East Turnaround. Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan.

Similar documents
We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Welcome. The purpose of today s session is to:

Appendix A-M Public Information Centre 4 Materials

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON MARCH 20, 2019 RECOMMENDATION

Role of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Appendix A-L Public Information Centre 3 Materials

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Troost Corridor Transit Study

WELCOME. New Septage Waste Haulage Receiving Station Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA)

Click to edit Master title style

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Scarborough Transit Planning

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Strategic Plan

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development


3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Community Open Houses November 29 December 7, 2017

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Welcome. Please Sign In

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

London s Rapid Transit Initiative

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

City of Kelowna Regular Council Meeting AGENDA

Connected and Automated Mobility in London Viajeo PLUS City Showcase November 2015, Singapore

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Powering Sydney s Future

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

Planning for Autonomous Vehicles. Stephen Buckley WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff KINETIC October 6, 2016

Preferred citation style

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Would you say you approve or disapprove of how Governor Charlie Baker is dealing with the transportation system in your area?

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Summary FEBRUARY 2019

AVs in BOSTON Shared rides, Seagulls, & Streets. Kris Carter Mayor s Office of New Urban Mechanics City of Boston

August 26, Main-McVay Transit Study Stakeholder Advisory Committee. John Evans, LTD David Reesor, City of Springfield

Planning for AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. Presentation on the planning implications of self-driving vehicles. by Ryan Snyder Transportation Planning Expert

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Travel to Work Survey 2018

METRO Light Rail Update

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9, 2015 ART ZUIDEMA CITY MANAGER SHIFT RAPID TRANSIT UPDATE

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Roy Hulli, P.Eng. and. Fernando Chua. Intelligent Transportation Systems Ministry of Transportation Ontario

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Cars: a potential future?

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

THE FUTURE OF VANCOUVER S VIADUCTS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program moving

Project Scoping Open House Welcome

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Transcription:

East Turnaround Options at Fanshawe College Ayreswood Access Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan. To mitigate the impacts of this, the following options are under consideration: Option 1: Detour via local roads Option 2: Provide for U-turns east of Ayreswood Avenue Option 3 (Long-term): Extend Ayreswood Avenue to Howland Avenue

Oxford Street West: Options Platt s Lane to Wharncliffe Road Existing Conditions: 4 general traffic lanes (2 east, 2 west) Left-turn lane at Summit Avenue and Fernley Avenue Option 1: Mixed Use 4 general traffic lanes (2 east, 2 west) Transit operates in general traffic lanes Option 2: Centre BRT 2 centre-running BRT lanes (1 east, 1 west) from Platt s Lane to Gower Street 4 general traffic lanes (2 east, 2 west) Raised median Option 3: Curb BRT 2 curb-side BRT lanes (1 east, 1 west) from Summit Avenue to Rathnally Street 4 general traffic lanes (2 east, 2 west) Raised median

Oxford Street West: Comparison Platt s Lane to Wharncliffe Road Option 1: Mixed Use of 4 general traffic lanes Option 2: 2 Centre BRT 4 general traffic lanes Option 3: 2 Curb BRT 4 general traffic lanes Least Property Impacts Requires 6 full properties. Requires 10 full properties. Requires 10 full properties. Least Tree Impacts Impacts 5 to 15 trees (estimated) Impacts 20 to 30 trees (estimated) Impacts 20 to 30 trees (estimated) Least Cultural/Built Heritage Impacts All options impact 7 listed properties and 1 designated property. Safer Left- and Right-turns Option 2 has fewer conflicts between turning and through vehicles, meaning safer left- and right-turns. More Reliable Rapid Transit Option 2 has more reliable rapid transit service with less interaction between buses and turning / stopping cars and trucks. Easier Mid-block Access Option 1 has easier access to unsignalized side streets and driveways. Efficient Winter Maintenance Option 2 has more efficient winter maintenance with transit lanes in the centre maintained first. Efficient Waste Removal Option 2 has more efficient waste removal with transit in the centre and waste removal at the curb.

Oxford Street West: Options Platt s Lane to Wharncliffe Road Your thoughts? Property Impacts Tree Impacts Cultural and Built Heritage Impacts Traffic and Transit Impacts Operation Impacts and Benefits

West Turnaround Potential Combined Local and Rapid Transit Stop: Oxford Express Bus Route currently uses Capulet Walk & Capulet Lane to turn around Consider combined stop to serve Express, BRT, and local buses on Capulet Rapid Transit Stop On-street at Wonderland: On-street BRT platforms at Wonderland Road BRT will turn around using Capulet Walk & Capulet Lane

Transit Travel Time Impacts When any portion of your trip uses rapid transit, there will be benefits. Transfers will be shorter and on schedule, and buses more reliable. Compare the time savings of these sample trips. Argyle to Masonville 51 minutes today during rush hour 44 minutes with BRT during rush hour START START Byron to Old East Village 43 minutes today during rush hour START 38 minutes with BRT during rush hour START

Intelligent Transportation Systems City-wide Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) will reduce congestion and shorten commute times for all commuters on buses and in personal vehicles. Implementing a smart signal system will move our traffic system into the next century. Intelligent traffic cameras will see and respond to traffic as it happens. Signal information will be coordinated through a central high-tech hub. Current and future traffic patterns will be managed by continuously adjusting to changing volumes. Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Transit signal priority (TSP) is a technology to maintain the BRT schedule. This can be achieved through: Passive TSP: signals are timed to provide a Wonderland Road North & Sarnia Road green wave for BRT Active TSP: signals will adjust to give a green light to BRT when behind schedule

New Mobility What is New Mobility? New travel choices that are made possible by new technologies such as ride-sharing, driverless vehicles and mobility as a service. Example: Uber and Lyft Innovative business models for ride-sharing made possible by advancements in smart phone technology Example: Driverless Taxis Driverless taxis are likely to be cheaper than taxis are today and will change the personal economics of transportation choice. Example: Mobility-as-a-Service A single mobile application where all mobility options are available in one place. For example, you could get a car share, rent a bike, pay for transit, or hail and pay for a taxi all from one application. The future of mobility won t require you to choose between being a driver or riding transit, it will allow you to do what makes most sense for any given trip. Traditional Mobility New Mobility

New Mobility What is the role of BRT in New Mobility? Rapid Transit is the backbone of a transportation system that can quickly and reliably move high volumes of people. Even when cars are driverless, transit vehicles will still be needed to move high volumes of people. In the future, BRT lanes may be used to move high-occupancy driverless transit vehicles. How many people can one lane of traffic move every hour? Exclusive lanes for buses or It depends on the mode: other high-capacity vehicles will still be needed in the future 4,500 2,400 1,800 1,200 800-950 Buses or AV buses only Private AVs or AV buses Private Cars & Buses Private AVs only Private Cars only

Next Steps in the Process Compile feedback from December and January public engagement events. Refine design and complete evaluation of design options to identify Technically Preferred Design. Present Technically Preferred Design to stakeholders, advisory groups, and the public in 2018 for feedback. Present the draft Environmental Project Report to Council. Initiate the 6-month Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) with additional consultation and opportunities for your input. Publish the final Environmental Project Report and start the 30-day public review period. Written objections on matters of Provincial importance can be made to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change during this period. We Are Here

Stay Connected What do you think? The Rapid Transit project team wants to hear your thoughts on the information presented today! Let us know by: Completing a comment sheet and putting it into the comment box Talking with a project team representative Emailing us at shift@london.ca You can also stay up to date by following us on the social media accounts below. Jennie Ramsay, P.Eng. Project Director, Rapid Transit City of London Tel (519) 661-2489 jaramsay@london.ca City of London PO Box 5035 London, Ontario Canada N6A 4L9 Brian Hollingworth, P.Eng. Director, IBI Group City of London Tel (519) 472-7328 bhollingworth@ibigroup.com IBI Group Suite 203-350 Oxford Street West London, Ontario Canada N6H 1T3