Contact person RISE Date Reference Page. Fredrik Öberg P02435B 1 (5) Building Technology

Similar documents
Contact person Date Reference Page Mikael Videby P08110A 1 (6) SP Structural and Solid Mechanics

Test of child safety locking device for windows (1 appendix) Summary

Contact person Date Reference Page Michael Lindblad F000833F 1 (1) Sustainable Built Environment

Contact person Date Reference Page Ulf Lemke F015337C 1 (4) Wood Technology

Contact person Date Reference Page Michael Lindblad F013838C 1 (1) Sustainable Built Environment

Contact person Date Reference Page Ulf Lemke F027196A 1 (4) Wood Technology

Contact person Date Reference Page Michael Lindblad F025884A 1 (1) Sustainable Built Environment

Contact person Date Reference Page Michael Lindblad F025884B 1 (1) Sustainable Built Environment

Contact person Date Reference Page Hans Eriksson F000838G 1 (4) Wood Technology

Circular Silencer. Rigid and flexible construction Type CA CB CF CS. TROX GmbH Telephone +49/28 45/ Telefax +49/28 45/

Contact person Date Reference Page Hans Eriksson F000838D 1 (3) Wood Technology

ETRTO proposal for UN R30 & 64 amendments

series RVV Variable flow rate controllers

Manual ProAc 1.2. Version Stifab Farex AB Arvika Sweden

IEQp1 Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Appeal Review

Evidence of Performance Airborne sound insulation of flat roofs

A brief guide for identification of non-compliant construction machinery. Is this. Compactor / Roller compliant with European legislation?

Economic and Social Council

BRC

MFPA Leipzig GmbH Test, monitoring and certification point for building materials, products and systems

Directions for use CK 125 C EC, CK 150 B EC, CK 160 B EC, CK 160 C EC CK 200 B EC, CK 250 B EC, CK 315 B EC, CK 315 C EC ENGLISH VERSION

Tiltrotator control GPC

TEKNISK RIKTLINJE TR05-10E

ESTIMATION OF VEHICLE KILOMETERS TRAVELLED IN SRI LANKA. Darshika Anojani Samarakoon Jayasekera

GENERAL EXPLANATION ABOUT CLASSIFICATIONS

issued by Notified Body No according to 2014/32/EU MID FULL QUALITY ASSURANCE Module H

Effect of road surfaces on road traffic noise on the public roads of Japan. --An investigation based on tyre/road noise measurement--

series Silencers

CETOP POSITION PAPER PP 07

M-11 MARINE DIESEL ENGINE FUEL INJECTOR

APPENDIX D NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

DOA and Environmental Protection

Sense7-series Non-contact coded safety switch

TEST REPORT F INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN 14764:2005 CITY AND TREKKING BICYCLES- SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS

Evidence of performance Reduction of impact sound pressure level by floor coverings

Dynamic characteristics of railway concrete sleepers using impact excitation techniques and model analysis

DCV-CF DCV-CF. DCV-CF Pressure control with airflow measuring CFL Version B03. Pressure controlwith airflow measuring. Product description

LGV INSTRUCTOR EXAMINING CRITERIA

Circular silencers. Type CS. For the reduction of noise in circular ducts, aluminium construction PD CS 1. 02/2017 DE/en

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

LABORATORY 2 MEASUREMENTS IN RESISTIVE NETWORKS AND CIRCUIT LAWS

BS EN :2011 BS :2002+A1:2013 UKSRG Guidelines-4:2011 EN124:1994 HA104\09

LINE SILENCER. Copyright 2009 by PULSCO Incorporated. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited.

Bevent Rasch BSK Fire /04/2017

IMPACT REGISTER, INC. PRECISION BUILT RECORDERS SINCE 1914

Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Grant of Petition for Temporary Exemption from an Electrical Safety Requirement of FMVSS No. 305

Bevent Rasch BSK6. - Fire /04/2017

Rectangular inlet air diffuser

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

Traffic Calming: traffic and vehicle noise

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION

SAFETY PRODUCTS. ASK-Series Safety Mat Product Manual

Duct Nozzle Diffuser. L e

SPRAY NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Gasoline and Diesel Using the znose Edward J. Staples, Electronic Sensor Technology

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Acoustic design of the air transparent soundproofing wall

Interface between Rail Vehicle Weights and Underline Bridges

Energy analysis of a reach stacker load handling system using SimulationX software

ACEA RDE Cold Start. 30 th August 2016

Sound transmission across plenum windows with non-parallel glass panes

Cartridge filter SDCC

Keymark Conference. Demands of Mineral Wool Manufacturers

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARIES. Hong Kong Collection

Revision of ASEP Considerations for Future Steps Enhancement of the presentation from Germany

Guideline No.M-10(201510) M-10 Marine Diesel Engine Fuel Injection Pump

TSFS02 Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Computer Exercise 2: Lateral Dynamics

FALCON Ceiling. Circular ceiling air diffuser for supply air QUICK FACTS

Effects of speed distributions on the Harmonoise model predictions

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Measurement of noise emitted by accelerating road vehicles Engineering method Part 2: L category

Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., Receipt of Petition for. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),

Axial Piston Fixed Pump A17FNO Series 10

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Mechanical vibration Rotor balancing Part 32: Shaft and fitment key convention

Iowa State University Electrical and Computer Engineering. E E 452. Electric Machines and Power Electronic Drives

Air Handling Units RM-/RL-Line. AHU Casing Characteristics, Design Details For Outdoor Installation And Increased Hygiene Requirements

DIRECT CURRENT MOTORS

56 LESLIE HOUGH WAY SALFORD GREATER MANCHESTER M6 6AJ UNITED KINGDOM. Test Report EN : TA11/0004c.

Test Report issued under the responsibility of: Report Reference No... : AS9-7 Date of issue... : Total number of pages...

Ecophon Solo Circle. System range. Size, mm. Special Fixing Thickness (THK) Inst. Diagr. Bosch, Warsaw, Poland

APPLICATION OF STAR RATINGS

Acoustic humidity sensitive air inlet. Technical specifications

CP 130 Sliding Door. CP 130 is a premium insulated sliding system combining high weather performance with enhanced security and great aesthetics.

VARYCONTROL VAV Dual Duct Terminal Boxes

NOW INTEGRATED WITH MLM DESIGNED FOR VAV DIFFUSER SYSTEMS LINEAR CHARACTERISTICS NO REGULAR MAINTENANCE REQUIRED PRESSURE SENSOR AND CONTROLLERS

Summary of Initial Type Testing Reports for Garage doors

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

9 Locomotive Compensation

A manufacturer s view of bushing reliability, testing and analysis. Lars Jonsson Håkan Rudegard

Evaluation Certificate

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

Customer Survey. Motives and Acceptance of Biodiesel among German Consumers

Advanced Troubleshooting Guide Snorkel V Battery Charger Rev 0 3JAN07

Special edition paper

Development of a High Efficiency Induction Motor and the Estimation of Energy Conservation Effect

Operating Instruction Inline Detonation Flame Arrester

Product Data. Features/Benefits. 35K Bypass Terminal. 110 to 4400 cfm

Combustion gas damper EKO-JB

[Insert name] newsletter CALCULATING SAFETY OUTCOMES FOR ROAD PROJECTS. User Manual MONTH YEAR

Fan Coil Units. Technical Data. Conceiled ceiling unit ECDEN FWB-BT

Transcription:

Contact person RISE Fredrik Öberg 2017-11-24 7P02435B 1 (5) Building Technology +46 10 516 56 06 fredrik.oberg@ri.se Essve Produkter AB Fredrik Sivertsson Box 7091 164 07 KISTA Joint sealant sound insulation - Examples of usage of measured laboratory value This document is an assessment to the measurement report 7P02435 (RISE 2017), where joint sound insulation of the product ESSVE Byggfog akustik an acrylic-based joint sealant was measured. Introduction RISE has been asked to assist in interpreting the measurand for joint sealants according to ISO 10140-1:2016, R s,w, and in addition, perform some example calculations on how to apply the measured result in a real situation. In practice these types of calculations shall be performed in the detail planning phase of a real building project by a person having sufficient knowledge to do so. RISE does not have the responsibility for the acoustic performance of any real in-situ building or part of building on the basis of the content of this document. This assessment only look at the case of joints between wall and window-/door frame. This is because the measurements were made under these circumstances. The effect of a joint between the wall and other floor/roof/other walls are not considered here. It should be noted though that in normal building procedures, the sound transmission through the sealant in those joints is normally considered to be neglectable for the total sound insulation, assuming they are completely sealed and the sealant is correctly applied. As stated in the report (7P02435), the measured value R s,w is defined as follows: R s = L 1 - L 2 + 10 lg (S n l/al n ) where L 1 is the average sound pressure level in the source room (db), L 2 is the average sound pressure level in the receiving room (db), l is the length of the joint (m), S n is the reference area (S n = 1 m 2 ), l n is the reference length (l n = 1 m), A is the equivalent absorption area of the receiving room (m²). R s,w is the weighted single-number quantity in accordance with ISO 717-1:2013 (R s is defined for each frequency band in the spectrum). The formula shows that the parameter R s,w is normalised to 1 meter of joint length and 1square meter of area. Postal address Office location Phone / Fax / E-mail This document may not be reproduced other than in full, Box 857 SE-501 15 BORÅS Sweden Brinellgatan 4 SE-504 62 BORÅS +46 10 516 50 00 +46 33 13 55 02 info@ri.se except with the prior written approval of RISE.

2017-11-24 7P02435B 2 (5) In practice the (Swedish) building regulations apply on the acoustic performance of the entire dividing structure, taking all of its building elements into account (windows, doors, air inlets, etc.). For facades (walls facing outdoors) and rooms containing noise sources/machines, the regulations also take into account the sound level of the noise source (e.g. the road traffic noise). Example 1. Outdoor noise Following is a table of different outdoor road traffic noise levels that can be handled for different measured Rs,w of a joint around a window, while still fulfilling the minimum building regulations for noise levels inside. The sound insulation is (among others) dependant on the amount of the total room façade surface that consists of the window surface. The facade construction in this case is assumed to have a very high sound insulation compared with the window, and is practically not considered in this example. The table is based on an example of a representative real situation, defined with the following conditions: Only equivalent outdoor free-field sound levels are considered (road traffic noise, 50 km/h). Indoor noise level is set to L paeq = 30 db in a small dwelling (BBR chapter 7). For sound class ( ljudklass ) B according to SS 25267, the same table can be used having subtracted 4 db from the resulting value. Window size 1,2 x 1,2 m, total façade size w x h 3,0 x 2,4 m, room depth 3,0 m. Façade sound insulation: R w +C tr = 50 db.

2017-11-24 7P02435B 3 (5) 22 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 23 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 24 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 25 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 26 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 27 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 28 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 29 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 30 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 31 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 32 65 65 65 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 33 66 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 34 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 35 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 69 69 69 69 69 69 Rw + Ctr, 36 68 68 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 window 37 69 69 69 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 38 69 70 70 70 70 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 39 70 70 71 71 71 71 71 71 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 40 70 71 71 71 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 41 71 71 71 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 42 71 71 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 43 71 72 72 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 44 71 72 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 75 75 75 75 75 75 45 72 72 73 73 74 74 74 74 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 46 72 72 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 47 72 73 73 74 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 48 72 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 49 72 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 77 77 77 50 72 73 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 76 77 77 77 77 77 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Rs,w Table 1 Highest A-weighted equivalent outdoor free-field sound level L paeq,24h that can be insulated against for different sound insulation of windows (R w +C tr ) and different joint sound insulations (R s,w ). Window size 1,2 x 1,2 m, façade size w x h 3,0 x 2,4 m, room depth 3,0 m. Indoor level according to regulations in BBR chapter 7. See text for further conditions and assumptions. As seen in the table the measured R s,w -value has little influence on the total sound insulation. It is relevant only in cases with windows/glass having exceptionally high sound insulation. A standard insulated glass window with no specific acoustic performance will have an R w +C tr of around 27 db. A window with R w +C tr 32 db would be considered to have a good sound insulation, and somewhere around R w +C tr 40 db we approach the limit of what is achievable with a window in the normal sense. The R s,w of the joint sets a limit on the outdoor sound level being possible to protect against. With an R s,w of 45 db, it doesn t really get higher than 72 db, even though the sound insulation of the window is increased. It should be noted here that 72 db is a very high outdoor sound level (it seldom reaches levels above 70 db) and that we are already in the area of almost unreasonable high window/glass sound insulation. The acoustic performance of the window(s) and wall, the window(s) surface size, the fresh airintake (if applicable), the properties of the sound source and the room dimensions/room properties are all considerably more decisive than the joint sound insulation in determining the demand for acoustic performance in most real cases. To be able to assess the sound level indoors given certain outdoor levels, one could find guidance in the figures on page 58 in the compendium from Boverket about noise protection (Bullerskydd i bostäder och lokaler, Boverket 2008).

2017-11-24 7P02435B 4 (5) Example 2. Internal door To assess perhaps the most normal indoor case, we look at the sound insulation of an internal door. We cannot relate it to sound level in this case since the sound source is unknown. We consider instead the weakening of the sound insulation of the actual door or window from a joint with a certain sound insulation R s according to this formula. R tot = 10 lg(10 0,1R + (l/s)10 0,1Rs ) where R is the sound reduction index of the door (db), l is the length of the joint (m), S is the area of the window/door (m²). Note that this only applies to the joint between wall and door frame, the sealing between door leaf and frame is expected to perform according to the declared sound insulation of the door. The following table shows the resulting sound reduction index R w after taking the joint sound reduction R s,w into account. The door size is standard w x h 1,0 x 2,1 m. Again, the wall is assumed to have a very high sound insulation compared with the doorset (R w = 50 db). 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 32 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 34 33 33 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 35 36 36 36 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 38 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Rw, 39 37 37 37 38 38 38 38 38 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 door 40 37 38 38 38 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 38 38 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 41 42 38 39 39 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 43 39 39 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 43 43 43 43 44 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 42 43 43 43 43 43 44 44 44 45 39 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 45 45 46 40 40 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 46 47 40 41 41 42 43 43 44 44 45 45 45 46 46 46 46 46 48 40 41 42 42 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 46 47 47 47 47 49 40 41 42 43 43 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 48 48 48 50 40 41 42 43 44 44 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 48 49 49 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Rs,w Table 2 Resulting total sound insulation R w,tot of a door considering the weakening effect of the joint sound insulations (R s,w ). Door size w x h 1,0 x 2,1 m. We can see that also in this case, the door sound insulation at which the joint start to affect acoustic performance is high but it could be relevant in the case of a heavy (steel)-door between rooms with loud noise sources adjacent to noise-sensitive areas.

2017-11-24 7P02435B 5 (5) Further comments It is expected that the one-sided joint with added mineral wool has an R s,w of ca. 56 db under the conditions in the measurement conducted (7P02435). The mineral wool will add ca. 4 db to the measured value of 52 db. This is based on experience and previous measurements. It is safe to expect that a double sided sealing with mineral wool will have better sound insulation than the one-sided case with mineral wool, and that the tables are applicable for the case of double sided sealing with mineral wool too. This statement is supported by the measurements of optimal joint sealing, R s,w,max from the conducted measurements (7P02435). Building Technology - Sound and vibration Performed by Examined by Signature_1 Fredrik Öberg Signature_2 Krister Larsson