Central London Congestion Charging Scheme. 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference. Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

Similar documents
Congestion Charging in London

The Central London Congestion Charge

Innovation in London. Policy approaches to mobility management and sustainable travel. Transport for London

London s Congestion Charge. Introduction to the Scheme and its Principal Impacts

The London Low Emission Zone. Nick Fairholme Head of the LEZ Transport for London

Commercial-in-Confidence Ashton Old Baths Financial Model - Detailed Cashflow

The Stockholm Trial: Congestion charging and improved public transport aimed at reducing traffic jams and creating a better environment

Automated Occupancy Detection October 2015 (Phase I) Demonstration Results Presented by Kathy McCune

The Low Emission Zone

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Enforcement Technology Wednesday 10 October Steve Smith Transport for London

L O W E M I S S I O N CITY

A Guide to the London Emission Zone

Introduction to the Ultra Low Emission Zone

Accommodating freight in Clean Air Zones

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Proposals for an Ultra Low Emission Zone

GUIDE FOR VAN DRIVERS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Presentation to the Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

The German Tolling Prospects

Horseshoe Bay Terminal Open House

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Energy Transformation In the Transport Sector. FRANCIS ROMANO Knights Energy

ULTRA LOW EMISSIONS ZONE CONSULTATION LONDON COUNCILS RESPONSE

London Transport Policy, Planning and Strategies

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

The impact of electric vehicle development on peak demand and the load curve under different scenarios of EV integration and recharging options

November 2018 Customer Switching Report for the Electricity and Gas Retail Markets

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. April 2018

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. July 2018

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012

Low Emission Vehicle Policy Development in London

The Low Emission Zone. Samantha Kennedy Strategy Manager: LEZ

Draft Results and Recommendations

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London s Consultation. Changes to the Ultra Low Emission Zone and Low Emission Zone.

September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data

Performance Measures 4 th Quarter/Year End 2010

Satellite and mobile communications HGV tolls in Germany: innovative, environmentally friendly and fair

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

20 January Road Safety in Provisional results. Manuelle SALATHÉ Head of the French Road Safety Observatory (ONISR)

Electricity Industry Code Minimum Service Standards & Guaranteed Service Levels Quarterly Report July September 2008

The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Industry Overview. Powersports Market Update

The potential for insurance markets to reduce road trauma. Samantha Cockfield, Manager Road Safety

Fixed Penalty Notice Statistics Northern Ireland

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

COMPILED BY GLASS S. Auction Report - LCV November 2013

The Largest Low Emission Zone of Europe: Traffic and Air Quality in London

Critical Success Factors for Implementing RUC Systems. Bernhard Oehry Rapp Trans AG Basel, Switzerland

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

TABLE C-43. Manufacturers' new and unfilled orders, {Amounts in millions of dollars] Nondurable. Capital goods. Total. goods.

November 2017 Customer Switching Report for the Electricity and Gas Retail Markets

Commuter Rail Update. October 25, 2018

The Dangers of Equipment & Vehicle Interaction (are we gambling with the risk?) Presented by Cres Bulger (Inspector Of Mines - DNRM)

2013 Operations Statistics Report Triangle Expressway Fourth Quarter

Meter Insights for Downtown Store

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

Used Vehicle Supply: Future Outlook and the Impact on Used Vehicle Prices

Hospitality & Tourism Management January 2015 Calendar Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet)

Up and Down Months of the Stock Market

Past Due. Account Charges. Contract Charges Security Deposit Due - Jun 09, , Customer Service. Jun 19, PAST DUE $1,693.

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

Price Category Breakdown - February 2010

Zero Emission Bus Deployment Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Around the World

Milano, from pollution charge to congestion charge

Draft Results and Open House

January-March 2017 Customer Switching Report for the Electricity and Gas Retail Markets

Road pricing (congestion charging)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: October 2017

Innovation in Transport. Mike Waters

Newcastle/Gateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Balance from your previous bill $0.00 Meter # Basic Charge: 17 $ /day 3.23* Energy charge:¹ 2

Capacity Analysis Report. For. William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility 4111 Dunn Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

3. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2009

Congestion tax in Stockholm - Effects and Lessons learned

Improving the air we breathe A Clean Air Zone for Birmingham. Birmingham City Council

Glendale Water & Power Smart Grid Project

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 42/14 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) April 23, 2014

Motorcycle Safety A Single Point of Truth

Black Book-Fitch Used Car Monthly Depreciation Rate

Residential Load Profiles

JULY 2009 REPORT: THE HOTEL INDUSTRY IS NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

2017 Adjusted Count Report February 12, 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Transcription:

Central London Congestion Charging Scheme 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

Contents 1. The Scheme 2. Impacts 3. Next Steps

The Scheme

Where is the Congestion Charging zone? Central London only

Charge Payment Daily, weekly, monthly or annual payment, for individual vehicle registration number T 123 ABC Flat charge of 5 per day Monday - Friday 7am - 6.30pm Payment available up until midnight, but charge rises to 10 after 10pm

Key Exemptions and Discounts Motorbikes / mopeds Military vehicles Emergency services Taxis and licensed minicabs Disabled persons Buses, coaches and minibuses Certain alternative fuel vehicles Breakdown and recovery vehicles Certain health service workers 90% discount for residents of zone Exempt and 100% discount currently account for 25,000 vehicles a day (23% of total traffic)

Payment channels 5% <1% 14% 30% Retail Outlets Internet Mobile Phone Text Call Centre Call Centre IVR Post 22% Total payment 108,000/day 80,000 @ 5 16,000 Residents @ 0.50 12,000 Fleet Accounts @ 5.50 29%

Payment channels April 2003 - January 2005 40% 30% 20% 10% Retail Web Mobile Text Phone IVR 0% Apr 03 Jul 03 Oct 03 Jan 04 Apr 04 Jul 04 Oct 04 Jan 05

Monthly Valid Charges Average per charging day (excluding fleets) 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Year to date average of Valid Charges at 95,500 is within 0.1% of the average for 2003 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 2004

Impacts of Congestion Charging

Summary of Impacts Traffic Levels down 18% Congestion down 30% No significant adverse affects outside the zone Public transport improvements Accidents Evidence of continuing decline in central zone Environment Reduction in key pollutants: CO 2, NO x, PM 10 Improvements perceived Business Concern expressed but TfL do not consider Congestion Charging wholly responsible

Congestion levels in the charging zone During charging hours 5 4 3 2 1 0 Jun/Jul 86 Jun/Jul 90 Jun/Jul 94 Jun/Jul 97 Jun/Jul 00 Jan/Feb 02 Mar/Apr 02 May/Jun 02 Jul/Aug 02 Sep/Oct 02 Nov/Dec 02 Jan/Feb 03 Mar/Apr 03 May/Jun 03 Jul/Aug 03 Sep/Oct 03 Nov/Dec 03 Jan/Feb 04 Mar/Apr 04 May/Jun 04 Jul/Aug 04 Travel Rate (min/km) Pre-Charge - Congestion Post-Charge - Congestion Pre- Charge - Nighttime Post-Charge - Nighttime

Total traffic entering the charging zone During charging hours May / Jun 2002 Sep / Oct 2002 Jan-03 Feb / Mar 2003 May / Jun 2003 Sep / Oct 2003 May / Jun 2004 Sep / Oct 2004 200,000 150,000 100,000 Pre-Charge Post-Charge 50,000 0 Cars Vans Lorries & Others Taxis Bus & Coach Motorcycles Pedal cycles

Public transport Public transport continues to cope well Supply meets demand - an extra 14,500 bus places have been provided to charging zone in peak hour to handle 14,000 additional passengers Improved bus reliability: 60% less traffic disruption Improved bus speeds of around 6% Excess bus waiting time reduced by around onethird

Overall changes in people travel Reduced car traffic does not mean significantly reduced people coming to the zone, as most have transferred to other modes Overall congestion charging has led to 5,000 fewer trips per day to the charging zone This is negligible in the context of 1.5m people in the zone per day

Accidents General year on year decrease across London Evidence of an accelerated decline in the charging zone Accidents involving personal injury in the zone March - October 2001 1,137 March - October 2002 1,020 March - October 2003 854 It is still too early to draw firm conclusions but the data is encouraging

Influences on recent business performance 3% 4% 15% 12% 46% Economic factors Tourism factors Company factors Seasonal factors Congestion charge Central Line Other 10% 10% Source: TfL Telephone Business Survey, Autumn 2003

Relationship between overseas tourist visits to the UK and retails sales UK Tourists Visits Central London Retail Sales UK Tourists Spending 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03 Feb-04 Apr-04-20% Source: ONS, LRC Retail Sales Monitor

Support for the scheme Prior to the introduction of the London congestion charge public opinion was equivocal After introduction, public opinion shifted decisively in favour of the scheme, with opposition levels falling 02 03 Pre-CC 03 Post-CC 04 Support 40 38 39 57 50 59 48 54 Neither 19 16 18 16 18 15 21 18 Oppose 40 43 41 27 31 24 28 27

Next Steps

Next Steps Improving the existing scheme Extending the scheme western extension Technology Trials to upgrade the existing scheme Long term planning - working towards a national road pricing scheme

Improving Existing Scheme Free days at Christmas Reducing entry level for fleet scheme to 10 vehicles Allowing cars onto the automated scheme More petrol stations Improving the web Improving the signage Promoting the use of SMS Finish charging at 18.00 rather than 18.30 If and when WEZ is introduced Introduction of Automated Pre-Payment scheme As part of re-let of contract

Western Extension

Western Extension Timetable Jan Feb 05 preliminary consultation on a Draft Order with key stakeholders May July 05 full consultation on a Made Order for preferred scheme with public, businesses and stakeholder groups Sept 05 Decision to proceed Feb 07 earliest possible go-live date

Technology Trials

Technology Trials and developments Can GNSS / GPS (satellite positioning), GSM (mobile phone) or DSRC (tag and beacon) Work in London environment? Be accurate and enforceable? Have limited Infrastructure requirements - visual intrusion? Offer more flexible, cost effective charging? Liaising with UK Department for Transport and Customs & Excise and European colleagues

Early Trials results Conclusions GNSS, GSM not likely as affordable solutions in London within next decade Tag and beacon plus cameras / ANPR for charge collection and enforcement possible in London by 2009

Long term planning Working with Government to help promote a national GPS based distance charging scheme, earliest likely implementation date 2015-2020 In the interim, and until satellite technology is suitable for the mass market in built up urban areas such as London, looking to develop schemes in London using tag and beacon

www.tfl.gov.uk