vision42

Similar documents
Bus Congestion on the West Side of Manhattan. 6/6/14 Manha*an Community Baord 4 1

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Connect. Thrive. Develop. KC Streetcar Riverfront Extension & Multi-Modal Feasibility Study

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Needs and Community Characteristics

Central Park Drives Traffic Management Overview

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

MTA Capital and Planning Review

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Current Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Transit System Joint Occupancy-Joint Use

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Will the L Train Shutdown be a Missed Opportunity or Model for the Future?

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

To Infill or Not to Infill?

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Why Regional Rail Should Be a Top Transportation Priority for New York City

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

Garrett Hill Master Plan

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Image from:

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

What is the Connector?

Sequence, Synergy, and Subsidy

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Troost Corridor Transit Study

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

T-THIRD PHASE 3 CONCEPT STUDY C: DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF CONCEPT ALIGNMENTS D: CONSTRUCTABILITY ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATES (HNTB CONSULTANTS)

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

West Broadway Transit Study. Minnesota APA Conference Charles Carlson, Metro Transit Adele Hall, SRF Consulting September 24, 2015

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Reducing Vehicle Use in Megacities Johanna Partin, N. America Regional Director Transportation and Energy Conference August 8, 2013

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

APTA Rail Conference 2017 Mark L. Dorn Design Manager for Oklahoma City MAPS 3 Modern Streetcar Jacobs/AECOM Team

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

AUTONOMOUS TRANSPORT. Investment Opportunity Brief

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The valet operation, service area, and drop-off lanes provided will be adequate Page i

SANDAG 3D Visualization Howard Blackson 6:15. Sub Area A Coalition Massing/Phasing - Mike Labarre 6:30

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Metra Milwaukee District West Line Transit-Friendly Development Plan

Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Case Study: City of San Diego

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

PORTLAND STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED TRANSIT

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP)

Perry City 1200 West Walking/ Biking Path Project Type Pedestrian/ Bike

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Transcription:

vision42 www.vision42.org

vision42 auto-free light rail boulevard for 42nd Street Roxanne Warren, AIA, Chair George Haikalis, ASCE, Co-Chair Institute for Rational Urban Mobility,Inc. www.vision42.org

a 2½-mile low-floor light rail line, river-to-river in 21 minutes with vehicles arriving every 3½ minutes in peak hours linking transit hubs and many of NY s major destinations

a fully landscaped walking environment for Manhattan s center eliminating traffic allows space for cafés and other amenities, and provides significant new open space in this park-deprived area of town

half a million people arrive daily at 42nd Street s major transit hubs

some 60 percent of the street space is allocated to motorists

demand for better surface transit and pedestrian space grows with every new development

the $2.4 billion #7 subway extension will not reach the waterfronts so there will be no rail transit serving either the ferries, the UN, or the developments occurring along the waterfronts

light rail will reach the new development planned at the rivers, stopping at every avenue and transit line along the way

light rail could ultimately be extended to create a continuous two-way 42nd/ 34th Street loop, to link all major Midtown transit hubs and ferries with the Javits Center, the United Nations, important tourism venues, and new developments planned along both rivers

low floors allow the system to perform almost like a moving walkway

light rail auto-free streets in the U.S. include those in Houston, Dallas, San Diego, Sacramento, Portland and Minneapolis

light rail auto-free streets are thriving, with high-end shops, in Zürich, Amsterdam, Gothenburg, Bremen, Kassel and Montpellier

New Jersey Transit chose light rail over buses for its Hudson Bergen line for the greater dependability of its dedicated right-of-way

which avoids this problem

Why Light Rail rather than Bus Rapid Transit for the 42nd Street corridor? Limited-stop service is not practical on a crosstown route because each stop is an important transfer point. Light Rail has additional key advantages: it has three times the capacity it has a smoother, more appealing ride, and thus it has a track record of attracting all income levels the rails are a self-enforcing path, resulting in more dependable trip times its permanence reinforces new development

vision42 TECHNICAL STUDIES ECONOMIC TRAFFIC COST www.vision42.org

Travel Time Savings Using LRT from Grand Central Terminal

Travel Time Savings Using LRT from Port Authority Bus Terminal

vision42 Produces a Big Gain for Property Owners on 42nd Street Major gains in office property values: $1.0 billion for 398 high-value properties, an average increase of $188/sf of lot area (4%).

Property values in the vision42 corridor Office $25 billion (2006 data) Residential 32 billion (2010 data, including not-yet-built properties at Hudson Yards and Con Ed site) Total $57 billion

vision42 Produces Even Bigger Gains for Owners of Residential Property Office $1.0 billion (+4% of full value) Residential 2.6 billion (+8% of full value) Total $3.6 billion

Projected Increase in Pedestrian Trips by Block Segment Projected gains in retail and restaurant sales are based on an average increase of 35 percent.

Traffic Level of Service 2010, PM, No Build..compiled from the data of 3 major environmental impact studies

mitigation methods include changes in traffic signals, traffic lane allocation, and parking regulations Traffic Level of Service 2010, PM, Build Mitigated

Freight Entrances between 3rd and 8th Aves TaxLots LRT Alignment <all other values> FRGT_TYPE Storefront DOOR TRUCK GARAGE DRIVE most large office buildings have their freight entrances on 41st or 43rd St., since ground floor rents on 42nd St. are too high for this function

Traffic Study Inventoried Existing Delivery Truck Parking Locations, 3rd to 8th Avenues At the peak hours of usage for each curb, the curb feet-minutes currently occupied by delivery trucks were carefully observed and compared with the curb space available.

Adequate Space for Delivery Truck Parking Locations Would be Reserved on the Avenues With some changes in parking regulations, sufficient space for delivery trucks can be provided by reserving curb space on adjacent avenues.

the three Business Improvement Districts that cover much of the 42nd St. corridor could handle maintenance and security of the pedestrian street the BIDs have expressed openness to extending their areas of responsibility

streetcars ran for decades over the underground utilities, until 1946

Two-Year Construction Schedule Minimum Utility Relocation six months per block only utilities interfering with rail construction will be relocated within one phase of digging per block, utility relocation, rail construction, then landscaping will follow each other

at the outset, the street becomes auto-free throughout construction, the sidewalks remain untouched, and bus service is maintained

upon completion of the utilities and track work in the center, bus service will move to the center, running over the rails landscaping will then proceed

when all segments are complete, the light rail service can begin

Estimate of Capital Costs for Alternative LRT Options Cost figures are in 2007 dollars. Component catenary system, self-powered LRT, self-powered LRT, full utility replcmt full utility replcmt min. utility work Utility Relocation $364.01 M $364.01 M $215.27 M All Other Work 204.53 M 218.30 M 195.98 M Net Capital Cost $568.54 M $582.31 M $411.25 M Depending upon the chosen option, the annual debt service requirement will range from $36.1 million to $51.1 million.

Annual Economic Benefits and Costs Travel Time Savings $152.0 M Office rent & occupancy increases $181.1 M Accident reduction savings $ 1.2 M LRT operational savings $ 0.1 M Increased Business Revenues Restaurant/Retail $408.4 M Hotels $ 5.7 M Theaters $ 14.3 M Increased Worker Earnings $ 26.2 M Total Benefits $789.0 M Increased Costs of Traffic diversion $ 83.8 M Increased Costs of deliveries $ 0.3 M Total Costs $ 84.1 M Net Gain $ 704.9 M

Annual Economic and Fiscal Benefits Net Economic Gains $704.9 M Fiscal Gains NYC Property Tax $ 55.1 M Other NYC Taxes $ 54.1 M NYS Taxes $ 66.3 M Total $175.5 M Total Economic & Fiscal Gains $880.3 M

FINANCING vision42 Capital Costs estimated at $411.3 to $582.3 million (2007 USD) Annual Debt Service $36.1 to $51.1 million The NYC tax gain of $55.1 M exceeds the required annual debt service, which can be recouped by one of two basic mechanisms, either: Tax Increment Financing (TIF), or creating a Transit Benefit Improvement District (TID)

interfacing with ferry terminals at both rivers and in the process, making ferry travel more attractive and ferry operations more efficient

connecting massive residential towers and theaters to Midtown s center

pedestrians at Times Square will greatly benefit from better transit access

linking major terminals to Midtown s east and west extremities

creating a fittingly ceremonial approach to the United Nations