Traffic Control Optimization for Multi-Modal Operations in a Large-Scale Urban Network

Similar documents
Jihong Cao, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Arnab Gupta, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Jay Yenerich, PE, Valley Metro

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

IMAGE PROCESSING ANALYSIS OF MOTORCYCLE ORIENTED MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW IN VIETNAM

Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia. Nicolas Saunier

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

EVALUATION OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY STRATEGIES FOR 400 SOUTH LIGHT RAIL LINE IN SALT LAKE COUNTY, UT PART II

ARE DIAMONDS LRT S BEST FRIEND? AT-GRADE LRT CROSSING AT A DIAMOND INTERCHANGE

CHAPTER 3 STUDIES OF TIME AND DISTANCE

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Fleet Penetration of Automated Vehicles: A Microsimulation Analysis

Preferred citation style for this presentation

Traffic Operations with Connected and Automated Vehicles

Public transport traffic management systems simulation in Craiova city

Connected Vehicles for Safety

AND CHANGES IN URBAN MOBILITY PATTERNS

Analysis of Radial and Trunk Feeder Transit System Configurations in Downtown Charlottesville

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

East Turnaround. Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan.

Efficiency Matters for Mobility. Presented at A3PS ECO MOBILITY 2018 Vienna, Austria November 12 th and 13 th, 2018

Measuring Autonomous Vehicle Impacts on Congested Networks Using Simulation

UDOT Signal Performance Metrics: New and Upcoming Metrics. Jamie Mackey UDOT Statewide Signal Engineer

Needs and Community Characteristics

Simulation of the influence of road traffic on the operation of an electric city bus

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

An Innovative Approach

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Province of Livorno. ITS to promote a change in travel behaviour

Rule-based Integration of Multiple Neural Networks Evolved Based on Cellular Automata

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Traffic Management through C-ITS and Automation: a perspective from the U.S.

RAILROAD PREEMPTION FORMS. Mark Johnson, P.E.

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

AGENT-BASED MODELING, SIMULATION, AND CONTROL SOME APPLICATIONS IN TRANSPORTATION

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Bringing Bus Rapid Transit to Tanzania

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

Adaptive network control Sitraffic Motion MX. The most intelligent answer to congestion and pollution.

SIMULATING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ON OUR TRANSPORT NETWORKS

TRAFFIC CONTROL. in a Connected Vehicle World

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

Cybercars : Past, Present and Future of the Technology

University Of California, Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering. ME 131 Vehicle Dynamics & Control (4 units)

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

RAIL INFRASTRUCTURES AND SERVICES: CONNECTING EUROPE FOR CITIES AND PEOPLE CITY OF SOFIA MOBILITY MANAGEMENT POLICIES. Metodi Avramov City of Sofia

AUDI URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Planning for Autonomous Vehicles. Stephen Buckley WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff KINETIC October 6, 2016

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Mountain View Automated Guideway Transit Feasibility Study Community Meeting September 25, 2017

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Smart Cities Around the Country

BRTS IN DHAKA: DESIGNING UNDER CONSTRAINTS

Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Connected and Automated Vehicle Applications

Traffic Signal Volume Warrants A Delay Perspective

Automated and Connected Vehicles: Planning for Uncertainty

Predicting Solutions to the Optimal Power Flow Problem

Transport Modes and Technologies A Walking Tour on Capacity, LOS. Urban Transportation Planning MIT Course 1.252j/11.

Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit

Chicago St. Louis High-Speed Rail. Braidwood Construction Public Meeting. August 7, 2014

Exhibit to Agenda Item #1a

LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICITY USE CONSIDERING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: ESTIMATES & POLICY OBSERVATIONS

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Incorporating Drivability Metrics into Optimal Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Vehicles. Daniel Opila

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

The intelligent Truck safe, autonomous, connected. N. Mustafa Üstertuna Mercedes-Benz Türk A.Ş.

TAEDE TILLEMA. Senior (Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid)

Transportation Sustainability Program

Tier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

The evolution of automotive in a connected, autonomous, shared world

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Autonomous Vehicle Impacts on Traffic and Transport Planning

Automated Driving - Object Perception at 120 KPH Chris Mansley

Study of Intersection Optimization Near Transportation Hub Based on VISSIM

emover AMBIENT MOBILITY Jens Dobberthin Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO e : t :

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Parking policies as a tool to foster sustainable urban mobility

Beth Kigel. Florida Transportation Commissioner. Florida s Smart Future: Innovation in Policy and Technology Planning

MIT ICAT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

TOMORROW S MOBILITY THE INNOVATIVE ROLE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT. Caroline Cerfontaine Senior Manager Combined Mobility UITP

2016 Traffic Signal System Performance Metrics Update Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineering, Public Works John Richardson, Planning and Sustainability

Transcription:

Traffic Control Optimization for Multi-Modal Operations in a Large-Scale Urban Network Cameron Kergaye, PhD, PMP, PE UDOT Director of Research 13th Annual NJDOT Research Showcase October 27 th, 2011

Improve Pedestrian Operations Reduce Vehicular Emissions Provide Priority for Transit Improve Traffic Flow

Source: Signal Timing Manual, FHWA 2008 Do we have right objectives and policies? No, sustainable policies to consider transit, emissions, person-based costs, etc. Do we (always) know what performance measures to use? No, we use surrogate performance measures (in lieu of emission-related metrics) Can current models support our goals? No, we need better models and better interfaces between models and field operations

Minimizing Delay of: Signal Timings to Optimize: Private Cars Person* Transit Vehicles Basic Very common Uncommon Common TSP Uncommon** Uncommon Very common** Basic + TSP Uncommon Uncommon Uncommon * Delay per person in the system regardless of travel mode used. ** TSP parameters not optimized (but manually adjusted) since commercial optimization tools do not adjust these parameters. 4

Unsuitable software (modeling tools) Signal optimization tools No transit operations No TSP optimization Simulation tools No optimization of signal timings Current practice Optimization of basic signal timings TSP settings adjusted based on engineering judgment Simulation used for fine-tuning and quality control but not in the optimization process 5

Basic Signal Timing Concepts Cycle length Split (A phase) Offset 6

Passive Priority Active Priority early green (red truncation) green extension actuated transit phase phase insertion phase rotation Adaptive/Real-Time Control 7

Distance Early start time Normal start time Transit vehicle trajectory Time 8

Source: Transit Signal Priority Evaluation Results Woodward Avenue. PTV America 9

Distance Normal end time End time with extension Transit vehicle trajectory Time 10

Gives the TSP phases extended green while shortening the next cycle s TSP phase Recovery at the end of the next cycle 11

Interface a signal optimization tool with a microsimulation tool Use GA as an optimization routine Use microsimulation (VISSIM) to model transit operations Use signal control emulator (within VISSIM) to truthfully model TSP operations 12

Better than searching techniques used in deterministic tools Optimization in complex search space (relationships between signal timing parameters - complex) Running many simulations is a slow process GA achieves good solution after a relatively small number of generations 13

Technique for solving search and optimization problems Solutions are evolved Stochastic search process based on survival of the fittest Mimics natural evolution GA in general independent from the specific problem 14

Encode Timing Plans Initialize First Population Run VISSIM & Evaluate Population End Criteria Satisfied? no Create Next Generation of Population yes Return Best Timing Plan 15

GA Optimization Inputs 16

Woodward Ave, Detroit, Michigan 13 miles long 70 signalized intersections 3 bus routes 12 buses per hour TSP Evaluated by PTV America (2006) Source: Transit Signal Priority Evaluation Results Woodward Avenue. PTV America 17

Vehicle Delay (s) 82 81 80 79 Initial Vehicle Delay Optimization of Basic Signal Timings Optimization of TSP Settings Optimization of All Signal Timings 78 77 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Number of Generations 157 a. 18

Transit Vehicle Delay (s) 253 252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Number of Generations b. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 c. Initial Transit Vehicle Delay Optimization of Basic Signal Timings Optimization of TSP Settings Optimization of All Signal Timings Number of Generations 19

Person Delay (s) 157 156 155 154 153 Number of Generations a. Initial Person Delay Optimization of Basic Signal Timings Optimization of TSP Settings Optimization of All Signal Timings 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 253 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Number of Generations b. 20

Optimization of basic signal timings most important 2nd best are optimizations of TSP settings Non-traditional performance measures (e.g. person delay) are successfully used as optimization objective functions 21

Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Transit Vehicles 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 y = 1.0748x + 2.0903 R² = 0.86 y = x 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Private Vehicles a. 22

Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Multi-Modal Delay per Person Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Private Vehicles 160 140 120 100 80 60 a. y = 0.9317x + 1.0284 R² = 0.9665 y = x 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Transit Vehicles b. 23

Initial Signal Timings 120 100 y = 0.9306x + 1.3742 R² = 0.9277 y = x 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 160 Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Private Vehicles a. 24

Initial Signal Timings 160 140 120 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Private Vehicles y = 0.7771x + 4.3852 R² = 0.8688 a. y = x 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Signal Timings Optimized to Minimize Delay of Transit Vehicles b. 25

Linearity of the investigated network Simplified phase designs of signal controllers (reducing the chance for benefits from TSP) Total number of parameters to be optimized Disparity between number of private drivers and transit passengers Good coordination provided for buses which join vehicular platoons 26

Repeat the study on a network where major transit and traffic flows do not share ROW but compete for priority from different approaches. In this research: 1 sec of delay of transit pax = 1 sec of driver s delay Instead, social costs of passenger s VMT vs driver s VMT can be used for fuller cost accounting These social costs may be further contrasted if sustainability costs (long-term impact on human environment) are involved in calculations 27

Questions & Comments