Evaluation of Heavy Vehicles on Capacity Analysis for Roundabout Design

Similar documents
TRAFFIC SIMULATION IN REGIONAL MODELING: APPLICATION TO THE INTERSTATEE INFRASTRUCTURE NEAR THE TOLEDO SEA PORT

Cooling System Simulation for Indian Utility Vehicle using COOL3D

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Exploring Electric Vehicle Battery Charging Efficiency

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

IS THE U.S. ON THE PATH TO THE LOWEST MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITIES IN DECADES?

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

Conventional Approach

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

What do autonomous vehicles mean to traffic congestion and crash? Network traffic flow modeling and simulation for autonomous vehicles

Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments (I)

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

CFIRE December 2009

APPENDIX C CATEGORIZATION OF TRAFFIC LOADS

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

RESTRICTIONS ON PARKING; POSTED LIMITATIONS.

Ramsey, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - CODE OF ORDINANCES >> Chapter 54 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES >> ARTICLE IV. - RECREATIONAL VEHICLES >>

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

PREDICTION OF FUEL CONSUMPTION

Investigation of Alternative Work Zone Merging Sign Configurations

Alex Drakopoulos Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Marquette University. and

Energy Innovation Emporium. Transport. Chair: Prof. John Nelson, Centre for Transport Research University of Aberdeen

Lecture 4: Capacity and Level of Service (LoS) of Freeways Basic Segments. Prof. Responsável: Filipe Moura

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Understanding Freight Vehicle Pavement Impacts: How do Passenger Vehicles and Trucks Compare?

PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

FE Review-Transportation-II. D e p a r t m e n t o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g U n i v e r s i t y O f M e m p h i s

Remote Combination Adaptive Driving Equipment Investigation Dynamic Science, Inc. (DSI), Case Number G 1990 Ford Bronco Arizona October

Traffic Capacity Models for Mini-roundabouts in the United States: Calibration of Driver Performance in Simulation

ICT-Emissions driving cycles Laura Borgarello CRF

Are Roundabout Environmentally Friendly? An Evaluation for Uniform Approach Demands

Presenters: Mr. Moresh Kolhe Mr. Babu Bhondave Mahindra & Mahindra (AFS) Copyright 2012 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. All rights reserved.

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Hybrid Electric Vehicle End-of-Life Testing On Honda Insights, Honda Gen I Civics and Toyota Gen I Priuses

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

MULTILANE HIGHWAYS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 21 CONTENTS

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

LADOT Railroad Preemption Form Instructions

CHAPTER 15 STREET LIGHTING TABLE OF CONTENTS

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Hydro Plant Risk Assessment Guide

Chapter 6. CEE 320 Anne Goodchild. Spring 2008 CEE 320

Simulating Trucks in CORSIM

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

GENERAL PROVISIONS BLOCKING INTERSECTIONS OR MARKED SIDEWALKS.

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

UPDATE OF THE SURVEY OF SULFUR LEVELS IN COMMERCIAL JET FUEL. Final Report. November 2012

CRASH RISK RELATIONSHIPS FOR IMPROVED SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF ROADS

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Estimation of Vehicle Queue Lengths Based on Driveway Access Design

Study Report. McCredie-Overton Transmission Line Right-of-Way Analysis. City of Columbia, Missouri. prepared for the (S49)

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Field Testing, Marketing, and Crash Analyses of Mini-roundabouts

Acceleration Behavior of Drivers in a Platoon

CHAPTER 72: PARKING RULES. Stopping, Standing or Parking

A Proposed Modification of the Bridge Gross Weight Formula

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

Volume URL: Chapter Title: Regional Differential Adjusted for City Size

Annex 1. Field Report: Solar Electric Light Fund Energy Harvest Control Study

Analyzing Crash Risk Using Automatic Traffic Recorder Speed Data

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

Chapter 12 VEHICLE SPOT SPEED STUDY

ASTM B117 Testing Quality Control

AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013

VALIDATION OF NVIDIA IRAY AGAINST CIE 171:2006

Technical Notes. Introduction. LED Efficacy. Light Output and Efficacy. Issue 4 April The general equation for light output can be written as:

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Section 5. Traffic Monitoring Guide May 1, Truck Weight Monitoring

Recent Transportation Projects

Olson-EcoLogic Engine Testing Laboratories, LLC

Evaluation of Low-cost Intersection Countermeasures to Reduce Red-Light-Running Violations: Retro-Reflective Signal Back Plates

City of Pacific Grove

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 5, No 2, 2014

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Transcription:

MN WI MI IL IN OH USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report NEXTRANS Project No. 180TUY2.2 Evaluation of Heavy Vehicles on Capacity Analysis for Roundabout Design By Ryan Overton Associate Professor Trine University overtonr@trine.edu

DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NEXTRANS Center, Purdue University under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC05 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.

MN WI MI IL IN OH USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY NEXTRANS Project No. 180TUY2.2 Final Report, 12/15/16 Evaluation of Heavy Vehicles on Capacity Analysis for Roundabout Design Introduction Roundabouts are growing in popularity across the United States. They are advantageous in intersection design for several reasons, the most compelling of which is their improved level of safety at intersections. As they become more common, it is important to be able to design a roundabout to the projected demands of an intersection and have it perform as expected. This requires not only a reliable system of calculations to determine flow rates from the roundabout s physical parameters, but also substantial statistical data to show the effects of parameters such as driver behavior characteristics and vehicle type (Isebrands and Retting). Heavy vehicles have a much larger effect on the flow of a roundabout than a passenger car, and therefore they must be accounted for in the design (Transportation Research Board). Very few studies have looked at the effect of heavy vehicles on the flow of a roundabout. In Chapter 21 of the Highway Capacity Manual, roundabouts are addressed and a passenger car equivalent (PCE) factor of 2.0 is suggested for all heavy vehicles (Transportation Research Board). The purpose of this research is to study the passenger car equivalent factor for heavy vehicles. Experience suggests that heavy vehicles, particularly semi-trucks, have a greater impact on a roundabout than two passenger cars in urban areas. It is expected that the impact of heavy vehicles on the functionality of the roundabout will vary with demand. The objective of this research is to provide support for the current 2.0 PCE or determine new heavy vehicle equivalence for the design of roundabouts. NEXTRANS Project No 180TUY2.2 Technical Summary - Page 1

Findings The recorded data was analyzed using the following two equations. v ppp = v f HH Eqn 2.1 f HH = 1 1+P T (E T 1) Eqn 2.2 v= total flow rate entering the roundabout (veh/hr) v pce = flow rate of passenger cars entering the roundabout (veh/hr) f HV = heavy vehicle adjustment factor P T = percentage of trucks E T = passenger car equivalent for heavy vehicles The total flow rate,including heavy vehicles, (v) for all entering traffic was determined by summing the number of vehicles for each minute of recorded footage, then dividing by the total number of minutes analyzed and multiplying by 60 to achieve vehicles per hour. Because the flows for the entering traffic on each approach were not steady at capacity for long periods of time, it was assumed that analyzing flows for each 15 minute period would provide data which was closest to at capacity flow rates. To calculate this flow rate, the 15 minute period with the highest vehicles entering was found and multiplied by 60 to calculate vehicles per hour. The flow rate for passenger cars only (v pce ) was calculated in the same manner as the flow rate for all traffic, except the minutes with trucks present was removed from the vehicle count. This allowed a maximum flow rate without the influence of heavy vehicles to be calculated. Percentage of trucks (P T ) was determined by dividing the total number of heavy vehicles (heavy vehicles being those rated by the FHWA Vehicle Classification System as 9 or higher) by the total number of vehicles during the observation period. The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 2.1. Using Equation 2.1 the heavy vehicle adjustment factor (f HV ) was calculated using the flows for both the passenger cars (v pce ) and the total vehicular flow when trucks were present (v). The passenger car equivalent for heavy vehicles (E T ) was then calculated, using Equation 2.2, for each approach leg using the heavy vehicle adjustment factor (f HV ) and the percentage of trucks (P T ). Finally, a weighted heavy truck passenger car equivalent average was calculated. The weight for the average was applied according to the flow rate with only passenger cars. The weighted average was used to reduce the influence of moving the average due to extreme high or low flows at the intersection. An overall weighted passenger car equivalent of 3.37 was determined. NEXTRANS Project No 180TUY2.2 Technical Summary - Page 2

Table 2.1: Calculations of each entrance to the roundabout The purpose of this study was to determine the passenger car equivalent for heavy vehicles in a roundabout. This was calculated because it was believed that the given value in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 might be too low at 2.0. The data supported this hypothesis and a weighted average passenger car equivalent of 3.37 was calculated for the roundabout. This value is considerably (69%) higher than the given value of 2.0 in the current design manual. NEXTRANS Project No 180TUY2.2 Technical Summary - Page 3

Recommendations More research is needed to verify the results of this report, however, this research is a good indication that heavy vehicles have an effect on the flow of a roundabout larger than the equivalent of 2 passenger cars. The restrictions of the data collection to only a single location is prohibitive to the validity of the results. However, the data was collected approximately a year apart with similar results. Therefore, the researchers recommend repeating the study at a variety of roundabouts with moderate heavy truck traffic to better understand the impacts of heavy vehicles on roundabout capacity and flow analysis. Furthermore, queue monitoring and dissipation following the presence of a heavy truck may be measureable variables that correlate with flow impacts. Contacts For more information: Ryan Overton Trine University One University Avenue Phone: 260-665-4892 Fax: 260-665-4814 overtonr@trine.edu www.trine.edu NEXTRANS Center Purdue University - Discovery Park 3000 Kent Ave. West Lafayette, IN 47906 nextrans@purdue.edu (765) 496-9724 www.purdue.edu/dp/nextrans NEXTRANS Project No 180TUY2.2 Technical Summary - Page 4