CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay System for Clean Diesel Production

Similar documents
A Practical Approach to 10 ppm Sulfur Diesel Production

Model test set up methodology for HDS to improve the understanding of reaction pathways in HDT catalysts

FCC pre-treatment catalysts TK-558 BRIM and TK-559 BRIM for ULS gasoline using BRIM technology

[Regular Paper] 1. Introduction

FCC pretreatment catalysts

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 246 NEAR ZERO SULFUR DIESEL FUEL (November 2002)

HYDRODESULFURIZATION AND HYDRODENITROGENATION OF DIESEL DISTILLATE FROM FUSHUN SHALE OIL

A Unique Way to Make Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

A Look at Gasoline Sulfur Reduction Additives in FCC Operations

RefComm Galveston May 2017 FCC naphtha posttreatment

Maximize Yields of High Quality Diesel

Reducing octane loss - solutions for FCC gasoline post-treatment services

Diesel hydroprocessing

Reactivity of several olefins in the HDS of full boiling range FCC gasoline over sulphided CoMo/Al 2 O 3

R&D on New, Low-Temperature, Light Naphtha Isomerization Catalyst and Process

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

Studying effects of hydrotreatment on PAC compositions in refinery streams using GC GC-FID/SCD and GC GC-ToFMS. Asger B.

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 211A HYDROCRACKING FOR MIDDLE DISTILLATES (July 2003)

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

The Role of the Merox Process in the Era of Ultra Low Sulfur Transportation Fuels. 5 th EMEA Catalyst Technology Conference 3 & 4 March 2004

Ultra deep Hydrotreatment of Iraqi Vacuum Gas Oil Using Modified Catalyst

Unity TM Hydroprocessing Catalysts

Hydrodesulfurization of sulfur-containing polyaromatic compounds in light gas oil using noble metal catalysts

Hydrocracking of atmospheric distillable residue of Mongolian oil

DIESEL. Custom Catalyst Systems for Higher Yields of Diesel. Brian Watkins Manager, Hydrotreating Pilot Plant and Technical Service Engineer

Detection of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas According to ASTM D5504 with an Agilent Dual Plasma Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector

Evaluation of phase separator number in hydrodesulfurization (HDS) unit

DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF ATIS-2L, A HIGH ACTIVITY, LOW COST PARAFFIN ISOMERIZATION CATALYST

Reactivity of several olefins in the HDS of full boiling range FCC gasoline over PtPd/USY

SCANFINING TECHNOLOGY: A PROVEN OPTION FOR PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW SULFUR CLEAN GASOLINE

How. clean is your. fuel?

Report. Refining Report. heat removal, lower crude preheat temperature,

GTC TECHNOLOGY. GT-BTX PluS Reduce Sulfur Preserve Octane Value - Produce Petrochemicals. Engineered to Innovate WHITE PAPER

Achieving Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel with IsoTherming Technology

Characterization and Refinery Processing of Partially-upgraded Bitumen

STUDY ON HYDROTREATING OF COKER DISTILLATE(S)

AT734G: A Combined Silicon and Arsenic Guard Catalyst

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

Relative volume activity. Type II CoMoS Type I CoMoS. Trial-and-error era

Claus unit Tail gas treatment catalysts

Selected Answers to the 2010 NPRA Q&A Hydroprocessing Questions

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 158A OCTANE IMPROVERS FOR GASOLINE (February 1992)

Oxidative Desulfurization. IAEE Houston Chapter June 11, 2009

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Feed Hydrotreatment and its Impact on Distribution of Sulfur and Nitrogen Compounds in FCC Diesel

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

The need to be able to assess the

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

DECARBONIZATION OFTRANSPORTATIONFUELS FEEDSTOCKS WITHPETROLEUM FRACTIONS VIA CO-HYDROPROCESSINGBIO-BASED

Transitioning from Commercial Pilot to Mass Production 2 IUT s skid mounted 15,000 barrel per day Processing Unit

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Low Carbon Footprint Adsorptive Technology for ULSD Production

Definition of White Spirits Under RAC Evaluation Based on New Identification Developed for REACH

IHS CHEMICAL PEP Report 29J. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. PEP Report 29J. Gajendra Khare Principal Analyst

An Overview of Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodenitrogenation

The Role of a New FCC Gasoline Three-Cut Splitter in Transformation of Crude Oil Hydrocarbons in CRC

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

Dual Plasma Sulfur and Nitrogen Chemiluminescence Detectors. Unsurpassed Stability, Selectivity, and Sensitivity for your GC Analysis

Effect of Operating Cconditions on Hydrodesulfurization of Vacuum Gas Oil

What is a refiner to do in order to ensure investments

Haldor Topsøe Optimising diesel yield and product properties in hydrocracking. Bettina Sander-Thomsen, New Delhi, April 2012

GTC Technology Day. 16 April Hotel Le Meridien New Delhi. Resid Upgrade and Sulfur Offerings

New hydrocracking catalyst brings higher diesel yield and increases refiner s profitability

Sensitivity analysis and determination of optimum temperature of furnace for commercial visbreaking unit

Growing the World s Fuels

Development of improved catalysts for deep HDS of diesel fuels

Modeling of Hydrogen Consumption and Process Optimization for Hydrotreating of Light Gas Oils

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

MODERN REFINING CONCEPTS No Oil Refining without Hydroprocessing

Oxidative Desulfurization of Kerosene in the Presence of Iron chloride ionic Liquid Catalyst and Ultrasound waves

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

EST technology: an advanced way to upgrade the bottom of the barrel G. Rispoli

Simulation of Hydrotreating Units of Gas oil and Vacuum Gas oil

Exceed Your Hydrocracker Potential Using The Latest Generation Flexible Naphtha/Middle Distillate Catalysts

Author: Vincenzo Piemonte, Associate Professor, University UCBM Rome (Italy)

Revamping HDS Units to Meet High Quality Diesel Specifications

Balancing the Need for Low Sulfur FCC Products and Increasing FCC LCO Yields by Applying Advanced Technology for Cat Feed Hydrotreating

IMPROVING SULFURIC ACID PLANT PERFORMANCE THROUGH NEW SHAPE & HIGHER ACTIVITY CATALYSTS

Diesel Fuel Quality in the Future

STATEMENT OF THE MANUFACTURERS OF EMISSION CONTROLS ASSOCIATION ON THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

MIDDLE DISTILLATE HYDROTREATMENT ZEOLITE CATALYSTS. CONTAINING Pt/Pd OR Ni. A Dissertation CELIA MARIN-ROSAS

Stricter regulations reducing average gasoline sulphur content will require further reduction of FCC gasoline sulphur. Gasoline sulphur content, ppm

Optimizing Hydroprocessing Catalyst Systems for Hydrocracking and Diesel Hydrotreating Applications: Flexibility Through Catalysis

CONVERSION OF GLYCEROL TO GREEN METHANOL IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER

Increase Flexibility to Upgrade Residuum Using Recent Advances in RDS/VRDS-RFCC Process and Catalyst Technology

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 251 BIODIESEL PRODUCTION (November 2004)

Application of In-line High Shear Mixing Process in the Oxidative- Adsorptive Desulfurization of Diesel Fuel

Objectives. WP7: On-engine aftertreatment systems. WP Leader: Jukka Leinonen. Partners:

Scaling down/up three phase reactors

-focusing on effects of sulfur on latest aftertreatment devices-

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

CHALLENGES IN DESIGNING SYNTHESIS CONVERTERS FOR VERY LARGE METHANOL PRODUCTION CAPACITY

Fischer-Tropsch Refining

STUDY OF CHANGES IN THE HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION OF GASOLINE AFTER EACH STAGE REFORMING REACTOR

Technologies & Construction Strategies for Clean Fuels Production in Africa. Stéphane Fédou

ExxonMobil Catalytic Dewaxing - A Commercial Proven Technology

Characterization of crude:

Meeting Sulfur Specifications for 2000 and Beyond

Transcription:

CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay System for Clean Diesel Production Yasuhito Goto and Katsuaki Ishida Petroleum Refining Research & Technology Center, Japan Energy Corporation 3-17-35 Niizo-Minami, Toda, Saitama 335-8502, Japan Abstract CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system is able to achieve ultra low-sulfur diesel production (S = 50ppm or less) without major revamp of conventional deep hydrodesulfurization unit. CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system has been developed based on considering reaction conditions in detail for each part in a desulfurization unit, particularly sulfur-containing compound types to be desulfurized and catalyst poisoning by produced H 2 S and NH 3. Fundamental experimental results for CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay systems are reported. Introduction Further tightening of diesel sulfur specifications has been decided and proposed in worldwide. The focus of the new specifications is reduction of suspended particulate matters (SPM) and NOx emission from diesel-fueled vehicles. In December, 2000, Ministry of the Environment, Japan announced a new sulfur specification for diesel fuel. According to the specifications, the maximum permissible sulfur content of diesel will be 50ppm from the end of 2004 1). Substantially sulfur-free diesel (10-15ppm or less) has been proposed as future diesel specifications. In June, 2000, Environmental Protection Agency, USA proposed 15ppm or less as a new diesel sulfur specification from 2006 2). In March, 2001, German government announced a new incentive tax policy to encourage clean fuel supply. According to the announcement, incentive tax (0.03DM/L) is given to 10ppm or less sulfur diesel from January, 2003 3). EU has already accepted the new German policy. In May, 2001, the European Commission proposed a mandatory zero sulfur specification (10ppm or less) from 2011 4). Japan is also considering a lower sulfur diesel specification than 50ppm 1). Thus much attention is given to effective technological solutions for ultra-low sulfur diesel, particularly sulfur-free diesel production. Features of HDS reaction of gas oil fraction are summarized in the following 5). (1) The feedstock contains various sulfur compounds with widely different reactivities. Sulfides, benzothiophenes, and dibenzothiophene (DBT) (reactive sulfur compounds) are relatively easy to be desulfurized. Conversely,

4-methyldibenzothiophene (4-MDBT) and 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT) (refractory sulfur compounds) are very hard to be desulfurized. (2) Hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, gaseous products of HDS and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) reactions seriously inhibit HDS reaction. (3) The reaction conditions around the inlet and the outlet of an HDS reactor are greatly different. In the reaction zone near the inlet, both reactive and refractory sulfur compounds coexist, and the concentrations of poisoning gaseous compounds are relatively low. In the reaction zone near the outlet, however, refractory sulfur compounds selectively remain, and the concentrations of poisoning gaseous compounds are very high. The outlook of diesel HDS is shown in Figure 1. We have developed CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay for ultra-low sulfur diesel production considering the above-mentioned three key points. CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system can achieve 50ppm sulfur diesel production without major revamp of conventional deep HDS units. In CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system, the first bed catalyst is CoMo type. CoMo catalyst is the pretreatment catalyst for ultra deep HDS over the main NiMo catalyst and plays a role of HDS of reactive sulfur compounds such as DBT. In CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system, the second bed catalyst is NiMo type. NiMo catalyst is the main catalyst for ultra-low sulfur diesel production and achieves HDS of refractory sulfur compounds such as 4-MDBT and 4,6-DMDBT, in the presence of high concentrations of catalyst poisoning materials such as hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Experimental Catalysts Conventional diesel deep HDS catalyst, HOP-463 (CoMo) Conventional diesel deep HDS catalyst, HOP-413 (NiMo) Newly developed catalyst, HOP-467 (CoMo) Newly developed catalyst, HOP-414 (NiMo) All the catalysts are provided by Orient Catalyst Co., Ltd. Single-stage Hydrotreating Experiments A fixed bed flow reactor was used for single-stage hydrotreating experiments. All the experiments were performed under the conditions of P(H 2 ) 5.0 MPa and H 2 /Oil 200 NL/L. LHSV and reaction temperature were variables to obtain various product sulfur levels. The hydrotreating experiments were carried out after presulfiding with diesel fuel containing CS 2 (S: 1wt%). Gaseous contaminants in product oils were removed by contacting with nitrogen gas.

Feedstock Properties of feedstock used for the hydrotreating experiments were summarized in Table 1. Feed 1, Feed 2 and Feed 3 are Middle-east straight-run gas oil fraction. Feed 4 is hydrotreated gas oil. Feed 4S (Feed 4 spiked with CS 2 : 1.6wt%-sulfur) was also used to demonstrate hydrogen sulfide inhibiting conditions. CS 2 is quantitatively converted into hydrogen sulfide at the inlet of the reactor. Analysis Sulfur content of product oil was determined by XRF. conducted to determine DBT, 4-MDBT, and 4,6-DMDBT. GC-AED analysis was also Results and Discussion Sulfur Compound Type Analysis of Different Sulfur Content Diesels Sulfur compound type analysis was carried out in order to know what type of sulfur compounds must be desulfurized to obtain ultra-low sulfur diesel. Table 2 shows the analytical results of Feed 1 and product oils hydrotreated over HOP-463 (CoMo). The case of 316wtppm total product sulfur meets the current 500ppm-sulfur regulation. In this case, a large amount of "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" such as 4-MDBT and 4,6-DMDBT are allowed to remain. Conversely, in the case to meet the 50ppm-sulfur regulation, "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" are allowed not to remain substantially (see total sulfur = 46wtppm). Another important information is that "Reactive Sulfur Compound" such as DBT is substantially removed by HDS upto about 2000ppm. Sulfur Compound Distribution in the Conventional Deep HDS Reactor Conceptual diagram of the sulfur compound distribution in the conventional gas oil deep HDS reactor is demonstrated in Figure 2. In the first bed of the reactor, HDS of the "Reactive Sulfur Compounds" is perfectly carried out. As a result, a high concentration of hydrogen sulfide is fed to the second bed of the reactor. Achievement of 50ppm product sulfur by using conventional CoMo catalyst seems to be hard. Effective HDS of "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" is needed in the second bed. CoMo catalyst primarily takes Direct HDS Route. However, Direct HDS Route is less effective for HDS of "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" than Hydrogenation HDS Route. Reactivities for "Reactive Sulfur Compounds" The reactivities of CoMo and NiMo catalysts for "Reactive Sulfur Compounds" with Feed 2 were characterized (Figure 3). HOP-463 (CoMo) showed a higher HDS activity than HOP-413 (NiMo) under the condition of HDS upto around

2000ppm-sulfur level in product oil. Reactivities for "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" The reactivities of CoMo and NiMo catalysts for "Refractory Sulfur Compounds" with Feed 4 and Feed 4S were characterized (Figure 4). HOP-413 (NiMo) showed a higher HDS activity than HOP-463 (CoMo) regardless of CS 2 spiking. Concept of CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay 6) Conceptual Diagram of the sulfur compound distribution in CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay is shown in Figure 5. The first bed CoMo catalyst achieves HDS of reactive sulfur compounds. The second bed NiMo catalyst plays a role of the main catalyst for ultra-low sulfur diesel production. The NiMo catalyst desulfurizes Refractory Sulfur Compounds in the presence of a large amount of poisoning materials such as hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Performance of CoMo / NiMo Catalyst Relay We have developed CoMo catalyst (HOP-467) and NiMo catalyst (HOP-414) based on the CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay concept. Figure 6 shows that the combined use of HOP-467 and HOP-414 is superior to HOP-463 (Conventional CoMo) to achieve 50ppm-sulfur diesel. Under the evaluation conditions, combination of HOP-467 / HOP-414 achieves 50ppm-sulfur diesel production at 341 o C, that is, 14 o C lower reaction temperature than HOP-463 does. Conclusions The CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay system achieves ultra-low-sulfur diesel production (S = 50ppm or less) without major revamp of conventional deep HDS unit. The first bed CoMo catalyst achieves HDS of reactive sulfur compounds. The second bed NiMo catalyst plays a role of the main catalyst for ultra-low sulfur diesel production. Literature Cited 1) http://www.env.go.jp/press/file_view.php3?serial=791&hou_id=1243.pdf (November 1, 2000, Japanese). 2) http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/epa-air/2000/june/day-02/ (June 2, 2000). 3) http://www.bmu.de/presse/2001/pm599.htm (March 13, 2001). 4) http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=ip/01/681 0 A GED&lg=EN (May 11, 2001). 5) Kabe, T.; Ishihara, A.; Qian, W. Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodenitrogenation Chemistry and Engineering, Kodansha, Tokyo (1999) and cited therein.

6) Koide, R.; Goto, Y.; Kawabata, M.; Ishida, K. Prepr. Div. Petrol. Chem., Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 46, 398-401. Table 1. Feed Properties Item Unit Feed 1 Feed 2 Feed 3 Feed 4 Density@15 [g/cm 3 ] 0.8604 0.8569 0.8490 0.8383 Sulfur [wtppm] 17160 16230 16900 303 Nitrogen [wtppm] 216 119 61 2 Distillation (ASTM D 86) IBP [ o C] 221.5 221.0 223.0 229.0 T10% [ o C] 281.5 272.5 256.5. 272.0 T50% [ o C] 309.5 303.0 287.0 301.5 T90% [ o C] 352.5 351.0 331.5 337.5 EP [ o C] 367.5 375.5 347.0 357.0 Table 2. Sulfur Composition of Feed 1 and Product Oils Hydrotreated over HOP-463 Sulfur [wtppm] Total DBT 4-MDBT 4,6-DMDBT 17160(Feed 1) 268 624 435 2230 4 137 126 316 0 11 27 46 0 0 3

Feed S > 10,000ppm Target Desulfurized Compounds H 2 S Dibenzothiophene (DBT) Easy HDS Type H 2 S Rich NH 3 Rich Product S 4-Methyl-DBT (4-MDBT) S 4,6-Dimethyl-DBT (4,6-DMDBT) Hard HDS Type Figure 1. Outlook of diesel hydrodesulfurization Feed Easy Hard CoMo H 2 S Product 50 2,000 17,000 Sulfur [wtppm] Figure 2. Conceptual diagram of the sulfur compound distribution in the conventional gas oil deep HDS reactor. HOP-463 HOP-413 0 1000 2000 3000 Product Sulfur [wtppm] Figure 3. HDS activity comparison of CoMo and NiMo catalysts. (Feed 2, P(H 2 ) 5.0 MPa, H 2 /Oil 200 NL/L, LHSV 2.0 h -1, Temp. 320 o C)

HOP-463 HOP-413 Feed 4S Feed 4 0 50 100 150 Product Sulfur [wtppm] Figure 4. HDS activity comparison of CoMo and NiMo catalysts. (P(H 2 ) 5.0 MPa, H 2 /Oil 200 NL/L, LHSV 2.0 h -1, Temp. 310 o C) Feed Easy CoMo Hard NiMo H 2 S Product 50 2,000 17,000 Sulfur [wtppm] Figure 5. Conceptual diagram of CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay for 50ppm-sulfur diesel production. Easy: Reactive Sulfur Compounds including DBT Hard: Refractory Sulfur Compounds including 4-MDBT and 4,6-DMDBT.

1000 HOP-463 HOP-467 / HOP-414 S in product, ppm 100 50ppm 10 341 o C 355 o C 310 320 330 340 350 360 Reaction temperature, o C Figure 6. Improvement of HDS activity with CoMo/NiMo Catalyst Relay Feed 1, P(H 2 ) 5.0 MPa, H 2 /Oil 200 NL/L, LHSV 1.0 h -1