Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Click to edit Master title style

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Final Report. Refining the Real-Timed Urban Mobility Report. Tim Lomax, Shawn Turner, Bill Eisele, David Schrank, Lauren Geng, and Brian Shollar

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 23,230 22,985 22,755 22,555 22,367 Commuters (1000s) 11,701 11,668 11,547 11,414 11,281 Freeway 186,865 184,033 185,460 192,841 190,566 Arterial Streets 211,745 210,009 209,885 212,415 211,085 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.35 3.56 3.53 3.37 2.75 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.68 3.95 3.95 3.74 3.02 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 25 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 23 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.52 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 323,816 317,443 311,811 306,087 301,664 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 18 17 17 17 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 660,045 646,981 635,457 624,037 615,114 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 37 36 36 36 35 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 Commuter Stress Index 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.08 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 15,631 15,566 15,514 15,543 15,804 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 867 862 859 861 876

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 22,090 21,825 21,555 21,280 21,060 Commuters (1000s) 11,099 10,919 10,724 10,530 10,346 Freeway 184,483 180,785 183,785 182,195 178,450 Arterial Streets 212,349 213,305 215,880 214,470 210,410 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.30 3.45 3.04 2.67 2.32 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.64 4.21 3.47 2.90 2.55 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 294,559 304,684 297,744 285,792 275,740 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 17 17 16 15 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 600,415 621,311 606,590 581,941 561,409 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 35 37 37 36 35 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.21 Total Cost ($ millions) 15,677 16,164 16,373 16,128 16,074 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 870 896 910 899 900

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 20,790 20,515 20,185 19,905 19,615 Commuters (1000s) 10,152 9,965 9,689 9,421 9,154 Freeway 173,820 167,755 162,870 156,590 152,025 Arterial Streets 205,255 200,660 195,555 190,525 186,615 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.97 1.55 1.41 1.56 1.57 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.01 1.55 1.40 1.57 1.54 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 266,375 257,282 245,488 236,417 227,688 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 15 14 13 13 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 542,347 523,609 499,325 480,488 462,609 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 34 33 32 32 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.16 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.20 Total Cost ($ millions) 16,060 15,914 15,523 15,177 15,021 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 902 897 879 863 856

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 19,290 19,040 18,740 18,520 18,270 Commuters (1000s) 8,896 8,672 8,421 8,227 8,012 Freeway 146,340 141,440 135,910 130,710 126,965 Arterial Streets 182,385 177,780 172,500 167,170 162,235 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.17 1.12 1.24 1.30 1.20 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.18 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.25 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 216,739 203,524 190,935 179,033 167,721 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 12 12 11 10 10 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 439,965 413,078 387,294 363,105 340,159 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 30 29 27 26 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.13 Commuter Stress Index 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.17 Total Cost ($ millions) 14,776 14,186 13,509 12,952 12,495 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 845 814 777 749 725

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 17,990 17,715 17,485 17,245 16,980 Commuters (1000s) 7,790 7,567 7,375 7,175 6,974 Freeway 122,450 119,215 115,295 108,525 105,690 Arterial Streets 157,450 152,855 147,843 142,345 138,340 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.11 1.15 1.17 1.15 1.10 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.14 1.19 1.19 1.27 1.12 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 157,108 145,492 134,977 124,549 114,585 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 9 8 8 7 7 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 318,520 295,095 273,652 252,479 232,382 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 25 24 22 21 20 Travel Time Index 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.10 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.14 Total Cost ($ millions) 12,039 11,425 10,917 10,383 9,958 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 701 667 640 610 588

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 16,775 16,540 16,300 16,065 15,830 Commuters (1000s) 6,830 6,687 6,537 6,393 6,254 Freeway 101,695 97,750 93,240 88,265 84,646 Arterial Streets 133,825 130,845 124,975 125,380 121,990 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.12 1.04 1.05 1.02 1.33 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.28 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 103,949 95,816 88,604 82,313 75,043 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 6 5 5 5 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 210,755 194,260 179,700 166,834 152,036 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 18 17 16 15 14 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.07 Commuter Stress Index 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.11 1.11 Total Cost ($ millions) 9,535 9,208 8,877 8,553 7,946 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 565 549 531 514 481

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 15,640 15,520 17,105 Commuters (1000s) 6,129 6,032 6,523 Freeway 79,960 74,840 79,735 Arterial Streets 115,075 114,035 119,955 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.34 1.38 1.44 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.29 1.32 1.38 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 68,975 61,523 64,012 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 4 5 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 139,608 124,418 130,233 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 13 12 12 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.06 1.06 Commuter Stress Index 1.10 1.10 1.09 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 7,573 7,039 7,714 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 465 434 600