Safety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County

Similar documents
Traffic Engineering Study

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 400 Block 14th Street SW

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Access Management: An R-CUT Above the Rest

Summary of the Alcoa Highway Redevelopment Project

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE 630/650 SOUTH STREET RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WRENTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS

Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 44 at Grand Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

CUY SAFETY STUDY KINSMAN RD (US 422) AT E. 93 RD ST CLEVELAND, OHIO - ODOT DISTRICT 12. October 13, LJB Inc.

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Traffic Feasibility Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Ce document est aussi disponible en français

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Corridor Analysis. For COUNTY LINE ROAD (S.R. 1001) CORRIDOR. located in. File No March 2019

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Existing 100 Block Michigan Avenue Northeast Westbound

Transportation accomplishments

2016 Congestion Report

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF WASHINGTON. County of Jefferson

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description B Existing 600 Block New York Avenue Northeast Westbound

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Planned Suitland Parkway Westbound at Stanton Road Southeast

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Created by: St. Louis County

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Letter of Transmittal

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

One Harbor Point Residential

Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project

CUY Safety Study Final Report

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Establishing Realistic Speed Limits

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager

Conventional Approach

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

Designation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

Transcription:

Safety Assessment for Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County Prepared by: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Northwestern Regional Operations - Traffic Engineering July 2008

July 1, 2008 Page 2 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY In response to a recent fatal crash that occurred at the intersection of Rte 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Rte 1670), the Virginia Department of Transportation conducted an Intersection Safety Assessment which is outlined in this report. The study at this signalized intersection included an inventory of existing conditions in respect to signing, markings, signal and related appurtenances, an examination of the operation of the intersection under prevailing conditions and identification of any enhancements to the operation and safety of the intersection. The safety study is structured to include the following key aspects: (1) Inventory of existing conditions, (2) Traffic counts, including daily traffic, AM and PM peak hours, (3) Sight distances available at the intersection, (4) Speed limit review, (5) Crash data reduction, (6) Recommendations (7) Implementation Plan (8) APPENDICIES

July 1, 2008 Page 3 Map of Area (North is up) TRAFFIC SIGNAL Hollymead Dr. STUDY INTERSECTION TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ashwood Blvd. TRAFFIC SIGNAL Polo Grounds Rd. Figure 1 - Study Area

July 1, 2008 Page 4 Aerial view of the US Route 29/Ashwood Blvd Intersection Route 29 Ashwood Blvd. Figure 2 - Aerial View

July 1, 2008 Page 5 Figure 3 - US Route 29 Northbound approach Figure 4 - US Route 29 Southbound approach

July 1, 2008 Page 6 Existing Conditions: US Route 29 is a four-lane (4) divided highway which extends in a general north-south direction, with the study intersection located within the limits of Albemarle County, Virginia, as shown in Figures 1 through 4. Traffic Volume US Route 29 has an estimated AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) of 51,000 vehicles for this section of road, according to 2006 VDOT published data and the percentage of trucks is 4 percent. An AM/PM peak hour count was conducted at the intersection including truck traffic and is shown in Appendix A. The AM peak hour is from 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM and the PM peak hour is 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The following is a summary of the peak hour turning movement counts: 29 SB Approach Peak Hour THRU LEFT AM 1396 18 PM 1340 67 Ashwood WB Approach Peak Hour LEFT RIGHT AM 319 44 PM 123 30 29 NB Approach Peak Hour THRU RIGHT AM 1231 142 PM 2037 348 Figure 5 - Peak Hour traffic volume

July 1, 2008 Page 7 Signal Head Visibility The diagram on the next page (Figure 6) illustrates the various sight distances that were measured during field investigation. Field measurements indicate the approach sight distance along US 29 in the northbound direction to the signal heads to be approximately 1100 ft. Similar measurements in the southbound direction of US 29 noted this distance to be approximately 1000 ft to the signal heads. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) recommends a minimum sight distance to the traffic signal heads to be 625 ft for an 85 th percentile speed limit of 55 mph, (Reference MUTCD PP4D-12,4D-13). The signal head visibility meets the minimum required. Stopping Sight Distance Stopping sight distance is the sum of the brake reaction distance and actual braking distance. This is the total distance that is available to a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. Field measurements conducted at this intersection (See Figure 6) noted the stopping sight distance in the northbound direction to be approximately 1160 ft and in the southbound direction to be approximately 475 ft. The stopping sight distance along Ashwood Blvd was measured to be approximately 480 ft. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommends a stopping sight distance for an approaching vehicle to see another vehicle to be 495 ft for a design speed of 55 mph (US Route 29) and 250 ft for a design speed of 35 mph (Ashwood Blvd) (Reference AASHTO Green Book, PP 112). The stopping sight distance meets the minimum required in the northbound direction, but is less than the required sight distance on Route 29 southbound. Operational Analysis/Stopping Sight Distance to Back of Queue The following is a summary of the operational performance of the intersection. Level of Service is a qualitative measure of the traffic flow based on the delay (seconds) experienced per vehicle. Peak Period US 29 SB US 29 NB Ashwood Blvd Overall Approach Approach WB Approach AM B B D B PM A F D E Table 1 - Operational Analysis, Level of Service (LOS) Operational analyses indicate the 90 th percentile queue in the northbound direction on US 29 during the PM Peak hour to be approximately 1125 ft. from the stop bar at the intersection (see Appendix C). The resulting stopping sight distance to the back of the queue is approximately 1190 ft. In the southbound direction on US 29, the 90 th percentile queue is approximately 600 ft and the stopping sight distance to the back of this queue is approximately 770 ft. Typical northbound queuing in the PM peak hour reaches the traffic signal at Polo Grounds Road. Signal Coordination A coordinated traffic signal system exists on Route 29 from Charlottesville North City Line (NCL) to Polo Grounds Roads.

July 1, 2008 Page 8 N GRASS MEDIAN NORTHBOUND VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NORTHWEST REGION- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Sight Distances and Lane Use Diagram Route 29-Ashwood Blvd Albemarle County A G E B F Ashwood Blvd Seminole Trail SOUTHBOUND ROUTE 29 GRASS MEDIAN C D A B C D Route 1670 KEY 1100 on approach to signal lights (will increase with trimming of vegetation, tree canopy) 1160 to crossing vehicle in intersection 500 from stop bar to approaching vehicle 480 from stop bar to approaching traffic E 475 to crossing vehicle in intersection F 1000 on approach to signal lights G 700 on approach to signal lights, then sight is blocked by tress in median, line of sight again at 350 Figure 6

July 1, 2008 Page 9 Speed Limit The speed limit on this section of US 29 is 55 mph; it is posted statutory from 1000 ft north of Polo Grounds Road to the Albemarle County line. The area south is posted 45 mph from NCL Charlottesville to 1000 ft north of Polo Grounds Road. The 45 mph speed limit was moved north to its current location from the Rivanna River Bridge (just south of Polo Grounds) in 2002. As a part of this investigation VDOT conducted a separate speed study on US 29 from Polo Grounds Road to Airport/Profit Road. A copy of this speed study is included under Appendix B. Existing warning signs and devices on the approaches of Route 29 at Ashwood Blvd Dual indicated diagrammatic Signal Ahead signs are located with a Watch for Stopped Vehicles plaque below at about 1025 ft from the intersection on northbound approach of US 29 and 650 ft from the intersection on southbound approach of US 29. Dual indicated Watch for Stopped Vehicles signs with full time Flashing Yellow Beacons and advisory speed plates of 35 mph are located approximately 1500 ft from the intersection along US 29 in the northbound direction and about 1150 ft from the intersection along US 29 in the southbound direction. In both directions of US 29 in the median, prior to all of the above noted signs there are Ashwood Blvd Next Signal advance guide signs with the appropriate right or left arrow (The northbound sign is located approximately 1800 ft from the intersection and the southbound sign is located approximately 2000 ft from the intersection). On Ashwood Blvd. there is a private sign Forest Lakes- South Entrance located in the median just behind the stop bar on Ashwood Blvd., which limits sight distance for vehicles in the left turn lanes, particularly in the turn lane closest to the median. Sight distance from the stop bar is 480 ft.

July 1, 2008 Page 10 Figure 7 View from Ashwood Blvd. In the northbound direction along US 29 there is a School Bus Stop Ahead sign with a 1700 ft distance plate located between the Watch for Stopped Vehicles sign and the Signal Ahead sign.

July 1, 2008 Page 11 Crash Data- below is a 5 year crash summary for the intersection: 5 YEAR CRASH SUMMARY- Route 29 and Ashwood Blvd. 01/01/2003 to 12/31/2007 Total Crashes RE Angles F/O F/O-I Deer SS(sd) Misc. # Injury Crashes Injuries Fatals 2003 21 14 3 3 0 1 0 0 5 7 0 2004 12 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 2005 20 12 4 0 1 1 1 1 12 20 0 2006 30 21 3 1 1 2 2 0 6 7 0 2007 19 12 1 2 0 0 4 0 6 7 0 Total 102 69 13 6 2 4 7 1 32 47 0* *Data above reflects to end of year only (current available update) and does not include the fatality on 5/9/08. This intersection ranked as the 3 rd highest intersection in Albemarle County for number of fatal and injury crashes from 2004 to 2006. This intersection is located on the Culpeper District Critical Crash rate intersection list in 2007. KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS ABOVE RE = Rear end collisions F/O = Run off road - hit fixed object F/O-I = Hit object in road SS(sd) = Sideswipe type collision same direction The crash data indicates that a predominant number of accidents (67%) are attributed to rear end collisions, with angle collisions (approx. 13%) being the second highest. Injury-related crashes resulted in a total of 47 injuries.

July 1, 2008 Page 12 Recommendations: Summarized below are recommended solutions to enhance operations and safety at the US 29/Ashwood Blvd intersection. The recommendations were developed as a result of a review of the existing physical conditions, crash history, traffic counts and field review of the site. 1. Install SIGNAL AHEAD on pavement both directions on US 29 with accompanying rumble strips, two lines before and after each message. The optimum location will be field determined. This action will draw added attention to the existing signalized intersection which is located along the hilly terrain of US 29. 2. Install a Controller Actuated Beacon (CAB) with flasher in both directions on US 29, activated when signal is going to turn red. This device has a diagrammatic signal ahead sign with a message to alert motorists, see Figure 8 below. This will replace the existing Flashing Yellow Beacons. This action will serve as an additional warning to drivers of stopped vehicles due to a red signal, in the northbound and southbound direction of US 29. Figure 8 Controller Actuated Beacon (CAB)

July 1, 2008 Page 13 3. Review Speed Limit The speed limit from north of Polo Grounds Road to Airport/ Proffit Road area has been completed and is included in Appendix B. Based upon roadway geometrics, roadside development and crash history along the study corridor we are recommending that the speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. This action would be contingent upon pending review and approval by the VDOT Central Office. If approved this new speed limit will provide a consistent speed limit to drivers over this section of US 29 with the section south, which is currently posted with 45 mph. Enforcement of this speed limit will be coordinated with Albemarle County and affiliated sheriff/police. Widened shoulders or pullouts should be installed along this section of Route 29 to permit law enforcement a safe area to patrol and safely pull drivers over. 4. Consideration should be given to relocating the Forest Lakes- South Entrance sign to enhance visibility exiting Ashwood Blvd. along the south leg of the intersection. This action will enhance the existing sight distance to drivers exiting Ashwood Blvd. and turning left or right on to US 29. In addition, the STOP bar location on the westbound approach of Ashwood Blvd should be relocated to bring it closer to the intersection. This action will enhance the visibility to westbound drivers exiting the intersection. 5. Trim vegetation in the area on both approaches of US 29 including the median to enhance visibility of signs and the sight distance for southbound left turn traffic. This action will enhance the sight distance to southbound to westbound drivers and also further increase signal head visibility to northbound and southbound traffic on US 29. 6. Install a Signal Ahead sign on Ashwood Blvd in advance of the intersection. This action provides advance warning of a signal along the westbound approach of Ashwood Blvd. 7. The yellow and all red clearance for this intersection has been checked, and the summary chart with recommended adjustments is below. This action further enhances operations and safety at the intersection.

July 1, 2008 Page 14 EXIST. YELLOW EXIST.ALL RED Calculated Yellow Calculated All Red Proposed Yellow Proposed All Red COMMENTS US 29 NB 5 secs 2 secs 3 secs 1.6 secs 5.5 secs* 2 secs decel=10ft/sec/sec US 29 SB 5 secs 2 secs 5.5 secs 1.45 secs 5.5 secs 2 secs SB Yellow governs NB, US 29 SBLT 4 secs 2.4 secs 4 secs 1.6 secs 4 secs 2.5 secs decel=10ft/sec/sec accel =15 ft/sec/sec ASHWOOD 4 secs 2.6 secs 4 secs 3 secs 4 secs 3 secs accel =10 ft /sec/sec *Although NB Yellow needed is 3 seconds, a value of 5.5 seconds is recommended due to the fact that the Southbound Yellow governs if the phasing is to be concurrent green. Figure 9 - Yellow and All Red calculations 8. Coordinate traffic signals along US Route 29 from Polo Grounds Road to Airport/Proffit Road. This action will improve traffic flow, reduce the number of stops, and potentially reduce the number of rear-end crashes.

July 1, 2008 Page 15 Estimated Implementation Schedule of Recommendations: An implementation schedule has been developed and estimated completion times developed. This schedule will be updated periodically. Improvement Responsible Party Estimated completion time 1. Install SIGNAL AHEAD VDOT NWRO Traffic Summer 2008 markings and rumble strips on pavement Engineering design/asset Maintenance install 2. Install Controller Actuated VDOT NWRO Winter 2008 Beacon (CAB) 3a. Speed Limit Reduction VDOT NWRO Traffic Late Summer 2008 Engineering seeks approval, Asset Maintenance installs 3b. Safety Pullouts VDOT Charlottesville Fall 2008 Residency 4a. Relocate Forest Lakes sign Forest Lakes Owners Assoc. To be determined 4b. Relocated STOP bar VDOT NWRO Asset Summer 2008 Maintenance 5. Trim Vegetation VDOT Charlottesville Residency 6. Install SIGNAL AHEAD sign VDOT NWRO Traffic Engineering design/asset Maintenance install VDOT NWRO Signal 7. Adjust yellow and red intervals Maintenance 8. Signal Coordination VDOT NWRO Traffic Operations Brush removal Summer 2008 Tree canopy removal - Spring 2009 Summer 2008 July 2008 Fall 2008

July 1, 2008 Page 16 APPENDIX A Peak Hour Traffic Counts

July 1, 2008 Page 17 Route 29 and Ashwood Blvd. AM/PM Peak Period traffic counts (All traffic) (7 AM - 9 AM) and (4 PM- 6 PM): (*Peak Hour in BOLD in chart below) Start Time Southbound Westbound (Ashwood) Northbound Rig ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 07:00 AM 0 428 1 8 0 33 4 206 0 680 07:15 AM 0 475 3 9 0 43 5 215 0 750 07:30 AM 0 511 2 9 0 74 19 215 0 830 *07:45 AM 0 532 4 13 0 92 24 292 0 957 08:00 AM 0 396 2 13 0 66 41 319 0 837 08:15 AM 0 506 2 10 0 74 50 326 0 968 08:30 AM 0 494 10 8 0 87 27 294 0 920 08:45 AM 0 426 3 7 0 74 18 296 0 824 Total AM 0 3768 27 77 0 543 188 2163 0 6766 04:00 PM 0 393 14 11 0 38 37 451 0 944 04:15 PM 0 267 11 8 0 24 50 430 0 790 04:30 PM 0 421 15 6 0 27 31 350 1 851 04:45 PM 0 342 10 7 0 28 54 376 0 817 *05:00 PM 0 356 25 10 0 22 101 568 1 1083 05:15 PM 0 364 17 10 0 33 83 489 0 996 05:30 PM 0 282 14 5 0 38 77 441 0 857 05:45 PM 0 338 11 5 0 30 87 539 0 1010 Total PM 0 2763 117 62 0 240 520 3644 2 7348

July 1, 2008 Page 18 Route 29 and Ashwood Blvd. AM/PM Peak Period (Truck traffic only) (7 AM - 9 AM) and (4 PM- 6 PM): (*Peak Hour in BOLD in chart below) Start Time Southbound Westbound (Ashwood) Northbound Rig ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 07:00 AM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 20 07:15 AM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 32 07:30 AM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 34 07:45 AM 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 24 *08:00 AM 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 30 08:15 AM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 25 08:30 AM 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 39 08:45 AM 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 22 0 41 Total AM 0 112 0 0 0 0 1 132 0 245 *04:00 PM 0 14 0 0 0 2 0 16 0 32 04:15 PM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 27 04:30 PM 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 22 04:45 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 05:00 PM 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 05:15 PM 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 15 05:30 PM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 16 05:45 PM 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 13 Total PM 0 68 0 0 0 2 0 85 0 155

July 1, 2008 Page 19 APPENDIX B US Route 29 from Polo Grounds Road to Airport/Profit Road Speed Study, June 2008

July 1, 2008 Page 20 Northwestern Region Operations Traffic Engineering VDOT Speed Study 6/30/2008 This Speed Study conducted under the direction of Vijay N. Kulkarni, PE, PTOE Licensed Engineer Study Area: Location: US Route 29, Seminole Trail County: Albemarle From: 1000 ft North of Polo Grounds To: 0.22 Miles North of Route 649 Proffit/Airport Road Length: Field Measured 2.50 Miles Functional Class: Urban Principal Arterial Speed Zone(s) in Study Area: Posted Statutory 55 mph Speed Zone(s) adjoining Study Area: Posted 45 mph by resolution of 1/29/2002 from 1000 ft north of Polo Grounds Road to Charlottesville City Limits; posted 55 mph statutory to Greene County Line. Origin and Nature of Request: We received a request from residents of Albemarle County for a reduced speed limit on Route 29 and requested a speed study be conducted to determine if a speed limit reduction is warranted. The citizens concern is speeding traffic. Study Results and Recommendations: Due to the roadway geometrics, roadside development and friction, crash history in the corridor, which is well above the state and district averages, we are recommending that the existing 55 mph statutory posted speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. Study Details: A. Speed Data: Radar speed samples were taken at 6 locations in the study area (3 northbound and 3 southbound). The results are below: Route 29 Northbound Date of Speed Sample: 6/9/08 Location: 0.1 Mi. N. of Rte. 1670 85th Percentile Speed: 53-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 49-mph Pace Speed Range: 45 through 54

July 1, 2008 Page 21 Date of Speed Sample: 6/12/08 Location: 0.2 Mi. S. of Rte. 1721 85th Percentile Speed: 55-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 49-mph Pace Speed Range: 45 through 54 Date of Speed Sample: 6/12/08 Location: 0.01 Mi. N. of Rte. 1722 85th Percentile Speed: 50-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 45-mph Pace Speed Range: 40 through 49 Route 29 Southbound Date of Speed Samples: 6/9/08 Location: 0.1 Mi. N. of Rte. 1670 85th Percentile Speed: 58-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 53-mph Pace Speed Range: 50 through 59 Date of Speed Samples: 6/12/08 Location: 0.02 Mi. S. of Towncenter Dr. 85th Percentile Speed: 51-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 48-mph Pace Speed Range: 43 through 52 Date of Speed Samples: 6/12/08 Location: 0.1 Mi. N. of Rte. 1722 85th Percentile Speed: 42-mph 50th Percentile Speed: 38-mph Pace Speed Range: 33 through 42 B. Road Characteristics: US Route 29 is a four-lane to six-lane divided highway in the study area with an alignment that has moderate to significant vertical curves in the south section of the study area from north of Polo Grounds Road/ Rio Mills Road to Hollymead Drive and is generally flat in the north section of the study area from Towncenter Drive to Airport/Proffit Road. The area between Towncenter Drive and Hollymead Drive serves as a transition zone from the 4-lane section to the 6-lane section. Northbound a left lane is added and southbound the lane is dropped. The pavement is 25 ft 36 ft wide, in addition to left and right turn lanes, and in good condition. Pavement markings are in good condition and consist of center skips, lane lines, stop bars, turn arrows and edgelines. There are also raised pavement markers in the south section of the study area only. The south section of the study from north of Polo Grounds Road/ Rio Mills Road to Hollymead Drive is a rural 4 lane section with a 50 ft median with edge of pavement, variable 2 to 8 ft shoulders and raised pavement markers. Sight distances in this section is generally adequate but is limited in some areas by the rolling terrain and vertical curves. The north section of the study area from Towncenter Drive to Airport/Proffit Road is an urban 6 lane section with a 38 ft

July 1, 2008 Page 22 median, primarily curb and gutter with 0 to 4 ft shoulders. Sight distances in this section of the study area are generally good. Signs in the study area are in good condition and include SIGNAL AHEAD signs, WATCH FOR STOPPED VEHICLES with flasher, speed limit signs, guide signs, other regulatory signs such as one ways, keep rights and stop signs on the state controlled side streets without a traffic signal. The AADT on US 29 are noted as follows: US 29 (from Rio Rd to Hollymeade Dr ) 51,000 vehicles US 29 (from Hollymeade Dr to Airport Rd) 39,000 vehicles C. Roadside Development and Environment: There are 5 signalized intersections on Route 29 within the study area; they are Airport/Proffit Road, Timberwood Blvd., Towncenter Drive, Hollymead Drive and Ashwood Blvd. The signalized intersections primarily serve the residential and commercial development in study area. There are 2 crossovers, 3 state road unsignalized intersections, 8 private entrances and 8 commercial entrances within the study area. The potential for conflicts is considered moderate. Access density is considered is low. D. Parking Practices and Pedestrian Activity: During the study no parking activity was observed and very little pedestrian activity was observed, although there are potential pedestrian generators in the north section of the study area. However, no intersections within the study area have pedestrian crosswalks and pedestrian equipment. E. Reported Crash Experience for 3-Year Period: Crash records and rates obtained through HTRIS are for the period From: January 1, 2005 To: December 31, 2007 Length of period: 3 - Years Note: Crashes where no injuries were sustained and property damage was below $1,000 may not be recorded in HTRIS. Also, due to the time required to process and code crash data, HTRIS typically does not include occurrences in the last several months. According to our records, the total number of reported crashes for this section of highway, from 1000 ft north of Polo Grounds to Airport/Proffit Road is: 364 And, the total number of reported injuries for this section of highway is: _170_ And, the total number of reported fatalities for this section of highway is: _0 The crash rate for this section of highway is: The injury rate for this section of highway is: The fatality rate for this section of highway is: 319 per 100 million VMT. 149 per 100 million VMT. 0 per 100 million VMT.

July 1, 2008 Page 23 For all primary roads statewide per the latest published crash data: The 2005 district average crash rate is: The 2005 district average injury rate is: The 2005 district average fatality rate is: 245 per 100 million VMT. 118_ per 100 million VMT. 219_ per 100 million VMT. For all primary roads in the State for 4-lane divided non access facilities per the latest published crash data The State average crash rate is 110 per 100 million VMT The State average injury rate is 61 per 100 million VMT The State average fatality rate is 0.91 per 100 million VMT F. Enforcement Consensus: This recommended change in speed limit has been discussed with First Sgt. Lisa Roakes of the Virginia State Police and Sgt. Pete Mainzer of the Albemarle County Police Office. The Local enforcement officer concurs with/ opposes the recommendation. The State Police Officer: Concurs Opposes If any officer opposes, please explain: G. Additional comments: provide any additional details not included in the previous that pertain to the speed study

July 1, 2008 Page 24 Study Area Map: Note: North is up the page Airport Road Proffit Road STUDY AREA Airport Road Rio Mills Polo Grounds

July 1, 2008 Page 25 APPENDIX C Operational Analysis