Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

Needs and Community Characteristics

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 525 525 520 520 520 Rank 77 77 75 75 75 Commuters (1000s) 270 275 273 272 271 Freeway 4,332 4,165 3,770 4,013 4,021 Arterial Streets 4,729 4,547 4,055 4,344 4,352 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.16 3.48 3.58 3.25 2.64 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.67 3.91 3.87 3.69 2.96 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 26 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 29 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.40 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 8,451 8,355 8,151 7,995 7,697 Rank 67 66 67 67 68 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 20 20 20 19 19 Rank 44 40 36 44 39 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 15,905 15,723 15,340 15,048 14,486 Rank 71 70 70 70 71 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 38 38 37 36 35 Rank 55 52 57 62 66 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 Rank 46 45 50 48 57 Commuter Stress Index 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 61 60 66 66 65 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.07 -- -- -- -- Rank 57 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 381 383 379 380 377 Rank 69 69 69 69 70 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 920 924 915 916 909 Rank 52 53 53 53 58

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 520 520 520 520 520 Rank 74 73 72 72 69 Commuters (1000s) 270 269 268 266 264 Freeway 3,900 3,805 4,025 4,125 4,090 Arterial Streets 4,336 4,465 4,855 5,040 4,920 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.19 3.40 2.88 2.58 2.24 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.58 4.17 3.35 2.83 2.48 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,456 7,822 7,654 7,410 7,118 Rank 69 68 68 68 68 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 19 18 18 17 Rank 45 41 47 45 46 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 14,032 14,722 14,406 13,947 13,396 Rank 71 69 71 69 70 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 36 35 34 33 Rank 68 66 75 73 74 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.15 Rank 56 56 66 63 72 Commuter Stress Index 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.16 Rank 76 72 75 77 81 Total Cost ($ millions) 371 388 394 392 389 Rank 70 69 69 68 68 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 896 936 951 946 939 Rank 61 59 63 65 63

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 520 520 510 505 500 Rank 69 69 69 69 69 Commuters (1000s) 263 261 253 248 242 Freeway 4,155 4,115 4,090 4,095 4,025 Arterial Streets 4,930 4,785 4,725 4,665 4,610 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.81 1.52 1.38 1.30 1.55 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.94 1.49 1.36 1.49 1.53 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 6,972 6,793 6,571 6,397 6,171 Rank 67 67 65 63 62 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 16 16 15 15 Rank 43 44 36 40 33 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 13,121 12,784 12,366 12,039 11,613 Rank 67 67 67 67 67 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 32 32 31 31 31 Rank 77 71 75 70 66 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.14 Rank 66 64 61 58 65 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.15 Rank 77 74 72 68 76 Total Cost ($ millions) 394 394 390 386 383 Rank 69 67 67 66 66 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 951 951 941 931 923 Rank 62 56 53 47 47

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 495 495 495 495 495 Rank 69 69 69 66 66 Commuters (1000s) 237 234 231 228 225 Freeway 3,805 3,745 3,590 3,380 3,305 Arterial Streets 4,550 4,480 4,430 4,425 4,000 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.14 1.11 1.13 1.28 1.12 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.15 1.17 1.25 1.39 1.22 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 6,028 5,952 5,789 5,588 5,216 Rank 62 62 59 57 57 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 14 14 13 13 Rank 26 27 18 17 15 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 11,346 11,203 10,895 10,517 9,816 Rank 64 64 64 63 63 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 30 30 30 29 27 Rank 67 62 57 56 59 Travel Time Index 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.13 Rank 62 56 47 50 47 Commuter Stress Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.14 Rank 74 68 63 58 61 Total Cost ($ millions) 386 390 385 380 366 Rank 64 63 63 63 62 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 932 941 929 918 882 Rank 41 33 30 29 28

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 490 490 490 490 490 Rank 66 65 64 64 64 Commuters (1000s) 220 217 215 212 209 Freeway 3,295 3,095 2,950 2,770 2,810 Arterial Streets 3,560 3,120 2,800 2,650 2,550 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.13 1.06 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.17 1.19 1.19 1.25 1.10 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,923 4,554 4,236 3,997 3,762 Rank 57 58 57 55 55 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 12 11 10 10 9 Rank 15 15 16 15 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 9,266 8,570 7,973 7,522 7,080 Rank 62 62 60 58 56 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 26 24 23 22 21 Rank 57 60 59 54 53 Travel Time Index 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 51 54 49 51 46 Commuter Stress Index 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.11 1.11 Rank 65 68 65 67 59 Total Cost ($ millions) 355 337 322 313 307 Rank 64 63 60 58 56 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 856 812 778 756 742 Rank 27 27 28 25 24

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 490 490 490 490 490 Rank 63 62 61 59 57 Commuters (1000s) 207 206 204 203 201 Freeway 2,725 2,615 2,805 2,535 2,785 Arterial Streets 2,505 2,435 2,395 2,110 2,015 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.28 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.05 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.24 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,519 3,321 3,063 2,828 2,616 Rank 54 54 55 55 53 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 8 8 7 7 6 Rank 18 15 19 14 17 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 6,622 6,250 5,765 5,323 4,923 Rank 56 56 56 55 55 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 19 18 17 16 15 Rank 55 52 51 52 50 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.07 1.07 Rank 48 43 44 49 48 Commuter Stress Index 1.10 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.08 Rank 63 55 59 63 58 Total Cost ($ millions) 303 300 288 276 260 Rank 56 55 55 55 54 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 731 723 695 665 626 Rank 22 22 21 22 22

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 485 485 485 Rank 57 58 58 Commuters (1000s) 197 196 194 Freeway 2,660 2,675 2,330 Arterial Streets 1,905 1,810 1,770 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.29 1.32 1.38 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.26 1.29 1.34 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 2,546 2,264 2,064 Rank 52 52 52 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 5 5 Rank 15 19 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 4,792 4,260 3,885 Rank 53 52 53 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 14 13 12 Rank 50 49 49 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.06 1.06 Rank 42 46 43 Commuter Stress Index 1.08 1.07 1.07 Rank 57 59 57 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 262 243 228 Rank 53 53 53 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 631 586 551 Rank 19 18 22