Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

CHART BOOK ON WAGES, OPERATING COSTS, AND COST OF LIVING

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Parking Management Strategies

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

THE 2001 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 1,765 1,770 1,770 1,775 1,775 Rank 28 28 28 28 28 Commuters (1000s) 854 852 852 853 850 Freeway 9,093 8,820 8,800 11,431 11,754 Arterial Streets 14,740 15,056 15,700 16,218 16,200 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.38 3.52 3.55 3.41 2.78 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.73 3.93 4.00 3.79 3.12 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 23 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 22 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 1.80 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 24,107 23,496 23,208 22,705 22,140 Rank 30 30 30 30 31 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 21 20 20 20 19 Rank 32 40 36 30 39 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 44,758 43,622 43,089 42,155 41,105 Rank 36 35 35 35 35 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 39 38 37 36 36 Rank 51 52 57 62 61 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 42 41 42 43 42 Commuter Stress Index 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.22 1.22 Rank 43 42 40 45 45 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 1.80 -- -- -- -- Rank 77 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,030 1,021 1,023 1,021 1,027 Rank 34 35 35 36 37 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 889 880 882 881 886 Rank 59 64 63 64 68

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 Rank 26 25 25 24 24 Commuters (1000s) 848 845 844 842 839 Freeway 11,524 11,880 12,405 12,155 12,330 Arterial Streets 16,606 17,120 17,360 17,420 17,760 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.33 3.42 2.97 2.68 2.28 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.73 4.41 3.56 2.93 2.58 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 21,230 22,151 22,723 22,367 22,040 Rank 31 31 30 30 29 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 19 20 19 19 Rank 45 41 26 33 30 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 39,416 41,127 42,188 41,528 40,919 Rank 35 35 33 32 32 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 36 37 36 36 Rank 68 66 60 61 58 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 46 47 46 45 42 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 Rank 46 48 45 44 44 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,001 1,041 1,109 1,122 1,142 Rank 37 36 33 32 32 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 864 898 957 967 985 Rank 70 68 60 58 54

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 Rank 24 23 23 23 23 Commuters (1000s) 836 832 826 806 787 Freeway 12,500 12,210 11,700 11,310 11,130 Arterial Streets 17,985 18,070 17,805 17,600 17,350 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.94 1.51 1.36 1.54 1.51 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.03 1.59 1.43 1.59 1.57 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 21,259 21,055 20,841 20,295 19,622 Rank 29 29 27 26 26 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 18 18 18 17 Rank 33 25 19 15 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 39,470 39,091 38,695 37,679 36,430 Rank 33 31 32 32 31 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 34 34 34 33 Rank 66 62 55 53 57 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.16 Rank 48 46 43 39 46 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 Rank 45 45 45 44 40 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,139 1,158 1,172 1,159 1,153 Rank 32 31 31 31 29 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 982 999 1,011 1,000 995 Rank 55 45 40 39 35

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 1,775 1,775 1,785 1,780 1,775 Rank 23 23 22 21 21 Commuters (1000s) 769 750 737 716 698 Freeway 11,300 10,910 10,540 10,310 10,105 Arterial Streets 17,200 17,080 17,175 17,515 17,505 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.11 1.06 1.19 1.26 1.19 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.19 1.20 1.30 1.39 1.32 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 18,606 17,854 17,352 17,137 16,566 Rank 25 24 23 23 22 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 15 15 15 14 Rank 17 17 12 10 12 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 34,545 33,148 32,216 31,817 30,757 Rank 31 29 29 27 24 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 32 31 31 31 31 Rank 58 57 50 45 40 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Rank 42 45 41 40 36 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.19 Rank 42 40 42 38 40 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,130 1,108 1,094 1,105 1,100 Rank 30 31 29 29 26 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 975 956 944 953 949 Rank 34 30 28 23 20

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 1,770 1,770 1,770 1,775 1,780 Rank 21 20 20 20 20 Commuters (1000s) 679 664 648 634 621 Freeway 9,420 9,350 9,135 8,600 8,195 Arterial Streets 17,275 17,385 17,265 17,730 17,775 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.04 1.09 1.14 1.16 1.30 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.15 1.21 1.28 1.29 1.08 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 16,144 15,130 14,333 13,357 12,580 Rank 21 21 21 21 19 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 14 13 12 12 11 Rank 9 10 12 9 9 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 29,973 28,091 26,611 24,798 23,356 Rank 24 23 22 22 22 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 29 28 27 25 Rank 32 32 31 30 34 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.13 Rank 35 35 34 33 33 Commuter Stress Index 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.17 Rank 38 36 38 38 36 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,102 1,059 1,034 992 974 Rank 25 23 22 22 22 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 951 914 892 856 840 Rank 15 16 15 16 16

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 1,785 1,785 1,790 1,790 1,790 Rank 19 19 19 18 18 Commuters (1000s) 617 612 608 602 597 Freeway 7,800 7,500 7,190 6,900 6,655 Arterial Streets 17,265 16,895 16,170 16,030 15,500 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.06 0.98 0.98 0.96 1.25 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.03 0.95 0.95 0.93 1.22 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 11,614 10,748 9,164 8,293 7,319 Rank 18 19 21 22 24 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 9 8 7 6 Rank 9 12 14 14 17 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 21,563 19,955 17,013 15,398 13,588 Rank 22 22 25 25 25 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 24 22 19 17 15 Rank 28 32 43 47 50 Travel Time Index 1.12 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.08 Rank 32 32 40 42 39 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.15 1.13 1.12 1.11 Rank 37 38 40 40 42 Total Cost ($ millions) 948 919 816 766 688 Rank 23 23 26 26 26 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 817 793 704 660 594 Rank 16 17 20 23 24

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 1,795 1,800 1,810 Rank 17 15 15 Commuters (1000s) 593 590 587 Freeway 6,460 6,110 5,635 Arterial Streets 15,065 14,655 14,825 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.27 1.30 1.35 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.23 1.26 1.32 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 6,418 5,912 5,271 Rank 23 22 23 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 5 5 Rank 15 19 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 11,915 10,975 9,787 Rank 25 26 27 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 13 12 11 Rank 53 52 54 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.06 1.05 Rank 42 46 51 Commuter Stress Index 1.11 1.10 1.09 Rank 39 42 43 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 625 601 553 Rank 26 26 27 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 539 518 477 Rank 29 27 31