Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

CHART BOOK ON WAGES, OPERATING COSTS, AND COST OF LIVING

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Streamlining the District s Nightlife Curbside Access. Managing High-Demand Curbside Passenger Loading Zones

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 945 965 985 1,000 1,015 Rank 50 47 45 45 43 Commuters (1000s) 451 448 457 455 459 Freeway 6,709 6,662 6,560 6,931 6,938 Arterial Streets 9,164 9,409 9,515 9,604 9,613 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.63 3.79 3.75 3.65 2.95 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.92 4.20 4.17 3.99 3.21 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 25 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 21 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.90 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 14,053 13,983 13,870 13,757 13,509 Rank 49 47 47 47 47 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 21 21 21 20 20 Rank 32 27 25 30 27 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 26,851 26,716 26,500 26,285 25,811 Rank 52 51 51 51 50 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 40 39 38 38 37 Rank 49 50 50 50 54 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.16 Rank 54 52 50 61 57 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 Rank 71 69 66 76 74 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.13 -- -- -- -- Rank 49 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 620 627 631 639 647 Rank 52 51 51 51 51 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 918 929 935 946 958 Rank 53 52 50 48 47

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 1,030 1,045 1,060 1,065 1,070 Rank 43 41 39 39 38 Commuters (1000s) 456 458 458 459 457 Freeway 6,700 6,595 6,760 6,870 6,720 Arterial Streets 9,400 9,540 9,645 9,235 8,700 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.47 3.55 3.19 2.82 2.40 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.90 4.52 3.71 3.03 2.66 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 13,447 13,335 13,823 13,607 13,591 Rank 48 48 47 46 46 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 20 20 20 20 20 Rank 24 30 26 22 19 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 25,692 25,478 26,411 25,998 25,968 Rank 50 50 50 48 48 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 37 36 37 36 36 Rank 55 66 60 61 58 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 Rank 56 68 66 63 61 Commuter Stress Index 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 Rank 76 79 80 77 76 Total Cost ($ millions) 655 647 697 705 727 Rank 50 51 50 50 49 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 970 958 1,032 1,043 1,077 Rank 46 54 47 42 35

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 1,085 1,095 1,100 1,110 1,110 Rank 38 37 37 37 36 Commuters (1000s) 462 464 459 456 449 Freeway 6,725 6,720 6,435 6,380 6,365 Arterial Streets 8,300 8,000 7,850 7,800 7,890 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.14 1.62 1.49 1.72 1.64 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.14 1.73 1.51 1.70 1.65 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 13,504 13,412 13,284 12,741 12,465 Rank 45 45 43 42 41 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 20 20 20 19 18 Rank 14 12 11 11 12 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 25,801 25,626 25,382 24,342 23,816 Rank 48 47 45 45 45 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 36 35 35 34 33 Rank 57 57 53 53 57 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.14 Rank 66 64 61 58 65 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.15 Rank 77 74 72 68 76 Total Cost ($ millions) 747 762 772 752 756 Rank 49 47 45 45 45 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,106 1,128 1,142 1,113 1,120 Rank 32 31 25 25 21

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 1,100 1,090 1,080 1,075 1,070 Rank 36 36 37 36 36 Commuters (1000s) 438 427 416 407 399 Freeway 6,050 5,850 5,700 5,530 5,565 Arterial Streets 8,115 7,950 7,500 7,100 6,800 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.19 1.15 1.31 1.37 1.27 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.24 1.29 1.39 1.28 1.19 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 11,591 10,162 8,776 7,919 7,569 Rank 42 43 45 45 45 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 15 13 12 11 Rank 12 17 27 31 35 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 22,146 19,416 16,767 15,131 14,462 Rank 44 47 49 50 49 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 32 28 25 23 22 Rank 58 66 73 74 76 Travel Time Index 1.14 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 62 72 72 76 73 Commuter Stress Index 1.15 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.10 Rank 74 79 82 84 88 Total Cost ($ millions) 727 652 571 527 519 Rank 46 46 48 50 49 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,076 964 846 781 768 Rank 25 29 43 48 47

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 1,070 1,070 1,070 1,065 1,065 Rank 35 35 35 34 34 Commuters (1000s) 392 386 380 372 366 Freeway 5,645 5,580 5,365 5,265 4,950 Arterial Streets 6,500 6,200 6,025 5,840 5,790 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.15 1.21 1.24 1.21 1.07 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.07 1.13 1.00 1.35 1.09 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,276 6,762 6,333 6,099 5,875 Rank 45 45 44 44 43 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 11 10 9 9 9 Rank 20 24 28 22 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 13,902 12,920 12,101 11,653 11,224 Rank 48 48 48 46 44 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 22 20 19 19 18 Rank 72 74 74 69 67 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.08 Rank 75 74 76 71 63 Commuter Stress Index 1.10 1.10 1.09 1.09 1.09 Rank 87 81 84 78 75 Total Cost ($ millions) 513 489 472 468 470 Rank 48 48 48 45 44 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 760 724 698 693 695 Rank 43 43 40 37 30

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 1,060 1,055 1,045 1,040 1,030 Rank 34 33 33 31 31 Commuters (1000s) 362 356 350 344 338 Freeway 5,000 4,890 4,680 4,475 4,280 Arterial Streets 5,600 5,500 5,300 5,150 5,000 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.13 1.04 1.05 1.02 1.34 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.05 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.24 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 5,464 4,803 4,300 4,161 4,068 Rank 41 42 41 40 38 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 8 7 6 6 6 Rank 18 21 27 23 17 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 10,439 9,176 8,215 7,951 7,773 Rank 44 47 44 41 40 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 17 15 14 14 13 Rank 63 67 64 58 57 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.06 1.06 Rank 66 60 66 57 54 Commuter Stress Index 1.08 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Rank 79 82 78 72 66 Total Cost ($ millions) 460 424 396 397 395 Rank 43 44 45 42 39 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 682 628 586 587 585 Rank 28 33 36 31 26

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 1,030 1,050 1,075 Rank 31 31 30 Commuters (1000s) 336 339 343 Freeway 4,000 3,775 3,980 Arterial Streets 4,900 4,750 4,630 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.35 1.38 1.44 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.25 1.28 1.34 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,634 3,260 3,198 Rank 39 39 39 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 5 5 Rank 22 19 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 6,944 6,230 6,110 Rank 41 40 39 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 12 11 10 Rank 56 57 58 Travel Time Index 1.05 1.05 1.04 Rank 57 55 61 Commuter Stress Index 1.06 1.06 1.05 Rank 76 67 80 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 366 342 346 Rank 41 41 40 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 541 506 513 Rank 28 30 26