Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 8 Passenger Transport Improvements

Similar documents
Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 12 Parking Restrictions

1. What are your experiences of parking on a footway or on a road next to a dropped kerb or double parking?

Procurement notes for councils (Scotland)

Appendix 3. DRAFT Policy on Vehicle Activated Signs

Public Transport Proposals including: Subsidised Bus Services, Concessionary Travel and Community Transport Draft Passenger Transport Strategy 2016

Integrating transport (buses)

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL)

Bus Stop Clearway - Review of Consultation responses. Summary

Community Self-help Scheme. for Minor Highway Maintenance GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

committee report General Permitted Development Order SPT response to consultation

ULTRA LOW EMISSIONS ZONE CONSULTATION LONDON COUNCILS RESPONSE

TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING

Please Read Carefully

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

REF NO. REC/S5/18/TB/36 RURAL ECONOMY AND CONNECTIVITY COMMITTEE TRANSPORT (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL. Low Emission Zones

Alconbury Weald: the story so far

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

Controlled Parking Zones Commentary

Forest Hill Street Clutter study

Bus Passenger Survey

Civil parking enforcement in Cambridgeshire Don t get a parking ticket!

Code of Practice v1.8. For the use by buses and coaches of the University of Bath

Chapter 11 Route Window NE10 Gidea Park station. Transport for London

Standard PCN Codes v6.6.1 On-Street

Comhairle Cathrach Chorcaí Cork City Council

Partnership Board. Management Team. Working Groups

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF DWELLING HOUSES AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS FOR WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES AND REFUSE VEHICLE ACCESS POLICY AND GUIDANCE NOTES

Welcome. Hello and welcome to this information stall about our proposals for the expansion of the Orchard Centre.

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

Annual Parking and Enforcement Report

Presentation to the Irish Parking Association s Annual Seminar and Exhibition. Managing On-Street Parking in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown.

APP/P1.2/SCH. Scheme Overview Summary Proof of Evidence Peter Adams

Reducing CO 2 emissions from vehicles by encouraging lower carbon car choices and fuel efficient driving techniques (eco-driving)

Essex Junction Train Station Access and Scoping Study Discussion of Transportation Alternatives

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE REVOLUTION

Dropped Crossing Service

Mobility Vehicle Policy

1. How has traffic congestion changed in London in recent years? Are there differences in the amount, time, type and/or location of congestion?

1. Mobility Scooter storage policy

The Streamlined Public Transit Commute.

The Highways Agency is working to improve the M3 between junctions 2 to 4a.

There were 638 responses received for this proposal. Of these, the majority (70%) replied as individuals.

Environmental Visual Audit. PC John Irving COPS Team

Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill. Response to the request for follow up written evidence at the Committee meeting on 24 November 2004

Interim Advice Note 137/10. The use of Stepped Speed Limits at Roadworks. Interim Advice Note 137/10 Stepped Speed Limits

Bus Stop Policy and Standards

Chairperson and Committee Members REGULATORY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 3 SEPTEMBER 2015

Motorcycles that are driven antisocially, illegally and on public land such as in alleyways, parks and green spaces.

TSRGD 2015: Changes affecting parking and civil enforcement. Parking Forum 8 August 2014

711. USE OF VEHICLES ON SCHOOL BUSINESS

RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND DRIVER AND VEHICLE STANDARDS AGENCY S CONSULTATION PAPER

CLERK s REPORT ON SPEED INDICATOR DEVICES

5 Days Notice is required (working days)

Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Guide to Parking Restrictions and Enforcement in Cambridge

E) That the General Manager be authorized to execute and deliver such documentation on behalf of the Park Board.

BUILDING THE UK S LARGEST CAR CLUB IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON. Martijn Cooijmans and Eric Manners London Borough of Islington

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CIP- Center for Innovation for the Poor Integrated Energy Centre Replication, urban to tribal

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

April 2010 April 2010 Presented by Alan Eirls

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

College Car Park Policy

METRO STRATEGY

Project : A Prepared by: Jack Wellings / Andrew Hughes. Client: Wembdon Parish Council Approved by: Philip Weatherhead

Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Rapid Response. Lineside Signal Spacing. Railway Group Standard GK/RT0034 Issue Three Date September 1998

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

Enderby Park & Ride, Leicester

THE GOVERNMENT S SPEED REVIEW: AA VIEWS

Onward travel. Insights from HS2 online panel

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

Introduction A mobility scooter could cause considerable damage to the user or to other people if it collided with someone or something.

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

Co-location Informal Guidance Note. March 2018 Version 1.1

STANDARD TECHNIQUE : SD5P/2

Designing Highways for Motorcyclists

Fiji Bus Industry: improving through greening

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

G u i d e l i n e S U S T A I N A B L E P A R K I N G M A N A G E M E N T Version: November 2015

School bus safety behaviours and responsibilities

Bus Passenger Survey. Autumn 2015 Report

CORE AREA SPECIFIC PLAN

South Gloucestershire Challenge Fund and Cycle Ambition Fund

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

Transformation in Energy and Transportation Sector

How to favor higher car occupancy

PUBLIC EXHIBITION - DRAFT MOTORCYCLE AND SCOOTER STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN

Our firm only processes the data that is required for the preparation, implementation and completion of the case in question.

Transcription:

Local Highway Panels Members Guide 8 Passenger Transport Improvements

2 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 1. Introduction Bus Services The bus services outside London were deregulated in October 1986 and in Essex about 85% of bus services are now wholly commercial and are fully independent of the local authority. When a bus operator identifies that it intends to change or completely withdraw, a commercial bus service, the Local Authority has a duty under the Transport Act to consider whether a replacement service should be provided. Although the authority works in partnership with the commercial operators it also represents the opinions of local residents and can express them with the aim of influencing bus routing and bus frequency. It can therefore attempt to persuade but it cannot control the commercial decisions. Where a commercial service is withdrawn and the local authority identifies a need for a service it can contract for a replacement service. The contract may be for a small number of journeys such as late evenings or it may be for an entire route, for example on a Sunday. In Essex, there is a combination of over 200 contracted services. None are commercially viable and are therefore funded by the authority. While the authority controls the routes and times of its contracted services it is constrained in the extent to which it can act by the available budget for supporting bus services. The longer term viability of many subsidised services is not certain. Therefore any steps that can be taken to increase passenger numbers are to be welcomed improving the passenger waiting environment and assisting the buses to operate punctually are very important factors here. In addition such roadside infrastructure also acts as the gateway to services for potential passengers, so has an important impact on how the public view bus services. Poor infrastructure gives a bad impression of bus services utility.

Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 3 2. Typical Problems Infrastructure issues are regularly raised with the County Council by passengers, bus operators, local councils and other interested parties. Some examples are given below: The bus stop is in the verge and it is very muddy We want a bus shelter to wait in There are no dropped kerbs near the bus stop We need a better bus service It is difficult to get on and off the bus as there is no high kerb Many of these issues are relatively straightforward to address, have a relatively low cost and have a significant positive impact if resolved. Funding for such works has to be obtained through the Local Highways Panel process. 3. Things to Consider The public will raise some issues regarding bus services that are not the responsibility of the Local Authority and therefore cannot be funded from the LHP budget. Members will be informed if this is the case. Bus stops, passenger shelters and raised kerbs are, in the main, the responsibility of the Authority and are likely to be the type of scheme requested via the LHP. It is also likely that representations will be made from time to time by those responsible for providing the bus services (either the bus operators themselves or issues identified by ECC s Passenger Transport team). There may also be other items important to the efficient operation of the service, but which do not constitute actual passenger infrastructure. Such elements may include minor adjustments to kerb lines, or consideration of parking restrictions at junctions in order to enable buses to operate effectively. The siting of a new stop will almost always be contentious, particularly if it is directly outside a resident s property, Often this includes the expectation that they will experience a loss of privacy, an increased level of anti-social behaviour and littering. While such concerns are often perceived rather than a reality, it is important to accept that to the individuals concerned they are real concerns and there may be some impact on resident which will need handling sympathetically. In an organised and

4 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 well-structured way that allows residents voices to be heard. Nonetheless, there is a balance of benefits that has to be assessed and local objections can be outweighed by benefit to the public at large. Not all locations can accommodate a bus stop. There may be difficulties with the road width or with access to the stop or safety issues. It may be difficult to provide the required solution in rural location: There may be no footways or only a footway on one side of the carriageway. Illumination at the stop may also be difficult due to lack of a suitable power 4. Typical Measures Public Transport Infrastructure LHP Schemes Within Essex, the Public Transport Infrastructure is mainly the responsibility of the Authority and is managed by Essex Highways, however, there are also Transport for London poles and flags in the south of the county. The sort of infrastructure that can be requested by the LHP includes: Bus stops installation of new stops or changes to existing locations. The local residents will be informed and their comments and concerns are taken into account before a decision is made. Local representatives may want to consider the reaction of residents before requesting new or adapted bus services. The poles and flags will be maintained by Essex Highways. Bus shelters (without advertising). Public Transport shelters that do not have advertising are classified as permitted development and do not require planning consent, however, as noted best practice is for adjacent properties to be informed and concerns taken into account before any decision is made. ECC has a standard suite of products for bus stop infrastructure improvements which should be used wherever possible to help maintain a consistent image across the County. The varied ownership of passenger shelters means that while many Boroughs, Districts and Parishes do purchase shelters from the ECC standard suite there may be areas where the predominant type of shelter is not a standard ECC product, and under these circumstances it may be more appropriate to use the predominant model.

Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 5 In rural and village settings, residents can have a very keen interest in their local shelters. The Parish or Town Council may wish to: Fund or part-fund a shelter. Take responsibility for cleaning and general maintenance. Shelters should include bench seating and sufficient space for shelter by a wheelchair user. Consideration should also be given as to whether lighting is needed: solar power is sometimes an option if there is not a nearby power supply. Bus stop clearways (yellow bus cages painted on the carriageway) Should only be installed when there is a persistent parking problem which prevents buses safely accessing the bus stop. The installation of the markings creates the Traffic Regulations Order. There is no requirement for formal consultation. However, consultation should be undertaken wherever there is likely to be an effect on local residents, especially if it removes kerbside parking in an area where there is limited offstreet parking provision. Real Time Passenger Information (RTPI) or Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) at stops/shelters. The RTPI/AVL systems are popular with passenger transport users and as more vehicles are equipped with trackers they give passengers accurate bus arrival times. They do require a power supply which may not be available in some rural locations. It may be possible to install solar powered units There is an additional ongoing maintenance cost that is not available through the ECC Revenue budget. Future maintenance costs for new RTPI/AVL equipment should be agreed with the respective Town or Parish Council before the LHP approves the budget for the installation. Raised kerbs to allow access to the services for the mobility impaired, which typically includes the elderly as well as wheelchair/pushchair users. Providing hard-standing for a passenger waiting area to prevent passengers getting muddy whilst waiting for their service. Constructing a safe access route to a bus stop, e.g. a footpath across a grass verge or dropped kerbs to provide a crossing point.

6 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 4. Typical Measures continued Bus Shelters with advertising are provided through commercial providers such as JCDecaux and Clear Channel, whom pay District Councils for the privilege. These contracts are the responsibility of the Borough/City/District Councils and are often very long term for example 15 years is a common contract term. Other items that LHPs might be asked to consider include; Introduction of parking restrictions (either permanent or time restricted) in order to facilitate buses (and other large vehicles) exiting a junction, Adaptations of kerb lines typically at junctions, in order to facilitate smooth movement of a bus around a corner, Adjusting the location of stop lines can also assist buses in making particularly turns into junctions where either the angle is particularly sharp and/or space is limited on the highway. It is also important to consider the potential for impact on local bus services, when considering other LHP schemes for approval. Whilst bus users may not be in the majority in some locations, a large number of people are dependent on bus services therefore consideration should be given to ensuring that existing services are not likely to be adversely affected by changes to the highway infrastructure. Major Schemes While frequency of a bus service and journey time are important to passengers, it is actually the reliability of the service that is the key factor to supporting or increasing ridership. In these cases, Major Schemes will be required to implement bus priority measures and this is outside the scope of the LHP budget. The use of Real Time Passenger Information can go a long way to improving passenger confidence in the bus network, but if the service is continuously unreliable then My bus is never on time My bus always gets stuck in traffic passengers will be deterred from using it and the service will become uneconomic and could be cut. Concerns about bus reliability, frequency or journey time should be passed to the bus operator in the first instance. Where passengers feel that their issue has not been reasonably considered, this can be referred to the ECC passenger transport group, although their influence over commercially operated services is more limited, than for the services that it contracts for.

Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 7 5. Scheme Investigation LHP Schemes The successful implementation of any new infrastructure will depend on a number of unique factors to the scheme, including the location and any utility apparatus that may be present within the highway. An engineer will investigate the site before validating the proposal. Major Schemes Schemes such as bus priority and congestion relief schemes are implemented to address the reliability and improve the journey time. These are generally identified through discussion with the operators. The implementation of bus priority and congestion relief schemes would generally be major schemes and outside the remit of the LHP. 6. Costs and Timescales The Essex County Council contract with Ringway Jacobs is a target cost contract and not a fixed price contract. This type of contract was chosen as the best type of contract to deliver savings and efficiencies and also to promote partnering between ECC and Ringway Jacobs. An explanation of the process and indicative costs and timescales can be found in Appendix 1

8 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2016/17 7. Glossary of Terms AVL CMA CMB EA ECC EH LHP NEPP PP RTPI Automatic Vehicle Location (similar to RTPI) Cabinet Member Action Cabinet Member Briefing Environment Agency Essex County Council Essex Highways Local Highways Panel North Essex Parking Partnership Parking Partnership Real Time Passenger Information S106 Section 106 (Money provided by a Developer to County Council to implement infrastructure as an obligation of the planning permission) S278 Section 278 (Infrastructure required to be implemented by the Developer as an obligation of the planning permission) SERP SID SEPP SLO SSSI TRO TSRGD VAS Safer Essex Roads Partnership Speed Indicating Device South Essex Parking Partnership Speed Limit Order Site of Special Scientific Interest Traffic Regulation Order Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions Vehicle Activated Sign