Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

Similar documents
Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Seoul Transport Reform and Information Technology for Public Transportation System

Seoul Transportation

Bus System Reform and Social Cohesion

Valuing Convenience in Public Transport in the Korean Context

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

Finance Operation Plan on Transportation Sector

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Autonomous Urban Mobility

Transportation Policy for Reducing GHG Emissions in Korea. Junhaeng Jo

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

TOPIS: Seoul s Intelligent Traffic System (ITS)

Urban Transport systems in major cities in China. Sun Kechao Senior Engineer China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China

Roundtable New Delhi, India

Mobility of Gurugram & NCR-

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Kaohsiung City Government Kaohsiung: Heading towards an Eco-Mobility City

Environmentally Sustainable Transport Singapore s s Experience

Building smart transport in Moscow

What We Heard. Edmontonians in communities Northwest of City Centre share their vision of the Metro Line NW LRT Expansion

An Innovative Approach

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

The Century of Cities

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Build a Green, Harmonious and Integrated Public Transport System

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Policies on Public Transport Development and Financial Schemes in Taipei

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

on the Real Estate Industry Rutt Bridges

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

GROWTH WEEK SESSION JUNE 01 JUNE A PRESENTATION BY KHAWAJA HAIDER LATIF CEO, LAHORE TRANSPORT COMPANY GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, PAKISTAN

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Urban Mobility. Story how to build the urban mobility of Seoul. Kim, Sangbum Visiting Professor University of Seoul

Safer Swifter Better Leadrail Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. / INDIA

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

Click to edit Master title style

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Sustainable Urban Transport Policy : Experience of Daejeon city

Back to the Future? Land Use, Mobility & Accessibility in Metropolitan China Day 23 C. Zegras. Contents

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

Urban Transport Development Investment Program (RRP MON 39256) SECTOR ROAD MAP

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Transport Modes and Technologies A Walking Tour on Capacity, LOS. Urban Transportation Planning MIT Course 1.252j/11.

An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009

The Central London Congestion Charge

Is there an alternative solution?

Istanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

MOSCOW TRANSPORT SYSTEM

BRT: NOT JUST LOW COST

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

C-ITS in Taiwan. Michael Li

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Seoul Bus Reform and Agenda: Big Data Application for Public Transportation

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Two years since our book

Reducing Congestion and Funding Transportation Using Road Pricing

The Strategies and Revelation of Free Buses in Chengdu

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

Embracing Smart Parking The Gurugram Story By Dr. Gaurav Antil, Joint Commissioner, MCG

Impact of the North South Line Project

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. July 2018

Sustainable Urban Transport Project (SUTP)

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

H.Vasant CSVO, NEKRTC KALABURAGI. MENTOR : Prof H.M.Shivanand swamy

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES OF ELECTROMOBILITY

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

Memorandum. To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject:

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

Strategic Plan

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

PROMOTION OF EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN MALAWI BY CHIMWEMWE KAUNDA

MyCiTi. Changing the way Cape Town travels

Transcription:

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS Seoul Case

about Seoul Seoul Was

about Seoul

about Seoul - 1/22 Economic Growth of Korea Item 1970 2004 Differences Population 5,433,198 10,297,004 2 times Vehicles 60,442 2,809,000 48 times GNI/P $ 254 $ 16,500 56 times Houses 584,000 2,278,000 4 time

about Seoul - 2/22 Expansion of Seoul City and Road Infrastructure To accommodate commutes to central business district, radial trunk roads were built initially, which eventually resulted in high-density road infrastructure around City Center. [building radial road network] [concentrated road infra] City Center 1 st Expansion 2 nd Expansion 3 rd Expansion Green Belt Bottleneck Overpass was built in 1969 above covered Cheong-gae stream

about Seoul - 3/22 Construction & Development In the 60 s, Seoul s road system was designed without considering future development of the city. As the economy improved, the city expanded with more citizens commuting in their passenger vehicles. Eventually, its road infrastructure led serious traffic congestion in Seoul. [bridge construction in the 60 s-70 s] [ Gangnam development in the 60 s-70 s]

about Seoul - 4/22 Metro Construction (km) Phase 1 Phase 2 300 6 7 250 200 Lines: 1/2/3/4 Lengths: 135 km 5 8 150 3 4 100 50 2 Lines: 5/6/7/8 Lengths: 154 km 1 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004

about Seoul - 5/22 Vicious Cycle Increase in income and extended commuting distance Traffic volume 2.7M cars/day ( 96) 3.2M cars/day ( 03) Occupation rate of passenger vehicle 72% Car speed 20.0 km/h ( 94) 16.3 km/h ( 02) Poor bus service quality Increase in # passenger cars Traffic congestion Decrease in bus revenue Bus ridership decrease No increase in subway ridership Subway expansion No. Of bus co. 103 ( 97) 57 ( 03) Mode share of bus 30% ( 97) 26% ( 03) Subway 146 km ( 95) 287km ( 02) Gov. Subsidy increases

about Seoul - 6/22 Paradigm Shift on Transportation Policy Past New Policy 1 2 3 Expansion-oriented Quality Service-oriented Passenger Veh.-oriented Public Trans.-oriented Environment-friendly Development-oriented Efficient operation & mgmt. 1 2 3 On Public Transportation Unified Public Transportation Service based on unified Fare Structure. On Pedestrian More Space and Seamless Connectivity. Congestion Mgmt. -Scientific transportation and traffic management -Tight control over personal vehicle usage -Strict law enforcement against traffic violation

about Seoul Renovation of Bus System

about Seoul - 7/22 Better Service for Bus Passengers Reorganize route policy IT system for new policy 1 Functional Route system 1 Unified distance-based fare system 2 4-Type Route system 2 Fee-transfer fare system 3 Altered Bus colors 4 Reorganize Route numbers 3 One Smartcard system

about Seoul - 8/22 Bus Route Reformed by Demand Responsive Before After New Suburban - Irregular headways - Decreasing ridership Feeder Suburban - Regular headways - Increasing ridership Inner City - Fierce competition - Reckless driving Trunk Inner City - Reduced traffic - Reduced operation cost Transfer facilities

about Seoul - 9/22 Reorganize Bus Route with Different Colors Regional connection between suburbs and downtown area Ensuring operation speed and punctuality Feeder to trunk lines and subways Meeting local traffic demand Trunk lines Feeder lines Blue bus Green bus Local lines within the downtown area Serving for business and shopping trips Circular lines Yellow bus Express connection between satellite cities and downtown area Absorbing passenger car commuters Wide area lines Red bus

about Seoul - 10/22 Unified distance-based & free transfer fare system Bus Rider Data Collection System Fare Settlement Center Subway Rider Data Collection System Boarding on a Bus Getting off the Bus Transfer to Subway Arriving at Destination Line number Stop location Boarding time Type of rider Stop location Time Distance Traveled Tentative Fares Stop Location Time Stop Location Time Total Distance Final Fares

about Seoul - 11/22 New Equipments for Faster Transaction Flow Driver Console [Taxi ]Card reader Card Validator HiPass Station Computer Electronic Farebox Vending Machine [Traffic]Congestion Fee charger

about Seoul - 12/22 T-money Smart Card for Unified Fare & Micropayment Plain Card For Adult wrist-watch Card Wristlet card Accessories Card Plain Card for Student USB Card Plain Card for Child

about Seoul - 13/22 Renovation of Transportation Infrastructure Facility 1. Bus-priority system Exclusive median bus lane Bus-priority signal system 2. Transfer facility Expansion of Transfer centers Transfer parking lot 3. Facility and vehicles Improving bus stop facility High quality buses

about Seoul - 14/22 Renovation of Transportation Infrastructure Facility - VS Before After

about Seoul - 15/22 Bus Management System Real-time Monitoring Internet <Arrival Info.> - City Hall Station No 62 bus just left from previous station Real-time Information Real-time Information Order for Reserved Vehicle Dispatch Management Wi-Bro Bus No. 62 has just departed the ABC station. ARS Headways Headways Order for Keeping Headway Distance from the former: 2.4KM (4Min)

about Seoul - 16/22 Scientific Administration Data Analyses Planning Fare Transaction Data Individual Trip Chains # of Passenger per Stop per Hours % of Transfer Demand Pattern Variation on Time Variation on Location Demand Plot for Ridership / Trip Ridership Contour OD Matrix (OD : Origination & Destination) BMS Data Link Travel Time / Speed Headways Min LOS Max Headway Max Ridership / Veh Optimization # of Vehicles / Route Opt. Schedule Opt. Manpower Operation Plan Opt. Dispatch Opt. Fleet Size Opt. Manpower Allocation

about Seoul - 17/22 Efficient & Transparent Operation Management 1. Interval Management Demand Distribution Operation Schedule 2. Route Management Route Planning - ridership (revenue) - overlap - curve - congestion Evaluation Index 3. Revenue Management Veh/Km Computation Operation Cost

about Seoul - 18/22 Passenger car reducing policy 1. Reduce driveways Demolish overpass driveways Create Seoul Plaza 2. Congestion charge Expand charged routes (ex. Urban expressway) Reduce illegal parking (ex. Robust surveillance camera system) 3. Improve pedestrian facility Improve pedestrian roads Increase crosswalks for pedestrians

Cheong-gae stream was covered and an overpass driveway was built in 1969 about Seoul - 19/22 Passenger car reducing policy Restoration of Cheng-gae Stream Before After

about Seoul Achievements in First Year

about Seoul - 20/22 Increase of ridership Public transportation passengers increased 11.0% from the same period of the previous year. Before After 1 year (Thousands person / day) 10,218 10,194 10,063 9,364 9,009 9,402 9,788 9,516 9,442 9,307 9,672 9,146 9,063 8,668 July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 03.7~12 Averaged 04.7~12 Averaged

about Seoul - 21/22 Decrease of Bus-related Accidents The number of accidents in July 2004 decreased 26.9% compared to that of July 2003. Before After 1 year (Number of Accidents per Month) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 658 516 142 accidents per month has been decreased

about Seoul - 22/22 Change in Satisfaction Levels (Percents) 47.2 51.8 54.7 56.0 54.2 49.2 43.6 Not satisfied Fare Satisfied 44.9 49.9 37.4 35.2 34.4 33.0 30.5 35.8 38.6 23.8 37.0 15.4 13.0 10.9 11.0 15.3 15.0 17.8 22.2 13.2 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.8 7.15 7.22 7.29 9.23 10.28 Service Open -2004. 7. 1 After 3-month

Seoul ITS Now, Paradigm shift Green Transportation From development to efficiency Public transportation passenger: 16% increase Traffic volume Bus average speed Carbon emissions : 24% decrease : 39% increase : 5.5% decrease

Video Clip Play

Thank you.