DRAG CHARACTERISTICS AND SUITABILITY OF TEE-FOOT LON$ PARACHUSI-ETC (U) NAY 61 c T calzanwo UNCLASSFIED

Similar documents
Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

Development of an Extended Range, Large Caliber, Modular Payload Projectile

Hypersonic Wind Tunnel Test of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule

Case Study: ParaShield

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

Modeling, Structural & CFD Analysis and Optimization of UAV

ARCHIVE COPY DO NOT LOAN. July lift *«*

Keywords: Supersonic Transport, Sonic Boom, Low Boom Demonstration

Coupled Aero-Structural Modelling and Optimisation of Deployable Mars Aero-Decelerators

General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

A FLYING EJECTION SEAT. By R. H. Hollrock* and J. J. Barzda* ABSTRACT

XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative

( 19 ) United States. ( 12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub. No. : US 2018 / A : Tayman ( 43 ) Pub. Date : Oct.

FLIGHT CONTROLS SYSTEM

FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual Supplement

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft

LAYING, HANDLING, SHOP, HUNTING, AND MECHANICAL SWEEP MINES

Subsonic Parachutes for Future Mars Missions

Critical Design Review

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Project NOVA

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

RESEARCH MEMORANDUM. fox the. U. S. Air Force

A high-glide ram-air parachute for 6,000 kg payloads, tested with the FASTWing CL test-vehicle.

The 38M Aerostat: A New System for Surveillance

Primary control surface design for BWB aircraft

Runway Surface Condition Assessment and Reporting. History Behind FAA Friction Level Classifications. Federal Aviation Administration

MK 66 ROCKET MOTOR/HELICOPTER COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM

OUTLINE. Commercial Requirements Insurance Mins Basic Info Systems Limitations Performance Charts Questions

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

F/A-18A/B/C/D Flight Control Computer Software Upgrade

DESIGN FOR SPIN. Leonardo Manfriani Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Keywords: aerodynamic design, rotary balance testing, flight mechanics, spinning

Boeing B-47 Stratojet USER MANUAL. Virtavia B-47E Stratojet DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 2

Contents. BAE SYSTEMS PROPRIETARY Internal UNCLASSIFIED Use Only Unpublished Work Copyright 2013 BAE Systems. All rights reserved.

Venus Entry Options Venus Upper Atmosphere Investigations Science and Technical Interchange Meeting (STIM)

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

FAA Approved Supplemental Airplane Flight Manual

Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers

AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

LOW DENSITY SUPERSONIC DECELERATOR. Kolby Javinar Department of Electrical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT

Adaptation of Existing Fuze Technology to Increase the Capability of the Navy s 2.75-Inch Rocket System

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics

APICAL S-76 BAGGAGE DOOR LIFERAFT KIT

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

CIRRUS AIRPLANE MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

These are supplemental Packing Instruction for the Lobo parachute only. This is not a complete Owners Manual. For a complete manual:

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

EGLIN AERO CLUB C-172 OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Apr Total usable fuel capacity for the aircraft with long range tanks is:

Weight & Balance. Let s Wait & Balance. Chapter Sixteen. Page P1. Excessive Weight and Structural Damage. Center of Gravity

FLIGHT TEST PROGRAM YOUR AIRPLANE HERE FLIGHT TEST PROGRAM YOUR AIRPLANE HERE

Flight Readiness Review

CARENADO COPYRIGHTS. Normal & Emergency Checklist

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

Entry, Descent, and Landing Technology Concept Trade Study for Increasing Payload Mass to the Surface of Mars

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

AGATE (ADVANCED GENERAL AVIATION TRANSPORTATION EXPERIMENT PROGRAM) FULL-SCALE TEST AND DEMONSTRATION REPORT NO: C-GEN (REV N/C)

Preliminary Design of a LSA Aircraft Using Wind Tunnel Tests

Structural Strength of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell Supported by Inflatable Torus against Aerodynamic Force

INVASION II MODERN EQUIPMENT

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

AIRPLANE PERFORMANCES

SPECIAL PURPOSE EQUIPMENT

Catalog Swirl diffuser DAL 358

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A16EA

MULTIDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS OF AN INFLATABLE AND FLEXIBLE VEHICLE IN SUBORBITAL REENRTY GRADUATION PROJECT. Nazlıcan KARACA

DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test. Cessna - 182

Reconstruction of Orion EDU Parachute Inflation Loads

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

JODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF

OPTIMAL MISSION ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING FOR ENGINE AGING AND EMISSIONS

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

Fokker 50 - Landing Gear

AWIATOR Project Perspectives:

FRP Fans: CLUB Series Performance and Technical Information

Operational Liaison Meeting FBW aircraft. Avoiding Tail Strike

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 6 WEIGHT AND BALANCE

A First Principles-based Li-Ion Battery Performance and Life Prediction Model Based on Single Particle Model Equations

Owners Manual. Table of Contents 4.1. INTRODUCTION SPEEDS FOR NORMAL OPERATION CHECKLIST & PROCEDURES 4

RIGGING ROAD ROLLERS C7, FM /TO 13C

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

AIR TRACTOR, INC. OLNEY, TEXAS

ASABOOSTER CD005 Conceptual Design Study for an Asaspace Launch Capability Version 0.04

AGM-114 Hellfire. Version: Basic Interim HF II Longbow Diameter: 7 in 7 in 7 in 7 in Weight: 100 lb 107 lb 100 lb 108 lb

Jay Gundlach AIAA EDUCATION SERIES. Manassas, Virginia. Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief. Blacksburg, Virginia. Aurora Flight Sciences

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Transcription:

-' AD-AIll 718 NAVAL AIR DEVELAPMENT CENTER WARMINSTER PA P/f 20/4 DRAG CHARACTERISTICS AND SUITABILITY OF TEE-FOOT LON$ PARACHUSI-ETC (U) NAY 61 c T calzanwo UNCLASSFIED N

Hil '~132 111122 1111 " ---- 411111_L2513 lii111114 111. MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 163-A

DRAG CHARACTERISTICS AND SUITABILITY OF THREE-FOOT LONG PARACHUTE DECELERATORS Carl T. Calianno Naval Air Development Center j~ Warminster, Pennsylvania 18974 jt~rq.abstract >lir drop and wind tunnel tests were conducted to verify I the stability of sonobuoys with decelerators limited to a total length of three feet. This limitation was established for safety reasons. The existing decelerator systems are configured to a length of 5 to 12 feet, with cross-type canopies varying in area from 1.5 to 3.5 square feet. Sonobuoys are blunt nose right circular cylinders, 4-7/8 inches in diameter, 36 inches long ranging in weight from 12 to 39 pounds. Testing established that suitable stability could be achieved using a three-foot 1. long decelerator. Drag coefficient, opening load, high altitude air descent time and stability data were also determined for three-foot long decelerators. INTRODUCTION Sonobuoys are expendable electro-acoustic sensors which are air deployed from Navy fixed and rotary wing aircraft. The air deployed body is blunt nosed, cylindrically shaped 4-7/8 inches in diameter 36 inches long ranging in weight from 12 to 39 pounds. The center of gravity varies randomly between 13 to 18 inches from the end opposite the decelerator. A Ballistic Coefficient (B), a ratio of weight to effective drag area ratio of 18 + 1.0 pounds per square foot is specified for sonobuoys weighing between 34 to 39 pounds and 12.3 + 1.0 for all other weights. The launch angle of the sonobuoy relative to the airstream varies between fixed and rotary wing aircraft. The fixed wing orientation is down and aft 450 from the horizontal. Rotary wing launches are either vertical straight down or horizontal 900 from the direction of flight. After launch a decelerator system is deployed which must sufficiently -.stabilize the sonobuoy prior to water impact. The stability must be adequate enough so that the electro-acoustic and hydromechanical systems function " normally after water impact. Currently the decelerator systems utilize cross-type parachutes which have canopy areas varying between 1.5 and 3.5 square feet. The length to width ratio of the canopy is 3 to 1. The uninflated length of the decelerator system, i.e., the length of the fully extended uninflated decelerator from the attachment point on the buoy to the tip of the uninflated canopy vary from 5 to 12 feet with no relation to area. Due to a safetyc of flight requirement, a maximum three-foot limitation was placed on the uninflated decelerator total length. - _-TE " 82 03 09 080 1 %AMAR 8 1982 1-417 -- loa

A program of wind tunnel and air drop testing was conducted to verify if the performance and configuration requirements could be met. The effect of close coupling the parachute to the store is of particular interest. Decelerator systems up to 12 feet in length and a variety of canopy areas were tested for comparison. WIND TUNNEL TESTING A test program was conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Lewis Research Center's 10 foot x 10 foot wind tunnel to evaluate decelerator characteristics as a function of total system length. The wind tunnel test model set-up is shown in Figure 1. A full scale model of the sonobuoy was placed in the wind tunnel parallel to the direction of flow. It is fixed to the ceiling by a strut. The parachute is stowed in the aft end of the model and is deployed on command. A captivated windf lap is released into the airstream when a dynamic pressure of 150 pounds per square foot, the wind tunnel maximum, is reached. The windf lap deploys the parachute from its stowage location in the model initiating parachute inflation. The tunnel drive is shut down and a braking system is activated to slow the tunnel. A load cell is used in the model to measure parachute loading only. The initial one second of load cell data is displayed on a high speed visicorder to evaluate opening loading. Load cell data and tunnel conditions are recorded as the tunnel decelerates for further evaluation. The decelerators tested had canopies made of lightweight nylon material predominantly 2.25 ounce/square yard. Ten percent of the canopies had 1.1 ounce/square yard material. The chutes were?)acked in a deployment bag and a line first deployment method was used. Some basic cross-chute configuration details are shown in Figure 1. To achieve higher effective drag area (CdSo) the number of suspension lines was varied from 2 to 3 per parachute panel and evaluated. The total quantity of runs made in the wind tunnel was approximately 100 including a combination of decelerator lengths and canopy area. Since the total decelerator length requirement is a unique design constraint a more conventional design parameter, suspension line length/canopy effective diameter (Ls/Do), is introduced at this time and will be included in the data. Examples of recorded opening load data are shown in Figures 2 and 3 for system total lengths equal to three feet and greater than three feet respectively. These curves represent some of the more severe loading 2 measured. There appeared to be no clear cut trend between snatch load and opening load factor, based as average load, related to length. About 5 percent of the snatch loads observed were 2 to 3 times the average load and appeared not to be related to decelerator length. The other snatch loads were less than the average load measured. The opening load factor varied between 1.3 and 1.5 and it also appeared to be independent of length. Although line first deployments were used in every test it seems that these systems are sensitive to packing technique, which may account for some of the high snatch loading. The opening load factor measured should 1-418

U. 04 LU Ugn oic- S U.. 0 0 0( z xz 0D z w 4c CA. -JL1 x zz ~- LXgLa - Iib kki -- a a. Cf"PC 1-41.9 Mll ->i

300. ]2 200 ICAIOPY REA=1. FT 3 SSPEN TON oo -'m ES/PAtI,, 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 TIME (SEC) 400.0. ~, 300. 0 200 CA OPY4EA3.5 FT2 Ls o=0.8-100 2 S SPENPION?too.. Lf ES/PANEL 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 TIME (SEC) 400 300 I CANOPY ARJEA:5. FT 2 200 Ls/D 60.6 ' SuPENSON 0 I L I EIS/PAN L 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 TIME (SEC) DECELERATOR INFLATION EVENT SYSTEM LENGTH= 3 FEET FIGURE 2 1-420

r U' I I.' 4001-3 0 0 1,A N O P A R E A z 1.7 F T 2!~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u H i!upsioin 4. I200 o I I l!:,.inesi ANEL I, 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 I l TIME (SEC) 1 400 300 - ; ' 'A!-. " "200 tano Y AREA=3.5 100, 2 SUSPENSION,"" 100. LINES/PANEL.0.1 612 0.3 0.4 o.5 0.6 or 0. T IME (SEC) I DECELERATOR INFLATION EVENT SYSTEM LENGTH) 3 FEET I FIGURE 3

influence design practices if these types of chutes are used. Drag Coefficient (Cd) data was then computed based on drag measured at Equilibrium Velocity (V ) for the specified Ballistic Coefficient. Figure 4 shows the relationship Cetween cross chute C d and L / DOB area and number of suspension lines. Figure 5, which applies to the three-foot maximum decelerator length requirement, shows how Cd varies as a function of decelerator area and number of suspension lines per panel. The L /D 0 relationship is also shown to comply with popular design practices. It was noted after reviewing all data that the weight of the material has no appreciable effect on Cd; therefore it was not included in Figures 4 and 5. HIGH ALTITUDE TESTING A series of high altitude air drop tests from 25,000 feet was conducted at NASA Wallops Flight Center to determine how air descent time is related to the sonobuoy weight to effective drag area ratio. A variety of buoy weights * and weight to effective drag area ratios were tested. The altitude of the * drop aircraft and the altitude/time history of the buoy air descent was determined by radar. Ten samples of each configuration was tested and the average time for that sample was used for Cd computation. A drag coefficient was computed based on air descent time, altitude, decelerator size and sonobuoy weight by varying the drag coefficient in a computer program until the average time measured was achieved. Figure 6 shows a comparison of the Cd computed based on air descent time and the Cd measured in the wind tunnel for the same configuration. All systems met the three-foot maximum length decelerator requirement. This data shows that for a given sonobuoy weight, as the ballistic coefficient is reduced, the sonobuoy is more stable. This is shown by the air descent time which compares more favorably with a predicted time based on wind tunnel measured drag coefficient. LOW ALTITUDE TEST A series of air drop tests were conducted at the Naval Air Development Center Field Station, Key West, Florida. The purpose was to determine if 4 the sonobucy could be adequately stabilized prior to water impact when launched from low altitude. The launch points used are shown on Table 1. TABLE I LOW ALTITUDE TEST POINTS Altitude (Feet) Airspeed (KIAS) 1,500 300 500 350 200 300 150 200 1-422

00 IL I IA 40 xz IL WWU 01 0 W 4cU 09 m a i 0_ (4 'IAIA CAC 40 in 1-423

0 Id I z cl n 0- z z. A w Lu., en uu. 4AA 0 0 00 Uaa u. 0 U P,- IkI... 0, "'il- > - w Cl a- Zl * * U 0 W I-n &A_ 0 _ LI 1-424

I'!M lc 00 Ob M 4 C4 4 4,. UU 4A 0 a Wa 1- I z... ot' W CS > 00 -= II-. M 0u 0 a LIM E-mU a 00-4 4A LU U In- -41-425

The time for store stabilization is minimal at the lower test altitudes. The stability at water entry must be adequate enough so the sonobuoy internal components could function after impact. Sonobuoys ranging in weight from 14 to 39 pounds were dropped from each launch point. The sample size in all cases was five. The results of the tests showed that decelerators sized within the established constraints could provide sufficient stability. The shallowest water entry angle that the buoys were exposed to was 350 relative to the water surface. The stability was such that the sonobuoy body oscillations about the trajectory angle varied by no more than +50. The sonobuoy in-water functioning was not affected. CONCLUSION Blunt nose stores ranging in weight from 12 to 39 pounds can be adequately stabilized with a cross-type parachute sized to the ballistic coefficient and total length requirements outlined above. Useful decelerator design information is compiled herein which would have a variety of applications. 1-426