UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Similar documents
Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Needs and Community Characteristics

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Treasure Island Toll Policy, Affordability and Transit Pass Programs. TIMMA Board Meeting December 11, 2018

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

7 Mass Transit. 7.1 Existing Conditions. 7.2 Transit

Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

3.17 Energy Resources

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Appendix C: GAPS ANALYSIS

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

The South Waterfront District and the Portland Aerial Tram

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Transportation Sustainability Program

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Executive Summary October 2013

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

Parking Management Element

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Urban Transport systems in major cities in China. Sun Kechao Senior Engineer China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

RTSP Phase II Update

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

Sound Transit 3. Appendix C: Benefits, Costs, Revenues, Capacity, Reliability, and Performance Characteristics

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Innovation and Transformation of Urban Mobility Role of Smart Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) service

Transit and Job Growth: Lessons for SB 375. Jed Kolko Public Policy Institute of California

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Transcription:

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis Board Workshop January 6, 2018 1

Executive Summary UTA ranks DART 6 th out of top 20 Transit Agencies in the country for ridership. UTA Study confirms what we all know about our region and parts of our service area -- there is low density for jobs and population, especially south of I-30. UTA calculates Transportation Costs as the sum of automobile ownership costs, automotive use costs, and transit use costs, not just transit costs. UTA confirms DART costs (fares including proposed fare increase) are affordable. UTA Study shows 97% of a 2,200 square mile area of the Region (including DART s 700 square mile service area) cannot afford transportation costs, but 100% can afford DART s transit costs. 2

Executive Summary Continued UTA Study emphasizes that low income and no car households are primarily in Southern Dallas, when in fact there are numerous low income and no car areas in the DART Service Area and the Region. While the UTA Study isn t clear about the percentage of population with transit access based upon ¼ mile walk distance (report shows both 63% and 71% in different parts of the study), the access would increase to 73% or 76% if the DART On-Call services were included. Using a ½ mile walk distance, which is more traditional in the transit industry, the population served increases to 91%. DART s analysis shows 77% of jobs with the DART Service Area are accessible by transit (including On-Call) using a 1/4 mile walk distance and 92% of jobs with the DART Service Area are accessible within ½ mile from transit. UTA Study validates the very low employment density in South Dallas. 3

Executive Summary Continued DART s service standards (and many US transit systems) define 15-minute bus and rail service as high frequency. UTA s definitions were based upon an academic study of the highest density US, European and Asian systems which classify 15-minute service as medium frequency. UTA s Study provides little to no discussion on land use responsibilities, transportation planning activities to leverage transit investments, or City infrastructure investments needed to support efficient transit. DART provides access to hundreds of thousands of jobs within 60-minute travel time. The average automobile travel time within the City of Dallas is nearly 30-minutes. UTA Study does not reference DART s Innovative Services approaches as solutions to move people to and from jobs including On-Call and Mobility on Demand services. 4

Programmed Improvements to DART Service Responsive to the UTA Study Assessment 2018 implementation of an account based fare structure designed to allow low income persons to obtain monthly fare discounts when paying daily Midday and weekend bus frequency improvements scheduled March 2018 2018 Expansion of On-Call (Go Link) service in Southern Sector 2018 Pilot Testing of Shared Mobility Services in Plano and Southern Sector without fixed route options 2018 Pilot testing of new generation of carpooling APP which will assist in expanding mobility for DART residents to jobs centers beyond the DART Service Area 2019 Purchase of 41 buses to expand DART s high frequency bus network Commitment of over $13 million to improve bus service on weekends, midday, evenings and peak periods to increase transit access 5

UTA Study Equity Factors Transportation and transit affordability Location efficiency in Dallas and the DART Service Area Definition of transit coverage based upon ¼ mile walk buffer Definition of frequent transit service Job access by using 45 minute travel time criterion 6

UTA Study Equity Factors - Transportation is Unaffordable UTA Definition of Transportation cost --- annual sum of automobile capital and operating costs plus transit costs HUD s Definition of Transportation Affordability Threshold --- annual costs exceed 15% of the household income Based upon the DFW region s median household annual income ($58,356) transportation is unaffordable for most of region s households DART questions the accuracy of UTA s calculation for regional affordability 7

UTA Study Equity Factors - Transit is affordable in Dallas UTA s study stated that DART fare affordability is not the major barrier to transit use in Dallas even for low income persons A low-income household will spend on average about 10% or less of its income using the local transit fare day pass only A low-income household will spend approximately 6% of its income on transit fare using the monthly pass exclusively A low-income household will spend less than 3% of its income if eligible for the reduced fare program Low income persons using the regional fare exclusively will still spend less that the transportation affordability threshold UTA researchers determined that DART s fare structure and proposed fare structure do not exceed the HUD transportation affordability threshold 8

UTA Study Equity Factors Dallas is location inefficient The City of Dallas is characterized by low location efficiency which is generally not supportive of the most efficient public transit Location efficient neighborhoods are characterized by the following Urban population density 17+ persons per gross acre Urban Employment density 17+ jobs per gross acre Mixed development retail, medical, schools, government, etc. Low income parts of Southern Dallas have very low location efficiency which is much more suburban in characteristic than urban 6 to 10 persons per gross acre is typical in Southern Dallas 0-5 jobs per gross acre is typical in southern Dallas Low levels of retail and other business in the Southern Sector 9

UTA Study Equity Factors Dallas is location inefficient continued Location inefficiency reduces bus and rail cost effectiveness in southern Dallas The low transit ridership per capita and per mile was pointed out by UTA UTA did not link the connection between low density and low location efficiency in much of the DART Service Area with the transit measures of effectiveness and efficiency The UTA analysis confirms that areas with a large population below the poverty level particularly in south Dallas receive better transit coverage and more frequent transit availability than other areas in the service area 10

11

12

13

14

UTA Study Equity Factors - Transit Coverage UTA Study states that 63% of the population of the City of Dallas is covered by transit if they are within ¼ mile from a bus stop DART uses a ½ mile transit walk distance because it is a more accurate reflection of transit usage by DART riders DART origin destination surveys verify that many transit riders frequently walk up to ½ mile to a bus stop UTA did not reflect transit access provided by DART On-Call services 91% of population is within ½ mile of a transit stop 92% of jobs are within ½ mile of a transit stop 15

16

17

UTA Study Equity Factors - Definition of Frequent Transit Service UTA researchers defined frequent service as follows: Transit Frequency Average Headway High More than 10 Services per Hour Less than 6 min Medium 4-10 Services per Hour From 6 min to 15 min Low Less than 2-4 Services per Hour More than 15 min-30 Very low Less than 2 Services per Hour More than 30 min Transit deserts No Service No operation UTA used research based upon frequency comparisons with Europe and Asia which have dramatically higher density, much higher gasoline prices and significant constraints on parking within the urbanized areas 18

UTA Study Equity Factors - Definition of Frequent Transit Service Continued DART defines service frequency as follows: Transit Frequency Average Headway Very High 8 trips or more per hour 7.5 minute frequency or better High 4 trips to 7 trips per hour More than 7.5 minutes to 15 minute frequency Medium 2 3 Services per Hour More than 15 min to 30 min Low Less than 2 Services per Hour More than 30 min to 60 minutes Transit deserts No Service No operation Across the United Stations in cities outside of New York and San Francisco, high frequency is typically defined as four (4) trips per hour. A major focus on DART s COA is improving frequency to create a high frequency network in the peak periods and moving to medium frequency in the off peak hours Comparing DART to European and Asia standards is not realistic 19

UTA Study Equity Factors - Job Access by Transit by Travel Time UTA researchers state that on average about 30% of the population in Dallas and 41% of the population in the transit dependent core have access to less than 1% of regional jobs in a 45 minute transit commute time. Compared to other aspects of DART, the lack of adequate access to jobs by transit appears to be the greatest barrier for considering transit as the major mode of transportation for all and particularly for the low income, transit dependent population. 20

UTA Study Equity Factors - Job Access by Transit by Travel Time DART believes that measuring transit access to regional jobs where over ½ of the population in the region measured has no public transit is an inappropriate measure of DART performance DART believes that the 45 minute transit commute time used as the UTA standard of reasonable travel time access by transit is unrealistic considering the 700 square mile transit district where the average car driver s commute is 28 minutes DART measures its transit network effectiveness in 15 minute increments ranging from 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes and 90 minutes 21

Six Dallas Low Income Areas and Downtown Dallas -- Access to Jobs By Transit Vickery Meadows Area -- Immigrant area east of Park Lane Station Kiest Station Area --- In South Oak Cliff off the Blue Line ML King Station Area --- In South Dallas near Fair Park West Dallas Area --- West of Downtown around Singleton and Hampton LBJ Skillman Station Area --- near I-635 and Audelia Downtown Dallas --- From Downtown Dallas 22

1,200,000 Vickery Meadows Neighborhood Job Access Within 60 Minutes Using Transit Jobs accessible By Transit 1,000,000 957,566 800,000 600,000 548,197 400,000 200,000 0 19,759 15 minutes 160,517 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 23

Jobs Accessible within 60 minutes by transit from Kiest Station Neighborhood in Oak Cliff Jobs Accessible By Transit 450,000 402,212 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 160,712 100,000 50,000 0 2,135 15 minutes 13,033 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 24

Jobs Accessible within 60 minutes by transit from ML King Station Neighborhood in South Dallas 800,000 700,000 Jobs Accessible By Transit 730,432 600,000 500,000 400,000 394,758 300,000 200,000 165,729 100,000 0 5,230 15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes60 minutes 25

Jobs Accessible Within 60 minutes by transit from West Dallas Neighborhood Jobs Accessible by Transit 600,000 540,340 500,000 400,000 346,712 300,000 200,000 135,834 100,000 0 2,752 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 26

Jobs Accessible within 60 minutes by transit from LBJ-Skillman Station Neighborhood Jobs Accessible By Transit 600,000 560,570 500,000 400,000 300,000 325,561 200,000 100,000 0 5,500 15 Minutes 70,065 30 Minutes 45 Minutes 60 Minutes 27

Jobs Accessible by Transit from Downtown Dallas by Transit Travel Time Including Light Rail 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,306,390 1,000,000 988,305 800,000 600,000 589,322 400,000 200,000 0 323,822 193,224 44,752 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 75 minutes 90 minutes 28

Jobs Accessible by Transit from Downtown Dallas by Transit Travel Time Without Light Rail 1,000,000 900,000 895,221 800,000 700,000 654,537 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 190,959 287,247 423,124 100,000 0 44,752 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 75 minutes 90 minutes 29

South Oak Cliff (Bonnie View and Simpson) --- Jobs Accessible by Transit With Light Rail by Time 800,000 700,000 703,159 600,000 500,000 434,435 400,000 300,000 200,000 187,145 100,000 0 121 1,683 8,216 23,790 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 75 minutes 90 minutes 105 minutes 30

South Oak Cliff (Bonnie View and Simpson) --- Jobs Accessible by Transit Without Light Rail by Time 450,000 400,000 406,516 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 199,534 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 121 1,683 7,744 14,174 44,689 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 75 minutes 90 minutes 105 minutes 31

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 15 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 32

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 30 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 33

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 45 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 34

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 60 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 35

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 75 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 36

Jobs Accessible by Transit within 90 Minutes from Downtown Dallas 37

Already Programmed Improvements to DART Service Addressed by the UTA Study 2018 implementation of an account based fare structure designed to allow low income persons to obtain monthly fare discounts by when paying daily 2018 midday and weekend bus frequency improvements 2018 Expansion of On-Call (Go Link) service in Southern Sector 2018 Pilot Testing of Shared Mobility Services in Plano and Southern Sector without fixed route options 2018 Pilot testing of new generation of carpooling APP which will assist in expanding mobility for DART residents to jobs centers beyond the DART Service Area 2019 Purchase of 41 buses to expand DART s high frequency bus network Commitment of over $13 million to improve bus service on weekends, midday, evenings and peak periods to increase transit access 38

39