Volume 2 Appendix Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. June 18, 2018

Similar documents
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Existing Traffic Conditions

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

One Harbor Point Residential

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

4131 Chain Bridge Road

Traffic Engineering Study

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Traffic Feasibility Study

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR ST. JOSEPH'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE 630/650 SOUTH STREET RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WRENTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

Peachtree Streetscape Atlanta, Georgia

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

1354 Carling Avenue. Community Transportation Study/ Transportation Impact Study

LCPS Valley Service Center

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

King Street & Wyman Road Transportation Impact Study & Transportation Demand Management. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Per Revised Concept Plan Residential Condo/Townhouse. Proposed Land Use per TIS


Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

Submittal Document II.G. D-bar-A Project, Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Bergmman Associates, dated November 3, 2015 ( Traffic Study )

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

ENGINE COMPANY 42. Traffic Study. Chicago, Illinois. March 2018 FRIEDMAN PROPERTIES. Prepared for:

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

Transcription:

Volume 2 Appendix 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928

Maple Avenue Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Drive 2 Drive 3 Brown Street Enid Street Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street Mansion Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard (10%) (10%) 10% (10%) (10%) 10% (10%) (10%) (15%) 10% 10% 10% 10% 15% (10%) EXHIBIT A1 Drive 1 Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment: 3000 Turtle Creek Boulevard 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 10% (10%) (10%) LEGEND: X% (Y%) 10% 10% X% = Percentage of Inbound Site-Generated Traffic (Y%) = Percentage of Outbound Site-Generated Traffic Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

Maple Avenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Enid Street Drive 2 Drive 3 Mansion Drive Brown Street Turtle Creek Boulevard 0 0 23 3 (21) 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 23 3 (21) (0) (0) (4) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 3 (21) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 3 (21) (0) (0) (4) 3 (21) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 0 (0) 5 (32) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 0 23 (4) 0 0 0 23 (4) 23 (4) 23 (4) 0 0 35 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (6) 0 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 0 (0) 23 (4) EXHIBIT A2 Site-Generated Traffic Volumes: 3000 Turtle Creek Boulevard 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX Drive 1 0 0 0 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 3 (21) LEGEND: 0 (0) 0 (0) X (Y) 23 (4) 23 (4) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

City Comments to March 23, 2018 TIA and KHA Responses kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300

CITY OF DALLAS TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMENTS Traffic Engineer: Scot Johnson, P.E. (Kimley-Horn) Project Name: 2727 Turtle Creek Blvd Email: scot.johnson@kimley-horn.com Received: 3/22/2017 Reviewed By: David Nevarez, P.E., PTOE Zoning Case: Z178-218(CY) Reviewed On: 4/20/2018 Sustainable Development and Construction Engineering Division received a Traffic Impact Analysis for the above-referenced project. The following comments are provided to Current Planning as comments for consideration based on a technical review of the analysis, findings and recommendations. A. General Comments 1. TIA presents a summary of trip generation comparisons between the proposed development and alternative as-of-right scenarios: 1) 850 MF DU, approx. 930 ksf of office, and 400 ksf of office to represent a theoretical full use of the existing building structures. Analysis shows that the proposed development will generate less than (or relatively similar trips to) the theoretical scenarios with the exception of a full MF development. The 850-MF scenario would still generate more outbound traffic during the morning peak hour than the proposed development. B. Request for Comments from Applicant 2. The office building element, located in the northernmost parcel (with direct access to Gillespie and Enid/Fairmount) will generate approximately 75-80% of the total traffic volumes during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic. Yet, the analysis only assigns 45% to the two driveways toward Gillespie and Enid. Given the geographical location and projected downgrading in level-of-service at intersections on Turtle Creek Blvd, staff anticipates a higher trip generation will concentrate on residential streets (i.e. Enid, Gillespie) until they reach their corresponding capacity. 3. Study of Enid at Brown shows site generated traffic but does not take into account any background traffic already generated by adjacent residential properties. Staff requests comments on proposed driveway geometry without significantly disrupting existing traffic operations. 4. Staff requests comments on anticipated traffic operations of proposed hotel meeting space (if any). 5. The projected average control delay for the WBR approach at Maple and Turtle Creek increases from 65 (LOS E) to 83 seconds/vehicle (LOS F) at horizon background during the morning study peak period. Developer, however, proposes no mitigation for the anticipated development impact. C. Site Plan Evaluation Review 6. TIA also omits background traffic in the capacity analysis of all site driveways on Turtle Creek. 7. TIA includes only three driveways on Turtle Creek Blvd. However, the proposed development plan for 2727 Turtle Creek shows five driveways: Study Drive 1 (hotel), Study Drive 2 (access to office garage), Study Drive 3 (access to both residential and office garage), in addition to a fourth driveway (between Drive 1 and 2) with access to residential parking garage and a fifth driveway (between Drive 2 and 3) with access to residential lobby. Engineering recommends the consolidation of some driveways by means of shared access agreements to reduce conflict points on Turtle Creek Blvd. D. Summary of Findings & Recommendations 8. Traffic study recommends improvements to the intersection of Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount to accommodate two-lane approach for all directions with shared-through lanes. This recommendation is a viable option but should not be a condition to this development or the City of Dallas. The City of Dallas Transportation Department will reevaluate traffic operations at project buildout. Page 1 of 2

9. Analysis of roadway capacity for Turtle Creek Blvd assumes left turn lanes; staff concurs that although projected traffic will exceed theoretical capacity of a two-lane, undivided roadway, the existing width of Turtle Creek allows for through traffic to bypass turning vehicles without impacting traffic operations or on-street parking. At this point, there is no plan of any re-striping mitigations or restricting on-street parking on Turtle Creek Blvd. 10. Study does not evaluate actual traffic operations of Gillespie at Turtle Creek, located within close proximity of the intersection at Cedar Springs. These intersections (combined) currently operate at failing levels-of-service. The proposed development will only exacerbate these conditions without proposing any mitigations. END OF REVIEW Page 2 of 2

MEMORANDUM To: From: Prescott Realty Group Scot A. Johnson, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: April 30, 2018 Subject: Response to Transportation Review Comments Z178-218(CY) 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard The following are responses to the April 20, 2018 transportation review comments by the City of Dallas. Each comment needing a response is reproduced in italics and then the response is listed. Comment: 2. The office building element, located in the northernmost parcel (with direct access to Gillespie and Enid/Fairmount) will generate approximately 75-80% of the total traffic volumes during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic. Yet, the analysis only assigns 45% to the two driveways toward Gillespie and Enid. Given the geographical location and projected downgrading in level-of-service at intersections on Turtle Creek Blvd, staff anticipates a higher trip generation will concentrate on residential streets (i.e. Enid, Gillespie) until they reach their corresponding capacity. Response: The office proportions of the site-generated traffic are 66% in the AM peak hour and 59% in the PM peak hour. The trip distribution assumed in the analysis is appropriate considering the relative attractiveness of Turtle Creek Boulevard and the major driveway direct from Turtle Creek Boulevard to the office parking area. The office traffic can reach the office garage from any of the main approach directions. Comment: 3. Study of Enid at Brown shows site generated traffic but does not take into account any background traffic already generated by adjacent residential properties. Staff requests comments on proposed driveway geometry without significantly disrupting existing traffic operations. Response: The 2025 Background and 2025 Background Plus Site traffic volumes at Enid street at Brown Street are shown in the updated Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 10 attached. The intersection would be set up in several ways: 1. In the existing configuration with the public streets forming an uncontrolled curve, and the driveway stopping when it approaches the public street. 2. A more formal T-intersection where southbound Brown Street is stop-controlled, and Enid Street and Drive 4 do not stop. 3. A 3-way Stop-controlled intersection, which would be preferred for consistency, traffic calming, and pedestrian friendliness and safety. Each of the potential configurations operates with favorable conditions on all approaches. The 3-way stop is the preferred alternative. kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300

Page 2 Comment: 4. Staff requests comments on anticipated traffic operations of proposed hotel meeting space (if any). Response: The amount of hotel meeting space is unremarkable for the size of the hotel (around 13,000 SF, or much less than 10% of the overall building area), so any trip generation is contained within the hotel s projection. Meeting space is specifically noted as a supporting facility or accessory use within the Hotel land use data in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Vehicles will approach and depart in the same manner as hotel guests. As shown in the below hotel drop-off drawing by HKS, the hotel dropoff has large areas set aside for valet operations, which will accommodate any peak traffic flows due to events. There are two inbound lanes for car stacking in addition to the bypass lane, and a long outbound staging lane plus the outbound bypass lane. kimley-horn.com 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75251 972 770 1300

Page 3 Comment: 5. The projected average control delay for the WBR approach at Maple and Turtle Creek increases from 65 (LOS E) to 83 seconds/vehicle (LOS F) at horizon background during the morning study peak period. Developer, however, proposes no mitigation for the anticipated development impact. Response: The site is adding only 24 westbound right-turning vehicles in the AM peak hour, to a background volume of 446 right-turning vehicles in the 2025 AM peak hour. The site-generated traffic is making up only 5% of the combined right-turn traffic volume. The existing signal timing at the intersection of Maple Avenue and turtle Creek Boulevard was not modified in the future scenarios of the original report, as it continued to operate at excellent levels of service with the background traffic and the addition of the site-generated traffic. Under that timing plan, the Turtle Creek Boulevard approaches are given only 19 seconds out of each 60-second signal cycle, which is quite short considering the large volume of existing westbound right-turning traffic. A signal timing adjustment of only 2 seconds towards the Turtle Creek Boulevard (21 seconds green/yellow/all-red, 39 seconds for Maple Avenue) would result in a westbound right-turn delay of 61.5 seconds (LOS E), effectively removing any impact from the site traffic. The table below shows the approach and overall operating conditions using the signal timing tweak. The westbound approach has been improved to better conditions than in the 2025 background scenario, and the overall intersection remains favorable. INTERSECTION Maple Avenue @ Turtle Creek Boulevard APPROACH 2025 Background Traffic AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS 2025 Background plus Site Traffic AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS 2025 Background plus Site traffic With Signal Mod AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) EB 6.5 A 6.5 A 5.9 A WB 59.7 E 73.5 E 55.2 E NB 6.8 A 6.9 A 8.2 A SB 9.9 A 12.8 B 15.5 B Overall 21.6 C 26.4 C 23.0 C LOS kimley-horn.com 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75251 972 770 1300

Page 4 Comment: 6. TIA also omits background traffic in the capacity analysis of all site driveways on Turtle Creek. Response: The background traffic is updated to show correctly in the attached updated Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 10. The following table excerpt shows the driveway operating conditions with all background traffic included. All driveways continue to operate with minimal delays to the public streets (LOS A for inbound movements) and LOS C or better conditions for outbound movements. INTERSECTION APPROACH 2020 Background plus Site Traffic 2025 Background plus Site Traffic 2020 Background plus Site Traffic 2025 Background plus Site Traffic Drive 1 @ Turtle Creek Boulevard Drive 2 @ Turtle Creek Boulevard Drive 3 @ Turtle Creek Boulevard Brown Street @ Drive 4 / Enid Street AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS PM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS PM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) EBL 8.6 A 8.6 A 8.4 A 8.4 A SB* 14.8 B 15.2 C 18.2 C 19.2 C EBL 8.6 A 8.7 A 8.3 A 8.4 A SB* 14.9 B 15.3 C 18.1 C 19.0 C EBL 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.2 A 8.3 A SB* 13.7 B 14.0 B 15.0 C 15.5 C EB* 7.8 A 7.8 A 7.7 A 7.7 A WB* 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.4 A 7.4 A EB* 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.1 A 7.1 A LOS Comment: 7. TIA includes only three driveways on Turtle Creek Blvd. However, the proposed development plan for 2727 Turtle Creek shows five driveways: Study Drive 1 (hotel), Study Drive 2 (access to office garage), Study Drive 3 (access to both residential and office garage), in addition to a fourth driveway (between Drive 1 and 2) with access to residential parking garage and a fifth driveway (between Drive 2 and 3) with access to residential lobby. Engineering recommends the consolidation of some driveways by means of shared access agreements to reduce conflict points on Turtle Creek Blvd. Response: Some driveways were combined for analysis purposes to ensure a conservative analysis of intersection operations, where the higher combined volumes result in increased delays. The TIA noted that Drive 2 was the combination of the central office driveway and the adjacent condo residential driveway. Drive 3 was the combination of the two multifamily residential driveways which are at opposite ends of the multifamily building porte-cochere. Even with the combined volumes, all the driveways operate at favorable levels of service with minimal delays and queuing. All the proposed driveways will meet the City of Dallas minimum driveway spacing standards. kimley-horn.com 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75251 972 770 1300

Page 5 Comment: 8. Traffic study recommends improvements to the intersection of Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount to accommodate two-lane approach for all directions with shared-through lanes. This recommendation is a viable option but should not be a condition to this development or the City of Dallas. The City of Dallas Transportation Department will reevaluate traffic operations at project buildout. Response: Noted. Comment: 9. Analysis of roadway capacity for Turtle Creek Blvd assumes left turn lanes; staff concurs that although projected traffic will exceed theoretical capacity of a two-lane, undivided roadway, the existing width of Turtle Creek allows for through traffic to bypass turning vehicles without impacting traffic operations or on-street parking. At this point, there is no plan of any re-striping mitigations or restricting on-street parking on Turtle Creek Blvd. Response: Additionally, parking is already prohibited on the north side of Turtle Creek Boulevard in the site vicinity. Comment: 10. Study does not evaluate actual traffic operations of Gillespie at Turtle Creek, located within close proximity of the intersection at Cedar Springs. These intersections (combined) currently operate at failing levels-of-service. The proposed development will only exacerbate these conditions without proposing any mitigations. Response: The analysis included the unsignalized intersection of Turtle Creek Boulevard at Gillespie Street, which operates favorably in all time periods when considered by itself. The southbound leftturn or through movement is blocked in some PM peak hour cycles by the eastbound left-turning queue extending back from the signal at Cedar Springs Road and Turtle Creek Boulevard, if the eastbound vehicles do not respect the Gillespie intersection by leaving gaps. Unfortunately there is no way to quantify this impact with the standard analysis tools. At its present location so close to Cedar Springs Road, there is no meaningful mitigation available for the Gillespie intersection. A Do Not Block sign is already installed for the eastbound traffic. Adjustment of the signal timing at Turtle Creek Boulevard and Cedar Springs Road has the potential for improving the eastbound operations to reduce the number of times the eastbound left-turning queue would extend back to Gillespie Street. Currently the Turtle Creek Boulevard approaches are given only 31 seconds out of each 120-second cycle in the PM peak hour. Increasing the proportion of the signal cycle available to Turtle Creek Boulevard would reduce the eastbound queue lengths. Considering the Cedar Springs Road coordinated signal timing, the intersection with Turtle Creek Boulevard has more time dedicated to the Cedar Springs Road approaches than do the adjacent signals at Carlisle Street or Bowen Street. This would indicate that some of the signal cycle can be redistributed to the Turtle Creek Boulevard approach without negatively affecting the Cedar Springs Road coordinated phase or green band. END Attachments: Updated Exhibit 8 2020 Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Updated Exhibit 10 2025 Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes kimley-horn.com 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75251 972 770 1300

Maple Avenue 201 53 84 20 44 68 6 22 (6) (373) (30) 43 (53) (33) (10) 8 (19) (19) (68) (16) 42 (19) 66 (37) 24 (57) 11 (8) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 28 (49) 17 (46) 191 35 61 (29) 16 (40) 24 53 5 (175) (48) 17 (23) (10) (87) (6) Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Enid Street Drive 2 Drive 3 Mansion Drive Brown Street Turtle Creek Boulevard 6 621 163 448 (287) 48 156 51 88 (113) 6 10 12 34 23 84 (55) 390 798 25 5 (24) (13) (685) (349) 4 (7) (60) (241) (116) 311 (271) (4) (12) 19 (8) (57) (11) (44) 479 (329) (172) (495) (38) 4 (27) 65 (86) 16 (43) 491 (385) 0 (1) 7 (34) 1 (13) 49 (28) 8 (0) 30 (19) 141 (451) 3 (11) 3 677 90 185 (337) 118 81 47 211 (541) 165 (451) 27 (4) 182 396 41 9 (5) (2) (538) (74) 23 (66) (39) (83) (32) 16 (71) 56 (144) (83) (903) (6) 16 16 (38) (38) 41 (19) 429 (417) EXHIBIT 8 2020 Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 41 (19) 261 (484) Drive 1 16 16 16 8 (38) (38) 41 (19) (38) (19) 20 (10) 453 (398) 478 (379) LEGEND: 41 (19) 41 (19) X (Y) 236 (503) 212 (522) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

211 54 89 20 44 71 6 23 (6) (391) (31) 44 (54) (35) (10) 8 (19) (19) (71) (17) 42 (19) 69 (37) 24 (57) 12 (9) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 29 (52) 17 (47) 201 36 61 (29) 16 (40) 24 55 5 (183) (50) 18 (23) (10) (91) (6) Maple Avenue Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Drive 2 Drive 3 Brown Street Enid Street Mansion Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard 6 653 167 470 (298) 50 164 52 92 (118) 6 11 13 36 24 87 (58) 406 839 25 5 (24) (14) (720) (365) 4 (8) (62) (253) (122) 325 (280) (4) (13) 19 (9) (60) (12) (45) 498 (342) (180) (520) (40) 4 (27) 68 (89) 17 (44) 511 (401) 0 (1) 7 (34) 1 (14) 50 (28) 9 (0) 31 (19) 147 (471) 3 (12) 3 711 93 190 (352) 125 86 48 219 (564) 170 (469) 27 (4) 188 416 41 10 (5) (2) (565) (76) 24 (69) (41) (88) (33) 17 (75) 58 (148) (85) (949) (6) 16 16 (38) (38) 41 (19) 449 (434) EXHIBIT 10 2025 Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 41 (19) 269 (507) Drive 1 16 16 16 8 (38) (38) 41 (19) (38) (19) 20 (10) 473 (415) 498 (396) LEGEND: 41 (19) 41 (19) X (Y) 244 (526) 220 (545) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

Traffic Counts and Historical Data Maple Avenue Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 2011 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 14,193-2 2012 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15,342 8.1% 3 2013 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 13,280-13.4% 4 2014 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15,332 15.5% 5 2015 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 14,670-4.3% 6 2016 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15,466 5.4% Turtle Creek Boulevard Average Growth 2011-2016: 1.7% Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 2001 Fairmount Street Park Bridge Court COD 6,142-2 2017 Park Bridge Court Mansion Driveway KHA 6,316 - Fairmount Street Average Growth 2001-2017: 0.2% Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 2004 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 3,700-2 2009 Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 4,809 - Brown Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source Average Growth 2004-2009: 5.4% 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 2017 Enid Street Hood Street KHA 653 - Enid Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 2017 Fairmount Street Brown Street KHA 917 - Gillespie Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate 1 1999 Welborn Street Oak Lawn Avenue TxDOT 1,580-2 2009 Welborn Street Oak Lawn Avenue TxDOT 1,420-1.1% 3 2017 Sale Street Turtle Creek Boulevard KHA 614-9.9% Average Growth 1999-2017: -5.1% kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300

NB Brown Street South of Hood Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 0 0 0 1 1 11/9/2017 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 1 1 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 1 1 0 3 5 7:00 0 3 0 2 5 8:00 2 2 1 5 10 9:00 3 5 0 2 10 10:00 3 4 4 2 13 11:00 1 3 1 2 7 12:00 7 5 4 6 22 13:00 5 2 3 3 13 14:00 6 4 6 2 18 15:00 2 1 4 7 14 16:00 11 5 6 8 30 17:00 8 4 6 8 26 18:00 9 5 7 16 37 19:00 10 12 3 7 32 20:00 8 3 8 2 21 21:00 5 5 4 6 20 22:00 4 3 3 1 11 23:00 0 1 2 1 4 TOTAL: 300 The A.M. peak hour from 8:30 to 9:30 is 14 The P.M. peak hour from 18:30 to 19:30 is 45 40 35 30 25 VOLUME 20 15 10 5 0 TIME

SB Brown Street South of Hood Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 3 0 0 1 4 11/9/2017 1:00 0 1 0 0 1 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 1 0 1 3 5 6:00 3 5 3 6 17 7:00 8 6 7 3 24 8:00 9 11 8 5 33 9:00 6 3 5 6 20 10:00 3 4 1 3 11 11:00 2 5 5 5 17 12:00 4 6 9 4 23 13:00 5 6 3 9 23 14:00 4 3 4 5 16 15:00 2 4 1 8 15 16:00 9 5 5 5 24 17:00 6 9 4 15 34 18:00 8 8 7 7 30 19:00 5 7 4 2 18 20:00 2 3 4 4 13 21:00 6 1 8 0 15 22:00 2 0 1 0 3 23:00 3 1 2 1 7 TOTAL: 353 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 33 The P.M. peak hour from 17:45 to 18:45 is 38 40 35 30 25 VOLUME 20 15 10 5 0 TIME

NB Gillespie Street South of Sale Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 2 1 2 3 8 11/9/2017 1:00 0 2 0 1 3 2:00 1 1 0 0 2 3:00 0 1 0 1 2 4:00 0 0 1 0 1 5:00 0 0 2 6 8 6:00 5 3 5 10 23 7:00 6 10 9 11 36 8:00 12 11 19 18 60 9:00 9 12 15 17 53 10:00 15 14 20 18 67 11:00 16 2 1 0 19 12:00 0 0 1 0 1 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: 283 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 60 The P.M. peak hour from 23:00 to 0:00 is 0 80 70 60 50 VOLUME 40 30 20 10 0 TIME

SB Gillespie Street South of Sale Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 2 1 0 0 3 11/9/2017 1:00 1 0 0 0 1 2:00 0 0 1 0 1 3:00 0 0 1 0 1 4:00 0 0 1 0 1 5:00 0 1 2 6 9 6:00 5 6 8 15 34 7:00 8 11 19 16 54 8:00 20 20 21 29 90 9:00 14 18 20 15 67 10:00 10 13 19 11 53 11:00 10 1 0 0 11 12:00 2 3 0 0 5 13:00 1 0 0 0 1 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: 331 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 90 The P.M. peak hour from 23:00 to 0:00 is 0 100 90 80 70 60 VOLUME 50 40 30 20 10 0 TIME

EB Enid Street east of Fairmount Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 2 0 0 1 3 11/15/2017 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 1 1 2 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 1 0 3 2 6 7:00 6 2 3 5 16 8:00 10 7 8 6 31 9:00 2 4 3 4 13 10:00 2 2 3 5 12 11:00 6 6 6 8 26 12:00 3 8 2 8 21 13:00 9 6 6 8 29 14:00 8 8 5 8 29 15:00 8 2 8 12 30 16:00 13 14 8 11 46 17:00 10 13 22 18 63 18:00 10 9 10 6 35 19:00 15 8 4 8 35 20:00 10 9 7 5 31 21:00 10 11 4 6 31 22:00 6 6 2 2 16 23:00 0 1 2 1 4 TOTAL: 479 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 31 The P.M. peak hour from 17:15 to 18:15 is 63 70 60 50 VOLUME 40 30 20 10 0 TIME

WB Enid Street east of Fairmount Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 1 0 1 1 3 11/15/2017 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 2 2 4 5:00 2 1 0 2 5 6:00 0 3 5 1 9 7:00 4 15 11 14 44 8:00 12 13 19 17 61 9:00 13 9 9 4 35 10:00 4 9 8 3 24 11:00 7 10 6 2 25 12:00 3 6 6 8 23 13:00 15 8 6 4 33 14:00 2 4 6 6 18 15:00 6 6 4 2 18 16:00 3 11 8 4 26 17:00 8 6 7 5 26 18:00 9 8 8 4 29 19:00 6 5 2 4 17 20:00 3 2 2 1 8 21:00 4 6 4 3 17 22:00 6 2 2 2 12 23:00 1 0 0 0 1 TOTAL: 438 The A.M. peak hour from 8:15 to 9:15 is 62 The P.M. peak hour from 16:15 to 17:15 is 31 70 60 50 VOLUME 40 30 20 10 0 TIME

EB Turtle Creek Boulevard West of Mansion TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 3 1 2 5 11 11/9/2017 1:00 0 2 2 0 4 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 3 3 4:00 1 1 0 0 2 5:00 1 3 8 6 18 6:00 9 16 10 21 56 7:00 17 20 27 25 89 8:00 24 42 46 42 154 9:00 46 30 30 22 128 10:00 24 31 29 35 119 11:00 25 31 33 46 135 12:00 35 36 44 42 157 13:00 47 45 41 38 171 14:00 37 35 29 37 138 15:00 50 42 46 63 201 16:00 61 76 102 100 339 17:00 108 101 106 83 398 18:00 110 86 97 85 378 19:00 78 51 29 33 191 20:00 21 29 20 19 89 21:00 24 28 19 18 89 22:00 7 17 11 14 49 23:00 10 10 6 6 32 TOTAL: 2951 The A.M. peak hour from 8:15 to 9:15 is 176 The P.M. peak hour from 16:45 to 17:45 is 415 450 400 350 300 VOLUME 250 200 150 100 50 0 TIME

WB Turtle Creek Boulevard West of Mansion TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0:00 3 0 2 3 8 11/9/2017 1:00 0 0 0 2 2 2:00 1 2 1 1 5 3:00 1 0 0 3 4 4:00 0 0 6 2 8 5:00 2 5 6 8 21 6:00 16 22 47 36 121 7:00 55 53 65 87 260 8:00 111 92 81 72 356 9:00 67 35 49 32 183 10:00 35 40 30 41 146 11:00 31 35 33 54 153 12:00 56 49 53 34 192 13:00 69 47 44 57 217 14:00 54 42 49 52 197 15:00 48 59 60 60 227 16:00 54 49 63 55 221 17:00 76 68 72 80 296 18:00 72 63 60 50 245 19:00 50 43 33 28 154 20:00 26 19 42 29 116 21:00 29 26 28 19 102 22:00 27 20 11 21 79 23:00 14 14 11 13 52 TOTAL: 3365 The A.M. peak hour from 7:45 to 8:45 is 371 The P.M. peak hour from 17:00 to 18:00 is 296 400 350 300 250 VOLUME 200 150 100 50 0 TIME

1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467862, Location: 32.803718, -96.805477, Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-15 7:00AM 51 67 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 22 0 69 0 2 0 10 0 12 1 199 7:15AM 49 87 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 49 22 0 71 1 4 1 20 0 25 0 232 7:30AM 52 143 1 1 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 23 0 132 2 7 2 16 0 25 0 354 7:45AM 64 161 3 0 228 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 84 35 0 120 0 4 0 32 0 36 1 386 Hourly Total 216 458 4 1 679 0 0 1 1 0 2 3 1 289 102 0 392 3 17 3 78 0 98 2 1171 8:00AM 94 190 0 0 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 110 37 0 14 8 0 6 1 23 0 30 4 4 62 8:15AM 83 202 1 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 31 0 14 4 0 11 2 28 0 4 1 0 4 71 8:30AM 85 195 0 0 280 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 75 25 0 103 0 7 0 31 0 38 0 4 24 8:45AM 57 188 1 0 24 6 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 86 24 0 112 0 7 1 32 0 4 0 2 4 00 Hourly Total 319 775 2 0 1096 1 2 1 2 0 5 3 6 384 117 0 507 0 31 4 114 0 14 9 6 1757 4:30PM 46 84 0 6 136 0 2 1 1 0 4 1 0 155 10 0 165 0 15 1 71 0 87 0 392 4:45PM 44 102 3 7 156 0 1 3 1 0 5 0 1 180 9 0 190 0 16 0 94 0 110 1 4 61 Hourly Total 90 186 3 13 292 0 3 4 2 0 9 1 1 335 19 0 355 0 31 1 165 0 197 1 853 5:00PM 32 100 1 12 14 5 0 4 4 2 0 10 2 1 209 13 0 223 0 15 1 88 0 104 0 4 82 5:15PM 42 106 1 9 158 0 2 3 0 0 5 1 0 250 8 1 259 0 16 0 101 0 117 1 539 5:30PM 39 129 0 8 176 1 1 3 2 0 6 1 0 206 12 0 218 0 25 0 85 0 110 1 510 5:45PM 35 122 0 4 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 205 17 0 222 0 26 0 107 0 133 2 516 Hourly Total 148 457 2 33 64 0 2 7 10 4 0 21 6 1 870 50 1 922 0 82 1 381 0 4 64 4 204 7 6:00PM 23 123 0 11 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 215 14 0 229 0 17 0 89 0 106 3 4 92 6:15PM 43 107 0 5 155 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 161 4 0 165 0 12 0 96 0 108 2 4 29 Hourly Total 66 230 0 16 312 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 376 18 0 394 0 29 0 185 0 214 5 921 Total 839 2106 11 63 3019 4 13 16 9 0 38 14 9 2254 306 1 2570 3 190 9 923 0 1122 18 674 9 % Approac h 27.8% 69.8% 0.4% 2.1% - - 34.2% 42.1% 23.7% 0% - - 0.4% 87.7% 11.9% 0% - - 16.9% 0.8% 82.3% 0% - - - % Total 12.4% 31.2% 0.2% 0.9% 4 4.7% - 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0% 0.6% - 0.1% 33.4% 4.5% 0% 38.1% - 2.8% 0.1% 13.7% 0% 16.6% - - Lights 828 2098 11 63 3000-13 16 9 0 38-9 2243 306 1 2559-188 9 913 0 1110-6707 % Lights 98.7% 99.6% 100% 100% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.5% 100% 100% 99.6% - 98.9% 100% 98.9% 0% 98.9% - 99.4% Artic ulate d Truc ks 0 1 0 0 1-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 0 1-2 % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 11 7 0 0 18-0 0 0 0 0-0 11 0 0 11-1 0 10 0 11-40 % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 1.3% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.4 % - 0.5% 0% 1.1% 0% 1.0% - 0.6% Pe de strians - - - - - 4 - - - - - 14 - - - - - 3 - - - - - 18 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lig hts, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467862, Location: 32.803718, -96.805477, Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-15 8:00AM 94 190 0 0 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 110 37 0 14 8 0 6 1 23 0 30 4 4 62 8:15AM 83 202 1 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 31 0 14 4 0 11 2 28 0 4 1 0 4 71 8:30AM 85 195 0 0 280 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 75 25 0 103 0 7 0 31 0 38 0 4 24 8:45AM 57 188 1 0 24 6 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 86 24 0 112 0 7 1 32 0 4 0 2 4 00 Total 319 775 2 0 1096 1 2 1 2 0 5 3 6 384 117 0 507 0 31 4 114 0 14 9 6 1757 % Approac h 29.1% 70.7% 0.2% 0% - - 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0% - - 1.2% 75.7% 23.1% 0% - - 20.8% 2.7% 76.5% 0% - - - % Total 18.2% 44.1% 0.1% 0% 62.4 % - 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0% 0.3% - 0.3% 21.9% 6.7% 0% 28.9% - 1.8% 0.2% 6.5% 0% 8.5% - - PHF 0.848 0.959 0.500-0.958-0.500 0.250 0.250-0.4 17-0.500 0.850 0.791-0.856-0.705 0.500 0.891-0.909-0.933 Lights 314 773 2 0 1089-2 1 2 0 5-6 381 117 0 504-31 4 112 0 14 7-1745 % Lights 98.4% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.2% 100% 0% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 98.2% 0% 98.7% - 99.3% Artic ulate d Truc ks 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 5 2 0 0 7-0 0 0 0 0-0 3 0 0 3-0 0 2 0 2-12 % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 1.6% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.8% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 1.8% 0% 1.3% - 0.7% Pe de strians - - - - - 1 - - - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 6 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 PM Peak (5:15PM - 6:15PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lig hts, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467862, Location: 32.803718, -96.805477, Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-15 5:15PM 42 106 1 9 158 0 2 3 0 0 5 1 0 250 8 1 259 0 16 0 101 0 117 1 539 5:30PM 39 129 0 8 176 1 1 3 2 0 6 1 0 206 12 0 218 0 25 0 85 0 110 1 510 5:45PM 35 122 0 4 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 205 17 0 222 0 26 0 107 0 133 2 516 6:00PM 23 123 0 11 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 215 14 0 229 0 17 0 89 0 106 3 4 92 Total 139 480 1 32 652 2 3 6 2 0 11 5 0 876 51 1 928 0 84 0 382 0 4 66 7 2057 % Approac h 21.3% 73.6% 0.2% 4.9% - - 27.3% 54.5% 18.2% 0% - - 0% 94.4% 5.5% 0.1% - - 18.0% 0% 82.0% 0% - - - % Total 6.8% 23.3% 0% 1.6% 31.7% - 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0% 0.5% - 0% 42.6% 2.5% 0% 4 5.1% - 4.1% 0% 18.6% 0% 22.7% - - PHF 0.827 0.930 0.250 0.727 0.926-0.375 0.500 0.250-0.4 58 - - 0.876 0.750 0.250 0.896-0.808-0.893-0.876-0.954 Lights 138 480 1 32 651-3 6 2 0 11-0 874 51 1 926-83 0 381 0 4 64-2052 % Lights 99.3% 100% 100% 100% 99.8% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 0% 99.8% 100% 100% 99.8% - 98.8% 0% 99.7% 0% 99.6% - 99.8% Artic ulate d Truc ks 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 1 0 0 0 1-0 0 0 0 0-0 2 0 0 2-1 0 1 0 2-5 % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% - 1.2% 0% 0.3% 0% 0.4 % - 0.2% Pe de strians - - - - - 2 - - - - - 5 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 7 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Leng th (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467863, Location: 32.803684, -96.805939, Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 7:00AM 1 3 1 0 5 0 8 63 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 6 0 14 0 90 7:15AM 0 5 4 0 9 0 7 56 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 5 0 20 0 92 7:30AM 2 11 4 0 17 0 13 69 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 10 0 26 0 125 7:45AM 3 10 2 0 15 0 14 90 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 17 3 0 24 0 14 3 Hourly Total 6 29 11 0 4 6 0 42 278 0 0 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 49 24 0 84 0 4 50 8:00AM 3 8 2 0 13 0 11 106 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 5 0 22 1 152 8:15AM 3 10 4 0 17 0 19 100 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 4 1 4 3 0 179 8:30AM 2 9 4 0 15 0 15 80 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 9 0 38 0 14 8 8:45AM 4 6 5 0 15 0 17 78 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 10 0 4 1 0 151 Hourly Total 12 33 15 0 60 0 62 364 0 0 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 99 28 1 14 4 1 630 4:30PM 15 3 4 0 22 0 7 40 1 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 80 6 0 102 1 172 4:45PM 12 0 8 0 20 0 8 52 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 80 9 0 101 0 181 Hourly Total 27 3 12 0 4 2 0 15 92 1 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 160 15 0 203 1 353 5:00PM 20 3 12 0 35 0 8 47 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 89 4 0 107 0 197 5:15PM 11 4 3 0 18 0 8 60 0 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 97 4 0 116 0 203 5:30PM 11 1 8 0 20 0 10 58 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 80 6 0 107 0 195 5:45PM 13 3 8 0 24 0 8 69 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 73 3 0 87 0 188 Hourly Total 55 11 31 0 97 0 34 234 0 1 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 339 17 0 4 17 0 783 6:00PM 20 3 5 0 28 0 18 65 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 92 5 0 119 0 230 6:15PM 7 5 7 0 19 0 11 51 1 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 77 5 0 97 0 179 Hourly Total 27 8 12 0 4 7 0 29 116 1 0 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 169 10 0 216 0 4 09 T otal 127 84 81 0 292 0 182 1084 2 1 1269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 816 94 1 1064 2 2625 % Approac h 43.5% 28.8% 27.7% 0% - - 14.3% 85.4% 0.2% 0.1% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 14.4% 76.7% 8.8% 0.1% - - - % Total 4.8% 3.2% 3.1% 0% 11.1% - 6.9% 41.3% 0.1% 0% 4 8.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 5.8% 31.1% 3.6% 0% 4 0.5% - - Lights 122 82 80 0 284-177 1077 2 1 1257-0 0 0 0 0-153 811 92 1 1057-2598 % Lights 96.1% 97.6% 98.8% 0% 97.3% - 97.3% 99.4% 100% 100% 99.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 100% 99.4% 97.9% 100% 99.3% - 99.0% Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 5 2 1 0 8-5 7 0 0 12-0 0 0 0 0-0 5 2 0 7-27 % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 3.9% 2.4% 1.2% 0% 2.7% - 2.7% 0.6% 0% 0% 0.9% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0.6% 2.1% 0% 0.7% - 1.0% Pe de strians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 % Pe de strians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467863, Location: 32.803684, -96.805939, Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 8:00AM 3 8 2 0 13 0 11 106 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 5 0 22 1 152 8:15AM 3 10 4 0 17 0 19 100 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 4 1 4 3 0 179 8:30AM 2 9 4 0 15 0 15 80 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 9 0 38 0 14 8 8:45AM 4 6 5 0 15 0 17 78 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 10 0 4 1 0 151 Total 12 33 15 0 60 0 62 364 0 0 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 99 28 1 14 4 1 630 % Approac h 20.0% 55.0% 25.0% 0% - - 14.6% 85.4% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 11.1% 68.8% 19.4% 0.7% - - - % T otal 1.9% 5.2% 2.4% 0% 9.5% - 9.8% 57.8% 0% 0% 67.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 2.5% 15.7% 4.4% 0.2% 22.9% - - PHF 0.750 0.825 0.750-0.882-0.816 0.858 - - 0.895 - - - - - - - 0.800 0.750 0.700 0.250 0.837-0.880 Lights 11 33 15 0 59-61 363 0 0 4 24-0 0 0 0 0-16 99 28 1 14 4-627 % Lights 91.7% 100% 100% 0% 98.3% - 98.4% 99.7% 0% 0% 99.5% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 99.5% Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 1 0 0 0 1-1 1 0 0 2-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-3 % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 8.3% 0% 0% 0% 1.7% - 1.6% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.5% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% Pe de strians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 % Pe de strians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 PM Peak (5:15PM - 6:15PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 467863, Location: 32.803684, -96.805939, Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 5:15PM 11 4 3 0 18 0 8 60 0 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 97 4 0 116 0 203 5:30PM 11 1 8 0 20 0 10 58 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 80 6 0 107 0 195 5:45PM 13 3 8 0 24 0 8 69 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 73 3 0 87 0 188 6:00PM 20 3 5 0 28 0 18 65 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 92 5 0 119 0 230 Total 55 11 24 0 90 0 44 252 0 1 297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 342 18 0 4 29 0 816 % Approac h 61.1% 12.2% 26.7% 0% - - 14.8% 84.8% 0% 0.3% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 16.1% 79.7% 4.2% 0% - - - % Total 6.7% 1.3% 2.9% 0% 11.0% - 5.4% 30.9% 0% 0.1% 36.4 % - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 8.5% 41.9% 2.2% 0% 52.6% - - PHF 0.688 0.688 0.750-0.804-0.611 0.913-0.250 0.895 - - - - - - - 0.784 0.881 0.750-0.901-0.887 Lights 53 11 24 0 88-43 251 0 1 295-0 0 0 0 0-69 342 18 0 4 29-812 % Lights 96.4% 100% 100% 0% 97.8% - 97.7% 99.6% 0% 100% 99.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 99.5% Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 2 0 0 0 2-1 1 0 0 2-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-4 % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 3.6% 0% 0% 0% 2.2% - 2.3% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.7% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% Pe de strians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Pe de strians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 467865, Location: 32.801671, -96.809901, Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 7:00AM 5 18 7 0 30 0 6 45 4 0 55 0 0 18 23 0 4 1 0 1 13 3 0 17 0 14 3 7:15AM 6 34 7 0 4 7 0 12 45 2 0 59 1 3 22 38 0 63 0 7 11 0 0 18 1 187 7:30AM 4 26 8 0 38 2 11 53 2 0 66 0 5 16 33 0 54 0 4 10 0 0 14 4 172 7:45AM 4 29 3 0 36 0 11 75 2 0 88 0 4 17 28 0 4 9 0 3 20 4 0 27 3 200 Hourly Total 19 107 25 0 151 2 40 218 10 0 268 1 12 73 122 0 207 0 15 54 7 0 76 8 702 8:00AM 9 21 7 0 37 0 22 83 1 0 106 0 4 26 39 0 69 1 5 14 8 0 27 1 239 8:15AM 11 37 3 0 51 0 20 76 3 0 99 0 12 14 30 0 56 0 5 21 6 0 32 0 238 8:30AM 14 34 12 0 60 0 17 59 1 0 77 0 5 24 27 0 56 1 7 17 8 0 32 1 225 8:45AM 5 59 8 0 72 0 19 50 3 0 72 0 5 15 19 0 39 0 5 27 6 0 38 0 221 Hourly Total 39 151 30 0 220 0 78 268 8 0 354 0 26 79 115 0 220 2 22 79 28 0 129 2 923 4:30PM 13 46 25 0 84 0 15 40 3 0 58 0 5 10 6 0 21 0 6 71 3 0 80 1 24 3 4:45PM 8 49 28 0 85 1 16 35 2 0 53 0 6 14 9 0 29 0 6 55 4 0 65 4 232 Hourly Total 21 95 53 0 169 1 31 75 5 0 111 0 11 24 15 0 50 0 12 126 7 0 14 5 5 4 75 5:00PM 14 50 29 0 93 1 29 35 7 0 71 0 8 23 11 0 4 2 0 15 74 5 0 94 3 300 5:15PM 12 52 22 0 86 0 22 38 9 0 69 0 5 22 7 0 34 0 10 81 3 0 94 1 283 5:30PM 10 72 26 0 108 2 18 43 2 0 63 0 6 20 12 0 38 0 15 66 2 0 83 2 292 5:45PM 4 60 26 0 90 2 22 53 5 0 80 0 2 16 8 0 26 0 24 65 7 0 96 0 292 Hourly Total 40 234 103 0 377 5 91 169 23 0 283 0 21 81 38 0 14 0 0 64 286 17 0 367 6 1167 6:00PM 5 54 27 0 86 0 20 46 2 0 68 0 12 20 11 0 4 3 0 13 74 4 0 91 0 288 6:15PM 2 55 19 0 76 0 21 33 5 0 59 0 4 27 9 0 4 0 0 15 61 1 0 77 0 252 Hourly Total 7 109 46 0 162 0 41 79 7 0 127 0 16 47 20 0 83 0 28 135 5 0 168 0 54 0 Total 126 696 257 0 1079 8 281 809 53 0 114 3 1 86 304 310 0 700 2 141 680 64 0 885 21 3807 % Approac h 11.7% 64.5% 23.8% 0% - - 24.6% 70.8% 4.6% 0% - - 12.3% 43.4% 44.3% 0% - - 15.9% 76.8% 7.2% 0% - - - % Total 3.3% 18.3% 6.8% 0% 28.3% - 7.4% 21.3% 1.4% 0% 30.0% - 2.3% 8.0% 8.1% 0% 18.4 % - 3.7% 17.9% 1.7% 0% 23.2% - - Lights 125 694 255 0 1074-276 801 52 0 1129-86 303 310 0 699-141 675 63 0 879-3781 % Lights 99.2% 99.7% 99.2% 0% 99.5% - 98.2% 99.0% 98.1% 0% 98.8% - 100% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.9% - 100% 99.3% 98.4% 0% 99.3% - 99.3% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1-0 2 0 0 2-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-3 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks 1 1 2 0 4-5 6 1 0 12-0 1 0 0 1-0 5 1 0 6-23 % Buses and Single - Unit Trucks 0.8% 0.1% 0.8% 0% 0.4 % - 1.8% 0.7% 1.9% 0% 1.0% - 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.7% 1.6% 0% 0.7% - 0.6% Pe de strians - - - - - 8 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 19 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 90.5% - Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 % Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 9.5% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 467865, Location: 32.801671, -96.809901, Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 8:00AM 9 21 7 0 37 0 22 83 1 0 106 0 4 26 39 0 69 1 5 14 8 0 27 1 239 8:15AM 11 37 3 0 51 0 20 76 3 0 99 0 12 14 30 0 56 0 5 21 6 0 32 0 238 8:30AM 14 34 12 0 60 0 17 59 1 0 77 0 5 24 27 0 56 1 7 17 8 0 32 1 225 8:45AM 5 59 8 0 72 0 19 50 3 0 72 0 5 15 19 0 39 0 5 27 6 0 38 0 221 T otal 39 151 30 0 220 0 78 268 8 0 354 0 26 79 115 0 220 2 22 79 28 0 129 2 923 % Approach 17.7% 68.6% 13.6% 0% - - 22.0% 75.7% 2.3% 0% - - 11.8% 35.9% 52.3% 0% - - 17.1% 61.2% 21.7% 0% - - - % Total 4.2% 16.4% 3.3% 0% 23.8% - 8.5% 29.0% 0.9% 0% 38.4 % - 2.8% 8.6% 12.5% 0% 23.8% - 2.4% 8.6% 3.0% 0% 14.0% - - PHF 0.696 0.640 0.625-0.764-0.886 0.807 0.667-0.835-0.542 0.760 0.737-0.797-0.786 0.731 0.875-0.84 9-0.965 Lights 39 149 30 0 218-76 266 8 0 350-26 79 115 0 220-22 78 28 0 128-916 % Lights 100% 98.7% 100% 0% 99.1% - 97.4% 99.3% 100% 0% 98.9% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 98.7% 100% 0% 99.2% - 99.2% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1-0 1 0 0 1-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-2 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.7% 0% 0% 0.5% - 0% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks 0 1 0 0 1-2 1 0 0 3-0 0 0 0 0-0 1 0 0 1-5 % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 0% 0.7% 0% 0% 0.5% - 2.6% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.8% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 1.3% 0% 0% 0.8% - 0.5% Pe de strians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 2 % Pe de strians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 467865, Location: 32.801671, -96.809901, Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 5:00PM 14 50 29 0 93 1 29 35 7 0 71 0 8 23 11 0 4 2 0 15 74 5 0 94 3 300 5:15PM 12 52 22 0 86 0 22 38 9 0 69 0 5 22 7 0 34 0 10 81 3 0 94 1 283 5:30PM 10 72 26 0 108 2 18 43 2 0 63 0 6 20 12 0 38 0 15 66 2 0 83 2 292 5:45PM 4 60 26 0 90 2 22 53 5 0 80 0 2 16 8 0 26 0 24 65 7 0 96 0 292 Total 40 234 103 0 377 5 91 169 23 0 283 0 21 81 38 0 14 0 0 64 286 17 0 367 6 1167 % Approac h 10.6% 62.1% 27.3% 0% - - 32.2% 59.7% 8.1% 0% - - 15.0% 57.9% 27.1% 0% - - 17.4% 77.9% 4.6% 0% - - - % Total 3.4% 20.1% 8.8% 0% 32.3% - 7.8% 14.5% 2.0% 0% 24.3% - 1.8% 6.9% 3.3% 0% 12.0% - 5.5% 24.5% 1.5% 0% 31.4 % - - PHF 0.714 0.813 0.888-0.873-0.784 0.797 0.639-0.884-0.656 0.880 0.792-0.833-0.667 0.883 0.607-0.956-0.973 Lights 39 234 103 0 376-90 166 23 0 279-21 81 38 0 14 0-64 285 17 0 366-1161 % Lights 97.5% 100% 100% 0% 99.7% - 98.9% 98.2% 100% 0% 98.6% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.7% - 99.5% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0-0 1 0 0 1-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-1 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.6% 0% 0% 0.4 % - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks 1 0 0 0 1-1 2 0 0 3-0 0 0 0 0-0 1 0 0 1-5 % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 2.5% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% - 1.1% 1.2% 0% 0% 1.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.3% - 0.4% Pe de strians - - - - - 5 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 6 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

4. Turtle Creek Blvd at Maple Ave - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 467866, Location: 32.801285, -96.811066, Site Code: 4 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Maple Ave nue Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Maple Ave nue Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int 2017-11-09 7:00AM 1 81 9 0 91 0 62 1 5 0 68 1 7 133 3 0 14 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 305 7:15AM 1 113 16 0 130 1 79 0 6 0 85 1 2 159 2 0 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 378 7:30AM 0 119 13 0 132 0 86 0 3 0 89 0 1 188 0 0 189 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 11 7:45AM 0 148 14 1 163 0 104 0 6 0 110 1 14 181 1 0 196 0 4 1 0 0 5 1 4 74 Hourly Total 2 461 52 1 516 1 331 1 20 0 352 3 24 661 6 0 691 1 5 1 3 0 9 2 1568 8:00AM 2 138 15 0 155 0 112 1 13 0 126 0 12 168 1 0 181 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 63 8:15AM 2 176 26 0 204 0 110 2 13 0 125 0 8 137 1 0 14 6 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 4 78 8:30AM 2 141 21 0 164 0 83 1 16 0 100 0 14 171 0 0 185 1 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 53 8:45AM 0 170 32 0 202 1 71 1 6 0 78 0 6 147 0 0 153 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 34 Hourly Total 6 625 94 0 725 1 376 5 48 0 4 29 0 40 623 2 0 665 1 5 3 1 0 9 0 1828 4:30PM 4 158 61 0 223 0 48 2 10 0 60 0 14 122 2 0 138 0 2 1 4 0 7 1 4 28 4:45PM 3 141 53 0 197 0 41 0 10 0 51 1 14 110 2 0 126 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 375 Hourly Total 7 299 114 0 4 20 0 89 2 20 0 111 1 28 232 4 0 264 0 2 1 5 0 8 1 803 5:00PM 2 175 74 0 251 0 45 4 11 0 60 0 13 130 0 0 14 3 1 2 5 5 0 12 0 4 66 5:15PM 3 178 78 0 259 2 44 1 15 0 60 1 6 116 0 0 122 0 1 3 2 0 6 2 4 4 7 5:30PM 2 129 71 0 202 0 56 1 11 0 68 0 16 149 1 0 166 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 4 4 0 5:45PM 6 183 79 0 268 0 58 1 10 0 69 0 18 127 1 0 14 6 0 2 3 2 0 7 0 4 90 Hourly Total 13 665 302 0 980 2 203 7 47 0 257 1 53 522 2 0 577 1 5 11 13 0 29 3 184 3 6:00PM 2 150 73 0 225 0 50 3 4 0 57 0 16 122 1 0 139 0 1 1 5 0 7 2 4 28 6:15PM 2 162 71 0 235 1 44 1 8 0 53 1 13 108 1 0 122 1 0 1 3 0 4 2 4 14 Hourly Total 4 312 144 0 4 60 1 94 4 12 0 110 1 29 230 2 0 261 1 1 2 8 0 11 4 84 2 Total 32 2362 706 1 3101 5 1093 19 147 0 1259 6 174 2268 16 0 24 58 4 18 18 30 0 66 10 6884 % Approac h 1.0% 76.2% 22.8% 0% - - 86.8% 1.5% 11.7% 0% - - 7.1% 92.3% 0.7% 0% - - 27.3% 27.3% 45.5% 0% - - - % Total 0.5% 34.3% 10.3% 0% 4 5.0% - 15.9% 0.3% 2.1% 0% 18.3% - 2.5% 32.9% 0.2% 0% 35.7% - 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0% 1.0% - - Lights 32 2333 702 1 3068-1086 19 146 0 1251-172 2245 16 0 24 33-18 18 30 0 66-6818 % Lights 100% 98.8% 99.4% 100% 98.9% - 99.4% 100% 99.3% 0% 99.4 % - 98.9% 99.0% 100% 0% 99.0% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 99.0% Articulated Trucks 0 2 1 0 3-1 0 0 0 1-0 2 0 0 2-0 0 0 0 0-6 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0.1% 0% 0.1% - 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks 0 27 3 0 30-6 0 1 0 7-2 21 0 0 23-0 0 0 0 0-60 % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 0% 1.1% 0.4% 0% 1.0% - 0.5% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.6% - 1.1% 0.9% 0% 0% 0.9% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.9% Pe de strians - - - - - 5 - - - - - 6 - - - - - 4 - - - - - 9 % Pe de strians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 90.0% - Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 % Bicycle s on Crosswalk - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 10.0% - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6