Increase Rail Service to the Mid City Green Line Stations

Similar documents
Precision Station Stopping Progress Update

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee. Rail Car Deployment Strategies

Authorize Public Hearing To Discontinue Non- Regional Metrobus Routes 2W, 12A-S and 20F-Y in Fairfax County

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Safety and Operations Committee. Action Item III-A. December 13, 2018

Update on Bus Stop Enhancements

RTSP Phase II Update

SafeTrack Plan. DRAFT May 6, 2016 Public Reference Document

Transit Access to the National Harbor

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

2019 New Transit Service Plan

Metrorail Line Load Application

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

Report by Planning, Development & Real Estate Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2018 JULY and NOVEMBER FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET REDUCTION PROGRAM (BRPs) ($ in millions) - Fav/(Unfav)

TPA Steering Committee for Tri-Rail Extension to Northern Palm Beach County. February 26, 2018

Customer Service, Operations and Security Committee. Information Item III-A. January 12, 2017

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Mr. Leif Dormsjo Director, District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE Washington, DC July 10, Dear Director Dormsjo,

Adhoc Planning Commission Committee Review of the Virginia Square Sector Plan. Virginia Square Site

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - A May 10, FY2018 Third Quarter Capital Program Updates

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-E May 13, 2010 Bus Fleet Plan

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Recommended Contracting Actions For Up To 217 Hybrid Electric & Clean Diesel Buses

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Minnesota Avenue Station Parking Garage Repair Project

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Frequent Service Network Proposal

1.0 Detailed Definition of Alternatives

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Downtown Transit Plan

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Revised Strategy for Downtown Parking

MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program. Community Meeting Route 66 Allston/Brighton

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2005

Draft Results and Open House

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Semi-Annual Status Report on Railcar Programs

4 Case Study of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Briefing on Metro Matters Projects

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

Briefing on Metro Matters Projects

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT EXTENSION OF EXISTING DIAL-A-RIDE PILOT PROJECT AND STOCK TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL BUS CONTRACTS

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

DART Priorities Overview

NAVY YARD BALLPARK STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS STUDY. Final Report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Status Report Metrobus Capital Improvement Program FY06-11

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Policy Advisory Committee Meeting November 13, 2013

Metro Performance Report ǀ Page 1

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

DC Circulator Transit Development Plan Update

MEMORANDUM. WMATA Service Evaluation Study BService Routes City Staff Recommendation

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Paid Parking Pilot Program Parking Management

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Stoughton Center Parking

Considerations in Evaluating the Future of GEORGE Bus Service in Falls Church, Virginia. --March 12, 2009 Revised: March 17, 2009

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Medlock Area Neighborhood Association (MANA) February 15, 2016

DC Circulator Service Changes. Implementation Plan for June 24, 2018

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016

Energy Technical Memorandum

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

West Rosslyn Development

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program. Community Meeting Route 57 - Boston. January 31, 2011 Boston Arts Academy, 174 Ipswich St.

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Quarterly Update Meeting

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Downtown Parking/Wayfinding Study. Review of Recommendations to City Council: January 16, 2018

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

Transcription:

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Increase Rail Service to the Mid City Green Line Stations P D E C Presented to the Board of Directors: Planning and Development Committee by Planning, Development, Engineering & Construction March 2, 2006

I. Purpose To update the Planning and Development Committee on the studies staff performed to determine the feasibility of increasing rail service to the Mid City Green Line Stations. 2

II. Background Councilmember Graham, a WMATA Board member; Scott Pomeroy, representing the Mid-City business association; and ANC 1B have proposed extending the Yellow Line to their neighborhood; At the November 9 th WMATA Town Hall Meeting the following statements were made by the public concerning increased service to the Mid-City Green Line stations: Green Line train service during the mid-day, late night, and weekend periods is not frequent enough, The Columbia Heights, U Street, and Petworth neighborhoods are all experiencing rapid development and Metrorail capacity should be expanded to keep pace with development, Metrorail service should be frequent enough to support transitdependent, urban lifestyles, not just commuting. In response, WMATA staff studied the feasibility of increasing rail service to the U St., Columbia Heights and Georgia Ave. neighborhoods at the Mid-City Green Line stations. 3

III. Current Green Line Ridership Scheduled headways for the Yellow and Green Lines are as follows: Weekday Peak Hours (6-9:30am & 3:30-7pm) have 6 minute headways (10 trains per hour) Weekday Mid-day and Evening have 12 minute headways (5 trains per hour) Saturday has a 12 minute headway mid-day and a 15 minute evening headway (5 & 4 trains per hour, respectively) Sunday has a 15 minute headway (4 trains per hour) Late Night (all days after 9:30 pm) has a 20 minute headway (3 trains per hour) Where two lines serve a station (i.e. Mt. Vernon Square/Convention Center) the headways are halved and the number of trains per hour is doubled. Station Average Ridership Profile for November, 2005 Avg. Peak Weekday Avg. Off-Peak Weekday Shaw/Howard 4,800 3,100 Total Weekday 7,900 Avg. Saturday 4,900 Avg. Sunday 2,600 U St. 6,100 4,000 10,100 8,000 4,200 Columbia Heights 8,900 5,000 13,900 10,000 7,200 Ga. Ave. 5,600 3,000 8,600 5,600 3,400 Ft. Totten 9,000 3,900 12,900 6,700 4,000 Total (Shaw Ft. Totten) 34,400 19,000 53,400 35,200 21,400 4

IV. Service Improvement Concepts Off-Peak Periods Increasing service during the peak periods would require a significant capital investment as discussed later in this presentation; Meanwhile, there are four concepts that offer additional service to the U St., Columbia Heights and Ga. Ave. neighborhoods during the offpeak periods only. Service Concepts I. Increase Green Line Service Levels Increase off peak service to 6 minute headways (i.e. 10 trains/hour). II. Service to Greenbelt service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Greenbelt during non-peak periods & weekends. III. Service to Ft. Totten service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Fort Totten during non-peak periods & weekends. IV. Service to Ga. Ave./Petworth service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Ga. Ave./Petworth during non-peak periods & weekends. 5

IV. Service Improvement Concepts Analysis, Off-Peak Service Concepts Capital Cost (millions) Annual Operating Cost (millions) Benefits in addition to more service to the Mid- City Green Line Stations I. Increase Green Line Service Levels $0.00 $10 Increased service to the northern and southern ends of the Green Line as well as the Anacostia waterfront II. III. IV. Service to Greenbelt Service to Ft. Totten Service to Ga. Ave./Petworth $1.00 $5 $1.25 $3 $2.40 $2 Increased service to the northern end of the Green Line and additional Yellow Line connectivity to the Red Line Additional Yellow Line connectivity to the Red Line None Operational Risks None None Mitigated with the capital investment Mitigated with the capital investment The above capital costs are Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) engineering estimates based on conceptual design; the Operations and Maintenance costs similarly are ROM estimates based on a limited operations planning analysis. 6

V. Service Improvement Concepts, Peak Periods Four concepts offer additional service to the U St., Columbia Heights and Ga. Ave. neighborhoods during peak periods only. Service Concepts I. Increase Green Line Service Levels Convert Green Line service to 3 minute headways during the peak periods (comparable to Red Line service). II. Service to Greenbelt peak period service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Greenbelt. III. Service to Ft. Totten peak period service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Fort Totten. IV. Service to Ga. Ave./Petworth peak period service north of Mt. Vernon Square to Ga. Ave./Petworth. 7

V. Service Improvement Concepts Analysis, Peak Periods I. II. III. IV. Service Concepts Increase Green Line Service Levels Service to Greenbelt Service to Ft. Totten Service to Ga. Ave./Petworth Capital Cost (millions) Annual Operating Cost (millions) Benefits in addition to more service to the Mid- City Green Line Stations Operational Risks $350 $10 Increased service to the northern and southern ends of the Green Line as well as the Anacostia waterfront None $200 $5 Increased service to the northern end of the Green Line and additional Yellow Line connectivity to the Red Line None $150 $3 Additional Yellow Line Mitigated with connectivity to the Red Line the capital investment $375 $2 None Mitigated with the capital investment The above capital costs are Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) engineering estimates based on conceptual design; the Operations and Maintenance costs similarly are ROM estimates based on a limited operations planning analysis. 8

VI. Service Improvement Concepts Capital Investments Service Concepts Capital Investments Off Peak Capital Investments Peak I. Increase Green Line Service None Levels II. III. IV. Service to Greenbelt Service to Ft. Totten Service to Ga. Ave./Petworth New signage and maps Revise wayside signals New signage and maps Overhaul wayside signals New signage and maps Purchase 120 Rail cars Upgrades to rail yard(s) Purchase 60 Rail cars Upgrades to rail yard(s) New signage and maps Purchase 30 Rail cars Upgrades to rail yard(s) Cut & Cover Turnback tunnel New signage and maps Purchase 20 Rail cars Mined Turnback tunnel New signage and maps Increases in operating costs are driven by an increase in the number of operator hours, increased electricity usage and increased maintenance of rail vehicles. 9

VII. Additional Option In addition to the above concepts for increased peak service, the Board has been briefed on a concept for a revision to the operation of the Blue Line The revised operation would divert 5 Blue Line trains per peak hour of operation to Greenbelt increasing service to the Mid City Green line stations by 50% This revised operating plan improves Orange and Blue operation because the Rosslyn portal is currently exceeding design train throughput 10

VIII. Summary WMATA was requested to assess to possibility of extending Yellow Line Service to the Mid City Green Line Stations There are a range of concepts that achieve the desired service improvements Feedback received at two community meetings was positive and endorsed extending the Yellow Line to Ft. Totten in the off peak periods 11

Next Steps Obtain Budget Committee and Board approval to include the yellow line extension as a DC Reimbursable Project in the FY07 approved budget. Upon approval of the Board complete all preparation work for the demonstration project from July 1 thru December 2006 Start passenger service by January 2007 for six months. 12

13

14

15

16