Test-Retest Analyses of ACT Engage Assessments for Grades 6 9, Grades 10 12, and College

Similar documents
Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores

Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests

DIBELSnet System- Wide Percentile Ranks for. DIBELS Next. Elizabeth N Dewey, M.Sc. Ruth A. Kaminski, Ph.D. Roland H. Good, III, Ph.D.

Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

The application of the 95% Confidence interval with ISAT and IMAGE

Cluster Knowledge and Skills for Business, Management and Administration Finance Marketing, Sales and Service Aligned with American Careers Business

Linking the PARCC Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP

Student-Level Growth Estimates for the SAT Suite of Assessments

DIBELSnet Preliminary System-Wide Percentile Ranks for DIBELS Math Early Release

Driving Tests: Reliability and the Relationship Between Test Errors and Accidents

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests. February 2017 Updated November 2017

FALL 2007 MBA EXIT SURVEY (Sample size of 29: 15 responses from the San Marcos location and 14 responses from the RRHEC location)

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the TNReady Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores

Dunlap Community Unit School District #323 Balanced Scorecard. Updated 12/13/16

We trust that these data are helpful to you. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Dr. Joe Ludlum at or

Innovation of Automobile Dealers in Hokkaido

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

Norming Tables for the Student Testing Program (STP97)

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS NEW JERSEY

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES MISSISSIPPI

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES NEVADA

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES MONTANA

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the Performance Evaluation for Alaska s Schools (PEAKS) based on MAP Growth Scores

Investigating the Concordance Relationship Between the HSA Cut Scores and the PARCC Cut Scores Using the 2016 PARCC Test Data

Associations between advanced driver training, involvement in four-wheeled motor sport, and collisions on public roads: Report on a Survey Study

2013 PLS Alumni/ae Survey: Overall Evaluation of the Program

RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENTS

Gains in Written Communication Among Learning Habits Students: A Report on an Initial Assessment Exercise

HARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program

JOB TITLES AND PAY GRADES Job Title Pay Grade Job Title Pay Grade

USC Aiken 2004 Freshman Orientation Survey Results Selected questions have been made parallel to those on the CIRP Freshman Survey

PLUMSTED TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT

Oregon DOT Slow-Speed Weigh-in-Motion (SWIM) Project: Analysis of Initial Weight Data

Automotive Technology

Inventory of Best Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education

BUILDING A ROBUST INDUSTRY INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL DATA

Quality Assurance & Research Efforts. RiderCoach Surveys: Comparing Results from 2003 and Sherry Williams

2009 Community College of Student Engagement (CCSSE) College Results: Frequency Distributions

Graduate Two Year-At-A-Glance

Tracey Ma, Patrick Byrne & Yoassry Elzohairy

Alphabetical Listing of Unified Pay Scale Positions SY Effective: July 1, 2017

Interim Evaluation Report - Year 3

2018 AER Social Research Report

Technical Manual for Gibson Test of Cognitive Skills- Revised

August ATR Monthly Report

Bachelor of Arts in Economics - Business Specialization (Fall 2016) Student

RC COMPANY PROFILE

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

JOB TITLES AND PAY GRADES Job Title Pay Grade Job Title Pay Grade

Effect of Sample Size and Method of Sampling Pig Weights on the Accuracy of Estimating the Mean Weight of the Population 1

ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA. The knowledge source for safe driving

HARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program

Charging Battery with Clean Energy

Virginia Association for Pupil Transportation. Legislation Committee Report June 2012

Goals, Objectives, Performance Measurements. Mayor s Transition Team Public Input Session: Finance & Budget/Pensacola Energy 1/22/2019

ADAP (Alcohol Drug Awareness Program)

Youth Guarantee Courses 2019 National Certificates at levels 2 and 3

Assistant Professor in Management Studies, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology 1

The Midas Touch Guide for Communication Management, Research and Training/ Education Divisions Page 2

July 24, Rhode Island Transportation Innovation Partnership AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE MOBILITY CHALLENGE

Arizona Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 3

CETA prime sponsor management decisions and program goal achievement. rural oriented research and development projects: a review and synthesis

More Now Disapprove of Trudeau Than Approve

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER

Table 3.1 New Freshmen SAT Scores By Campus: Fall Table 3.2 UVI New Freshmen SAT Scores By Gender: Fall 1999

Bayt.com Middle East Job Index. August 2013

Clinical Laboratory Science Program Annual Assessment Report

Hydro Plant Risk Assessment Guide

Automotive Technology

City University of New York Faculty Survey of Student Experience (FSSE), Spring 2010

Academic Course Description

Public engagement on Electric Vehicles. evidence published by the Department for Transport

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

ASI ATV RiderCourse Program

Graduate Symposium. Group D

Continuous Efficiency Improvement Loop

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

AUTO 140A: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

NHTSA-ODI-CFR Review with FDIC Apr

Assessment is expected as part of my institution's continuous improvement process. Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Algebra 2 Plus, Unit 10: Making Conclusions from Data Objectives: S- CP.A.1,2,3,4,5,B.6,7,8,9; S- MD.B.6,7

Nebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report

2010 National Edition correlated to the. Creative Curriculum Teaching Strategies Gold

RAA Member Panel. Older Drivers. Self-regulation by older drivers

INTERNET ACCESS GOALS AND PLANS

Clinical Laboratory Science Program Annual Assessment Report

Scholastic Big Day for PreK. Arkansas Early Childhood Education Framework for Three & Four Year Old Children 2011

Economics and Management of Convention and Exhibition

Follow this and additional works at:

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

University of New Brunswick Fall Full-Time Enrolment by Faculty and Year in Program (Head Count)

16 th Annual North American Automotive OEM - Tier 1 Supplier Working Relations Index Study

Transcription:

ACT Research & Policy ACT Stats Test-Retest Analyses of ACT Engage Assessments for Grades 6 9, Grades 10 12, and College Jeff Allen, PhD; Alex Casillas, PhD; and Jason Way, PhD 2016 Jeff Allen is a statistician in the Research division at ACT. He specializes in longitudinal research linking test scores to educational outcomes and student growth models. Alex Casillas is a principal research psychologist in Research for Assessment and Learning at ACT, specializing in assessment design and behavioral predictors of performance and persistence. Jason Way is a research psychologist in Career Transitions Research at ACT. He researches behavioral and psychosocial skills, including their relevance to important academic and work outcomes. For each ACT Engage assessment, test-retest data were examined to assess instrument reliability, determine if consistency in scores depends on the time between assessments, and assess longitudinal mean score trends. Results Summary for ACT Engage Grades 6 9 Test-retest reliabilities (0 2 month interval) range from r =.71 to.85 across scales (median =.80). The success indices are near the top of this range (.85 for Academic Success and.83 for Graduation). Test-retest correlations decrease as the time interval increases, suggesting that psychosocial factors are changing between grades 6 and 9. Mean difference scores tend to become more negative as the time interval increases (with the noted exception of Orderly Conduct). This could be due to grade-level effects; for example, scores on some scales tend to be lower for students in grade 9 relative to students in grades 6 or 7. For most scales, the mean differences are small (< 1 ) in comparison with the standard deviations. Results Summary for ACT Engage Grades 10 12 Test-retest reliabilities (0 2 month interval) range from r =.70 to.84 across scales (median =.76). The success indices are at the top of this range (.81 for Academic Success and.84 for Retention). The test-retest reliabilities for ACT Engage Grades 10 12 are lower than those for ACT Engage Grades 6 9, but are based on smaller sample sizes (as small as n = 609). Test-retest correlations decrease as the time interval increases, suggesting that psychosocial factors are changing between grades 10 and 12. Mean difference scores tend to be small (< 1 ), even for the longest time interval of 16 32 months, with the exceptions of Commitment to College (difference of -1.5) and Study Skills (difference of 1.7). These small mean differences, combined with the large standard deviations, indicate that scores are not changing substantially between administrations. Results Summary for ACT Engage College Test-retest reliabilities (0 2 month interval) range from r =.70 to.92 across scales (median =.78). The Retention Index is at the top of this range, while the Academic Success Index is at.78. The testretest reliabilities for ACT Engage College are lower than those for ACT Engage Grades 6 9 and lower in most cases than those for ACT Engage Grades 10 12, but are based on smaller sample sizes than both assessments (as small as n = 461). Test-retest correlations decrease as the time interval increases, suggesting that psychosocial factors are changing during the first two years of college. Mean difference scores tend to become increasingly negative as the time interval lengthens. This suggests that students rate their behavior lower with more exposure to college, which could be due to them developing a higher standard of comparison. www.act.org/research 2016 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. 6027

Table 1. Test-Retest Statistics for ACT Engage Grades 6 9 Academic Discipline Commitment Family Attitude Family Involvement Managing Feelings Optimism Orderly Conduct 0 2 1,189 0.82 47.5 8.8 47.4 8.9-0.1 5.3 3 8 939 0.69 46.4 8.4 46.4 9.1 0.0 6.9 9 15 12,824 0.67 47.9 8.6 47.3 8.5-0.5 7.0 16 32 8,167 0.59 48.2 8.7 47.2 8.3-1.0 7.8 0 2 1,187 0.73 55.5 6.6 55.1 7.0-0.4 5.0 3 8 939 0.58 55.4 6.0 55.2 6.4-0.1 5.7 9 15 12,803 0.55 56.2 5.4 55.9 5.6-0.2 5.3 16 32 8,166 0.44 56.4 5.3 55.9 5.5-0.5 5.7 0 2 1,185 0.71 54.7 6.4 54.2 6.7-0.5 5.0 3 8 938 0.56 54.7 5.9 54.5 6.1-0.1 5.6 9 15 12,780 0.56 55.6 5.4 55.2 5.5-0.4 5.1 16 32 8,165 0.48 55.9 5.2 55.1 5.5-0.8 5.4 0 2 1,189 0.77 46.5 9.4 46.7 9.5 0.1 6.4 3 8 939 0.68 45.2 9.4 45.8 9.5 0.6 7.5 9 15 12,813 0.65 47.5 8.7 47.1 8.9-0.5 7.4 16 32 8,168 0.56 48.1 8.6 47.0 8.9-1.1 8.2 0 2 1,185 0.83 42.1 10.5 41.8 10.7-0.3 6.1 3 8 938 0.73 40.1 10.1 41.1 10.2 1.0 7.5 9 15 12,778 0.69 42.6 10.5 42.4 10.3-0.2 8.2 16 32 8,165 0.58 43.3 10.5 43.0 9.8-0.3 9.3 0 2 1,189 0.79 48.8 8.3 48.4 8.7-0.3 5.6 3 8 939 0.67 47.1 9.0 47.9 9.1 0.8 7.3 9 15 12,808 0.6 49.2 7.9 48.9 8.1-0.3 7.1 16 32 8,166 0.5 49.7 7.6 48.7 8.1-1.0 7.9 0 2 1,182 0.81 45.4 14.2 45.5 14.5 0.1 8.9 3 8 937 0.69 42.9 14.5 44.4 14.9 1.5 11.5 9 15 12,742 0.67 45.5 14.0 46.4 14.0 0.8 11.3 16 32 8,160 0.55 45.6 13.8 48.1 13.3 2.4 12.8 2

Table 1. (continued) Relationships with School Personnel School Safety Climate Thinking Before Acting Academic Success Index Graduation Index 0 2 1,188 0.78 39.8 9.8 39.5 10.2-0.3 6.7 3 8 939 0.64 38.8 9.7 39.3 9.7 0.5 8.3 9 15 12,807 0.6 40.8 9.3 39.9 9.6-0.8 8.4 16 32 8,166 0.49 41.5 9.2 39.7 9.4-1.9 9.4 0 2 1,189 0.75 42.2 9.0 41.8 9.4-0.4 6.5 3 8 939 0.69 41.3 9.6 41.4 9.8 0.2 7.6 9 15 12,827 0.63 42.1 8.8 41.1 9.0-1.1 7.6 16 32 8,168 0.48 42.8 8.5 40.5 8.6-2.3 8.7 0 2 1,189 0.8 40.8 8.4 40.9 8.6 0.2 5.4 3 8 939 0.67 39.0 7.9 39.9 8.5 0.8 6.7 9 15 12,813 0.65 41.1 8.0 41.3 8.2 0.3 6.8 16 32 8,167 0.54 41.2 8.0 41.6 8.1 0.4 7.7 0 2 1,182 0.85 72.2 19.5 72.3 19.6 0.1 10.8 3 8 937 0.75 69.5 20.0 69.5 21.1-0.1 14.5 9 15 12,738 0.72 73.7 18.4 73.0 18.7-0.6 13.9 16 32 8,159 0.64 74.6 17.9 73.7 18.0-0.8 15.2 0 2 1,182 0.83 83.3 18.9 83.0 19.1-0.3 10.9 3 8 937 0.71 82.7 17.4 81.6 19.5-1.1 14.3 9 15 12,728 0.69 85.5 16.0 84.9 16.7-0.6 13.0 16 32 8,160 0.61 86.6 15.0 85.9 16.0-0.8 13.7 3

Table 2. Test-Retest Statistics for ACT Engage Grades 10 12 Academic Discipline Academic Self-Confidence Commitment to College Communication Skills General Determination Goal Striving Social Activity 0 2 609 0.77 47.9 9.9 48.1 9.6 0.2 6.6 3 8 4,291 0.76 46.6 9.1 46.1 9.4-0.5 6.4 9 15 3,529 0.7 47.4 8.1 47.7 8.3 0.3 6.3 16 32 640 0.67 47.9 8.8 48.0 8.8 0.2 7.2 0 2 609 0.78 45.2 9.1 45.5 9.3 0.3 6.1 3 8 4,290 0.78 43.0 8.6 43.5 8.7 0.4 5.7 9 15 3,529 0.74 42.6 8.0 43.1 8.1 0.4 5.8 16 32 639 0.71 43.7 8.5 43.7 8.7 0.0 6.6 0 2 610 0.73 51.9 8.9 51.5 9.2-0.4 6.7 3 8 4,291 0.74 50.7 8.8 49.9 9.2-0.8 6.5 9 15 3,529 0.67 52.6 7.6 52.1 8.2-0.6 6.4 16 32 640 0.59 52.2 8.0 50.7 9.0-1.5 7.7 0 2 609 0.76 49.1 7.6 48.9 8.2-0.3 5.5 3 8 4,291 0.66 48.4 7.1 48.3 7.4-0.1 6.0 9 15 3,528 0.64 48.2 7.0 48.8 7.0 0.6 5.9 16 32 639 0.61 49.3 7.1 49.9 7.1 0.6 6.2 0 2 609 0.76 51.5 7.2 51.6 7.4 0.1 5.1 3 8 4,290 0.68 51.0 6.4 50.9 6.8-0.1 5.3 9 15 3,529 0.68 51.0 6.3 51.7 6.3 0.6 5.1 16 32 640 0.62 51.2 6.6 52.0 6.4 0.9 5.7 0 2 609 0.7 49.9 7.8 50.1 8.4 0.1 6.3 3 8 4,289 0.72 49.0 7.5 48.9 7.8-0.1 5.8 9 15 3,528 0.69 49.8 7.2 50.2 7.2 0.4 5.6 16 32 639 0.64 49.3 7.7 49.9 7.3 0.7 6.4 0 2 609 0.75 39.7 10.0 40.1 10.1 0.4 7.2 3 8 4,290 0.77 40.5 9.6 40.6 9.6 0.1 6.5 9 15 3,529 0.72 39.4 8.9 39.7 9.2 0.3 6.7 16 32 640 0.68 41.5 9.8 41.5 10.0 0.0 7.9 4

Table 2. (continued) Social Connection Steadiness Study Skills Academic Success Index Retention Index 0 2 609 0.77 43.8 9.3 43.9 9.6 0.2 6.3 3 8 4,291 0.73 43.9 8.5 43.9 8.8-0.1 6.4 9 15 3,529 0.69 44.0 7.9 44.0 8.3 0.0 6.3 16 32 640 0.67 46.0 8.8 45.6 9.2-0.5 7.2 0 2 609 0.73 42.0 9.9 42.4 9.9 0.4 7.2 3 8 4,291 0.73 40.8 9.1 41.1 9.3 0.3 6.8 9 15 3,529 0.71 41.5 9.4 42.4 9.4 1.0 7.2 16 32 640 0.64 41.8 9.2 42.4 9.1 0.6 7.7 0 2 609 0.75 44.7 8.9 44.9 9.5 0.1 6.6 3 8 4,289 0.68 41.9 8.7 42.5 8.8 0.6 7.0 9 15 3,528 0.67 43.9 8.3 44.8 8.3 1.0 6.7 16 32 639 0.58 42.8 8.3 44.5 8.2 1.7 7.6 0 2 609 0.81 77.8 20.1 77.4 19.8-0.3 12.4 3 8 4,290 0.77 76.1 18.9 75.7 19.1-0.4 12.8 9 15 3,529 0.71 78.0 15.8 78.2 15.9 0.2 12.1 16 32 640 0.62 78.1 18.3 78.4 17.7 0.2 15.6 0 2 609 0.84 70.3 14.9 69.9 15.3-0.4 8.5 3 8 4,290 0.81 68.7 13.7 68.2 14.2-0.5 8.6 9 15 3,529 0.75 70.2 11.6 70.0 12.0-0.1 8.3 16 32 640 0.7 70.9 13.2 70.7 14.1-0.2 10.6 5

Table 3. Test-Retest Statistics for ACT Engage College Academic Discipline Academic Self-Confidence Commitment to College Communication Skills General Determination Goal Striving Social Activity 0 2 3,580 0.77 49.9 7.4 49.8 7.9-0.1 5.3 3 8 2,910 0.63 49.4 7.7 47.2 8.6-2.2 7.1 9 15 914 0.65 48.5 7.9 47.3 8.3-1.2 6.8 16 32 463 0.61 50.1 7.8 47.6 8.5-2.5 7.2 0 2 3,558 0.8 53.6 9.2 53.9 9.3 0.3 5.9 3 8 2,905 0.69 52.5 9.0 52.2 9.3-0.3 7.2 9 15 912 0.68 53.0 9.2 53.0 9.8-0.1 7.6 16 32 462 0.63 55.0 9.2 54.4 9.7-0.6 8.1 0 2 3,582 0.7 55.5 6.0 55.1 6.5-0.4 4.8 3 8 2,910 0.55 55.4 5.9 53.1 7.6-2.3 6.6 9 15 914 0.49 55.4 5.2 53.5 7.0-1.9 6.4 16 32 465 0.46 56.0 5.1 53.5 7.8-2.5 7.1 0 2 3,572 0.73 51.2 6.3 51.2 6.5 0.0 4.7 3 8 2,910 0.63 50.9 6.2 50.3 6.6-0.6 5.5 9 15 914 0.6 51.2 5.8 50.7 6.3-0.5 5.4 16 32 463 0.51 51.4 5.8 50.6 6.4-0.7 6.0 0 2 3,574 0.72 59.6 6.0 59.6 6.3-0.1 4.6 3 8 2,910 0.61 59.4 5.8 58.4 6.6-1.0 5.5 9 15 914 0.59 59.2 5.6 58.7 6.2-0.5 5.3 16 32 463 0.56 59.4 5.8 58.5 6.5-0.9 5.8 0 2 3,561 0.75 52.8 6.3 52.7 6.6-0.1 4.5 3 8 2,905 0.67 52.3 6.4 51.6 6.9-0.8 5.4 9 15 912 0.61 52.2 5.9 51.7 6.4-0.5 5.4 16 32 462 0.57 52.4 5.8 51.7 6.7-0.7 5.9 0 2 3,577 0.83 41.5 9.7 41.6 9.7 0.1 5.6 3 8 2,910 0.75 41.9 9.8 41.0 9.7-0.9 7.0 9 15 914 0.72 41.9 9.3 41.6 9.5-0.3 7.0 16 32 465 0.66 41.1 10.6 41.1 9.7-0.1 8.4 6

Table 3. (continued) Social Connection Steadiness Study Skills Academic Success Index Retention Index 0 2 3,573 0.78 49.9 8.5 50.1 8.8 0.2 5.7 3 8 2,910 0.65 49.9 8.2 48.9 9.1-1.0 7.2 9 15 914 0.62 50.2 8.0 49.8 8.4-0.4 7.1 16 32 464 0.57 49.3 8.5 48.0 8.6-1.2 7.9 0 2 3,578 0.8 54.0 10.7 54.2 10.8 0.2 6.9 3 8 2,909 0.7 52.9 10.5 51.3 10.8-1.6 8.2 9 15 914 0.64 53.1 10.0 52.4 10.6-0.7 8.8 16 32 464 0.56 53.3 10.1 52.5 10.8-0.9 9.8 0 2 3,567 0.76 57.2 9.2 57.7 9.4 0.5 6.5 3 8 2,906 0.64 56.3 9.3 55.9 9.7-0.4 8.1 9 15 912 0.62 55.8 8.7 56.5 9.0 0.7 7.7 16 32 461 0.5 56.4 8.8 56.3 8.8 0.0 8.8 0 2 3,577 0.78 80.6 12.5 80.6 12.5 0.0 8.3 3 8 2,910 0.62 79.1 12.4 77.8 13.7-1.2 11.5 9 15 914 0.63 79.9 13.9 79.7 13.5-0.3 11.8 16 32 463 0.53 83.1 12.1 82.1 13.3-1.0 12.4 0 2 3,573 0.92 63.5 13.5 63.2 13.6-0.3 5.6 3 8 2,910 0.78 68.4 11.7 66.9 12.5-1.4 8.0 9 15 914 0.76 71.5 11.2 70.3 11.9-1.1 8.0 16 32 463 0.68 72.4 11.2 70.8 12.9-1.7 9.7 Methodological Notes Test-retest data were examined for four time intervals: 0 2 months (the short interval that is typical for assessing instrument reliability) 3 8 months (interval corresponding to tests given the same school year) 9 15 months (tests given approximately one year apart) 16 32 months (tests given approximately two years apart) For each interval and each ACT Engage scale, the following statistics are reported: N (sample size) r (the test-retest correlation) Test 1 mean and standard deviation (Test 1 is the earlier assessment.) Test 2 mean and standard deviation (Test 2 is the later assessment.) 7 Difference score mean (Test 1 mean minus Test 2 mean) and standard deviation Records with response flags for inconsistent or non-varied responding were removed from the analysis. The results are presented in Table 1 for ACT Engage Grades 6 9, Table 2 for ACT Engage Grades 10 12, and Table 3 for ACT Engage College.