Observations farthest from the centroid (Mahalanobis distance) (Group number 1) Observation number Mahalanobis d-squared p1 p2 170 64,979,000,002 91 60,905,000,000 109 59,027,000,000 62 57,087,000,000 145 55,996,000,000 93 52,031,001,000 153 45,083,006,000 178 44,931,006,000 197 44,355,007,000 36 44,120,007,000 162 43,184,009,000 118 42,882,010,000 108 42,761,011,000

Observation number Mahalanobis d-squared p1 p2 168 41,690,014,000 1 38,760,029,001 200 38,068,034,002 175 36,886,045,009 81 36,546,049,009 156 36,129,053,011 68 36,101,054,006 110 35,974,055,004 90 35,917,056,002 77 35,660,059,002 188 34,536,076,017 112 34,086,083,027 151 33,567,093,050 89 32,700,111,161 111 32,676,111,119 31 32,658,112,085 72 32,602,113,064 155 32,457,116,058 133 32,391,118,044 143 32,366,118,030 114 32,123,124,035 19 31,911,129,038 106 31,858,131,028 126 31,840,131,019 16 31,815,132,013 40 31,317,145,031 141 30,766,161,081 147 30,549,167,093 172 30,506,169,073 119 29,908,188,185 104 29,686,195,213 190 29,558,200,209 44 29,334,208,243 157 29,076,217,297 163 28,914,223,312 79 28,796,228,307 154 28,748,230,272 189 28,478,240,340 184 28,392,244,322 193 28,198,252,359 43 28,035,259,382 180 28,032,259,324 28 27,979,261,294 82 27,951,262,254

Observation number Mahalanobis d-squared p1 p2 173 27,304,290,533 148 27,098,300,587 101 26,890,310,641 164 26,730,317,670 146 26,656,321,653 181 26,624,322,613 195 26,516,328,616 100 26,501,328,566 179 26,468,330,525 56 26,453,331,474 122 26,381,334,457 12 26,361,335,409 185 26,303,338,385 57 26,177,344,400 160 26,039,351,423 34 26,036,351,368 97 25,909,358,385 161 25,873,360,350 22 25,589,374,461 191 25,589,374,404 117 25,583,375,352 24 25,440,382,380 115 25,388,385,355 132 25,304,389,351 86 25,204,395,354 23 25,086,401,369 192 25,086,401,317 64 24,970,407,330 127 24,850,414,347 159 24,733,420,363 38 24,557,430,416 84 24,397,439,460 80 24,243,448,502 129 24,198,450,475 94 23,898,467,610 85 23,785,474,627 105 23,610,484,680 65 23,388,497,756 120 23,170,510,820 78 23,082,515,821 107 23,077,515,784 183 22,835,530,853 171 22,651,540,888

Model Fit Summary CMIN Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 54 650,260 246,000 2,643 Saturated model 300,000 0 Independence model 24 2848,734 276,000 10,322 RMR, GFI Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI Default model,029,802,759,658 Saturated model,000 1,000 Independence model,176,265,201,244 Baseline Comparisons Model NFI RFI IFI TLI Delta1 rho1 Delta2 rho2 CFI Default model,772,744,845,824,843 Saturated model 1,000 1,000 1,000 Independence model,000,000,000,000,000 Parsimony-Adjusted Measures Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI Default model,891,688,751 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1,000,000,000 NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 90 Default model 404,260 332,518 483,667 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 2572,734 2405,081 2747,755 FMIN Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90 Default model 3,268 2,031 1,671 2,430 Saturated model,000,000,000,000 Independence model 14,315 12,928 12,086 13,808 RMSEA

Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model,091,082,099,000 Independence model,216,209,224,000 AIC Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC Default model 758,260 773,777 936,369 990,369 Saturated model 600,000 686,207 1589,495 1889,495 Independence model 2896,734 2903,631 2975,894 2999,894 ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI Default model 3,810 3,450 4,209 3,888 Saturated model 3,015 3,015 3,015 3,448 Independence model 14,556 13,714 15,436 14,591 HOELTER Model HOELTER HOELTER.05.01 Default model 87 92 Independence model 23 24 MODIFIKASI MODEL Excluding : Z4, Z6, Y14, X31 Covary: e4 dan e7, e9 dan e11,

Model Fit Summary CMIN Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 48 281,853 162,000 1,740 Saturated model 210,000 0 Independence model 20 1962,549 190,000 10,329 RMR, GFI Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI Default model,024,881,845,679 Saturated model,000 1,000 Independence model,165,319,247,288 Baseline Comparisons Model NFI RFI IFI TLI Delta1 rho1 Delta2 rho2 CFI Default model,856,832,933,921,932 Saturated model 1,000 1,000 1,000 Independence model,000,000,000,000,000 Parsimony-Adjusted Measures Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI Default model,853,730,795 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1,000,000,000 NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 90 Default model 119,853 77,116 170,453 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1772,549 1634,040 1918,463 FMIN Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90 Default model 1,416,602,388,857 Saturated model,000,000,000,000 Independence model 9,862 8,907 8,211 9,641 RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE

Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model,061,049,073,066 Independence model,217,208,225,000 AIC Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC Default model 377,853 389,179 536,172 584,172 Saturated model 420,000 469,551 1112,647 1322,647 Independence model 2002,549 2007,268 2068,515 2088,515 ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI Default model 1,899 1,684 2,153 1,956 Saturated model 2,111 2,111 2,111 2,360 Independence model 10,063 9,367 10,796 10,087 HOELTER Model HOELTER HOELTER.05.01 Default model 137 147 Independence model 23 25 KONVERGEN VALIDITY : Factor Loadings Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate X17 <--- X1,568 X16 <--- X1,532 X15 <--- X1,628 X14 <--- X1,568 X13 <--- X1,561 X12 <--- X1,609 X11 <--- X1,788 X37 <--- X3,748 X36 <--- X3,687 X35 <--- X3,725 X34 <--- X3,759 X33 <--- X3,563 X32 <--- X3,668 Y13 <--- Y1,679 Y12 <--- Y1,827 Y11 <--- Y1,671

Estimate Z3 <--- Z,616 Z2 <--- Z,807 Z1 <--- Z,872 Z5 <--- Z,761 Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate X15 <--- X1,614 X12 <--- X1,604 X11 <--- X1,806

Estimate X37 <--- X3,745 X36 <--- X3,665 X35 <--- X3,746 X34 <--- X3,766 X32 <--- X3,663 Y13 <--- Y1,673 Y12 <--- Y1,834 Y11 <--- Y1,669 Z3 <--- Z,617 Z2 <--- Z,802 Z1 <--- Z,877 Z5 <--- Z,757 KONVERGEN VALIDITY : Average Variance Extracted Estimate X15 <--- X1 0,614 X12 <--- X1 0,604 X11 <--- X1 0,806 X37 <--- X3 0,745 X36 <--- X3 0,665 X35 <--- X3 0,746 X34 <--- X3 0,766 X32 <--- X3 0,663 Y13 <--- Y1 0,673 Y12 <--- Y1 0,834 Y11 <--- Y1 0,669 Z3 <--- Z 0,617 Z2 <--- Z 0,802 Z1 <--- Z 0,877 Z5 <--- Z 0,757 AVE 0,463 0,516 0,532 0,591

DISKRIMINAN VALIDITY Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate X1 <--> X3,113 X1 <--> Y1,812 X1 <--> Z,876 X3 <--> Y1,208 X3 <--> Z,123 Y1 <--> Z,880 e11 <--> e9,441 RELIABILITY Variabel CR X1 0,718 X3 0,841 Y1 0,771 Z 0,850 Goodness of Fit Model Model Fit Summary CMIN Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 37 139,640 83,000 1,682 Saturated model 120,000 0 Independence model 15 1490,297 105,000 14,193 RMR, GFI Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI Default model,021,918,881,635 Saturated model,000 1,000 Independence model,187,351,258,307 Baseline Comparisons

Model NFI RFI IFI TLI Delta1 rho1 Delta2 rho2 CFI Default model,906,881,960,948,959 Saturated model 1,000 1,000 1,000 Independence model,000,000,000,000,000 Parsimony-Adjusted Measures Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI Default model,790,716,758 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1,000,000,000 NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 90 Default model 56,640 27,929 93,235 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1385,297 1264,217 1513,781 FMIN Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90 Default model,702,285,140,469 Saturated model,000,000,000,000 Independence model 7,489 6,961 6,353 7,607 RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model,059,041,075,195 Independence model,257,246,269,000 AIC Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC Default model 213,640 220,110 335,678 372,678 Saturated model 240,000 260,984 635,798 755,798 Independence model 1520,297 1522,920 1569,771 1584,771 ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI Default model 1,074,929 1,257 1,106 Saturated model 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,311 Independence model 7,640 7,031 8,285 7,653

HOELTER Model HOELTER HOELTER.05.01 Default model 151 166 Independence model 18 19 STRUKTURAL MODEL Model Fit Summary CMIN Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 37 139,640 83,000 1,682 Saturated model 120,000 0 Independence model 15 1490,297 105,000 14,193

RMR, GFI Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI Default model,021,918,881,635 Saturated model,000 1,000 Independence model,187,351,258,307 Baseline Comparisons Model NFI RFI IFI TLI Delta1 rho1 Delta2 rho2 CFI Default model,906,881,960,948,959 Saturated model 1,000 1,000 1,000 Independence model,000,000,000,000,000 Parsimony-Adjusted Measures Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI Default model,790,716,758 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1,000,000,000 NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 90 Default model 56,640 27,929 93,235 Saturated model,000,000,000 Independence model 1385,297 1264,217 1513,781 FMIN Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90 Default model,702,285,140,469 Saturated model,000,000,000,000 Independence model 7,489 6,961 6,353 7,607 RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model,059,041,075,195 Independence model,257,246,269,000 AIC Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC Default model 213,640 220,110 335,678 372,678 Saturated model 240,000 260,984 635,798 755,798

Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC Independence model 1520,297 1522,920 1569,771 1584,771 ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI Default model 1,074,929 1,257 1,106 Saturated model 1,206 1,206 1,206 1,311 Independence model 7,640 7,031 8,285 7,653 HOELTER Model HOELTER HOELTER.05.01 Default model 151 166 Independence model 18 19 Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label Y1 <--- X1 1,175,182 6,464 *** par_11 Y1 <--- X3,124,076 1,641,101 par_12 Z <--- Y1,703,195 3,604 *** par_13 Z <--- X1,952,294 3,232,001 par_14 Z <--- X3 -,053,079 -,670,503 par_15 X15 <--- X1 1,000 X12 <--- X1 1,005,143 7,015 *** par_1 X11 <--- X1 1,736,211 8,226 *** par_2 X35 <--- X3 1,000 X34 <--- X3 1,120,119 9,376 *** par_3 X32 <--- X3,942,118 7,968 *** par_4 X36 <--- X3 1,033,124 8,327 *** par_5 X37 <--- X3 1,108,116 9,518 *** par_6 Y13 <--- Y1 1,000 Y12 <--- Y1 1,137,117 9,697 *** par_7 Y11 <--- Y1,719,088 8,187 *** par_8 Z1 <--- Z 1,000 Z2 <--- Z,897,064 13,944 *** par_9 Z3 <--- Z,695,074 9,453 *** par_10 Z5 <--- Z 1,164,094 12,423 *** par_16