SOLAR ENERGY ASSESSMENT REPORT. For 115 kwp. Meteorological Data Source Meteonorm. Date 18 October, Name of Place California.

Similar documents
LAYOUT REPORT OF ROOFTOP PROJECT. For 115 kwp. Order No. # Date 13 October, Name of Place California.

LAYOUT REPORT OF GROUND MOUNTED PROJECT

Master Class on PVsyst Solar Project Designing Tool 7 th June 2013

Solargis Report. Solar Resource Overview. Plataforma Solar de Almeria, Spain. 03 August Solargis s.r.o.

Example printout. Building project. SDC Example. Dyfi Eco Park SY20 8AX Machynlleth UK. Mr C. Laughton Phone:

Results of annual simulation

Solargis Report. Solar Resource Overview. Plataforma Solar de Almeria, Spain. 03 August Solargis s.r.o.

Yield Reduction Due to Shading:

Yield Reduction Due to Shading:

100kW GROUND MOUNTED SOLAR PHOTOVOLTIC POWER PLANT DETAILED PROJECT REPORT AERO SPACE MATERIALS PVT LTD

Energy Produced by PV Array (AC):

Todae Solar s 1.22 MWp Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Installation for Stockland Shellharbour, NSW.

OFF GRID PV POWER SYSTEMS SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE PACIFIC ISLANDS

Thomas Alston Director of Business and Policy Development. Presented By N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 410 Scottsdale Arizona 85257

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Modeling and Comparison of Dynamics of AC and DC Coupled Remote Hybrid Power Systems

Design Criteria Data

Jean Marie River Solar and Wind Monitoring Update

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Yield vs simulation of Canadian Solar modules October 2012 QUALITY I VALUE I INNOVATION

Design Criteria Data

Large scale solar power plant in Nordic conditions. Antti Kosonen, Jero Ahola, Christian Breyer, Albert Albó

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Solar photovoltaic research: Drakenstein Municipality

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

A 3-Year Case Study of a Residential Photovoltaic System with Microinverters

DIN W.-Nr AISI 304

Capture The Power of Photovoltaics. IEEE Power Engineering Society Meeting May 2005

Design Criteria Data

Meter Insights for Downtown Store

Solar Power for Home...

Application of HOMER Software in Wind and Solar Resources Integration

Vunivau, Bua Province Vanua Levu, Fiji Solar Home System Design. Luis A. Vega, Ph.D.

Onix Structure Private Limited. Solar PV Power Generation System Detailed Project Report

By: Ibrahim Anwar Ibrahim Ihsan Abd Alfattah Omareya. The supervisor: Dr. Maher Khammash

NE (SE) Beam

Sunrise: 05:48 N (S) Beam

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

GAZIFÈRE INC. Prime Rate Forecasting Process 2017 Rate Case

Title Goes Here and Can Run Solar Photovoltaic up to 3 lines as shown here Systems as you see

Design Criteria Data

Commercial-in-Confidence Ashton Old Baths Financial Model - Detailed Cashflow

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Operational Opportunities to Minimize Renewables Curtailments

Solar Power. Demonstration Site. Annual Performance Report 2017

Shkel Photovoltaic Parks in Albania. August 2017

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 36 (2013 )

Techno-Economic Design of 432 KW P Grid Interactive Rooftop SPV Power Plant at Delhi Technological University (DTU)

Electricity Industry Code Minimum Service Standards & Guaranteed Service Levels Quarterly Report July September 2008

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

40KW Solar System for Apple Sauce Co

Designing Stand Alone Systems. Overview, components and function, Elements in Design

PV Systems Modeling and Analysis Tools

Daily output in average month 77 m³ Daily values Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Av.

2016 UC Solar Research Symposium

Design of A 12 KWp Grid Connected roof top Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant on school building in the Rohtak District of Haryana

SunSwitch setting in PumpScanner. Daily output in average month 219 m³ Daily values Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Av.

Daily output in April 193 m³ Daily values Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Av.

4 submersible pumps powered by renewable energy sources

2012 DFW Solar Home Tour October 6, 2012 Reference Solar PV

Q-CELLS CIGS THIN FILM MODULES: HIGHEST EFFICIENCY IN THE MARKET

Performance Analysis of 40 KW Solar Photovoltaic System at DTU

SunSwitch setting requirements min. 15 % Daily output in average month 154 m³

NJ Solar Market Update As of 6/30/15

W (W) Beam

Figure 1b: Daily Production Profile Non Power Limiting Day

Sun Sensor setting in PumpScanner Daily output in average month 52 m³ Daily values Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Av.

Thank you for requesting information on our utility auditing services!

Total number of PV modules: 42 Energy usability factor: 99.9 % Number of PV inverters: 1

December 2018 RenewableGenerations Monthly Report

Daily output in May 32 m³

4 submersible pumps with integrated electronics powered by renewable energy sources ENGLISH

Flexible Capacity Needs and Availability Assessment Hours Technical Study for 2020

P.O BOX 429, NUKU ALOFA, Tel: (676) Fax: (676)

Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody ever does anything about it. Mark Twain

Company name: Created by: Phone:

Transcription:

SOLAR ENERGY ASSESSMENT REPORT For 115 kwp Name of Place California Client abc Capacity 115 kw Meteorological Data Source Meteonorm Email ezysolare@gmail.com Order No. #1410180005 Date 18 October, 2014 Address United States, Fullerton, California, United States of America 00000

INDEX 1. Methodology of SEAR 4 2. Summary 5 3. Project Features 5 4. Characteristics of Site 6 5. Solar Radiation Resource Assessment 7 6. Irradiation, Electricity Production & Performance Ratio 8 7. Generation Analysis 8 8. Uncertainty of Estimates 9 9. Savings/Earnings 9 10. Glossary of Terms 10 ABOUT EZYSOLARE ezysolare is dedicated to making the journey of going solar easy. Starting from decision making to design, ezysolare breaks the process into 2 simple steps. We assist in ascertaining the feasibility of a solar project through SEAR (Solar Energy Assessment Report), while LAYOUT (Solar Module Layout) details the placement of modules and other key equipment of a solar power plant. Both our offerings are designed for all possible variations of projects - rooftop and ground mounted, MW and kw scale, crystalline and thin film modules promising users a tailor made solution to their unique requirements. DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL INFORMATION: Considering the nature of climate variation, inter-annual and long-term changes, as well as uncertainty of measurements and calculations, ezysolare cannot take full guarantee of the accuracy of estimates. The maximum possible has been done for the assessment of climate conditions based on the best available data, software and knowledge. Ezysolare shall not be liable for any direct, incidental, consequential, indirect or punitive damages arising or alleged to have arisen out of use of the provided report. 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 2 of 12

CONTENT OF A FORM Geo Coordinates Latitude Longitude 33.9000015259 North 117.900001526 West Technical Specifications Capacity 115 kw Shadow Free Area - Type of Area Roof Type of Roof Flat Modules & Inverters Set # Item Type Make Capacity Set Module Polycrystalline Canadian Solar 250.000 Wp Inverter String Danfoss 15.000 kw Remarks - Electricity Tariff Tariff / kwh Remarks - 0.32 USD Type of SEAR Provider Meteonorm 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 3 of 12

1. METHODOLOGY OF SEAR The SEAR report consists of highest accuracy data from multiple databases based on customer requirement. The general information, which we put in, our report comes from Meteonorm, NASA-SSE, SolarGIS database and PVsyst. Meteonorm database: Meteonorm data is a climatologic database for solar energy applications combined with a synthetic weather generator. It contains a large database of ground station measurements collected from various sources. PVsyst: The PVsyst software offers resource assessment solutions for grid connected, off-grid, and DC grid based systems based on an extensive set of database consisting of solar modules, invert-ers and other BoS components. Its calculation of energy generation is based on Meteorological data. Process: The Process we follow to create your Energy Assessment report is as follows: Specify the geographical location and the meteorological data for the irradiance & temperature of a particular site. Define a basic system variant, including the orientation of the PV modules, the required power or available area and the type of PV modules and inverters that is required. PVsyst will propose a basic configuration for this choice and set reasonable default values for all parameters that are required for a first calculation. We define successive variants by progressively adding far shadings, near shadings, specific loss parameters, economic evaluation, probability exceedance etc. 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 4 of 12

2. SUMMARY This assessment report is carried out to generate renewable energy through Solar Photovoltaic Technology. The proposed solar PV energy project is located at United States, California. The project is aimed to produce electricity from photovoltaic panels and is defined to have 115 kwp installed capacity. The project site can be traced by geographical co-ordinates of Latitude and Longitude. As per the analysis, this project can generate 203334 kwh/annum. 3. PROJECT FEATURES Project Location California Address United States Latitude 33.900 North Longitude 117.900 West Altitude 69 m Azimuth (0=South) 0 Tilt Angle 34 Type of System On Grid Installed Capacity (kwp/mwp) 115 kwp Type of PV Module Polycrystalline Module Make Canadian Solar Capacity of Module (Wp) 250 Total number of Modules 460 Number of PV Module 23 Modules in Series, 20 Strings in Parallel Total Rated Power PDC(kWp) 115 Type of Inverter String Inverter Danfoss Inverter Capacity (kw/mw) 15kW Number of Inverters 7 Total Inverter Power P AC (kw) 105 Ratio (P DC /P AC) 1.10 Annual Energy Generation Specification Production 203334 kwh/annum 1768 kwh/kwp/annum 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 5 of 12

4. CHARACTERISTIC OF SITE 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 6 of 12

5. SOLAR RADIATION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT The yearly global solar radiation in California (on horizontal plane) is 1842.60-kWh/sq.m., the average maximum solar radiation being 228.10-kWh/sq.m. in July and the average minimum being 82.90-kWh/sq.m. in December. The weather file for the locations of California has been selected from Meteonorm database. Month GlobHor Ambient GlobInc Wind Velocity E_Array E_Grid Performance kwh/m 2 2 Temperature C kwh/m (m/s) kwh kwh Ratio % January 89.30 14.18 142.30 1.80 14565 14170 86.60 February 104.50 14.46 143.80 2.30 14759 14366 86.90 March 151.00 15.99 182.20 2.40 18455 17954 85.70 April 184.00 16.99 191.20 2.70 19206 18686 85.00 May 201.90 19.22 188.40 2.70 18832 18314 84.50 June 201.50 20.43 179.00 2.80 17881 17395 84.50 July 228.10 22.52 206.80 2.50 20253 19701 82.80 August 210.20 23.23 209.90 2.40 20436 19879 82.30 September 163.20 22.32 185.80 2.20 18194 17708 82.90 October 130.80 19.58 175.40 2.00 17551 17080 84.70 November 95.40 16.32 145.20 1.80 14784 14389 86.20 December 82.90 13.88 135.80 1.80 14065 13692 87.70 Year 1842.60 18.28 2085.80 2.30 208981 203334 84.80 *GlobHor: Horizontal global irradiation *E_Array: Effective energy at the output of the array *GlobInc: Global Incident in coll. Plane *E_Grid: Energy injected into grid 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 7 of 12

6. IRRADIATION, ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION & PERFORMANCE RATIO Global Incident in Collector Plane (kwh/m2) 0 50 100 150 200 250 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0k 5k 10k 15k 20k 25k Electricity Production (kwh) 0 25 50 75 100 Performance Ratio (%) Global Incident in Collector Plane Electricity Production Performance Ratio 7. GENERATION ANALYSIS The yield calculation was performed using the PVsyst software. The yield values listed in the following were produced. Technical Parameters Value Gain/Loss (%) Horizontal Global Irradiation 1843 kwh/m Global Incident in coll. plane 13.2 % Incident angle modifier -1.40% PV loss due to irradiance level -0.10% PV loss due to temperature -6.30% Array Soiling -2.00% Module quality loss -1.50% Module array mismatch -1.00% Ohmic wiring loss -1.10% Inverter loss during operation -2.40% External transformer losses 0.00% AC Ohmic Losses -0.30% PV SYST Generation 203334 kwh kwh/annum 2 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 8 of 12

8. UNCERTAINTY OF ESTIMATES Financial institute use statistical methods to determine the likelihood that a power plant will generate a certain amount of energy in any given year over the plant's 20- to 30- year life. An exceedance probability has been used in a solar industry to describe the probability that a particular location will experience sufficient solar energy for a proposed area to be financially sound. Banks and investment firms working on energy generation projects often require P50, P75 & P90 values of the solar resource at a location to determine the risk associated with a project's ability to service its debt obligations and other operating costs. P50 Generation Expected 203334.453 kwh P50 PLF Expected 20.180 % P75 Generation Expected 195671.375 kwh P75 PLF Expected 19.400 % P90 Generation Expected 188759.016 kwh P90 PLF Expected 18.730% 9. SAVINGS/EARNINGS Cut your electricity bills and get paid for the electricity you generate. Number of units Tariff Savings 203334 kwh 0.32/kWh 65066.88 USD/annum 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 9 of 12

10. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Global Horizontal Irradiation It is the total amount of shortwave radiation received from above by a surface horizontal to the ground. This value is of particular interest to photovoltaic installations and includes both Direct Normal Irradiance (DNI) and Diffuse Horizontal Irradiance (DIF). Global Incident in Collector Plane The Global incident is computed from the Horizontal Global and Diffuse irradiance in hourly values, using a model. Performance Ratio Performance Ratio (PR) of a plant for a period of time =Energy measured (kwh)/(irradiance (kwh/m ) on the panel x Active area of PV module (m ) x PV module efficiency) PLF - Power Load Factor Plant Load Factor is the ratio of annual energy output of solar power plant to the maximum output that plant could generate in a given year. PLF = kwh/(365 x 24 x Installed capacity). 2 2 Losses: Incident angle modifier The Incident angle modifier corresponds to the weakening of irradiation reaching the PV cells surface, with respect to irradiance under normal incidence, due to reflexions increasing with the incidence angle. In practice, this is commonly calculated using the ASHRAE-model, defined by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers as it has become standard in America. PV loss due to irradiance level This loss is the difference between efficiency at 1,000 W/m conditions) and actual irradiance within each hour. It is typically recommended to use detailed information on the electrical parameters for the PV modules selected to estimate this loss. PV loss due to temperature Whenever there is increase in ambient temperature, the temperature of the PV module also increases, resulting in reduction of power output from the PV module. This depends on the temperature coefficient of the PV module as specified by the manufacturer. 2 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 10 of 12

Array Soiling Dust and Soil can accumulate on the solar module surface, blocking some of the sunlight and reducing output. It is weather and location dependent. Module quality loss Module quality loss is the matching of real module set performance, with respect to the manufacturer's specification. It at half the inferior tolerance, meaning that the real delivered module sample can have an average power between the lower tolerance and the nominal value. Module array mismatch The maximum power output of the total PV array is always less than the sum of the maximum output of the individual modules. This difference is a result of slight inconsistencies in performance from one module to the next and is called module mismatch. Ohmic wiring loss The wires regardless of its compositions (copper, aluminium) or gauge (size, cross sectional area) exhibit ohmic losses. Ohmic losses causes voltage drop in the wiring proportional to its length and current being carried. Inverter loss during operation Inverter losses the output power while converting DC into AC due to variation in ambient operating condition power threshold upper and lower MPPT ranges. External transformer losses In some PV installations (in the MWp range), the transformer is not part of the inverter, but an external device directly connected to the MW grid. The main losses associated with transformer are: The Iron Losses: As we have a constant grid voltage, this is considered as a constant loss with a default value of 0.1% of the nominal power. The Ohmic Losses either in the primary or in the secondary windings. AC Ohmic Losses The AC wiring losses may simply be defined by the distance between the inverter output and the injection point. Plant Load Factor (PLF) Plant load factor is the ratio of annual energy output of solar power plant to the maximum output that plant could generate in a given year. PLF= kwh / (365 X 24 X Installed Capacity) 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 11 of 12

108, Pinnacle Business Park, Corporate Road, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380015 company/ezysolare pages/ezysolare/506233432835389 ezysolare u/0/106466619653569381444/posts info@ezysolare.com 115 kwp SOLAR POWER PLANT AT CALIFORNIA 12 of 12