CALL FOR IDEAS FOR THE RE-USE OF THE MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM PLATFORM CAPABILITIES. D. McCoy

Similar documents
Commercial-in-Confidence Ashton Old Baths Financial Model - Detailed Cashflow

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

Exomars Orbiter Module Bus OMB

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

THE KOREASAT5 PROGRAM

System Testing by Flight Operators the Rosetta Experience

Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

ITT ISSUE DATE. Selected Bidder - Name of Contractor. Issuing Company ITT Title AO Number STATUS

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

Baseline Concepts of the Kayser-Threde Team

NanoRacks External Payload Platform

r bulletin 96 november 1998 Figure 1. Overall ATV configuration (ESA/D. Ducros)

Results of annual simulation

ELECTRIC PROPULSION MISSION TO GEO USING SOYUZ/FREGAT LAUNCH VEHICLE M.S. Konstantinov *, G.G. Fedotov *, V.G. Petukhov ±, G.A.

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

EPIC Workshop 2017 SES Perspective on Electric Propulsion

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

Michael J. Cully Director of Civil and Commercial Space Swales Aerospace Beltsville, Maryland

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

LEOSTAR A Small Spacecraft for LEO Communication Missions. (1) G. Barresi - (1) G. Rondinelli - (1) C. Soddu (2) D. 1. Brown

The European Lunar Lander Mission

Mars Express Bus: Simplified User Manual

Thinking Outside the Cube

Preliminary Design of the Electrical Power Subsystem for the European Student Moon Orbiter Mission

SMARTSat. Shape Memory Alloy Research Technology Satellite. Allison Barnard Alicia Broederdorf. Texas A&M University Space Engineering Institute

The GHOST of a Chance for SmallSat s (GH2 Orbital Space Transfer) Vehicle

The Mars Express Mission A Continuing Challenge. Erhard Rabenau, NOVA Space Associates Ltd Mars Express Senior Mission Planner

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

Seminar 12! The Future of Space Flight! Spacecraft Power & Thermal Control!

The DoD Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (ESPA) Class Program

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

FlexCore Low-Cost Attitude Determination and Control Enabling High-Performance Small Spacecraft

NE (SE) Beam

Sunrise: 05:48 N (S) Beam

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

Industrial-and-Research Lunar Base

Europa Lander Mission Overview and Update

EPIC Gap analysis and results

Yield Reduction Due to Shading:

Thinking Outside the Cube

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Yield Reduction Due to Shading:

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

OLEV AN ON-ORBIT SERVICING PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL SPACECRAFTS IN GEO

Pathfinder Technology Demonstrator

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

The Common Spacecraft Bus and Lunar Commercialization

Instruction Manual: Space Launch System Payload Transfer Module (PTM)

Cibola Flight Experiment

E3000 High Power SADM Development

ASTRIUM. Lunar Lander Concept for LIFE. Hansjürgen Günther TOB 11. Bremen, 23/

W (W) Beam

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

VACCO ChEMS Micro Propulsion Systems Advances and Experience in CubeSat Propulsion System Technologies

Cygnus Payload Accommodations: Supporting ISS Utilization

PDR Energy Baseline Alternative. Proposal for Discussion October 27, 2015

Li-ion battery and super-capacitor Hybrid energy system for low temperature SmallSat applications

Proposed Europa Lander Descent Stage Overview

ELECTRON LOSSES AND FIELDS INVESTIGATION U.S. AIR FORCE. Ground Support Equipment Mission PDR. Michael Anderson

Example printout. Building project. SDC Example. Dyfi Eco Park SY20 8AX Machynlleth UK. Mr C. Laughton Phone:

Philae : A made to measure battery. Richard Hague ESTEC AIM Workshop 22/23 Feb 2016

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

LOW SHOCK RELEASE UNIT EASY RESETTABLE AND 100 % REUSABLE. Jens Müller 1, Christoph Zauner 2

Rover development status

ULA Briefing to National Research Council. In-Space Propulsion Roadmap. March 22, Bernard Kutter. Manager Advanced Programs. File no.

Palamede, more than a microsatellite. Workshop on University Micro Satellites in Italy Rome, July 27, 2005

Development of Low Shock Release Device

PM Individual Weapons Ms. Barbara Muldowney

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Energy Produced by PV Array (AC):

Facilitated Discussion on the Future of the Power Grid

First results and next steps in Kazakhstan Earth Observation missions in cooperation with SSTL

DEVELOPMENT OF AN EUROPEAN EDDY CURRENT DAMPER (ECD-100)

Canisterized Satellite Dispenser (CSD) As A Standard For Integrating and Dispensing Hosted Payloads on Large Spacecraft and Launch Vehicles

Virginia Tech Research Center Arlington, Virginia, USA. PPT slides will be available at

Power Team Mission Day Instructions

Validation System (EVS)

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Graph #1. Micro-Generation Generating Units in Alberta 20

Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop 2014

Modeling and Comparison of Dynamics of AC and DC Coupled Remote Hybrid Power Systems

Company name: Created by: Phone:

Space Transportation Atlas V / Auxiliary Payload Overview

ANCR CRU Statistics February 2007 to December 2007

GLAST LAT Project Subsystem Managers Meeting, May 13, Introduction. Lowell A. Klaisner Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Project Manager

In-Space Demonstration of HighPerformance Green Propulsion (HPGP) and its Impact on Small Satellites

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

Systems Engineering. Chris Hall AOE 4065 Fall 2005

ANTENNA SCAN MECHANISM FOR AN INTER SATELLITE LINK OF A CONSTELLATION PROGRAM

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: October 2017

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Transcription:

Mars Express Reuse: Call for Ideas CALL FOR IDEAS FOR THE RE-USE OF THE MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM PLATFORM CAPABILITIES D. McCoy PARIS 23 MARCH 2001 page 1

Mars Express Reuse: Call for Ideas PRESENTATION CONTENTS MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS OPTIMAL DESIGN OF MISSION AND INSTRUMENTS PLANNING STUDY PRIORITIES page 2

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS PRINCIPLE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Three Axis stabilised: gyros, star trackers, reaction wheels Bi-propellant Propulsion System: main engine (400 N) and attitude thrusters (10 N) Fixed Communications Antennae: X/S band transmit and receive Single Axis Solar Array Articulation two deployable arrays with rotation motors Fixed orientations for experiment viewing, earth communications and cold face for cryogenic radiators page 3

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS Experiment Panel Dimensions ~ 1.5 x 1.5 m 25/10/2000 15:39:21 High Gain Antenna = 1.6 m diameter page 4 Solar Array Length = 11 m Cruise Phase Configuration Orbit Phase Configuration

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS Attitude Control: During NADIR ~ 0.05 deg. With stability 0.005 deg (30 sec) Slew rate up to 0.15 deg/second with reaction wheels Fuel Load: Tanks capable of ~480 kg (equivalent to ~1500 m/s velocity increment on Mars Express) Data Handling: Maximum data transmission of 228 kbps (without coding) On board mass memory with 12 Gbits capacity page 5

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS cont d Power System Capable of distributing up to 1500 watts Mars Express maximum power generation is on the order of 750 watts (currently consuming ~600 watts maximum) Three batteries (Lithium Ion) to support eclipse and smooth out power generation fluctuations over mission life. Thermal System Power dissipation is relatively smooth over typical operations cycle allowing passive controls. Radiator (for low temperature at experiment IR sensor) provides 180 deg Kelvin with heat load of 7 watts. page 6

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS Experiment Panel (interior side) Equipment Panel (interior side) 27/11/2000 17:30:48 Main Engine and Attitude Thrusters Radiator Panel (interior side) Equipment Panel (exterior side with stowed solar array) Propulsion Tank page 7

MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM CHARACTERISTICS Experiment Panel (exterior side) Equipment Panel (interior side) 27/11/2000 17:30:12 Star Trackers Radiator Panel (exterior side) Large Experiment Mounting Propulsion Tank Equipment Panel (exterior side with stowed solar array and stowed radar ant.) page 8

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF MISSION AND INSTRUMENTS CONSTRAINTS RESULTING FROM THE REUSE OBJECTIVE Structure/propulsion maintain the basic platform/shear wall construction and propulsion layout Spacecraft electrical architecture maintain the existing cold redundant system with reallocation of resources such as power, pyros, data, and commanding Software maintain the core functions and operational modes Launch environment maintain the Soyuz/Fregat launch environment; other launchers might require re-qualifications in Sine/Acoustic. page 9

LAUNCH CONFIGURATION ON FREGAT Soyuz Fairing 07/12/2000 18:09:15 Adaptor Insert view of spacecraft in fairing with notes on fairing dimensions, and interface to Fregat. Fregat Upper Stage page 10

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF MISSION AND INSTRUMENTS MISSION CONSIDERATIONS Mission operations must be oriented to a store and forward type of approach divide into observation period and a communications period to optimise use of existing operations modes. The thermal environment of the chosen mission can alter the design significantly. Try to work within existing thermal limits (typical operational unit temperatures from -10 to +40 C). Maintain overall spacecraft inertias to minimise changes to the attitude and orbit control system Limited by pointing requirements and reaction wheel capacities as well as dynamics. page 11

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF MISSION AND INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENT CONSIDERATIONS Accommodate experiments within existing envelopes Departures from this will require a new structure design. Use the existing data and power interfaces. Three high rate data carriers (IEEE 1355 ~500 kbps - 10 Mbps. Remaining four are OBDH links (10-80 kbps) Total power to experiments ~ 250 watts. No special EMC or Magnetic requirements for experiments (platform for normal EMC standards). Moderate pointing performance requirements page 12

EXAMPLE OF LARGE MARS EXPRESS INSTRUMENT Optical and electronic units of OMEGA during integration at Paris Observatory (http://www.ias.fr/cdp/omega/omega.html) Mass = 29 kg Dimensions ~ 900 x 260 x 380 mm (2 units) page 13

PLANNING MINIMUM SCHEDULE Assumes no major developmental undertakings. Refurbishing and use of Mars Express spare units is baselined. Assumes the re-use of MGSE and EGSE as well as test benches and other supporting test items such as software test environments. Based on actual Mars Express planning experience. page 14

PLANNING Activity Description Origem % Early Dur u Start Return from Baikonur 0 30JUN03* Early Finish 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 JAFEMAAPMAJUJUAUSEOCNODEJAFEMAAPMAJUJUAUSEOCNODEJAFEMAAPMAJUJUAUSEOCNODEJAFEMAAPMAJUJUAUSEOCNODEJAFEMAAPMAJUJUAUSEOCNODEA Mars Express Refurbishment period 66 30JUN03 29SEP03 3 1 01JAN01 01JAN01 Initiate Units Procurement 0 01NOV01* Start manufacture Structure & Propulsion 0 03JUN02* Structure/Propulsion mating start 0 01JUL03* FM Experiment Delivery 0 03NOV03* Procurement of S/C FM Units 261 01NOV01 31OCT02 EM Experiment Development 218 01MAR02* 31DEC02 FM Experiment Development 173 01NOV02* 01JUL03 Test Bench S/W Validation 261 01NOV02* 31OCT03 Design/Manufacture Structure/Propulsion 522 01NOV01* 31OCT03 Start FM Integration 0 03NOV03* FM System Integration 174 03NOV03 01JUL04 FM Environmental Testing 172 02JUL04 28FEB05 FM Delivery to ESA 0 01MAR05* ESA Launch Campaign/margin 109 01MAR05 29JUL05 Launch 0 01AUG05* Start Date 01JAN01 Early Bar Finish Date 29JUL05 Data Date 01JAN01 Progress Bar Run Date 02MAR01 13:39 Critical Activity Primavera Systems, Inc. Schedule Overview 2005 Science Mission ESA/ESTEC (tentative) 12 10 8 12 24 8 8 5 page 15

STUDY PRIORITIES Accommodation Study The restrictions imposed by the platform re-use require study to ensure scientific objectives can be met. Particular items to clarify with respect to proposed missions are Experiment mounting arrangements and stability needs Platform operations Thermal environments; operational and non-operational Power requirements page 16