Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Friday 17 March 2017
Programme 11.00-11.05: Welcome 11.05-11.15: Presentation of the FREVUE project 11.15-11.35: Presentation on Technical assessment of electric vehicles for logistics 11.35-11.40: Experience in Rotterdam 11.40-11.45: Experience in Lisbon 11.45-12.00: Questions & Answers Conclusion
Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Friday 17 March 2017
Freight Electric Vehicles in Urban Europe Webinar: Technical Suitability of EFVs for City Logistics 17 March 2017 Tanja Dalle-Muenchmeyer FREVUE Co-ordinator
FREVUE Context Air quality and environmental impacts Urban congestion 2011 White Paper Fossil fuel free urban logistics by 2030
Objectives Demonstrate suitability of electric freight vehicles for urban last-mile deliveries Underpin future uptake of these vehicles Provide evidence for policy intervention
Consortium City + Policy Co-ordination and Dissemination Cross River Partnership Hyer Polis (Co-ordinator) City of Amsterdam City of Lisbon City of Madrid City of Milan City of Oslo Logistics Research Imperial College London TNO (NL) SINTEF (NO) ICT Partners City of Rotterdam City of Stockholm Swedish Transport Adm. EMEL Transport for London Vehicle Manufacturers Grid Operators
FREVUE Vehicles
Logistics Models Established in London, Madrid, Milan, Rotterdam and Stockholm
Output Key reports Technical suitability Economics of EVs for city logistics Transport and environmental impacts Social and attitudinal impacts Policy and governance Guidelines / recommendations
Next steps Wider deployment Declaration of Intent Further funding requirements Final event London 21 June 2017
For further information please contact: Tanja Dalle-Muenchmeyer FREVUE Coordinator Cross River Partnership tdmuenchmeyer@westminster.gov.uk www.frevue.eu
Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Friday 17 March 2017
Technical assessment of EVs for logistics 17 March 2017 Terje Tretvik, SINTEF
Collection of dynamic vehicle data 15 operators delivered dynamic vehicle data to the database management system at SINTEF 10 of these operators and 83 vehicles provided valid values for state of charge at the start and end of each trip Two types of data were collected from the operators Static vehicle data: Mostly information filled in to a special Static Data Template (Excel sheet) Dynamic vehicle data: Mostly directly uploaded to a special SINTEF server
Total number of trips by month and year
Operational characteristics per trip or per day Operator Vehicles Trips Av trip distance (km) Total trip distance (km) Av speed (km/h) Amsterdam & Rotterdam. TNT 7 4 134 29.6 122 464 13.4 Amsterdam. Heineken 6 461 47.4 21 829 8.1 Rotterdam. EMOSS 2 455 70.3 31 994 10.6 Rotterdam. Heineken 5 1 115 62.0 69 123 8.7 Rotterdam. Operator 1 8 253 73.4 18 564 8.7 Rotterdam. Operator 3 1 198 69.8 13 818 10.4 Rotterdam. UPS 4 1 390 45.6 63 411 - Oslo. Bring 4 14 806 8.9 131 077 20.7 Madrid. TNT & SEUR & Pascual 3 1 059 37.4 39 623 8.7 London. UPS 43 5 208 31.5 163 876 - Total 83 29 079 23.3 675 779 17.5
Operational characteristics per day Operator Number of vehicle days Distance (km) per vehicle per day Duration (hours) per vehicle per day Amsterdam & Rotterdam. TNT 1 524 80.4 7.6 Amsterdam. Heineken 410 53.2 8.7 Rotterdam. EMOSS 455 70.3 8.1 Rotterdam. Heineken 1 115 62.0 8.4 Rotterdam. Operator 1 253 73.4 8.6 Rotterdam. Operator 3 198 69.8 8.0 Rotterdam. UPS 1 390 45.6 n/a Oslo. Bring 1 317 99.5 6.8 Madrid. TNT & SEUR & Pascual 802 49.4 7.0 London. UPS 5 208 31.5 n/a Total 12 672 53.5 7.9
Example of vehicle performance: A 24 hour period
Example of vehicle performance: A working day
Size of vehicles by operator Operator Small (< 3.5 t) Weight group Medium (3.5t - 7.5 t) Amsterdam & Rotterdam. TNT 7 Large (> 12 t) Amsterdam. Heineken 6 Rotterdam. EMOSS 2 Rotterdam. Heineken 5 Rotterdam. Operator 1 8 Rotterdam. Operator 3 1 Rotterdam. UPS 4 Oslo. Bring 4 Madrid. TNT & SEUR & Pascual 3 London. UPS 43 Total 7 54 22
Km per kwh for weight groups
Energy usage per vehicle per day
Example of climate parameters
Km per kwh depending on temperature and weight group
Average state of charge of the battery at the end of day for UPS vehicles
Km per kwh depending on average speed
Conclusions The electric vehicles demonstrated in FREVUE are technically suitable for logistics operations Some small and medium sized vehicles have limited range, and may need fast charging during the working day Most large vehicles seem to have excess battery capacity for the logistics operations they are currently performing The building of inner city fast charging infrastructure and new battery packs with higher capacity will further remove barriers for the operation of EFVs in cities
Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Friday 17 March 2017
Technical assessment of BREYTNERs EV s
ZERO IN THE CITY 19-tons distribution trucks Over 50.000 km driven Conversion of MAN TGM platform 200 Kwh battery pack Range of 180-240 km pending load Electric heating Manufactured by EMOSS
First Testimony Selection procedure manufacturers Conversion versus OEMs Heavy Duty Vehicles (>16 tons) HDV is challenging OEMs do not facilitate Reverse engineering interface Position of conversion companies
Drivers instructions and experiences The human factor Energy consumption
Seasonal influence on performance Dutch climate mild -7 winter maximum night temp No influence on battery pack or range Electric heater is challenging
Down time Teething troubles/learning by doing Diagnostics very important Remote monitoring of trucks Remote monitoring charging Protocol for drivers Truck performance is stable now
Future Expending fleet OEMs
BREYTNER www.breytner.com Twitter: @Breytnerzero Linked in: Breytner Zero Emission Transport If you have any questions? Feel free to contact us
Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Friday 17 March 2017
Lisbon Experience
Who we are EMEL Lisbon Mobility and Parking Municipal Company Company 100% owned by the City with private management. Activity regulated by municipality. On-street parking management & enforcement (+50.000 parking spaces and about 2000 parking meters). Warnings, fines, clamping and towing 21 Parking Lots (+4.000 spaces). Park & ride schemes 4 Historical neighborhoods with controlled access. and more mobility solutions to be implemented in the near future.
EMEL Fleet EMEL Fleet Renewal EMEL Fleet 2017 100% 90% 80% Total: 69 vehicles (65 passenger and light duty vehicles; 4 towing vehicles) + 17 escooters 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ICEV HEV & PHEV EV "staff use" EV "maintenance and operational areas" 30% Alternative Fuel Vehicles (excluding the scooters) 12 EV allocated to operational and maintenance areas 4 EV for corporate use 5 HEV & PHEV for corporate use
Operational Areas Fleet Operational and maintenance areas tasks include: Parking meters maintenance; Parking meters money collection; Parking lots maintenance. Vehicle average daily travelled distance 50km EV allocated to operational and maintenance areas: 2013: 5 Renault Kangoo ZE; 2014: 6 Renault Kangoo ZE (+1); 2015: 12 Renault Kangoo ZE (+6). Currently, 20% of operational and maintenance areas fleet are EV (Renault Kangoo ZE).
FR-EVUE (2013-2017) EV & ICEV Monitoring and Comparison Two types of operation routines were monitored (early 2015): A - Parking Meters Maintenance; B - Money Collection. Both with ICEV (Renault Kangoo DIE) and EV (Renault Kangoo ZE). Monitoring parameters DIESEL EV A B A B # days 96 14 69 15 # trips 1695 218 1046 175 Average number of trips per day 17,7 15,6 15,2 11,7 Total travelled time (h) 367 16 264 18 Average trip duration (min) 13 4 15 6 Total travelled distance (km) 6147 337 4365 337 Average travelled distance per day (km) 64 24 63 22 Average trip length (km) 3,6 1,5 4,2 1,9 Total Cost of Ownership DIESEL EV Acquisition value ( ) 14.203 20.301 Energy cost ( /km) 0,14 0,05 Total travelled distance per year (km) 13926 13926 Lifetime(years) 8 8 Energy cost ( /8 years) 15.374 5.459 Charging station ( ) N/A 5.000 Insurance ( /8 years) 5.256 5.752 Maintenance ( /8years) 2.650 1.392 TCO ( ) 37.483 37.904 TCO/km ( ) 0,34 0,34
FREVUE (2013-2017) EV & ICEV Monitoring and Comparison There were no changes in the operation due to the use of EV. There were no changes in mobility patterns (distance, speed and O/D). Drivers were satisfied with the experience (less noise, less vibration, more comfort). EV TCO is similar to ICEV TCO. This experience has proved the EV feasibility to EMEL operation needs and give confidence to keep with (EV) operational fleet renewal policy: 6 more Renault Kangoo ZE were acquired after this monitoring in 2016; 6 more ICEV will be replaced with EV in 2017 (financed by Sharing Cities H2020 project); In the end of 2016 EMEL introduce (17) electric scooters in its enforcement activities.
Nuno Sardinha n.sardinha@emel.pt
Webinar Technical assessment of Electric Freight vehicles Questions and Answers www.frevue.eu