SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Similar documents
SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

P.L. 2007, c.348 Approved January 13, 2008

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1620

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

WHEREAS, Fees for parking meters, devices or timed parking systems have been historically approved by the City using the Ordinance process; and

ORDINANCE NO The City finds and declares the following:

Ordinance /11/2017

ERIC S. CASHER, CITY ATTORNEY WINSTON RHODES, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER

Colorado Revised Statutes Automated vehicle identification systems

ORDINANCE This ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section Florida Statutes.

1 [Building Code - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - Expedited Permit Process]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1997 SESSION S.L SENATE BILL 260

CITY OF LYNN In City Council

SENATE BILL 803. (1lr0342) ENROLLED BILL Judicial Proceedings/Judiciary

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Repo_rt

Regulation of Commercial Waste Originators, Pumpers, Transporters, Processors, and Disposal Facilities

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM: URSULA LUNA-REYNOSA, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; JACK HOLDEN, BUILDING OFFICIAL

INDUSTRIAL HAUL AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY 28. REGULATION OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC West Virginia University and Its Regional Campuses

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 14, 2018

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE SEALER OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. LCB File No. R Effective December 14, 1998

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

CHAPTER 77: MOTORIZED GOLF CART AND MINI TRUCK USE ON ROADWAYS

Prospector Square Property Owners Association Parking Rules & Regulations SECTION 1- GENERAL

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE: DRAFT ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF MOBILE BILLBOARD ADVERTISING DISPLAYS

West Virginia Motor Vehicle Laws

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE SEALER OF CONSUMER EQUITABILITY. LCB File No. R172-18

TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SESSION CHAPTER 530 HOUSE BILL 516

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONOENCE

Documents: CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION GOLF CARTS - COPY.DOCX, GOLF CART PERMIT PROPOSAL.DOCX, IOWA GOLF CART CODE.DOCX

ENROLLED ACT NO. 56, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SIXTY-FOURTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING 2018 BUDGET SESSION

TITLE 13. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING AND REGULATING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, NORTH CAROLINA

TITLE 14: STREETS AND SIDEWALKS VEHICLES PARKED FOR SALE CAMPING PROHIBITED

Edi tor's note: T his version of paragraph (a) is effective until January 1, 2009.

IC Chapter 6. Commercial Driver's License

MOTORIZED CART ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO O-015 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, California

ORDINANCE NO. 536 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE USE AND REGULATION OF GOLF CARTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF GRIDLEY, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

BOARD POLICIES. DIVISION XI Campus Police POLICY NUMBER [1] DATE Adopted 1980 Edited 1982 Revised 9/92, 3/00, 12/02, 10/13

Senate Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2101

TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE #16-06 REVISED

CLARKSVILLE PARKING AUTHORITY REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 580 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 580.

CHAPTER XIV. TRAFFIC ARTICLE 1. STANDARD TRAFFIC ORDINANCE

Public Service Company of Colorado THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:

To facilitate the extension of departmental services through third party testing organizations as provided for by CRS (b)

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW28.11, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on April 24, 25, 26 and 27, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO

ORDINANCE NO

Parking) shall be established as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. _. The City finds and declares the following:

Clean Taxicab Initiative Code Amendment to Provide an Extended Age Limit for Low Emission Taxicabs

CHAPTER 1-7 ARTICLE V AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING AND REGULATING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

HOUSE BILL No Koch

ORDINANCE NO

Agenda Item TBD DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: December 4, 2018

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 469* Committee Substitute Favorable 4/24/17

SENATE BILL 265 A BILL ENTITLED. Vehicle Laws Young Drivers Driving Privileges

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL INTRODUCED BY HANNA, MALONEY, KORTZ AND SANKEY, MAY 11, 2017

CITY OF STURGIS TITLE 37-1 TITLE 37 CITY TRANSIT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

[Agreement - TEGSCO, LLC, dba San Francisco AutoReturn - Towing and Storage of Abandoned and Illegally-Parked Vehicles - Not to Exceed $65,400,000]

Policy Resolutions #5 (Amended 4/3/13)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE NOVATO MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF RV S ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHOUT A PERMIT

ATAS TAXIS. Goals. Responsibilities. Accomplishments: What got done?

Prospector Square Property Owners Association Parking Rules & Regulations SECTION 1- GENERAL

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CHAPTER 90. STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC WAYS ARTICLE II. USE OF STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC WAYS DIVISION 10. SIDEWALK CAFÉS

Chapter 56 POLICE DEPARTMENT

H 7373 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

CHAPTER 12 TOW TRUCKS

SECTION ONE: ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY PARKING REGULATIONS DISABLED PARKING PARKING CITATION AUTHORITY...

Driving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6

APPENDIX I Motor Vehicle Point and Surcharge Regulations CHAPTER 19. COMPLIACE AND SAFETY

ASSEMBLY, No. 950 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

TOWN OF BRIDGTON TRAFFIC ORDINANCE

Vista Municipal Code

NEW YORK CITY TAXI AND LIMOUSINE COMMISSION

SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RULES CHAPTER TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES AND TAXI SERVICES

ORDINANCE NO. 15,658

CHAPTER 14 TRAFFIC CODE THE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT.

Transcription:

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 180619-093 WHEREAS, In March, 2018, three companies began operating shared electric scooter programs (Powered Scooter Share Programs) in San Francisco, resulting in a proliferation of Powered Scooters on sidewalks, streets, and other public right-of-ways; and, WHEREAS, Powered Scooter Share Programs have the potential to complement San Francisco s existing transportation network by providing a sustainable last mile solution; and, WHEREAS, Since the Powered Scooter Share Programs have begun operating, the City has received numerous complaints about these scooters being operated in a manner that is inconsistent with state law, including being operated on sidewalks, or left on sidewalks or in the public right-of-way so as to impede pedestrian traffic, including blocking access to stairways and doorways; and, WHEREAS, On May 1, 2018 the SFMTA Board of Directors amended Division II of the Transportation Code to establish a pilot Powered Scooter Share Permit Program that authorized the SFMTA to issue permits to operators of Powered Scooter Share Programs and established permit fees, permit requirements and penalties for violations, including a fine amount of for parking an unpermitted Powered Scooter in the public right-of-way in violation of Section 7.2.111 of Division I of the Transportation Code; and, WHEREAS, Meaningful enforcement is an important part of an effective permit program, and the ability to impose increased penalties for repeated violations, and issue citations for improperly parked scooters covered by Powered Scooter Share Permits, in addition to the existing authority to impose administrative penalties, will improve SFMTA s ability to ensure compliance with Powered Scooter Share Permit Program requirements; and, WHEREAS, San Francisco City Charter Section 16.112 requires that published notice be given and a public hearing be held before any fee or any schedule of rates, charges or fares which affects the public is instituted or changed; and, WHEREAS, In compliance with Charter Section 16.112, advertisements were placed in the City s official newspaper to provide notice that the Board of Directors will hold a public hearing on June 19, 2018 to increase penalties for Powered Scooter Share Permit Program violations; and, 1

WHEREAS, The Board's Rules of Order require that the advertisement run for at least five days with the last publication not less than fifteen days prior to the public hearing and advertisements ran in the City s official newspaper for five-days as follows: June 3, 2018, June 6, 2018, June 7, 2018, June 10, 2018, and June 13, 2018, resulting in four of these publication dates being less than fifteen days in advance of the June 19th SFMTA Board meeting; and, WHEREAS, On June 1, 2018 staff contacted representatives of all companies known to the SFMTA to be operating, or considering operating, Powered Scooter Share Programs in San Francisco to inform them of the proposed changes; and, WHEREAS, The SFMTA Board is requested to waive the Board s Rules of Order that require the last publication to be published not less than fifteen days prior to the public hearing; and, WHEREAS, On April 10, 2018, the SFMTA, under authority delegated by the Planning Department, determined that the Powered Scooter Share Program is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15060(c) and 15378(b); and, WHEREAS, A copy of the CEQA determination is on file with the Secretary to the SFMTA Board of Directors, and is incorporated herein by reference; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors waives the Board s Rules of Order that require the last date for publication of notice be not less than fifteen days prior to the public hearing; and be it further RESOLVED, That the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors amends the Transportation Code, Division II, to revise the pilot Powered Scooter Share Permit Program by increasing the fines for repeated Powered Scooter Share Parking violations, and making technical corrections to clarify the scope of the fines, and the authority of the Director of Transportation to issue procedures governing the review of Powered Scooter Share Permit Program application and revocation decisions. I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors at its meeting of June 19, 2018. Secretary to the Board of Directors San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 2

RESOLUTION NO. 180619-093 [Transportation Code Powered Scooter Share Program Penalties] Resolution amending Division II of the Transportation Code to establish increased penalties for violations of Powered Scooter Share Permit Program requirements, clarify the scope of penalties and the authority of the Director of Transportation to issue procedures for the review of Powered Scooter Share Permit Program application and revocation decisions, and make a technical correction. NOTE: Additions are single-underline Times New Roman; deletions are strike-through Times New Roman. The Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors of the City and County of San Francisco enacts the following regulations: Section 1. Article 300 of Division II of the Transportation Code is hereby amended by revising Section 302, to read as follows: SEC. 302. TRANSPORTATION CODE PENALTY SCHEDULE. Violation of any of the following subsections of the Transportation Code shall be punishable by the fines set forth below. TRANSPORTATION CODE SECTION DESCRIPTION FINE AMOUNT Effective July 1, 2018** FINE AMOUNT Effective July 1, 2019** 3

SHARED MOBILITY SERVICES VIOLATIONS Div I 7.2.111 Unpermitted Powered Scooter Share Parking First offense Second offense within one year of first offense Third or subsequent offense within one year of first offense $200 $500 $200 $500 Section 2. Article 900 of Division II of the Transportation Code is hereby amended by revising Section 916, to read as follows: SEC. 916. POWERED SCOOTER SHARE PILOT PROGRAM. (d) General Permit Requirements and Criteria for Powered Scooter Share Program Permits. (6) To be eligible and qualified to obtain a Powered Scooter Share Program Permit, a permit applicant must demonstrate compliance with, or must agree to, as applicable, the following requirements, to the SFMTA s satisfaction: (D) If the SFMTA, Public Works, or any other City agency, department, or commission, including the City Attorney s Office, incurs any costs of addressing or abating any violations of this Section 916, including repair or maintenance of public property, upon receiving written notice of such City costs, the Powered Scooter Share 4

Operator shall reimburse the SFMTA for such costs within 30 days. The SFMTA shall arrange for transfer of funds to any other City agency, department, or commission that incurred costs described above. The Powered Scooter Share Operator s payment under this subsection (ed)(6)(d) shall not substitute for any installment payment otherwise owed or to be paid to the SFMTA. (e) Powered Scooter Share Program Permit Issuance. (1) After evaluating an applicant s permit application, the Director of Transportation shall either grant the Permit as requested, grant the Permit with modifications, or deny the Permit. Where the Permit is granted with modifications or denied, the notice shall explain the basis for the Director of Transportation s decision. An applicant may request review by a hearing officer of the Director of Transportation s decision to deny a permit or grant a permit with modifications. The Director shall issue procedures governing review of these decisions. (2) Notwithstanding any other requirement, the Director of Transportation has the authority to deny a permit based on the extent that issuing a permit would lead to an over-concentration of shared Powered Scooters in the public right-of-way, cause an imbalance in the geographical distribution of scooters that are part of the Powered Scooter Share Program, or otherwise not be in the public interest. (3) In evaluating a permit application, the Director of Transportation may consider the extent to which an operator has the capacity to meet the permit terms based on past experience, including compliance with applicable laws and its efforts to ensure compliance by its users with applicable laws. (f) Permit Revocation. 5

(1) For good cause, the Director of Transportation may revoke any permit issued under this Section 916. Good cause hereunder shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (1A) A Permittee failed to pay a fine imposed by the SFMTA under Section 302 of this Code within 30 days of the date due under this Section 916; (2B) A Permittee failed to pay a permit fee within 30 days following notice of nonpayment; (3C) The Permittee has violated any statute or ordinance, including any provision of Division I or II of this Transportation Code, governing the operation of Powered Scooters regulated by this Code; or (4D) The Permittee has violated one or more conditions of the permit. (2) A Permittee may request review by a hearing officer of the Director of Transportation s decision to revoke a permit. The Director shall issue procedures governing review of these decisions. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 31 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors approves this ordinance. Section 4. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors intends to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, letters, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Transportation Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions or deletions in accordance with the "Note" that appears under the official title of the ordinance. 6

APPROVED AS TO FORM: DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney By: DAVID A. GREENBURG Deputy City Attorney n:\legana\as2018\1800455\01280542.docx I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors at its meeting of June 19th, 2018. Secretary to the Board of Directors San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 7