Govind Vadakpat, Research Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D, USDOT. U.S. Department of Transportation

Similar documents
Connected and Automated Vehicle Activities in the United States

Presentation Overview

Connected Vehicle Human-Machine Interface: Development and Assessment

Connected Vehicles for Safety

Convergence: Connected and Automated Mobility

APCO International. Emerging Technology Forum

Smart Cities Tampa s Perspective. Vik Bhide Chief Traffic Management Engineer

TRAFFIC CONTROL. in a Connected Vehicle World

Associated Pennsylvania Constructors 2019 Construction Innovation Conference. April 4, 2019

Eco-Signal Operations Concept of Operations

G4 Apps. Intelligent Vehicles ITS Canada ATMS Detection Webinar June 13, 2013

NHTSA Update: Connected Vehicles V2V Communications for Safety

V2V Advancements in the last 12 months. CAMP and related activities

State and Local Implications for Connected and Automated Vehicles. James Pol, PE, PMP. AASHTO SCOHTS Meeting

Beyond ATC and ITS Standards. Edward Fok USDOT/FHWA - RESOURCE CENTER San Francisco

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TYLER SVITAK CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS TECH PROGRAM MANAGER CDOT INTELLIGENT TRANPSORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)

2007 ITS World Congress, London, U.K. SS 59 Communications for Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Communications in the US

Future Vehicle Safety: Connected, Cooperative, or Autonomous? Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director

Click to edit Master title style

Traffic Management through C-ITS and Automation: a perspective from the U.S.

Commercial Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (CVII) Program

WRONG WAY DRIVER COUNTERMEASURES

Leading the way to seamless mobility November th, 2017 Tampa, Florida

Beth Kigel. Florida Transportation Commissioner. Florida s Smart Future: Innovation in Policy and Technology Planning

Connected and Automated Vehicle Program Plan. Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE VDOT Statewide Operations Engineer February 10, 2016

Smart Cities Around the Country

Operating Toll Facilities in a CAV World, Are We Prepared?

Connected Vehicles. V2X technology.

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND ITS. Built It, Renew It and Operate It

Connected vehicles on European roads: benefits for safety and traffic management

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS, CONNECTED VEHICLE AND DRIVING AUTOMATION STANDARDS, CYBER SECURITY, SHARED MOBILITY

Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Connected and Automated Vehicle Applications

Stan Caldwell Executive Director Traffic21 Institute Carnegie Mellon University

Automated Commercial Motor Vehicles: Potential Driver and Vehicle Safety Impacts

Samer Rajab, PhD 7/11/2018

Connected Vehicles and Emergency Responder Technologies

Roy Hulli, P.Eng. and. Fernando Chua. Intelligent Transportation Systems Ministry of Transportation Ontario

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Fixing the Line s Canarsie Tunnel. Manhattan CB6 11/5/2018

Technology for Transportation s Future

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

FAST-TRAC and Other Innovations at the Road Commission for Oakland. County

Jalil Kianfar, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

PORTUGUESE NETWORK FOR C-ITS

Interconnected vehicles: the French project

COMMERCIAL VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRATION: (CVII) WIRELESS ROADSIDE INSPECTION WITH 5.9 GHz DSRC

LIGHT VEHICLE DRIVER ACCEPTANCE CLINICS PRELIMINARY RESULTS. Mike Lukuc NHTSA Research. May 21, 2012

Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Aty, P.E. Connected-Autonomous Vehicles (CAV): Background and Opportunities. Trustee Chair

Case Study STREAMS SMART MOTORWAYS

Open Source Big Data Management for Connected Vehicles

Robots on Our Roads: The Coming Revolution in Mobility. Ohio Planning Conference July 27, 2016 Richard Bishop

Connecting Europe Facility. Regulation Study for Interoperability in the Adoption of Autonomous Driving in European Urban Nodes

Enhanced Transit Operations and Travel Experience in Connected Vehicle Environment

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Transportation Transformation: Tomorrow or Today? Connected Vehicles Test Bed Program Driverless Shuttles

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS, CONNECTED VEHICLE AND DRIVING AUTOMATION STANDARDS

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Intelligent Vehicle Systems

MEETING 21 ST CENTURY TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES: Entering New Era of Redefining Mobility. SUSAN MARLOW, GISP Principal at Stantec MAPPS President

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Click to edit Master title style

Implementation of Cooperative ITS in Europe: the case of Compass4D

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise. Incident Management Program for All Levels & Specialty Towing & Roadside Repair (STARR)

Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Club 20 RoadX Overview February 23, 2018

Automation is in the Eye of the Beholder: How it Might be Viewed by the Traffic Engineer

For personal use only

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

The Role of the Infrastructure Investments in the New EU Road Mobility Package

Smart Columbus: The Projects and the Data December 6, 2018

Background Subway crowding and unmet transit needs: Slowing bus speeds: A growing city: Limited capital funding:

Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge Brian Cronin

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Minnesota Autonomous Shuttle. NACV Summit June 12, 2018

Compass4D Deployment

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Traffic Operations with Connected and Automated Vehicles

Cooperative Autonomous Driving and Interaction with Vulnerable Road Users

A Vision for Highway Automation

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

Session: Connected Vehicles Status of C-ITS Deployment in Europe

Application of Autonomous Vehicle Technology to Public Transit

Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit - Functional Capabilities for Safety and Capacity

Light Rail Performance Initiatives Update. February 4, 2014

The Role of Intelligent Transport Systems in Road Safety and Logistics

Transcription:

Govind Vadakpat, Research Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D, USDOT 1

OVERVIEW Connected Vehicles Pilot Deployment Program Overview Overview of CV Pilot Program Award Sites Wyoming DOT (WYDOT) CV Pilot Deployment New York City (NYC) DOT CV Pilot Deployment Tampa (THEA) CV Pilot Deployment Interoperability Testing Summary How to Stay Connected 2

CV PILOT DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM GOALS 3

THE THREE PILOT SITES WYDOT Reduce the number and severity of adverse weather-related incidents in the I-80 Corridor in order to improve safety and reduce incident-related delays. Focused on the needs of commercial vehicle operators in the State of Wyoming. New York City DOT Improve safety and mobility of travelers in New York City through connected vehicle technologies. Vehicle to vehicle (V2V) technology installed in up to 8,000 vehicles in Midtown Manhattan, and vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) technology installed along high-accident rate arterials in Manhattan and Central Brooklyn. Alleviate congestion and improve safety during morning commuting hours. Deploy a variety of connected vehicle technologies on and in the vicinity of reversible express lanes and three major arterials in downtown Tampa to solve the transportation challenges. 4

CV PILOT DEPLOYMENT SCHEDULE Is the concept ready for deployment? Does the system function as planned? CV tech integrated into operational practice PHASE 1 (up to 12 months) PHASE 2 PHASE 3 (minimum 18 months) Routine Operations (ongoing) Concept Dev. Design/Build/Test Maintain/Operate Pilot Post-Pilot Operations Progress Gate Progress Gate transition COMPLETED Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Aug 2018 Apr 2019 (tentative) Dec 2019 Oct 2020 (tentative) Last updated: June 12, 2018 Phase 1: Concept Development (COMPLETE) Creates the foundational plan to enable further design and deployment Phase 2: Design/Deploy/Test Detailed design and deployment followed by testing to ensure deployment functions as intended (both technically and institutionally) Phase 3: Maintain/Operate Focus is on assessing the performance of the deployed system Post Pilot Operations (CV tech integrated into operational practice) 5

WYDOT PILOT DEPLOYMENT OVERVIEW Objective: Reduce the number and severity of adverse weatherrelated incidents (including secondary incidents) in the I-80 Corridor in order to improve safety and reduce incident-related delays. Focused on the needs of the commercial vehicle operator in the State of Wyoming Approach: Equip fleet vehicles (combination of snow plows, maintenance fleet vehicles, emergency vehicles, and private trucks) that frequently travel the I-80 corridor to transmit basic safety messages (BSMs), collect vehicle and road condition data and provide it remotely to the WYDOT TMCs Deploy DSRC roadside equipment (RSE) to supplement existing assets and initiatives Road weather data shared with freight carriers who will transmit to their trucks using exiting in-vehicle systems Source: Wyoming DOT 6

WYDOT PILOT DEPLOYMENT PROPOSED CV APPLICATIONS & DEVICES Category V2V Safety V2I/I2V Safety WYDOT CV Application Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Situational Awareness Work Zone Warnings (WZW) Spot Weather Impact Warning (SWIW) V2I and V2V Safety Distress Notification (DN) WYDOT Devices Estimated Number Roadside Unit (RSU) 75 WYDOT Fleet Subsystem OBU 100 Integrated Commercial Truck Subsystem OBU 150 Retrofit Vehicle Subsystem OBU 25 Basic Vehicle Subsystem OBU 125 Total Equipped Vehicles 400 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 2 Vehicle 1 Vehicle 3 I2V/V2I Situational Awareness Source: WYDOT 7

WYDOT Pilot Deployment Vision 400 Equipped Trucks: 100 WYDOT Fleet 150 Integrated Commercial Trucks 25 Retrofit Vehicles 125 Basic Vehicles 122 VSL Signs 75 RSU 402 Miles of I-80 55 Parking Locations 8

NYCDOT PILOT DEPLOYMENT OVERVIEW Objective: Improve safety and mobility of travelers in New York City through connected vehicle technologies Aligned with the NYC s Vision Zero initiative, which seeks to reduce crashes and pedestrian fatalities, and increase safety of travelers in all modes of transportation Approach: Equip up to 8,000 vehicles (taxis, buses, commercial fleet delivery trucks, and City-owned vehicles) that frequently travel in Midtown Manhattan and Central Brooklyn to transmit and receive connected vehicle data Install V2I technology at high-accident rate arterials: Upgrade 310 traffic signals along 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 6th Avenues in Manhattan and Flatbush Avenue in Central Brooklyn (emergency evacuation route). In addition to the north/south avenues, five east/west two-way cross streets (14th, 23rd, 34th, 42nd, and 57th Streets) will be secondary corridors. Deploy Roadside equipment (RSE) along FDR Drive 9

NYCDOT PILOT DEPLOYMENT PROPOSED CV APPLICATION-FLEET DISTRIBUTION Category V2I/I2V Safety V2V Safety V2I/I2V Pedestrian Mobility NYCDOT CV Application Speed Compliance Curve Speed Compliance Speed Compliance/Work Zone Red Light Violation Warning Oversize Vehicle Compliance Emergency Communications and Evacuation Information Forward Crash Warning (FCW) Emergency Electronics Brake Lights (EEBL) Blind Spot Warning (BSW) Lane Change Warning/Assist (LCA) Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) Vehicle Turning Right in Front of Bus Warning Pedestrian in Signalized Crosswalk Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System (PED-SIG) Intelligent Traffic Signal System (I-SIGCVDATA) NYCDOT Devices Roadside Unit (RSU) at Manhattan and Brooklyn Intersections and FDR Drive Taxi Equipped with Aftermarket Safety Device (ASD)* Estimated Number 353 5,850 MTA Fleet Equipped with ASD* 700 UPS Truck Equipped with ASD* 400 NYCDOT Fleet Equipped with ASD* 800 DSNY Fleet Equipped with ASD* 250 Vulnerable Road User (Pedestrians/Bicyclists) Device PED Detection System 100 10 + 1 spare Total Equipped Vehicles 8,000 MTA: Metropolitan Transportation Authority; DSNY: City of New York Department of Sanitation * In addition, 600 spare ASDs will be purchased. 10

NYCDOT Pilot Deployment Vision 100 Vulnerable Road User Device 700 MTA Buses 1,050 Sanitation & DOT vehicles 5,850 Taxis 353 RSU 400 UPS Vehicles 11 PED Detection System

TAMPA (THEA) PILOT DEPLOYMENT OVERVIEW Objective: The primary objective of this deployment is to alleviate congestion and improve safety during morning commuting hours. Deploy a variety of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicleto-infrastructure (V2I) safety, mobility, and agency data applications to create reinforcing benefits for motorists, pedestrians, and transit operation. Approach: Deploy a variety of connected vehicle technologies on and in the vicinity of reversible express lanes and three major arterials in downtown Tampa to solve the following transportation challenges: Morning peak hour queues, wrong-way entries, pedestrian safety, bus rapid transit (BRT) signal priority optimization, trip time and safety, streetcar trolley conflicts, and enhanced signal coordination and traffic progression. Source: THEA 12

TAMPA (THEA) PILOT DEPLOYMENT PROPOSED CV APPLICATIONS & DEVICES Category V2I Safety V2V Safety Mobility Agency Data Tampa (THEA) CV Application End of Ramp Deceleration Warning (ERDW) Wrong Way Entry (WWE) Pedestrian in Signalized Crosswalk Warning (PED-X) Pedestrian Collision Warning (PCW) Pedestrian Transit Movement Warning (PTMW) Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL) Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) Vehicle Turning Right in Front of a Transit Vehicle (VTRFTV) Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System (PED-SIG) Intelligent Traffic Signal System (I-SIG) Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Probe Date Enabled Traffic Monitoring (PDETM) Tampa (THEA) Devices Estimated Number Roadside Unit (RSU) at Intersection 44 Vehicle Equipped with OBU 1,580 Pedestrian Equipped with App in Smartphone 500 HART Transit Bus Equipped with OBU 10 TECO Line Street Car Equipped with OBU Total Equipped Vehicles 1,600 10 Source: THEA 13

Tampa (THEA) Pilot Deployment Vision 500 equipped pedestrians 10 equipped buses 10 equipped trolleys 40 intersections (I-SIG, TSP, PED-SIG) 1,580 vehicles equipped with OBU

OVERVIEW OF INTEROPERABILITY TEST Dates/Location: June 25 28, 2018 at FHWA Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (TFHRC) Objectives: Test interoperability among connected vehicle (CV) devices from the three sites as well as to identify potential interoperability issues that may require resolution prior to the sites advancing to an operational phase of the CV Pilot Deployment Program later in 2018. Interoperability Definition (defined by the team): A vehicle with an onboard unit (OBU) from one of the three CV Pilot sites is able to interact with OBUs and roadside units (RSUs) from each of the other sites in accordance with the key connected vehicle interfaces and standards. NYCDOT Tampa (THEA) WYDOT USDOT 15

OVERVIEW OF TEST PLAN CV Pilots Phase 2 Interoperability Test demonstrated interactions among different site s OBUs and among selected OBUs and RSUs. OBU Interactions : Receive Basic Safety Messages (BSMs) transmitted by the other site s OBUs via DSRC; authenticate them as needed; parse them; and process them in accordance with SAE J2945/1. CV applications: Forward Collision Warning (FCW), Electronic Emergency Brake Light (EEBL), and Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) - only NYC/Tampa OBU and RSU interactions: Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) and MAP (only NYC and Tampa) 16

PHOTOS FOR EXAMPLE TESTS Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL) Host Vehicle Stopped Same Lane Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Stationary Remote Vehicle Same Lane Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) Host Vehicle Stopped 17

SUMMARY Key Results More than 100 test runs within three days. Successful message transfer via multiple communications. Interoperability demonstrated inclusive of SCMS enrollment. Nearly 5 GB of test data generated for analysis. Testimonials with Respect to Value Test Team did an outstanding job planning and organizing the tests. Everyone had a good experience with the testing. A test of this nature had never been conducted before. NYCDOT Tampa (THEA) WYDOT USDOT 18

STAY CONNECTED Join us for the Getting Ready for Deployment Series Discover more about the CV Pilot Sites Learn the Essential Steps to CV Deployment Engage in Technical Discussion Visit the Pilot Site Websites for more Information: NYCDOT Pilot: https://www.cvp.nyc/ Tampa (THEA): https://www.tampacvpilot.com/ Wyoming DOT: https://wydotcvp.wyoroad.info/ Contact for CV Pilots Program: Kate Hartman, Program Manager Kate.hartman@dot.gov Contact for Pilot Sites: Kate Hartman, WYDOT Site AOR Kate.Hartman@dot.gov Jonathan Walker, NYCDOT Site AOR Jonathan.b.Walker@dot.gov Govind Vadakpat, THEA Site AOR G.Vadakpat@dot.gov 19