Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Similar documents
Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

An Advanced Fuel Filter

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

Predator Program Office

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

US Army CERDEC: Fuel Cell Testing Update

Quarterly Progress Report

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

SMC Standard SMC-S June Supersedes: New issue. Air Force Space Command SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER STANDARD

Battery Research & Development Need for Military Vehicle Application

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

2012 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 14-16, MICHIGAN

Methylene Chloride Alternative HAP-Free Chemical Paint Strippers at Anniston Army Depot

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center

Transcription:

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells Terrill B. Atwater 1 Joseph Barrella 2 and Clinton Winchester 3 1 US Army RDECOM, CERDEC, Ft. Monmouth NJ 2 International Battery, Inc, Ridgewood NJ 3 US Navy, NSWC, Carderock, West Bethesda, MD ABSTRACT Power deficiencies have developed and presently continue to exist in numerous remote applications thus limiting mission effectiveness. The warfighter, first responder, personnel stationed in remote location as well as shelters, and command posts have been burdened with exhaustive amounts of electronics and demand for power has increased beyond the capability of supply and re-supply. The only viable solution to this problem is to equip the user with advanced battery technology, specifically high energy lithium-ion batteries, designed for this application. This paper will discuss the development of a man portable auxiliary power unit designed specifically to address these issues. INTRODUCTION To meet this growing power and energy need, a 15/3 volt Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) is being developed. This APU has an integrated charger that is detachable and a Battery Management System (BMS) with State Of Charge Indicator (SOCI). The unit is capable of accepting charge from 1-36v DC or 11 (dirty) AC. The acceptance of dirty power is especially important in remote applications where either an unreliable grid or generators are supplying usable power. The APU consists of eight AH cells, in two four-cell independent series strings. The series strings will be configured in a series or parallel arrangement whereby the battery can provide either AH @ 3v or 1AH @ 15v depending upon the application requirements. The current output has been initially set at 15 amperes. Battery weight, including the charger, BMS, case and cells is approximately 7 lbs. The battery weighs 43 lbs and the charger weighs 27 lbs. This battery is intended to provide the user with a power source to conduct missions in the manner they were intended without limitations due to battery power or an unstable electrical grid. An array of electrical testing to evaluate the soldier portable APU has been conducted and will be presented in this paper. These tests include environmental and safety specific, as well as, performance tests for cycling and storage. The tests have been designed to not only confirm performance of the APU but also provide the required data for a safety release. EXPERIMENTAL Initial testing of large format ( AH) Lithium-Ion cells from International Battery, Inc. (IB) was conducted by CERDEC. This evaluation was conducted to determine the appropriateness of the cells for this application. The cells were subjected to various electrical, and limited preliminary safety testing. These tests were designed to determine if the development of an APU is warranted. Initial testing included capacity and preliminary cycle life and shelf life tests. In addition to the IB AH cells, IB 2 AH cell tests were conducted during this initial evaluation. The data from the 2 AH cells are appropriate due to the similarities in design and construction and proportional nature of the cell design. The 2 AH cell is being evaluated for an independent application. The preliminary cycle life test was conducted on 2 AH cells. This test was designed to simulate an in use scenario of charge throughout the day, and discharge over night. The battery was placed in continuous service with a 2 Amp discharge to 2.5 Volts. The charging was performed at 2 Amps to 4.2 volts then 4.2 Volts for 1 hrs or 1. Amp. The preliminary shelf life test was conducted on AH cells. The cells were subjected to three 15-amp charge/ discharge cycles, then were either allowed to remain in the discharge state or were charged to % or 1% state-ofcharge. After the conditioning the cells were placed in casual storage for 6 months or 1 year. Due to the promising results of the preliminary tests, the development of the APU, as well as, additional testing was initiated. The expanded tests included: 1) 15 Amp cycling on AH cells at o C and 4 o C, 2) Thermal imaging during a moderate rate (15A charge - 25A discharge on AH cell) charge/discharge cycle, 3) Limited preliminary safety testing, and 4) Tests, conducted on 9 AH cells at the C rate at 25 C, 4 C, and C. The 9 AH cell tests were conducted by a third party commercial entity. Limited and preliminary safety tests have been conducted on the AH cells. These tests have been adapted from published Navy and SAE/DOE safety test and performance evaluations. These tests are outlined and described in references [2], [3]. Tests conducted included overcharge under constant-current and high temperature exposure.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 74-188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 124, Arlington VA 2222-432. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 21 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED --21 to --21 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army Research, Development & Engineerig Command (RDECOM),CERDEC,Ft. Monmouth,NJ,773 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 1. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 14. ABSTRACT Power deficiencies have developed and presently continue to exist in numerous remote applications thus limiting mission effectiveness. The warfighter, first responder, personnel stationed in remote location as well as shelters, and command posts have been burdened with exhaustive amounts of electronics and demand for power has increased beyond the capability of supply and re-supply. The only viable solution to this problem is to equip the user with advanced battery technology, specifically high energy lithium-ion batteries, designed for this application. This paper will discuss the development of a man portable auxiliary power unit designed specifically to address these issues. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 4 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

RESULTS Figures 1 3 show the capacity versus cycle for the 2 AH cell cycled at 2 Amps at 2 o C and AH cells cycled at 4 o C and o C, respectively. 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 Discharge at 2 o C for 2 AH Cell Vs. 2 A to 4.2 V Charge / 2 A to 2.5 V Discharge 2 A to 4.25 V Charge / 2 A to 2.5 V Discharge 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Figure 1. Vs. Cycle for a 2 AH. Cell cycled at 2 Amps at 2 o C. Charge limit changed from 4.2 V to 4.25 V after cycles, discharge cut off 2.5 V. 6 4 3 2 1 Discharge at 4 o C for AH cell Vs. connector re-seated Table 1 shows the reduced data for AH cells preconditioned and stored for 6 months and 1 year at %, %, and 1% state-of-charge. Figure 4 shows the thermal image at the hottest point during 15A charge - 25A discharge cycle. The highest temperature occurred as expected at the end of discharge. It is interesting to note that the cell temperature rose and fell with cycling, and remained consistent for successive charge discharge cycles. For example the cell temperature at end of discharge was 4 o C for the first and third cycle. Table 1. Retained and Recovered for AH cells Casually Stored at %, % and 1% States-of-charge Conditioned SOC and Storage Time Initial () Retained () Recovered () 1%, 6 Mo. 51.3 37.1 47.2 1%, 6 Mo..6 35.7 44.8 %, 6 Mo..9 15.8 47.6 %, 6 Mo..5 13.9 46.8 %, 6 Mo. 51.1 ~ 47.5 %, 6 Mo. 49.8 ~ 42.2 1%, 1 Yr..4 26.4 46.2 1%, 1 Yr..5 24.1 45.6 %, 1 Yr. 51.1 1.7 48. %, 1 Yr. 49.1 9.9 47.4 %, 1 Yr. 51.2 ~ 46.6 %, 1 Yr. 49.6 ~ 45.4 1 1 2 2 Figure 2. Vs. Cycle for a AH. Cell cycled at 4 o C. Charge limit 15 Amps to 4.2 V discharge 1 Amps to 2.5 V. 6 Discharge at o C for AH Cell Vs. 4 2 o C Cycling 3 2 1 Figure 4. Thermal image at end of life of AH cell discharged at 25 Amps to 2.5 Volts. Cell Temperature is uniform at 4 o C. 2 4 6 8 1 12 Figure 3. Vs. Cycle for a AH. Cell cycled at o C. Charge limit 15 Amps to 4.2 V discharge 1 Amps to 2.5 V. Cell 1 still under test, Cell 2 cycling continued at 2 o C after 1 cycles. Figures 5A-5C depict the C rate discharge performance of 9 AH cells after three months of storage at 25 C, 4 C, and C as compared to initial. As can be seen, the cells stand up well to extended high temperature environments and show little degradation after three months. These tests were run by an independent commercial entity.

Results of Preliminary Limited Safety Tests 5A 5B 5C Figure 5 discharge performance of 9 AH cells after three months of storage at A) 25 C, B) 4 C, and C) C. Graphs display initial 3 day, 6 day and 3 Month storage periods. The battery cells in response to severe constant current overcharge at a C/3 rate and thermal abuse resulted in immolation of the cell under test. The AH cells, although "burning" with a noticeable volume, did not produce a pressure event, nor eject debris away from the cells under test. Post test inspections reviewed the cell plate stack to be essentially intact in a tight bundle evidenced with severe thermal damage but no indication of mechanical instability during the combustion. This was a very stationary event. This is in contrast to smaller cells (25 AH) that produced substantial pressure releases as the vent mechanisms were overcome by the volume of gassing products from the cells. The plastic case material of IB cells contributes to both the volume of material released, as well as, the relative mechanical safety under extreme abuse and combustion. DISCUSSION As a result of the promising preliminary cell tests, an APU was designed. This design incorporated input from potential users and lessons learned from previous development efforts. From concept to first fully functional and submersible prototype, the development process took less than 6 months. This was due to the cooperation of the major players, CERDEC, International Battery, Inc., and Bren-Tronics, Inc working toward a common goal. Figure 6 shows the resultant Man Portable Auxiliary Power system and its separate charger and battery components. The fully assembled unit has the dimensions of 12 inches in length, 9.5 inches in width and 16 inches in height. User feedback indicates that a high capacity, high energy battery (1.5 2.7 KWHs) is necessary to power devices in many remote applications. To meet the growing power and energy needs, users are reporting that they have tried to use smaller capacity batteries in parallel. This practice is burdensome and has safety and service life implications, especially when the batteries are not properly maintained.. Additional concern arises from temporary good set-up using portable generators in remote applications. Under these conditions, the power is often dirty and disrupts the operation of advanced electronics being used. The Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit is being developed to meet the ever growing power and energy needs of today s soldiers. This unit also has an integrated charger that can be detached from the battery, thereby minimizing the weight into the field if necessary or desired. The battery itself contains a Battery Management System (BMS) with State of Charge Indicator (SOCI) displaying state of charge on the container surface. The unit is capable of accepting charge from 1-36v DC or (dirty) 11 AC. The output is currently delivered through two independent 15 volt taps that can be placed in parallel or series to obtain 1 Ah @ 15V or AH @ 3V.

A B C Figure 6. Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit. Configured as a complete system (A) and the two components: battery unit (B) and charger unit (C). The initial design consisted of eight AH cells, in two four cell independent series strings. Lessons learned during development enabled design of the same case to accept 9 AH cells for applications that might require an increased run time off the grid. By using the 9 AH cells, the battery will provide 18 AH @ 15V r 9 AH @ 3V. The current output has been initially set at 15 amperes. Battery weight, including the charger, BMS, case and cells is approximately 7 lbs. The battery weighs 43 lbs and the charger 27 lbs.. As designed, the unit is capable of full immersion. We have been testing four units with no anomalies and look forward to completing full qualification testing. Figure 7 shows the APU block schematic. The schematic shows the layers of protection incorporated in the system. In order to address the various input options, a two-layer charge system has been incorporated in the APU. This is also shown in the schematics. Figure 7. Auxiliary Power Unit Schematic 1) Charger Section 2) Battery Section The APU offers the user a complete auxiliary power unit that is portable and can be powered (recharged) by either AC (96-264v) or DC (28v) supplies. The APU is packaged as one portable compact unit. The charger and battery can be separated and used independently. This is of special importance if weight is an issue. The APU offers the user the opportunity to easily provide power in remote locations where the use of multiple batteries is not efficient. REFERENCES 1) www.internationalbatteryllc.com 2) NAVSEA Technical Manual, S931-AQ-SAF-1, 19 Aug 4 3) SAND 25-3123 FreedomCAR Electroical Energy Storage System Abuse Test Manual for Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Applications, June 25 also listed under SAE J2464 Electric Vehicle Battery Abuse Teating