APPENDIX I. Traffic Impact Analysis

Similar documents
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS M. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC

4.4 Transportation and Circulation

4.1 Traffic, Circulation, and Parking

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

2.4 Build Alternatives

TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. TRAFFIC / TRANSPORTATION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS D. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 1. INTRODUCTION

Appendix Q Traffic Study

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY (ASSISTED LIVING) AND 8 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 3814 LENAWEE AVENUE CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Updated Off-street Parking Analysis Memorandum

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR A PROPOSED CHICK - FIL - A RESTAURANT. Located at 8521 Sepulveda Boulevard. City of Los Angeles

We re using a giant machine to dig tunnels for trains.

APPENDIX TR-1 PARKING AND QUEUING ASSESSMENT

Impacts to street segments were analyzed based on procedures detailed in the Highway Capacity Manual for levels of service related to roadways.

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis J. Traffic, Access, and Parking

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis, Asphalt Plant No. 1 Replacement and Modernization

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

4.7 Construction Surface Transportation

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

Section 3.12 Traffic and Transportation

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Transportation Characteristics

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SETTING

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

4.11 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

4.7 Construction Surface Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development. Traffic Impact Analysis

3.8 TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

L. KASSAN, P.E. Consulting Traffic Engineer

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

YULA Boys High School Expansion

3.14 Parks and Community Facilities

Traffic Engineering Study

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The valet operation, service area, and drop-off lanes provided will be adequate Page i

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

MAYWOOD FLORENCE CHESTERFIELD SQUARE WINDSOR HILLS CULVER CITY. MARINA del REY VENICE C1

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

Appendix F: Traffic Impact Analysis

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Transcription:

APPENDIX I Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR ASSISTED LIVING AND SKILLED NURSING FACILITY Located at 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard In the City of Los Angeles Prepared by: Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. 27201 Tourney Road # 206 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 799 8423 July 2008

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project being analyzed in this traffic impact study is an assisted living and skilled nursing facility located at 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard. The project is located on the east side of La Cienega Boulevard south of Olympic Boulevard in the City of Los Angeles, as shown in the following aerial photograph. The project consists of a 22-unit skilled nursing facility and a 153-unit (183 beds) senior assisted living facility. On-site parking will be provided in a two level subterranean parking structure with approximately 218 parking spaces. Access to the parking garage is provided by one driveway serving the skilled nursing facility and a circular driveway serving the senior assisted living facility. The project site is currently occupied with a 36 unit apartment building. The existing building will be removed as part of the development project. It is estimated that the project will generate approximately 531 daily trips, 27 morning peak hour trips and 44 afternoon peak hour trips. After accounting for the removal of the apartment building, the net change in traffic generated by the site is expected to be an increase of 289 daily trips, 8 morning trips and 22 afternoon trips. To be conservative, no trip credits were taken for commercial uses that were recently removed from the site. The focus of this traffic study is to evaluate the potential traffic impact created by the change in land use. The study intersections were determined based on the expected travel routes to and from the site and the estimated amount of traffic volume that would have the potential to create significant traffic impacts at nearby intersections. Intersections with low volumes of project traffic were not included in this analysis. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page i July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Highway Dedications and Street Standards As part of the project application process, the City of Los Angeles will review the adjacent street standards for La Cienega Boulevard and may require additional street dedications and improvements. Below are the adjacent streets standards and current conditions. La Cienega Boulevard is designated a major highway class II. The standard for a major highway class II is 104 feet of right-of-way consisting of an 80 foot wide street with two 12 foot sidewalks. The dedication and street improvement standards are therefore 52 feet of right-of-way with a 40 foot wide street and 12 foot sidewalks for each half-street. A review of the city files shows that La Cienega Boulevard is currently developed with a total right-of-way of 100 feet (50 feet each half). The street is developed to approximately 70 feet in width consisting of two 35-foot half streets. The east sidewalk is 15 feet in width. There may be exceptions to the highway standards and criteria contained in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and the City's Standard Street Dimensions as listed above when environmental issues, planning practices and community desires, among other factors, warrant alternate standards. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page ii July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction 1 Chapter 2 - Project Description 4 Chapter 3 - Environmental Setting 6 Land Use 6 Transportation Network 6 Transit Information 7 Chapter 4 - Project Traffic 9 Traffic Generation 9 Distribution of Trip Origins and Destinations 11 Assignment of Project Traffic Volume to Area Streets 11 Chapter 5 - Traffic Conditions Analysis 16 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions 16 Analysis of Future Traffic Conditions 22 Impacts on Regional Transportation System 35 Chapter 6 - Mitigation Measures 36 Appendix A Site Plan Appendix B Community Plan Land Use Appendix C Circulation Maps, Street Standards & Street Plans Appendix D Transit Routes Appendix E Traffic Volume Data Appendix F Level of Service Worksheets 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page iv July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Table of Contents

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Location... 3 Figure 2 - Project Site Plan... 5 Figure 3 - Study Intersections Characteristics... 8 Figure 4 - Project Traffic Distribution... 12 Figure 5 - Project Traffic Assignment Percentages... 13 Figure 6 - Project Traffic Volume - AM Peak Hour... 14 Figure 7 - Project Traffic Volume - PM Peak Hour... 15 Figure 8 - Existing Traffic Volume - AM Peak Hour... 17 Figure 9 - Existing Traffic Volume - PM Peak Hour... 18 Figure 10 - Related Projects Location Map... 28 Figure 11 - Future Traffic Volume (Without Project) - AM Peak Hour... 29 Figure 12 - Future Traffic Volume (Without Project) - PM Peak Hour... 30 Figure 13 - Future Traffic Volume (With Project) - AM Peak Hour... 33 Figure 14 - Future Traffic Volume (With Project) - PM Peak Hour... 34 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page v July 2008 Traffic Impact Study List of Figures

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. TABLES Table 1 - Project Trip Generation Rates... 10 Table 2 - Project Traffic Generation... 10 Table 3 - Level of Service Definitions... 20 Table 4 - Existing Traffic Conditions Summary... 21 Table 5 - Related Projects Descriptions... 23 Table 6 - Related Projects Trip Generation... 26 Table 7 - Future Traffic Conditions Without Project... 31 Table 8 - Future Traffic Conditions With Project... 32 Table 9 - Future Traffic Conditions With Project Mitigation... 37 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page vi July 2008 Traffic Impact Study List of Tables

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION An evaluation of the potential traffic impacts created by the proposed project has been conducted as part of the project s environmental review. This traffic study was prepared using procedures adopted by the City of Los Angeles to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project. The potential traffic impact of the proposed development has been evaluated using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) method. The CMA analysis method quantifies the operating conditions of an intersection using a ratio of peak hour traffic volume to intersection capacity. The amount of new traffic added to an intersection by the proposed project determines the significance of the project traffic impact. The proposed project is located on the east side of La Cienega Boulevard between Olympic Boulevard and Whitworth Drive as shown on Figure 1. Three intersections have been selected for the project s traffic impact analysis. These intersections are: 1. Olympic Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard; 2. Whitworth Drive and La Cienega Boulevard; and 3. Pico Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 1 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Introduction

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. The analysis of traffic flow has been conducted for present conditions and for future conditions. The future analysis documents traffic conditions with the proposed project and other potential land development projects in the study area. Pursuant to the City of Los Angeles traffic impact guidelines, the following steps have been taken to develop the future traffic volume estimate: (a) Existing traffic + ambient growth to 2010 study year (added 1% per year); (b) Traffic in (a) + other development related projects (without project scenario); (c) Traffic in (b) with the proposed project traffic (with project scenario); (d) Traffic in (c) + traffic mitigation, if necessary. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 2 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Introduction

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project being proposed by the applicant is the construction of a skilled nursing facility of 22-units and an assisted living facility with 183 beds. Parking will be provided in a two level subterranean parking garage. The parking will consist of approximately 110 standard parking spaces, 4 handicapped spaces, and 104 compact spaces for a total of 218 spaces. Figure 2 shows the proposed 1 st floor plan which illustrates driveway locations and access to the parking and project site plan. Project access to the parking is provided by three driveways. The southerly driveway is an entry only driveway which serves the lobby area for the assisted living facility. Valet service and delivery vehicles will be served by this onsite motor court. The middle driveway provides an entry/exit for the parking garage and an exit for the motor court. The northerly driveway also provides an entry/exit to the parking garage. Floor plans for the entire project and garage parking layouts are provided in Appendix A. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 4 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Project Description

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Land Use The project is located in the Wilshire community plan area. The predominant land uses in the community plan area are single family and multi-family residential. The majority of commercial uses are situated along the major highways, including portions of Beverly Boulevard, Fairfax Avenue, 3 rd Street, Pico Boulevard, Wilshire Boulevard, Olympic Boulevard, Melrose Avenue, La Cienega Boulevard, La Brea Avenue, Western Avenue and Vermont Avenue. The land uses in the vicinity of the project site are commercial along La Cienega Boulevard and multi-family to the west and east. The land uses within the City of Los Angeles Wilshire plan area are approximately 2,078 acres (23.2%) single family, 2,788 acres (31.1%) multiple family, 1,222 acres (13.6%) commercial, 40 acres (0.4%) industrial, 412 acres (4.3%) open space/public facilities and 2,422 acres (27%) streets. The community land use summary table and land use map for the study area are provided in Appendix B. The streets within the study area are under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. A map illustrating the community plan highway designations, Los Angeles street standards and street layout plans are included in Appendix C of this report. Transportation Network The Santa Monica Freeway (Interstate 10) is located approximately 1.5 miles to the south of the project site. This east-west freeway provides 4 mixed-flow lanes in each direction in the vicinity of La Cienega Boulevard. Full access to the freeway is provided at Robertson Boulevard and at La Cienega Boulevard. The San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405) is located approximately 3 3/4 miles to the west of the project site. This north-south freeway provides 4-5 mixed-flow lanes in each direction in the vicinity of 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 6 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Environmental Setting

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Olympic Boulevard. Partial access to the freeway is provided at Pico Boulevard and at Olympic Boulevard. The Hollywood Freeway (U.S. Highway 101) is located approximately 5 miles to the east of the project site. This north-south freeway provides five mixed-flow lanes in each direction in the vicinity of Beverly Boulevard/Silver Lake Boulevard. La Cienega Boulevard is a north-south major highway constructed to a 70-foot width in the vicinity of the project site providing three lanes in each direction during peak hours (7-9am and 4-7pm) On-street parking is metered (1 and 2 hours) during the off peak time from 9 am to 4 pm along some segments of La Cienega Boulevard. Pico Boulevard is an east-west major highway constructed to a 70-foot width in the study area providing two lanes in each direction with a third lane westbound during the morning peak period (7-9am). On-street parking is metered during the off peak time from 9 am to 6 pm. Whitworth Drive is designated a local street east of La Cienega Boulevard and a collector street west of La Cienega Boulevard. Whitworth Drive provides one lane in each direction and on-street parking. Olympic Boulevard is an east-west major highway with two lanes in each direction with a third lane provided during both the morning and afternoon peak periods (7-9am and 3-7pm). On-street metered parking is provided during off-peak periods. In addition to collecting traffic volume data at the study intersections, field surveys were conducted to determine the roadway and intersection geometry and traffic controls (i.e., stop signs and traffic signals). Figure 3 illustrates the study locations, type of intersection traffic control and lane configurations. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 7 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Environmental Setting

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Transit Information Public transportation in the study area is provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and Santa Monica s Big Blue Bus. Metro provides route 28 and 728 rapid service along Olympic Boulevard, and routes 105 and 705 rapid service along La Cienega Boulevard. Santa Monica lines include 5, 7, and 13 along Pico Boulevard though the study area. Transit maps are illustrated in Appendix D. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 8 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Environmental Setting

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC This chapter describes the procedures for estimating the potential traffic volume generated by the project and its directional orientation. Traffic Generation Traffic-generating characteristics of uses associated with the project have been surveyed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The results of these traffic generation studies have been published in a handbook titled Trip Generation,7 th Edition. This publication of traffic generation data is the industry standard for estimating traffic generation for different land uses and is used when analyzing traffic impacts. The ITE studies show that the trip-making characteristics of the proposed uses generate peak hour traffic as shown by the average traffic generation rates contained in Table 1. It is estimated that the project will generate approximately 531 daily trips, 27 morning peak hour trips and 44 afternoon peak hour trips. After accounting for the removal of the apartment building, the net change in traffic generated by the site is expected to be an increase of 289 daily trips, 8 morning trips and 22 afternoon trips. The following analysis is conservative because traffic credits have not been taken for the commercial retail uses previously on the site: 4,464 square feet of retail uses and 9,581 square feet of automotive care facility. It is estimated those uses would have generated 42 morning peak hour trips and 66 afternoon peak hour trips using the ITE trips generation rates, respectively. A net negative trip generation would result if the prior commercial uses were accounted for. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Daily Total In Out Total In Out Apartments (per unit) 220 6.72 0.51 0.10 0.41 0.62 0.40 0.22 Assisted Living (per bed) 254 2.66 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.22 0.10 0.12 Skilled Nursing (per unit) 253 2.02 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.17 0.09 0.08 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 10 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Project Traffic

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 2 Estimated Project Traffic Generation Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proposed Land Use Traffic Total In Out Total In Out 183 bed Assisted Living 487 26 17 9 40 18 22 22 unit Skilled Nursing 44 1 1 0 4 2 2 531 27 18 9 44 20 24 Existing Land Use 36 Apartments - 242-19 - 4-15 - 22-14 - 8 Net Project Trips 289 8 14-6 22 6 16 Distribution of Trip Origins and Destinations The primary factor affecting the distribution of the traffic flow is the location of the current population, residents and patrons of the uses which would generate trip origins and destinations. Figure 4 illustrates the estimated project traffic distribution percentages. Assignment of project traffic volume to surrounding streets Traffic to and from the project site has been assigned to the most direct and reasonable routes considering the project driveway location and surrounding street system. Percentages of the traffic flows are illustrated in Figure 5. The hourly traffic volume at each study intersection was calculated by multiplying the assigned intersection percentages as shown in Figure 5 to the net traffic generation estimates in Table 2. The resulting peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6 for the morning and Figure 7 for the afternoon peak hours. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 11 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Project Traffic

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 5 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data used in the following peak hour intersectional analysis were based on traffic counts conducted by The Traffic Solution, an independent traffic data collection company. The AM and PM peak period counts were conducted manually from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Traffic counts were conducted by counting the number of vehicles at each of the 3 study intersections making each movement. The peak hour volume for each intersection was then determined by finding the four highest consecutive 15-minute volumes for all movements. Existing peak hour traffic volume at each study intersection is illustrated in Figure 8 for the morning rush hour and Figure 9 for the afternoon rush hour. Data collection worksheets for the peak hour counts are contained in Appendix E. Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions The traffic conditions analysis was conducted using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) method. All study intersections were evaluated using this methodology pursuant to the criteria established by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. The peak hour traffic counts were used along with current intersection geometrics and traffic controls to determine the intersection s operating condition. The CMA procedure uses a ratio of the traffic volume to the capacity of an intersection. The highest combinations of conflicting traffic volume (V) at an intersection are divided by the intersection capacity value. Intersection capacity (C) represents the maximum volume of vehicles which has a reasonable expectation of passing through an intersection in one hour under typical traffic flow conditions. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 16 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. The CMA procedure uses a ratio of the traffic volume to the capacity of an intersection. This volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio defines the proportion of an hour necessary to accommodate all the traffic moving through the intersection assuming all approaches were operating at full capacity. V/C ratios provide an ideal means for quantifying intersection operating characteristics. For example, if an intersection has a CMA value of 0.70, the intersection is operating at 70% capacity with 30% unused capacity. Once the volume-to-capacity ratio has been calculated, operating characteristics are assigned a level of service grade (A through F) to estimate the level of congestion and stability of the traffic flow. The term "Level of Service" (LOS) is used by traffic engineers to describe the quality of traffic flow. Definitions of the LOS grades are shown in Table 3. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 19 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. LOS (V/C) Ratio Table 3 Level of Service Definitions Operating Conditions A 0.000 0.600 At LOS A, there are no cycles that are fully loaded, and few are even close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically, the approach appears quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B >0.600 0.700 LOS B represents stable operation. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted with platoons of vehicles. C >0.700 0.800 In LOS C stable operation continues. Full signal cycle loading is still intermittent, but more frequent. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication, and back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. D >0.800 0.900 LOS D encompasses a zone of increasing restriction, approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive back-ups. E >0.900 1.000 LOS E represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C = 1.00) there may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection and delays may be great (up to several signal cycles). F >1.000 LOS F represents jammed conditions. Back-ups from location downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. V/C values are highly variable, because full utilization of the approach may be prevented by outside conditions. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 20 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. By applying these procedures to the intersection data, the CMA values and the corresponding Levels of Service (LOS) for existing traffic conditions were determined for each intersection. The LOS values are summarized in Table 4. Supporting capacity worksheets are contained in Appendix F of this report. Table 4 Level of Service for Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Intersection CMA LOS CMA LOS 1. La Cienega Blvd. & Olympic Blvd. 0.869 D 0.817 D 2. La Cienega Blvd. & Whitworth Dr. 0.532 A 0.588 A 3. La Cienega Blvd. & Pico Blvd. 0.997 E 0.967 E 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 21 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Analysis of Future Traffic Conditions Future traffic volume projections have been developed to analyze the traffic conditions after completion of other planned land developments including the proposed project. Pursuant to the City of Los Angeles traffic impact guidelines, the following steps have been taken to develop the future traffic volume estimate: (a) Existing traffic plus ambient growth (1 percent per year) to 2010 study year; (b) Traffic in (a) plus related projects (without project scenario); (c) Traffic in (b) with the proposed project traffic (with project scenario); (d) Traffic in (c) plus traffic mitigation, if necessary. The future cumulative analysis includes other development projects located within the study area that are either under construction or planned. As part of this analysis, development information was obtained from the City of Los Angles Department of Transportation and the City of Beverly Hills. Development lists were reviewed to identify those projects that could produce additional traffic at the study intersections by the future study year 2010. It should be noted that this project, or any actions taken by the City regarding this project, does not have a direct bearing on these other proposed related projects. The locations of the 50 related projects are shown in Figure 10, with their descriptions provided in Table 5. To evaluate future traffic conditions with the related projects, estimates of the peak hour trips generated by the other developments were developed. The potential net increase in traffic from the related projects is provided in Table 6. The traffic impact of traffic volume increases has been calculated by adding the existing traffic volume, the ambient growth factor and traffic from other development projects. Future cumulative without project peak hour traffic volume estimates are shown in Figures 11 and 12 for the morning and afternoon, respectively. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 22 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 5 Related Projects Descriptions No. Project Size Location 1 Hotel 228 rooms 202-204 N. Beverly Drive Condominiums 37 units specialty retail 791 s.f. Restaurant 2,230 s.f. 2 Office 41,500 s.f. 265 N. Beverly Drive 3 Church 9,325 s.f. 432 S. Beverly Drive 4 Condominiums 88 units 9355-9373 Wilshire Bd. shopping center 40,000 s.f. 5 automotive 39,700 s.f. 9001 Olympic Bd. 6 Office 19,000 s.f. 8536 Wilshire Bd. 7 mixed-use 41,500 s.f. 8600 Wilshire Bd. 8 Apartments 37 units 8601 Wilshire Bd. 9 medical office 85,000 s.f. 8767 Wilshire Bd. 10 Condominiums 16 units 216 N. Arnaz Drive 11 congregate care 80 units 201 N. Crescent Drive 12 Condominiums 11 units 155 N. Hamilton Drive 13 Condominiums 11 units 140 S. Oakhurst Drive 14 Condominiums 23 units 261 Reeves Drive 15 apartment 1 unit 428 Smithwood Drive 16 Condominiums 3 units 115 N. Swall Drive 17 Retail 7,872 sf 1070 La Cienega Bd. Office 16,200 sf 18 Condominiums 53 units 9200 Wilshire Bd. Retail 8,400 sf restaurant 5,600 sf 19 day care 84 students 1062 Robertson Bd. private school K-8 216 students 20 condominiums 65 units Third St. & La Cienega Bd. assisted living 181 units retail less theaters 20,000 sf 21 synagogue 9,000 sf 9090 Olympic Bd. private school 10,000 sf 22 screening room 66 seats 150 E. Camino Drive 23 retail/office 14,750 sf 8800 Burton Way 24 office to medical 14,000 sf 50 N. La Cienega Bd. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 23 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 5 (cont d) Related Projects Descriptions No. Project Size Location 25 Condominiums 60 units 9590 Wilshire Bd. commercial 12,000 sf 26 Condominiums 25 units 317 Elm Drive removed 6 units 27 Condominiums 27 units 225 S. Hamilton Drive removed 14 units 28 Condominiums 16 units 156 N. La Peer Drive removed 6 units 29 Condominiums 5 units 1488 S Rexfird Dr. 30 Condominiums 4 units 918 S Wooster St. 31 Condominiums 4 units 924 S Sherbourne Dr. 32 Condominiums 5 units 1069 S Sherbourne Dr. 33 Condominiums 16 units 908 S Shenandoah St. 34 Condominiums 15 units 1237 S Holt Ave. 35 Apartments 68 units 375 La Cienega Boulevard 36 Condominiums 140 units 300 Wetherly Drive 37 Apartments 39 units 8525 Pico Boulevard Shopping Center 11,327 sf 38 private school 140 students 329 La Cienega Boulevard 231 Beverly Drive 39 Retail 29,060 sf 6411 Wilshire Bl Fast Food 2,500 sf Apartments 130 apts 40 Apt Addition 300 apts 6300 W 3rd St 41 LACMA 652 S Ogden 42 Condominiums 62 units 100 N La Cienega Bl Apartments 177 apts High turn Res. 38,739 sf Retail 316,279 sf 43 Apartments 60 units 5863 3rd Street Retail 5,350 sf 44 Private School 170 Students 310 N Huntley Dr 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 24 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 5 (cont d) Related Projects Descriptions No. Project Size Location 45 Chabad 423 students 9001-9041 Pico Boulevard 9,615 retail 31 apts 46 Office 7 ksf 5900 W Wilshire Bl High turn Res. 3.5 ksf restaurant 15.613 ksf 47 Office 28.8 ksf 725 S Curson Av High turn Res. 800 sf 48 Museum 8,375 sf 7600 Beverly Blvd 49 Apartments 175 units 5500 Wilshire Boulevard 50 Apartments 288 units 5600 Wilshire Boulevard 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 25 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 6 Estimated Traffic Generation for Other Projects Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hours No. Project Traffic In Out Total In Out Total 1 Hotel 2,151 86 57 143 141 97 238 2 Office 457 56 8 64 10 51 61 3 Church 85 4 3 7 3 3 6 4 Condominiums 2,289 6 33 39 79 76 155 5 automotive 1,324 60 21 81 41 64 105 6 Office 274 34 5 39 6 31 37 7 mixed-use 290 10 9 19 12 16 28 8 Apartments 249 4 15 19 15 8 23 9 medical office 1,535 108 34 142 55 110 165 10 Condominiums 94 1 6 7 6 3 9 11 congregate care 162 3 2 5 7 6 13 12 Condominiums 64 1 4 5 4 2 6 13 Condominiums 64 1 4 5 4 2 6 14 Condominiums 135 2 9 11 8 4 12 15 apartment 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Condominiums 18 0 1 1 1 1 2 17 retail/office 516 27 6 33 18 35 53 18 Condominiums 1,384 43 54 97 71 49 120 19 day care 751 215 117 332 164 79 243 20 condominiums 1,721 34 41 75 77 72 149 21 synagogue 96 67 54 121 7 8 15 22 screening room 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 23 retail/office 633 9 6 15 27 29 56 24 office to medical 506 27 8 35 14 38 52 25 Condominiums 867 12 27 39 43 33 76 26 Condominiums 111 1 7 8 7 3 10 27 Condominiums 76 1 5 6 5 2 7 28 Condominiums 59 1 4 5 4 2 6 29 Condominiums 29 0 2 2 2 1 3 30 Condominiums 23 0 1 1 1 1 2 31 Condominiums 23 0 1 1 1 1 2 32 Condominiums 29 0 2 2 2 1 3 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 26 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 6 (cont d) Estimated Traffic Generation for Other Projects Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hours No. Project Traffic In Out Total In Out Total 33 Condominiums 94 1 6 7 6 3 9 34 Condominiums 88 1 6 7 5 3 8 35 Apartments 457 7 28 35 27 15 42 36 Condominiums 820 10 52 62 49 24 73 37 Apartments 262 4 16 20 16 9 25 Shopping Center 486 7 5 12 20 22 42 38 private school 347 70 57 127 10 14 24 39 Retail 1248 18 12 30 52 57 109 Fast Food 1240 68 65 133 45 42 87 Apartments 874 13 53 66 52 29 81 40 Apt Addition 2016 30 123 153 120 66 186 41 LACMA 632 26 27 53 31 30 61 42 Condominiums 363 4 23 27 22 11 32 Apartments 1189 18 73 90 71 39 110 High turn Res. 4926 232 214 446 258 165 423 Retail 13581 199 127 326 569 617 1186 43 Apartments 403 6 25 31 24 13 37 Retail 230 3 2 6 10 10 20 44 Private School 0 77 76 153 56 56 112 45 Chabad 836 58 49 107 68 34 34 46 Office 77 10 1 11 2 9 10 High turn Res. 445 21 19 40 23 15 38 restaurant 1404 0 0 13 78 39 117 47 Office 317 39 5 45 7 36 43 High turn Res. 102 5 4 9 5 3 9 48 Museum 452 6 3 9 28 31 59 49 Apartments 1176 18 72 89 70 39 109 50 Apartments 2809 58 143 201 159 97 256 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 27 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. The impact of a development project is determined by comparing, at each study intersection, the changes in the traffic conditions between the different growth scenarios. According to the standards adopted by the City of Los Angeles, a traffic impact is considered significant if the related increase in the V/C value equals or exceeds the thresholds shown in the table below and are marked in the following tables with an asterisk ( * ). City of Los Angeles Criterion LOS Final V/C Value Increase in V/C Value C 0.701-0.800 + 0.040 D 0.801-0.900 + 0.020 E, F > 0.900 + 0.010 or more As shown in Table 7, traffic growth from the related projects and the ambient growth will increase traffic congestion in the study area. The traffic impact of project s traffic volume has been calculated by adding the project volume to the non-project traffic growth. Table 7 Future Traffic Conditions Without Project Peak Existing Future Without Project No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS Growth 1. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 0.869 D 1.012 F +0.143 Olympic Boulevard PM 0.817 D 0.963 E +0.146 2. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 0.532 A 0.590 A +0.058 Whitworth Drive PM 0.588 A 0.675 B +0.087 3. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 0.997 E 1.112 F +0.115 Pico Boulevard PM 0.967 E 1.124 F +0.157 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 31 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Table 8 contains the project impact values at the study intersections. As shown below, none of the study intersections are expected to be significantly impacted by project traffic volume using the significant impact criteria established by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. It should be noted that the impact analysis does not consider any changes to the existing intersection configuration (i.e., future roadway improvements). Future cumulative with project peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for the morning and afternoon, respectively. Table 8 Future Traffic Conditions Without and With Project Peak Future Without Future With Project No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS Growth 1. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 1.012 F 1.012 F +0.000 Olympic Boulevard PM 0.963 E 0.966 E +0.003 2. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 0.590 A 0.591 A +0.001 Whitworth Drive PM 0.675 B 0.676 B +0.001 3. La Cienega Boulevard & AM 1.112 F 1.113 F +0.001 Pico Boulevard PM 1.124 F 1.126 F +0.002 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 32 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. Impacts on Regional Transportation System The Congestion Management Program (CMP) was adopted to track regional traffic growth, building permits and transportation improvements. The CMP designated a transportation network including all state highways and some arterials within the County to be monitored by local jurisdictions. If the LOS standard deteriorates on the CMP network, then local jurisdictions must prepare a deficiency plan to be in conformance with the CMP program. Current changes to the CMP program being considered by local officials include adding a countywide trip fee to mitigate regional cumulative impacts. For purposes of the CMP LOS analysis, a substantial change in freeway segments are defined as an increase or decrease of 0.10 in the demand to capacity ratio and a change in LOS. A CMP traffic impact analysis is required if a project will add 150 or more trips to a freeway segment in either direction and where the project will add 50 or more trips to any CMP monitoring intersection during either the AM or PM weekday peak hour. The nearest CMP monitoring location is Wilshire Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard. The traffic study shows that significant traffic impacts would not be exceeded at this location. As shown in Figures 6 and 7, the proposed project does not exceed the CMP traffic limits. Therefore, no additional CMP analysis is necessary. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 35 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Traffic Conditions Analysis

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. CHAPTER 6 MITIGATION MEASURES Based on the analysis in this study, it has been determined that the added traffic generated by the proposed project will not significant impact any of the three study intersections using criteria established by the City of Los Angeles. Therefore, no traffic mitigation is necessary. 1022-1054 La Cienega Boulevard Page 36 July 2008 Traffic Impact Study Mitigation Measures

APPENDIX A PROJECT SITE PLANS

APPENDIX B COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE

WILSHIRE SUMMARY OF LAND USE CATEGORY LAND USE CORRESPONDING ZONES NET ACRES % AREA TOTAL NET ACRES TOTAL % AREA RESIDENTIAL Single Family 2,078 23.2 Very Low I RE20, RA 23 1.1 Very Low II RE15, RE11 347 16.7 Low I RE9 118 5.7 Low II R1, RS, RD6 1,590 76.5 Multiple Family 2,788 31.1 Low Medium I R2,RD3, RD4,RZ3, RZ4, 571 20.5 Low Medium II RD1.5, RD2, RW2, RZ2.5 305 11.0 Medium R3 1,145 41.1 High Medium R4 767 27.5 COMMERCIAL 1,222 13.6 Limited CR, C1, C1.5, P 49 4.0 General C1.5, C2, C4, P 347 28.4 Neighborhood C1, C1.5, C2, C4, P 311 25.4 Community CR, C2, C4, P, PB 183 15.0 Regional Center CR, C1.5, C2, C4,R3, R4, 332 27.2 INDUSTRIAL 40 0.4 Limited CM, MR1, M1, P 40 100.0 OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC FACILITIES 412 4.6 Open Space OS, A1 190 46.1 Public Facilities PF 222 53.9 STREETS 2,422 27.0 Private Street 38 1.6 Public Street 2,384 98.4 TOTAL 8,962 100.0 WILSHIRE

APPENDIX C CIRCULATION MAPS, STREET STANDARDS & STREET PLANS

APPENDIX D TRANSIT ROUTES

43rd St 16 14 10 218 316 BBB5 BBB7 BBB12 BBB13 000 ROUTE MAP N 302 2 MAP NOTES LEGEND INSET 1 CRENSHAW N Sunset Bl Holloway Dr 305 704 4 Santa Monica Bl a Vernon Blue Line Station Metro Bus Lines 105, 611, 705; DASH Pueblo Del Rio, DASH Southeast b Kenneth Hahn State Recreatio Area c Washington/Fairfax Transit Center Metro Bus Lines 35, 37, 38, 105, 217, 335, 534, 439, 705, 780; C1; CE 437 d Kaiser Hospital e Plaza La Cienega f La Cienega Park g Cedars Sinai Medical Center h Beverly Center i Leimert Park j Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza Line 105 Route Extended Route of Weekday Peak Trips Timepoint Metro Rail Metro Rail Station Transit Center Connecting Line 000 Rapid Connecting Line BBB Santa Monica s Big Blue Bus CC Culver City Bus CE LADOT Commuter Express INSET 1 CRENSHAW Line 105 Route Timepoint Leimert Bl M L King Bl 705 Melrose Av 714 San Vicente Bl Beverly Bl 3rd St Crenshaw Bl 305 BEVERLY HILLS Burton Wy 550 720 920 20 Wilshire Bl Olympic Bl Marlton Av Santa Rosalia Dr M L King Bl 728 28 Stocker Dr Robertson Bl Pico Bl La Cienega Bl Airdrome St Hillcrest Dr Fairfax Av 217 18th St Coliseum St 780 333 33 Cadillac Av 335 35 10 534 439 CE437 37 Adams Bl Jefferson Bl 38 Exposition Bl C4 C1 Venice Bl Washington Bl National Bl Long Beach Av E Long Beach Av W Main St Normandie Av Western Av Atlantic Bl Boyle Av Soto St Broadway Arlington Av Crenshaw Bl 210 305 Compton Av Hooper Av Central Av Avalon Bl 10 Figueroa St Vermont Av Rodeo Rd Coliseum St 710 CULVER CITY Downey Rd 60 102 760 VERNON M.L. King Bl 40 740 940 42 Leimert Bl Vernon Av SEE INSET 1 La Brea Av Sycamore Av 212 La Cienega Bl VERNON 53 rd St Stocker Dr Cudahy Av Pacific Bl 760 Santa Fe Av Crenshaw Bl 710 740 940 312 55 439 C5 251 60 355 53 51 52 40 45 81 207 210 CRENSHAW 254 751 611 102 350 352 48 745 381 204 754 206 305 209

534 38 16 20 14 218 28 439 10 316 BBB5 BBB7 BBB12 BBB13 37 CE437 40 ROUTE MAP INSET 1 CRENSHAW Coliseum St M L King Bl N 60 VERNON 760 Long Beach Av E Long Beach Av W Pacific Bl VERNON 60 611 Santa Fe Av N 760 Hillcrest Dr Santa Rosalia Dr Marlton Av Stocker Dr Crenshaw Bl 43rd St M L King Bl Leimert Bl Vernon Av Compton Av Hooper Av Central Av Avalon Bl Main St Broadway Vernon Av 55 355 53 51 52 45 611 102 350 352 48 745 LEGEND 704 4 000 000 CC BBB Rapid Line 705 Route Northbound Route Only Timepoint Rapid Stop Southbound Rapid Stop Only Metro Rail Metro Rail Station Transit Center Connecting Line Rapid Connecting Line Culver City Bus Santa Monica s Big Blue Bus INSET 1 CRENSHAW Rapid Line 705 Route Timepoint Rapid Stop 714 720 920 MAP NOTES a Vernon Blue Line Station Metro Bus Lines 105, 611, 705; DASH Pueblo Del Rio, DASH Southeast b Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area c Washington/Fairfax Transit Center Metro Bus Lines 35, 37, 38, 105, 217, 335, 534, 439, 705, 780; C1; CE 437 d Kaiser Hospital e Plaza La Cienega f La Cienega Park g Cedars Sinai Medical Center h Beverly Center i Leimert Park j Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza 728 Fairfax Av 217 333 33 780 335 35 Adams Bl Crenshaw Bl Jefferson Bl 210 305 Exposition Bl 710 102 110 Figueroa St Vermont Av Rodeo Rd Coliseum St M.L. King Bl 740 940 Leimert Bl 42 SEE INSET 1 CRENSHAW La Brea Av Sycamore Av 212 Western Av 40 210 Stocker Dr 312 81 204 Normandie Av 207 Arlington Av Crenshaw Bl 381 754 206 305 209 710 740 940 Palm Av Santa Monica Bl 105 San Vicente Bl Melrose Av Beverly Bl 305 3rd St Burton Wy 550 BEVERLY HILLS Wilshire Bl Olympic Bl Robertson Bl Pico Bl La Cienega Bl Airdrome St 18th St Cadillac Av 10 C4 Venice Bl C1 Washington Bl National Bl CULVER CITY La Cienega Bl 439 C5

Burton Way Wilshire Bl Wilshire Bl 20 720 920 Pico Bl Wilshire Bl Olympic Bl 728 20 720 920 728 Figueroa St Pico Bl Figueroa St Flower St S Hope St Grand Av Olive St Broadway Main St Hill St Los Angeles St Maple Av Wall St Central Av Alameda St Flower St S Hope St Grand Av Broadway Main St ROUTE MAP N DOWNTOWN L.A. Union Av SEE INSET #1 INSET MAP 1 - DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES Alvarado St 200 WESTLAKE/ MACARTHUR PARK PERSHING SQUARE 4th St Winston St 5th St Hoover St Vermont Av Normandie Av Western Av WILSHIRE/ VERMONT WILSHIRE/ NORMANDIE WILSHIRE/ WESTERN KOREATOWN 603 204 754 206 207 757 7TH ST/METRO CENTER METRO BLUE LINE METRO RED LINE METRO RED LINE 7th St 8th St 9th St Spring St 6th St Olympic Bl Wilton Pl Arlington Av Staples Center 11th St Rossmore Av 209 12th St Rimpau Bl Keniston Av CE534 Crenshaw Bl 210 710 MAP NOTES a Shubert Theatre LEGEND La Brea Av Hauser Bl Fairfax Av La Cienega Bl Robertson Bl Doheny Dr BEVERLY HILLS Beverly Dr MIRACLE MILE San Vicente Bl Foster Dr Rexford Dr Crescent Dr Canon Dr 14 305 Carrillo Dr 550 Genesee Av Beverly Dr BBB5 Beverwil Dr 30 31 330 212 312 217 780 105 705 220 ### ### AV BBB C CE M SC Route of Line 28 Short Line Turnaround Late Night Route Timepoint Metro Rail Metro Rail Station Connecting Line Rapid Connecting Line Antelope Valley Transit Authority Santa Monica s Big Blue Bus Culver City Bus LADOT Commuter Express Montebello Municipal Bus Santa Clarits Transit INSET 1 DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES Route of Line 28 Late Night Route Local Stop Stop and Timepoint Metro Rail Station Metro Rail Station Entrance Metro Rail 4 16 316 704 Constellation a Santa Monica Bl BBB5 CE534 Pico Bl Century Park East Ave Of The Stars MGM Dr SC792,797 CE573 Century Park West BBB5 C3 CENTURY CITY

Burton Way Wilshire Bl Wilshire Bl 20 720 920 Pico Bl Wilshire Bl 20 720 920 Figueroa St Olympic Bl Pico Bl Figueroa St Flower St S Hope St Grand Av Olive St Broadway Main St Hill St Los Angeles St Maple Av Central Av Alameda St Flower St Broadway Main St Central Av Alameda St Grand Av Vignes St ROUTE MAP N Hoover St Vermont Av Normandie Av Western Av Union Av Alvarado St 200 WILSHIRE/ VERMONT WILSHIRE/ NORMANDIE WILSHIRE/ WESTERN WESTLAKE/ MACARTHUR PARK SEE INSET #1 & 2 KOREATOWN DOWNTOWN L.A. 603 204 754 206 207 757 INSET MAP 1 - DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES Cesar E Chavez Av 101 S Hope St N Hope St 7TH ST/METRO CENTER Arcadia St Temple St PERSHING SQUARE METRO RED LINE CIVIC CENTER METRO RED LINE UNION STATION 1st St 2nd St 3rd St 4th St Winston St 5th St 6th St 7th St Wilton Pl Arlington Av 8th St Spring St Rossmore Av Rimpau Bl Keniston Av CE534 Crenshaw Bl 209 210 710 METRO BLUE LINE Staples Center 9th St Olympic Bl 11th St 12th St La Brea Av Hauser Bl Fairfax Av MIRACLE MILE 305 550 Genesee Av 212 312 MAP NOTES a LEGEND Shubert Theatre La Cienega Bl Robertson Bl Doheny Dr BEVERLY HILLS Beverly Dr San Vicente Bl Carrillo Dr Foster Dr Rexford Dr Crescent Dr Canon Dr 14 Beverly Dr BBB5 Beverwil Dr 30 31 330 217 780 105 705 220 ### ### AV BBB C CE M SC Route of Line 728 Metro Rapid Stops Timepoint & Metro Rapid Stops Metro Rail Metro Rail Station Connecting Line Rapid Connecting Line Antelope Valley Transit Authority Santa Monica s Big Blue Bus Culver City Bus LADOT Commuter Express Montebello Municipal Bus Santa Clarita Transit INSET 1 DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES Route of Line 728 Local Stop Stop and Timepoint Metro Rail Station Metro Rail Station Entrance Metro Rail Pico Bl 4 16 316 704 Constellation a BBB5 CE534 Century Park East Ave Of The Stars MGM Dr SC792,797 CE573 Century Park West BBB5 C3 Santa Monica Bl CENTURY CITY

* n

APPENDIX E TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W OLYMPIC BOULEVARD FILE NUMBER: 1-AM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 700-715 28 224 6 10 406 39 14 334 48 30 133 19 715-730 39 268 5 13 470 32 15 304 40 27 154 12 730-745 38 239 6 15 536 39 15 339 42 38 204 15 745-800 59 290 10 12 469 45 18 401 36 59 260 19 800-815 47 283 12 17 498 31 22 459 41 38 324 20 815-830 55 328 11 19 516 34 20 443 40 20 278 21 830-845 52 249 12 24 527 32 24 467 53 30 258 24 845-900 53 263 19 21 491 25 18 438 42 41 319 27 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 700-800 164 1021 27 50 1881 155 62 1378 166 154 751 65 5874 715-815 183 1080 33 57 1973 147 70 1503 159 162 942 66 6375 730-830 199 1140 39 63 2019 149 75 1642 159 155 1066 75 6781 745-845 213 1150 45 72 2010 142 84 1770 170 147 1120 84 7007 800-900 207 1123 54 81 2032 122 84 1807 176 129 1179 92 7086 A.M. PEAK HOUR 207 1123 54 0800-0900 92 81 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD 1179 2032 129 122 176 1807 84 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W OLYMPIC BOULEVARD FILE NUMBER: 1-PM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 400-415 43 277 30 12 300 36 24 337 49 40 437 29 415-430 50 301 28 10 276 30 20 329 48 31 373 26 430-445 44 337 34 12 265 35 23 316 42 32 388 28 445-500 37 335 42 12 293 37 23 369 41 39 367 24 500-515 35 280 39 16 333 30 24 320 33 40 388 23 515-530 47 309 31 10 367 34 17 364 35 31 410 20 530-545 33 308 25 16 301 34 19 373 30 38 356 23 545-600 30 343 20 13 346 30 15 387 26 36 372 22 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 400-500 174 1250 134 46 1134 138 90 1351 180 142 1565 107 6311 415-515 166 1253 143 50 1167 132 90 1334 164 142 1516 101 6258 430-530 163 1261 146 50 1258 136 87 1369 151 142 1553 95 6411 445-545 152 1232 137 54 1294 135 83 1426 139 148 1521 90 6411 500-600 145 1240 115 55 1347 128 75 1444 124 145 1526 88 6432 P.M. PEAK HOUR 145 1240 115 0500-0600 88 55 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD 1526 1347 145 128 124 1444 75 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W WHITWORTH DRIVE FILE NUMBER: 2-AM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 700-715 7 314 3 5 4 4 3 349 3 10 5 1 715-730 8 294 3 7 7 6 3 356 6 12 5 2 730-745 16 307 5 13 19 9 6 410 11 14 13 7 745-800 52 322 14 10 37 8 11 466 19 15 25 10 800-815 33 338 11 10 36 7 10 467 18 19 20 14 815-830 28 283 6 14 59 10 9 470 14 15 36 11 830-845 17 308 4 16 58 5 5 487 15 22 28 17 845-900 25 301 4 19 51 7 7 480 19 17 35 18 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 700-800 83 1237 25 35 67 27 23 1581 39 51 48 20 3236 715-815 109 1261 33 40 99 30 30 1699 54 60 63 33 3511 730-830 129 1250 36 47 151 34 36 1813 62 63 94 42 3757 745-845 130 1251 35 50 190 30 35 1890 66 71 109 52 3909 800-900 103 1230 25 59 204 29 31 1904 66 73 119 60 3903 A.M. PEAK HOUR 130 1251 35 0745-0845 52 50 WHITWORTH DRIVE 109 190 71 30 66 1890 35 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W WHITWORTH DRIVE FILE NUMBER: 2-PM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 400-415 18 346 17 9 9 1 7 369 19 26 59 13 415-430 22 352 14 5 6 2 6 393 18 27 56 10 430-445 17 361 9 5 10 3 5 394 17 19 47 10 445-500 14 380 13 8 12 2 5 358 13 12 54 10 500-515 20 349 12 7 16 4 6 392 21 20 72 10 515-530 23 351 15 4 10 5 10 427 24 23 81 12 530-545 21 342 14 6 5 3 18 374 20 22 64 7 545-600 15 378 18 3 4 1 13 355 16 18 84 8 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 400-500 71 1439 53 27 37 8 23 1514 67 84 216 43 3582 415-515 73 1442 48 25 44 11 22 1537 69 78 229 40 3618 430-530 74 1441 49 24 48 14 26 1571 75 74 254 42 3692 445-545 78 1422 54 25 43 14 39 1551 78 77 271 39 3691 500-600 79 1420 59 20 35 13 47 1548 81 83 301 37 3723 P.M. PEAK HOUR 79 1420 59 0500-0600 37 20 WHITWORTH DRIVE 301 35 83 13 81 1548 47 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W PICO BOULEVARD FILE NUMBER: 3-AM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 700-715 24 281 5 10 263 23 13 344 77 32 63 12 715-730 27 314 5 15 310 25 20 345 64 26 72 12 730-745 31 313 6 10 430 26 25 370 56 34 110 18 745-800 45 277 10 11 382 22 21 490 66 39 156 19 800-815 49 286 17 15 353 31 33 449 65 37 170 18 815-830 30 285 11 17 390 26 26 451 63 46 149 15 830-845 36 321 10 15 410 36 21 457 52 38 170 18 845-900 37 279 14 19 332 25 31 482 54 30 159 16 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 700-800 127 1185 26 46 1385 96 79 1549 263 131 401 61 5349 715-815 152 1190 38 51 1475 104 99 1654 251 136 508 67 5725 730-830 155 1161 44 53 1555 105 105 1760 250 156 585 70 5999 745-845 160 1169 48 58 1535 115 101 1847 246 160 645 70 6154 800-900 152 1171 52 66 1485 118 111 1839 234 151 648 67 6094 A.M. PEAK HOUR 160 1169 48 0745-0845 70 58 PICO BOULEVARD 645 1535 160 115 246 1847 101 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: OVERLAND TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT: LOS ANGELES DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008 PERIOD: 04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION: N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD E/W PICO BOULEVARD FILE NUMBER: 3-PM 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 400-415 39 382 19 10 163 32 43 342 42 65 248 39 415-430 28 312 23 11 172 34 43 346 42 54 283 31 430-445 20 366 17 14 157 25 33 377 44 54 249 30 445-500 20 325 13 11 169 30 37 339 45 53 303 25 500-515 28 382 17 15 157 35 51 367 57 56 237 32 515-530 21 326 22 10 190 41 45 379 62 63 264 34 530-545 31 351 15 10 209 45 35 370 51 55 273 41 545-600 22 340 13 13 210 57 47 390 44 46 262 41 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 400-500 107 1385 72 46 661 121 156 1404 173 226 1083 125 5559 415-515 96 1385 70 51 655 124 164 1429 188 217 1072 118 5569 430-530 89 1399 69 50 673 131 166 1462 208 226 1053 121 5647 445-545 100 1384 67 46 725 151 168 1455 215 227 1077 132 5747 500-600 102 1399 67 48 766 178 178 1506 214 220 1036 148 5862 P.M. PEAK HOUR 102 1399 67 0500-0600 148 48 PICO BOULEVARD 1036 766 220 178 214 1506 178 LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978