MetroExpress Improvements

Similar documents
Green Line Long-Term Investments

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

What is Project Connect?

Draft Enhancement Project and Investment Corridor

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Making Mobility Better, Together

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

South Congress Connector Corridor

Riverside Connector Corridor

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Executive Summary October 2013

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Multnomah County Commission December 15, 2016

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Frequent Service Network Proposal

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Demographic Report. Jarrell Independent School District. Spring Learn from Yesterday Understand Today Plan for Tomorrow

North Lamar/Guadalupe Connector Corridor

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

The Smart Growth Countywide Transit Master Plan

Specific recommendations are made for downtown Austin, park-and-rides, and several different transit center locations.

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Jarrell Independent School District

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Tech Ridge Express. Tech Ridge Park & Ride. Parmer U.S. 290 IH st. Airport. Dean Keeton IH-35 IH-35. To Route/Garage. Riverside at IH-35

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

Needs and Community Characteristics

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Caldwell. Guadalupe Hays Travis Williamson. Georgetown Hutto Manor. New Braunfels. Development Corporation INTERSTATE

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

House Committee on Transportation Policy Public Hearing HB April 5, 2017

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Click to edit Master title style

Highland Connector Corridor

Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Plan. September 23, 2009

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

The Future of Rail in Maryland. Kevin B. Quinn, Jr. Administrator

January Final. Phase 2 Initial Screening Memorandum

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Maryland Gets to Work

A Plan to Connect Baltimore

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Transcription:

Improvements

Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail Commuters Connectors Circulators Project Connect Project Connect is the Central Texas high-capacity transit plan that will create real, tangible transit projects that offer an alternative to mindnumbing traffic congestion. It s not about a single train or bus route, but a robust transit system that improves travel into, out of and around Central Austin from the surrounding region. It will provide options that build upon one another and create a system to move more people, more quickly. The end result will connect residents, businesses, schools, services, and shopping through a high-capacity transit network. Capital Metro operates service in order to provide a limited stop service between central Austin and regional communities such as Leander, Round Rock and Manor. Capital Metro currently has 8 routes that utilize highway and tollways in order to provide travel time savings to riders. Many riders access the system by driving to park & rides near regional highways which helps to get cars off the road in the areas with the highest congestion. In order to expand the system, partnerships will need to be created with communities outside of the Capital Metro service area by bringing them into the service area or through the use of transit development plans or coordination with other transportation providers such as CARTS. Key Terms Park & Ride Basic facilities typically designed for transferring from cars to transit

Corridor Introduction How Connects the Region The Austin region is growing tremendously and that growth isn t always within the boundaries of the City of Austin. Capital Metro connects communities surrounding Austin through its service that provides a direct link between regional suburbs to the urban core of Austin and the highest concentration of jobs. Capital Metro currently provides a variety of routes to communities to the Northwest of Austin and the northern extent of Austin all of which lie within the Capital Metro service area. There are many other areas of the region that would like to have that same direct connection, but are located outside of Capital Metro s service area. Through the use of partnerships with other agencies and surrounding communities, Capital Metro can expand the reach of their service to all corners of the region including: Hutto, Georgetown, Bastrop, Lockhart, Buda and Oak Hill. METROEXPRESS COST ESTIMATES Low Investment: 5th/6th Priority Lanes to Express Lanes Enhancement Costs: Regional Enhancement Costs: High Investment: $200,000 $900,000 $15,650,000 $38,600,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $15,850,000 $39,500,000 To improve the speed and reliability of, Capital Metro coordinates with CTRMA to open express lanes and toll roads to buses in order to zip by traffic. By partnering with the City of Austin, enhancements to 5th/6th St and Cesar Chavez between the Mopac and Republic Square can further improve speed by cutting further through downtown traffic. Through the use of these partnerships and enhancements to existing roadways, Capital Metro can provide a service that creates an alternative to driving in traffic that is fast, reliable and near you. 1

Regional System 2

Proposed Improvements North: Round Rock & Georgetown Project Overview SITE Proposed PLAN Express AND CONCEPT Route The North market consists mainly of N MoPac north of 183, I-35 from SH 45 to Georgetown, and SH 45 from N MoPac to I-35. Much of this market is just beginning to be served by CapMetro through partnerships with the Cities of Round Rock and Georgetown. Currently, 1 route operates in this market serving 2 park & rides at Round Rock Transit Center and Howard Station. There is potential to extend Express service further north from its current endpoint in Round Rock all the way to Georgetown as the partnership grows. Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 a.m. 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $5.4M for buses $1.8M B $5.4M for buses $0.9M C $2.4M for buses $0.4M Potential Ridership ~2,300/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 3

Proposed Improvements Northeast: Pflugerville & Hutto Project Overview The Northeast market consists mainly of US 290 to SH 130 and SH 130 to Hutto. CapMetro is currently supporting adoption of Transit Development Plans (TDPs) with the cities of Pflugerville and Hutto similar to the current partnerships with Round Rock and Georgetown. There are no routes that currently tap into this market. There is potential to provide Express service to the communities of Pflugerville and Hutto through the TDPs. Utilizing the SH 130 and Manor Expressway toll roads, CapMetro will be able to bypass traffic, providing service from Hutto all the way to Central Austin. SITE Proposed PLAN Express AND CONCEPT Route Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $4.8M for buses $1.3M B $4.8M for buses $0.7M C $2.4M for buses $0.3M Potential Ridership ~800/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 4

Proposed Improvements East: Manor & Elgin Project Overview Proposed Express Route The East market consists mainly of US 290 from Downtown Austin to Elgin. CapMetro currently provides service to Manor and service to Elgin through a partnership with CARTS. New buses are coming for this route in order to provide a more comfortable experience for CapMetro s customers. Utilizing the Manor Expressway toll road, CapMetro is able to bypass traffic, providing service from Manor to Central Austin. Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $4.8M for buses $1.7M B $4.8M for buses $0.9M C $2.4M for buses $0.4M Potential Ridership ~750/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 5

Proposed Improvements Southeast: Del Valle to Bastrop Project Overview The Southeast market consists mainly of SH 71 to Bastrop connecting to Downtown Austin via US 183 and 7th Street. There are no routes that currently tap into this market. There is potential to provide Express service to the communities of Cedar Creek and Bastrop through cooperation with CARTS by upgrading the existing Interurban service to service. Utilizing the SH 71 Express lanes and 183 South toll road, CapMetro will be able to bypass traffic, providing service from Central Austin to Del Valle. SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT Proposed Express Route Proposed Express Route Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $5.4M for buses $1.8M B $5.4M for buses $0.9M C $2.4M for buses $0.4M Potential Ridership ~750/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 6

Proposed Improvements South: Easton Park & Lockhart Project Overview The South market consists mainly of US 183 to Lockhart connecting to Downtown Austin via 7th Street. There are no routes that currently tap into this market. There is potential to provide Express service by connecting to the growing Easton Park development and Lockhart through cooperation with CARTS by upgrading the existing Interurban service to vehicles. The route would use the US 183 toll road in order to bypass traffic coming into the core. Proposed Express Route Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $6M for buses $1.9M B $6M for buses $1.1M C $3M for buses $0.4M Potential Ridership ~600/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 7

Proposed Improvements South Central: Buda Project Overview The South Central market consists mainly of I-35 to Buda. CapMetro is currently supporting adoption of a Transit Development Plan (TDP) with Buda similar to the current partnerships with Round Rock and Georgetown. There are no routes that currently tap into this market. There is potential to provide Express service to the community of Buda through the TDP. This service would connect Buda to Southpark Meadows and Downtown Austin. Proposed Express Route Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $4.2M for buses $1.5M B $4.2M for buses $1.4M C $1.8M for buses $0.3M Potential Ridership ~350/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 8

Proposed Improvements Southwest: Circle C and Oak Hill Project Overview The Southwest market consists mainly of US 290 to Oak Hill and S Mopac to Circle C. There are no routes that currently tap into this market. There are some MetroFlyer routes that reach these two areas but they do not operate as directly as Express routes. Upon completion of the S Mopac Express Lanes and Oak Hill Parkway Projects by CTRMA, CapMetro would be able to provide new service that will bypass traffic, utilizing the express lanes and toll roads from Oak Hill and Circle C all the way to Downtown Austin. SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT Proposed Express Route Proposed Service Levels Level Type Hours of Operation A All Day 6 a.m. 10 p.m. B Full Peak 6 10 a.m. & 3 7 p.m. C Peak Limited 3 trips a.m. & p.m. ENHANCED COST ESTIMATES Level Estimated Capital Cost Estimated O&M Cost A $3M for buses $1M B $3M for buses $0.7M C $1.8M for buses $0.2M Potential Ridership ~750/day* *Potential ridership at highest service level 9

Additional Information Led by Capital Metro with support from the City of Austin. Want to learn more? Go to www.projectconnect.com to read more about the work we re doing through Project Connect. Tell us what you think, take the Phase 2 Survey! https://www.capmetroengage.org/en/provide-input Additional Project Connect briefing books: High Capacity Transit 101 briefing book Investments program briefing book and project flip books Enhancement program briefing book and project flip books Project Connect Funding and Financing briefing book

Led by Capital Metro with support from the City of Austin. Prepared by AECOM, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, and Alliance Transportation Group with support from Bronner Group and Robin O Connell Design