Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

Similar documents
Presentation Outline. # Title

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Critical Design Review

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Flight Readiness Review

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Project NOVA

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

The University of Toledo

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

NASA SL Critical Design Review

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

University Student Launch Initiative

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

University of Notre Dame

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

Critical Design Review

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

Critical Design Review Report

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler

University Student Launch Initiative

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

USLI Flight Readiness Review

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

USLI Critical Design Report

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

Preliminary Design Review

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Post Launch Assessment Review

Madison West High School Green Team

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Critical Design Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

The University of Toledo

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

Electronic Deployment

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Pre-Launch Procedures

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team

SSC Swedish Space Corporation

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 5, 2014

York College of Pennsylvania NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Report

Skill Level 3 Average Skills Needed. Made In USA. Kit #04997 Skill Level 4. Zephyr Parts List

Slipstick III Level 3 Certification

Innovating the future of disaster relief

ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae

MR-1. Please read and understand all instructions before building!

Transcription:

CDR Presentation 1

Presentation Outline # Title # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Team Introduction Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Payload Housing Structure Booster Section Coupler Design Fins Static Margin Diagram Static Stability Margin Final Motor Selection Mass Statement Recovery System Overview Recovery System Components Recovery Electronics Kinetic Energy Summary Landing Radius Testing Overview Test Plans and Procedures Structure Tests Structure Tests Pictures Subscale Flight Results Subscale Flight Results, cont. Subscale Simulated Flight Path 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Subscale Actual Flight Path Staged Recovery Tests Payload Overview SMD Payload Overview Physical Layout Block Diagram Wireless Transmitter ARTCOS Video Camera Scoring Altimeter Payload PCB Schematics Payload Integration Procedure First Prototype Test Flight Data Test Flight GPS Data Failures and Solutions Interface Status of Requirements Verification Design Verification Public Outreach Progress Educational Outreach What Does NASA Stand For? Questions* 2

Team Introduction 3

Vehicle Overview 4

Vehicle Dimensions Total Length: 109.25 in Upper airframe section: 36.5 in Acrylic payload section: 36 in Booster section: 36.75 in Outer diameter: 5.525 in Upper Body Section Payload Housing Booster Section 5

Upper Body Section Dimensions 36.5 in long.075 in thick (airframe and nosecone) Nose Cone Ballast System Upper Body Airframe 6

Payload Housing Structure Dimensions 36 in long 0.125 in thick Material Clear Acrylic 7

Booster Section Dimensions 36 in long 0.075 in wall thickness Materials Fiberglass 8

Coupler Design Dimensions 11.25 in long Outer diameter 5.373/5.178 in Inner diameter 5.06 in Material Fiberglass 9

Fins Dimension Root Chord 12 in Tip Chord 0 in Height 5 in Sweep Length 9.8 in Sweep Angle 63 Degrees 10

Static Margin Diagram 11

Static Stability Margin Center of Gravity 62.992 in from the tip of the nose Center of Pressure 80.709 in from the tip of the nose Stability margin 17.8 in or 3.22 calibers of body width 12

Final Motor Selection Cesaroni L1720-WT-P Rail Exit Velocity 69.8 ft/s 2.95 in diameter Total impulse of 831 lb f s Estimated apogee at 4,852 ft AGL unballasted 656 ft/s max velocity 2.15 second burn time 13

Mass Statement Subsection Payload 2.47 Recovery 8.20 Structure 26.46 Total Mass (Launch) 37.13 Total Mass (Apogee) 33.25 10.6:1 thrust-to-weight ratio Mass may change by ±10 percent Reduction to weight planned Mass (lb)times acceleration 14

Recovery System Overview 15

Recovery System Components Material 1.9 oz. silicone coated, reinforced cross-form, rip stop nylon Main 10 ft diameter Four 10 ft long 0.625 in wide tubular woven nylon shroud lines 40 ft long 0.25 in wide tubular Kevlar shock cord SkyAngle XXL deployment bag Drogue 2 ft diameter Four 2ft long 0.25 in wide tubular woven nylon shroud lines 20 ft long 0.25 in wide tubular Kevlar shock cord Nomex blanket for protection 16

Recovery Electronics Altimeter System Metallic flashing Shields avionics from false signaling by interfering RF Featherweight magnetic arming switch Primary Featherweight Raven 3 Secondary PerfectFlite Stratologger SL100 Power One 9-volt battery GPS System Transmitter Garmin Astro DC40 Secured to drogue parachute shock cord Handheld Receiver Garmin Astro 320 17

Kinetic Energy Summary Phase Nose Cone and Upper Body Airframe Payload Booster Total Contained Vehicle Apogee to Main (max) Main to Landing (max) 965.6 ft lbf 1280.2 ft lbf 1225.3 ft lbf 3730.3 ft lbf 5.4 ft lbf 17.7 ft lbf 15.9 ft lbf 51.6 ft lbf 18

Landing Radius Wind Speed Landing Radius (ft) 0 mph 7 5 mph (7.33 ft/s) 501 10 mph (14.67 ft/s) 1,156 15 mph (22 ft/s) 1,639 20 mph (29.33 ft/s) 2,243 19

Testing Overview 20

Test Plans and Procedures Subscale Flights Full Scale Flights Pre-Launch Checklists Post-Flight Checklists Timed Assemblies Failure Analysis 21

Structure Tests Component Test Date Description Procedure Success Epoxy Hydraulic Press 12/28/12 Bulkhead epoxied into airframe, then pressed Hydraulic press applied force simulating shock force Yes; epoxy maxed out the scale at 1500 lbs. Fiberglass Bulkhead Strength Hydraulic Press 12/28/12 Bulkhead was placed under incrementing force Hydraulic press pressed on a block of 2 in x 3 in simulating shock force Yes; bulkhead maxed out the scale at 1500 lbs or 250 psi. Airframe testing (both fiberglass and acrylic) Hydraulic Press 1/4/13 Airframes were subjected to force axially Hydraulic press pressed on the center on a steel sheet across the circumference of the acrylic and fiberglass airframes Yes; both withstood 1500 pound shock force, and 1 minute of constant 1500 pound force Fin Test Hydraulic Press 1/5/13 Torque applied to fins until compromised. Fin mount was placed under the hydraulic press and force applied to create torque. Yes, fins withstood a maximum of 550 in-lbf of torque. First eye bolt Test Test Launch 1/7/13 Drogue parachute attached to eye bolt in place of u bolt. Prototype Vehicle was launched using a custom L667. Yes, eye bolt survived the flight. Second eye bolt Test (with weld) Hydraulic Press TBD Force applied to eye bolt via hydraulic press eye bolt is mounted onto a bulkhead and pressed until failure or weight maximum reached TBD 22

Structure Test Pictures 23

Subscale Flight Results Location Date Apogee (AGL) Predicted Apogee (AGL) Video Link Hunewell Ranch 30 November 12 N/A 401 ft N/A Hunewell Ranch 5 December 12 460 ft 450 ft Video Hunewell Ranch 7 December 12 N/A 575 ft N/A Hunewell Ranch 8 December 12 519 ft 600 ft N/A Hunewell Ranch 8 December 12 509 ft 690 ft N/A Hunewell Ranch 14 December 12 N/A 520 ft N/A Asa, TX 15 December 12 666 ft 615 ft N/A Asa, TX 15 December 12 476 ft 530 ft N/A 24

Subscale Flight Results, cont. Location Date Apogee (AGL) Predicted Apogee (AGL) Video Link Hunewell Ranch 19 December 12 929 ft 1848 ft N/A Hunewell Ranch 19 December 12 1,061 ft 1848 ft Video Hunewell Ranch 21 December 12 629 ft 780 ft Video Hunewell Ranch 21 December 12 4,992 ft 5227 ft Video Hunewell Ranch 5 January 13 2,271 ft 3214 ft Video Hunewell Ranch 6 January 13 2,920 ft 3559 ft Video P&L Ranch 7 January 13 2,402 ft 2908 ft N/A 25

Subscale Simulated Flight Path 26

Subscale Actual Flight Path Featherweight Raven3 PerfectFlite Stratologger SL100 27

Staged Recovery Tests Consists of subscale test launches and static ejection tests As noted in the previous table, X successful dual deployments have occurred with subscale flights Upon completion of prototype 2 assembly, recovery systems test will continue These will better simulate final launch conditions for the recovery system 28

Payload Overview 29

SMD Payload Overview Atmospheric Data Gathering Autonomous Real-Time Camera Orientation System (ARTCOS) Video Recording Clear Housing PCB in final design 30

Physical Layout Atmospheric Sensors UV and Solar Irradiance Sensors Video Camera ARTCOS 31

Block Diagram 32

Wireless Transmitter Xbee XSC S3B 33

ARTCOS Concept Mounting 34

Video Camera Keyfob 808 #20 Price: $20 35

Scoring Altimeter Adept A1E Name Distributor Dimensions Input Voltage Cost A1E Adept 0.55" x 2.2" 12V $29.95 36

Payload PCB Schematics Breakout Boards PCB Surface Mount PCB Actual PCB 37

Payload Integration Procedure Payload In Bulkhead Static Bulkhead 38

First Prototype No PCB Slow ARTCOS Image Storage No Magnetic Switch Only 180 o UV 39

Test Flight Data 40

Test Flight GPS Data 41

Failures and Solutions Component Mounting No UV Measurements Temperature Spike ARTCOS Mounting Failure 42

Interfaces Airframe Couplers Rail Buttons Magnetic Switches Electrical Ignition System Telemetry 43

Status of Requirements Verification 44

Design Verification To date the vehicle meets every requirement provided in the SOW The recovery subsystem team will continue verification through test flights Payload has all sensors working together, clear acrylic filtering must be tested 45

Public Outreach Progress 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 46

47

What Does NASA Stand For? National Asteroid and Space Association New Airplanes Super Awesome 48

Questions? 49