Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

Similar documents
Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL.

Vehicle: Risks and Measures. Co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union

Study on the Influence of Seat Adjustment on Occupant Head Injury Based on MADYMO

Lateral Protection Device

POLICY POSITION ON THE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION REGULATION

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN CAR COMPATIBILITY PHENOMENA

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

Automobile Body, Chassis, Occupant and Pedestrian Safety, and Structures Track

VOLKSWAGEN. Volkswagen Safety Features

The Future of Vehicle Safety

Toyota s トヨタの安全への取り組み

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

*Friedman Research Corporation, 1508-B Ferguson Lane, Austin, TX ** Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, 93109

DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS

Australian Pole Side Impact Research 2010

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

Human Body Behavior as Response on Autonomous Maneuvers, Based on ATD and Human Model*

Lighter and Safer Cars by Design

Új technológiák a közlekedésbiztonság jövőjéért

Improvement of Crashworthiness of Bus Structure under Frontal Impact

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Crash Safe Composite Lighting Columns, Contact-Impact Problem

Correlation of Occupant Evaluation Index on Vehicle-occupant-guardrail Impact System Guo-sheng ZHANG, Hong-li LIU and Zhi-sheng DONG

Future Safety Systems As a Challenge in an Changing Industry

Safer Vehicle Design. TRIPP IIT Delhi

Optimization & Development of Vehicle Rear Under-Run Protection Devices in Heavy Vehicle (RUPD) for Regulative Load Cases

Egg Car Collision Project

Women In Transportation Seminar The Future of Transportation How Do We Get There. US Department of Transportation NHTSA Julie J Kang

Renault Trafic SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

Design Evaluation of Fuel Tank & Chassis Frame for Rear Impact of Toyota Yaris

Suzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Wheelchair Transportation Principles I: Biomechanics of Injury

Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

MINI Clubman 68% 90% 68% 67% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Mazda 2 78% 86% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Potential Effects of Deceleration Pulse Variations on Injury Measures Computed in Aircraft Seat HIC Analysis Testing

STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY

Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research

Investigation of Potential Mitigation of Driver Injury in Heavy Truck Frontal and Rollover Crashes

Crashworthiness Evaluation of an Impact Energy Absorber in a Car Bumper for Frontal Crash Event - A FEA Approach

Renault Trafic 91% 52% 53% 57% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Nissan NP300 Navara 78% 79% 78% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Pick-up. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Suzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

GRSP ASIA MEETING - MARCH

LAND ROVER DISCOVERY. ANCAP Safety Rating. ancap.com.au. Test Results Summary. This ANCAP safety rating applies to: Adult Occupant Protection.

Application of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards by Type of Motor Vehicle or Item of Motor Vehicle Equipment. August 2005

Transport Canada. Child Occupant Protection Research. Considerations for Future Regulations. Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research

DIFFERENT BUSSES -COMPARISON-

Skoda Superb 86% 86% 76% 71% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.

I. Road Safety Targets and Indicators. II. Follow-up. III. Proposal. Note by the secretariat

After-accident vehicle inspection

Crashworthiness for Transit Bus. Presentation by Jodi Godfrey Co author: Lisa Staes

Renault Kadjar 81% 89% 74% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Honda HR-V 79% 86% 72% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

Pre impact Braking Influence on the Standard Seat belted and Motorized Seat belted Occupants in Frontal Collisions based on Anthropometric Test Dummy

Hyundai i20 73% 85% 79% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

INFLUENCE OF BUMPER DESIGN TO LOWER LEG IMPACT RESPONSE

CMVSR 208 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN FRONTAL IMPACT

Design Optimization of Crush Beams of SUV Chassis for Crashworthiness

Opel/Vauxhall Astra 84% 86% 83% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

< R e v i s e d D r a f t R o a d m a p >

Using Injury Data to Understand Traffic and Vehicle Safety

Fiat 500X 85% 86% 74% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle

Hyundai Tucson 85% 86% 71% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Audi TT SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Finite Element Analysis of Rear Under-Run Protection Device (RUPD) for Impact Loading

Study concerning the loads over driver's chests in car crashes with cars of the same or different generation

HOLDEN ACADIA NOVEMBER ONWARDS ALL VARIANTS

Forgiving roads: safe for motorcyclists, safe for everyone

BMW X1 90% 87% 77% 74% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.

Enhancing Safety Through Automation

Side Impact and Ease of Use Comparison between ISOFIX and LATCH. CLEPA Presentation to GRSP, Informal Document GRSP Geneva, May 2004

An Overview of Automotive EMC Standards & Emerging Requirements

JARI Research Activities for Traffic Safety

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (dual), Passenger (dual)

PLASTIC HYBRID SOLUTIONS IN TRUCK BODY-IN-WHITE REINFORCEMENTS AND IN FRONT UNDERRUN PROTECTION

Lancia Ypsilon 79% 44% 64% 38% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Design and analysis of door stiffener using finite element analysis against FMVSS 214 pole impact test

Development of a 2015 Mid-Size Sedan Vehicle Model

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION

Audi A4 90% 87% 75% 75% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist.

Audi TT 68% 81% 64% 82% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Pedestrian.

FIMCAR. Frontal Impact Assessment Approach FIMCAR. frontal impact and compatibility assessment research

Progress of NCAP. Total (42 vehicles) : 31 Passenger cars, 9 RV, 2 Buses. Some of the popular cars sold in Korea. Brake test RV(6) Frontal impact

Simulation of Occupant Posture Changes due to Evasive Manoeuvres and Injury Predictions in Vehicle Frontal and Side Collisions.

The Backseat Passenger Protection Point of View in Car Design Requirements

FMVSS208 Simulation using Finite Element Methods

A factsheet on Volvo Cars safety technology in the new Volvo S90

ISSN Vol.08,Issue.22, December-2016, Pages:

Jaguar XE 82% 92% 81% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

LAMINATED WINDSHIELD BREAKAGE MODELLING IN THE CONTEXT OF HEADFORM IMPACT HOMOLOGATION TESTS

METHOD FOR TESTING STEERABILITY AND STABILITY OF MILITARY VEHICLES MOTION USING SR60E STEERING ROBOT

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT)

Renault Scenic 82% 90% 67% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

ACTIVE SAFETY 3.0. Prof. Kompaß, VP Fahrzeugsicherheit, 14. April 2016

Case Study on Design Optimisation & Regulation Review of Vehicle Front End Structural Crashworthiness

IIHS Side Impact Evaluations. Sonja Arnold-Keifer 10/15/ th German LS-DYNA Forum

Transcription:

Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

Core Knowledge of Automotive Safety and Assessment Engineer Program and Research in TGGS Vehicle fundamentals and manufacturing process Vehicle and part Assessment Crash and human simulation Vehicle standard & Regulation

Overview Research with Integrated Automotive Safety System Active safety Pre-collision Safety Passive Safety Rescue Accident warning & Avoidance Passenger protection Damage mitigation Fast and Accessible Active Safety 1) Driver assistance system e.g. Lane Watch, Night vision 2) Vehicle Assist system e.g. ESC, ABS Pre-collision safety 1) Occupant Restraint system e.g. Pretension Seat Belt. 2) Seat adjustment Passive Safety 1) Occupant protection system e.g. Airbag, absorb energy material 2) Pedestrian protection system e.g. Airbag, material response 3) Structure integrity Rescue 1) Accident information for fast rescue 2) Rescue person can access occupants

Research Activities in ASAE Bus Structure crashworthiness Study of motorcycle grip force on Bus structure design and optimization Study of motorcycle grip force on Bus crashworthiness braking Development of rollover (ECE Motorcycle crash simulation Development of rollover R66) and frontal impact test pedulum rig braking distance Study of child postures and child seat (R29) for safety Bus chassis design and development (ECE R66) and MC rider brake behavior MC component test and evaluation Development of injury mitigation system for buses undr frontal impact Underrun guard rail for Truck frontal impact pendulum (R29) Motorcycle crash simulation Rear end underrun protection Bus & MC component test and evaluation Motorcycle Bus Driving behavior in Bangkok Truck Study of child postures and child seat for safety Vehicle safety Analysis of Vehicle to pedestrian Break test evaluation Car & collision using finite element human Pedestrian Driving head kinematic analysis under model (Car, bus,van,pickup) Frontal impact collision and occupant Pick-up frontal offset collision injury under influence of vehicle manufacturing during process in Thailand rebound Design and development of Analysis of Vehicle to pedestrian Driving head kinematic analysis under frontal offset collision during rebound phase pedestrian collision using finite friendly element human vehicle front phase model (Car, bus,van,pickup) Design and development of pedestrian Fatal Injury Analysis of for friendly vehicle front structure Pickup Vehicle Offset-frontal Collision Fatal Injury Analysis of Occupants for structure Pickup Vehicle Offset-frontal Collision Develop testing protocol for evaluating bus front end design

BUS Crashworthiness (Rollover R66)

Bus Crashworthiness (Impact R29) then click the placeholders to add your own pictures and captions.

Bus Driving Behaviour (Pedestrian Injury)

FMVSS No.223 - Rear underrun protective devices (RUPDs) Truck (UnderRun Design) FMVSS No.223 - Rear underrun protective devices (RUPDs)

Requirement of FMVSS No.223 - Rear underrun protective devices (RUPDs) Apply force to the guard in a forward direction such that the displacement rate of the force application device is constant and not less than 2 cm and not more than 9 cm per minute until the force specified for each test location below has been exceeded, or until the displacement of the force application device has reached 130 mm +0, -5 mm, whichever comes first.

CAR: Driving head kinematic analysis under frontal offset collision during rebound phase

Head acceleration in X direction against Time Head starting to rebound at t= 141 msec. Head rebound velocity (B-Pillar) VS. HIC Head hitting B-pillar t = 240 msec.

Pickup: Fatal Injury Analysis of Occupants for Pickup Vehicle Offset-frontal Collision FMVSS No.223 - Rear underrun protective devices (RUPDs)

Wheel Strength Characteristics of Motorcycle

Brand Size Price (Bath) Mass (kg) Max Load (KN) / Deform (mm.) Damage Type No brand 17 X 1.2 300-400 0.760 14.95 : 61.92 Distort => Broken Spoke Copied STD 17 X 1.4 250-350 1.370 18.50 : 99.34 Radius STD (Loosen Spoke) 17 X 1.4 450-550 1.575 19.30 : 114.39 Radius Genuine STD (Goshi) 17 X 1.4 450-550 1.575 21.50 : 106.86 Radius COMSTAR (Imported) 17 X 1.4 700-800 1.115 33.05 : 101.99 Only Broken Hub Genuine EXCEL (Japan) 17 X 1.2 1000-1100 0.850 24.90 : 100.60 Broken Spoke => Distort Genuine YOKO (Thai) 17 X 1.2 650-750 0.995 21.65 : 104.47 Radius Genuine DID (Japan) 17 X 1.4 1350-1450 1.100 27.80 : 110.51 Radius 35 Compression Load (KN) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 No Brand Copied STD STD (loosen Spoke) Genuine STD COMSTAR EXCEL YOKO DID

Motorcycle: Study of motorcycle grip force on braking distance

Motorcycle: Post crash Kinematic simulation

High Speed Impact Low Speed Impact

Pedestrian: collision using finite element human model

Parameters Standard front end Modified front end HIC 1296 952.7 Resultant moment 214.960 Nm 184 Nm Resultant force 4922.3 N 2850.4 N Aluminium foam 86% porosity

Thank You for Your Attention