TRAFFIC SAFETY OF A SLOW VEHICLE

Similar documents
(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:10min)

Analysis of minimum train headway on a moving block system by genetic algorithm Hideo Nakamura. Nihon University, Narashinodai , Funabashi city,

Research and Design of an Overtaking Decision Assistant Service on Two-Lane Roads

AN ANALYSIS OF DRIVER S BEHAVIOR AT MERGING SECTION ON TOKYO METOPOLITAN EXPRESSWAY WITH THE VIEWPOINT OF MIXTURE AHS SYSTEM

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

Beginner Driver Support System for Merging into Left Main Lane

Analysis of Emergency Braking System

Safety and Preventitive Cautions for Teenage Drivers

SPEED ZONING ON TEXAS HIGHWAYS

D = ( R) D = distance covered in m V = velocity of the car in km/h (speed) R = road surface index

Triple Fatal Motorcycle Crash On Wellington Road And Ferguson Line South of London, Ontario

Heavy Truck Conflicts at Expressway On-Ramps Part 1

P5 STOPPING DISTANCES

The challenges of driving

#6 IN A SERIES SHARING THE ROAD. How to stay safe.

THE PRESENT EUROPEAN TYRE DESASTER Egon-Christian von Glasner 28

Model of deceleration lane length calculation based on quadratic

Seals Stretch Running Friction Friction Break-Out Friction. Build With The Best!

Braking Performance Improvement Method for V2V Communication-Based Autonomous Emergency Braking at Intersections

PRESEASON CHASSIS SETUP TIPS

MONTANA TEEN DRIVER CURRICULUM GUIDE Lesson Plan & Teacher Commentary. Module 2.2 Basic Control and Vehicle Location

VEHICLE TOWING SAFETY

On-Road Driving INSTRUMENTS AND WARNING LIGHTS DRIVING PRECAUTIONS POWER ASSISTED STEERING WARMING UP VEHICLE HEIGHT

Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles

Chapter 9 Real World Driving

Study on State of Charge Estimation of Batteries for Electric Vehicle

DRIVING TIPS AND SAFE DRIVING

Industry input to ACSF-18 meeting, June 6-8, 2018 The Hague Homework from ACSF-17

Adaptive Cruise Control

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Underrun Protection

Technical Note. Management of Sealed Lead Acid Batteries in Reliable Small DC Standby Power Supply Systems

The graph shows how far the car travelled and how long it took. (i) Between which points was the car travelling fastest? Tick ( ) your answer.

FOLLOWING DISTANCE RISK ENGINEERING

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY FOR SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS

ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR MEDIAN WIDTH

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

B10 Driving on Highway

Research on Skid Control of Small Electric Vehicle (Effect of Velocity Prediction by Observer System)

Strategies That Work to Reduce Alcohol-Impaired Driving

YORK COUNTY FIRE TRAINING EMERGENCY VEHICLE DRIVER REFRESHER

Maximum Superelevation: Desirable, Allowable, and Absolute

Application of Skid Resistance Measurements

REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK DISPLAYS EVALUATION:

Adaptive Cruise Control

Rural Speed and Crash Risk. Kloeden CN, McLean AJ Road Accident Research Unit, Adelaide University 5005 ABSTRACT

Devices to Assist Drivers to Comply with Speed Limits

Effects of speed distributions on the Harmonoise model predictions

Evaluation of Event Data Recorder Based on Crash Tests

Frequently Asked Questions about Bus Transportation

The Effect of Spring Pressure on Carbon Brush Wear Rate

Acceleration Behavior of Drivers in a Platoon

IMPROVED EMERGENCY BRAKING PERFORMANCE FOR HGVS

b. take a motorcycle-riding course taught by a certified instructor.

Bigger Trucks and Smaller Cars

Road User Cost Analysis

Traffic Calming: traffic and vehicle noise

1.3 Research Objective

Road Signs. 1) Which one of the following is correct when encountering this sign:

Predicted availability of safety features on registered vehicles a 2015 update

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

ISSN: SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF PASSIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR DIFFERENT ROAD PROFILES WITH VARIABLE DAMPING AND STIFFNESS PARAMETERS S.

BAC and Fatal Crash Risk

INSTRUCTIONS FOR TRI-METRIC BATTERY MONITOR May 8, 1996

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79

Improving CERs building

Traffic Simulator Model Validation Comparing Real and Virtual Test Result *

EFFECT OF WORK ZONE LENGTH AND SPEED DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VEHICLE TYPES ON DELAY-BASED PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS IN WORK ZONES

Fleet Penetration of Automated Vehicles: A Microsimulation Analysis

Isaac Newton vs. Red Light Cameras

DRIVING P2 IN NEW P36 ZEALAND

REAL TIME TRACTION POWER SYSTEM SIMULATOR

Analyzing Crash Risk Using Automatic Traffic Recorder Speed Data

Annex D DRIVING COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT

DRIVER CONTRIBUTING CIRCUMSTANCES

Comments on the Draft South African Learner Driver Manual Compiled by the Department of Transport of the Republic of South Africa

Economic and Social Council

TECHNICAL REFERENCE CLEANING POWER GUIDELINES TANKJET TANK CLEANER OVERVIEW BY TANK DIAMETER OPTIMIZING TANK CLEANING OPERATIONS

Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance.

PERSONAL COMMUTING VEHICLE CONCEPT

Oregon DOT Slow-Speed Weigh-in-Motion (SWIM) Project: Analysis of Initial Weight Data

TESTING OF AUTOMOBILE VW GOLF OPERATING ON THREE DIFFERENT FUELS

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

Session Objectives. You will be able to: Understand defensive driving techniques. accidents and injuries on the road

Study on V2V-based AEB System Performance Analysis in Various Road Conditions at an Intersection

Vehicular modal emission and fuel consumption factors in Hong Kong

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

Research on Transient Stability of Large Scale Onshore Wind Power Transmission via LCC HVDC

Optimizing the life of Cut-Off Wheels: a study of variables when using cut-off wheels on a right angle grinder

Purpose of the System...3. System Components...3 Instrument Cluster Display...4

Adaptive cruise control (ACC)

Project Report Cover Page

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF IMPACT BETWEEN SHUNTING LOCOMOTIVE AND SELECTED ROAD VEHICLE

MOBILITY SCOOTER SAFETY GUIDE

Circumstances affecting the protection against electrode potential rise (EPR)

User Manual. Product: Smart Balance Scooter. Model: K1

WLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class

Chapter 11 Sharing. the Roadway with Others. - Pedestrians - Bicycles and Motorcycles - Light trucks and small vehicles - Large Vehicles

Head light sight distance is the distance visible to a driver during night driving under the illumination of head light

Transcription:

139 TRAFFIC SAFETY OF A SLOW VEHICLE Estonian University of Life Sciences Introduction In accordance with the theory of traffic safety the vehicles (drivers) who drive at a speed different from the traffic flow speed get into traffic accidents more often than those vehicles (drivers) which drive at traffic flow speed. There is the more risk to get into traffic accidents the greater the difference in speed compared to traffic flow speed. Great difference between a slow vehicle (tractor, farm or forest machine, etc.) speed and traffic flow speed is the main risk factor for a slow vehicle which should be considered not only by the drivers of slow vehicles, but also by the drivers of fast vehicles. The insecurity of a slow vehicle arises from the fact that in case of slow speed every manoeuvre, eg driving start, traffic lanes change, turns, passing, takes much time. A slow vehicle covers a short distance. A fast vehicle covers during the same time a significantly longer distance and its adaptation to the speed or stoppage of the fast vehicle in case of need requires a long distance. Inexperienced drivers of fast vehicles may not be able to evaluate the speed and distance of a slow vehicle properly and begin to slow down too late, having thus too little space for stopping the vehicle. To prevent road accidents, it is essential for the driver of a slow vehicle to make sure before any manoeuvre that he does not create a situation in which the driver of a fast vehicle will not be able to avoid a road accident. The driver of a slow vehicle has to indicate in good time before manoeuvre. Keywords: slow vehicle, fast vehicle, separation distance, stopping distance, adhesion factor, reaction time of driver. Material and Methods When a slow vehicle drives on the road, it is significant for ensuring safety that the drivers of fast vehicles evaluate properly the safe distance when approaching the slow vehicle, slow down according to the decreasing distance and that the driver of the slow vehicle indicates timely before manoeuvre. As we know, the value of safe separation distance in traffic flow is considered to be equal to half of speed number on urban road (if the unit of separation distance is m and unit of speed is km/h). On highway, the value of safe separation distance in traffic flow is considered to be equal to speed number. The recommendations are valid if the vehicles are driving at the same speed. If a fast vehicle is approaching a slow vehicle, the safe separation distance is considered to be the distance which enables the fast vehicle to stop behind the slow vehicle, in case the latter is forced to stop unexpectedly and passing is impossible. Therefore, the safe separation distance is considered the smallest distance from the slow vehicle, at which the driver has to decide, whether the passing is possible or is it necessary to begin slowing down and adapting the speed to the decreasing distance. When approaching a slow vehicle, the distance is not constant, but decreases continuously. The stopping distance depends on speed, adhesion factor, efficiency of vehicle brake system, etc. To ensure safety, the fast driver approaching a slow vehicle can apply only one method adapt the speed of his vehicle to the continuously decreasing distance. At the same time, the driver of the fast vehicle must be prepared for the worst, when the driver of the slow vehicle brakes unexpectedly. Proceeding from the above-said, the safe separation distance may be expressed as follows (Figure 1): where S kp stopping distance of fast vehicle, m; S ap braking distance of slow vehicle, m; S 0 safety reserve, m. S pv = S kp S ap + S 0, (1)

140 S pv S ap S kp S 0 Figure 1. Safe separation distance S pv safe separation distance, S ap braking distance of slow vehicle, S kp stopping distance of fast vehicle, S 0 safety reserve Expression to calculate the stopping distance of a fast vehicle: S kp 1 vk = t j + t pk + tak vk + kek, () gϕ k where t j reaction time of driver, s; t pk application time of brakes, s; t ak the time necessary to obtain the utmost possible deceleration, s; v k speed of vehicle, m/s; k ek vehicle brake system efficiency factor; φ k road surface adhesion factor, subscript k marks the fast vehicle and subscript a marks the slow vehicle. The braking distance of a slow vehicle is shorter than the stopping distance by the driver's reaction distance: 1 va S ap = t pa + t aa v a + kea. (3) gϕ a Taking into consideration expressions (1), () and (3) we obtain the expression for calculating the safe separation distance: S pv 1 vk 1 va = t j + t pk + tak vk + kek + S0 t pa + taa va kea (4) gϕ k gϕ a Using expression (4), the safe separation distance is calculated at following stipulations. A slow vehicle is approached by a fast vehicle on the highway at the speed of the fast vehicle equal to 90 km/h. The reaction time of the driver is taken equal to 0.8 s. It is assumed that the fast vehicle has disk brakes and brake force adjuster (t pk = 0.1 s, k ek = 1). The application time of the brakes of the slow vehicle is taken equal to 0. s. The safe separation distance is calculated for asphalt road surface (t a = 0.5 s, φ k = 0.9 ja φ a = 0.8). If it is not possible to pass the slow vehicle at once or if the situation is not definite, the driver of the fast vehicle has to slow down in time at sufficient distance. Using the above-given expressions, the safe speed of the fast vehicle is calculated depending on the separation distance and speed of the slow vehicle.

Traffic safety of a slow vehicle 141 Results and Discussion One significant circumstance influencing the safe separation distance is the speed of the slow vehicle. Slow vehicles may go on roads over ten times slower (4 40 km/h) than the traffic flow (90 km/h, presuming that the drivers of fast vehicles do not exceed the permissible speed). When the slow vehicle goes at 40 km/h (11 m/s), the driver of the fast vehicle who approaches the slow vehicle should begin slowing down no later than at the distance of 5 m from the slow vehicle, if passing is impossible (Figure ). If the speed of the slow vehicle is equal to 30 km/h (8.3 m/s) (it is the most frequent speed for farm tractors), the driver of the fast vehicle should begin slowing down no later than at the distance of 57 m from the slow vehicle. When the slow vehicle goes very slowly (5 km/h or 1.4 m/s), the driver of the fast vehicle should begin slowing down at the distance of 66 m. Taking into consideration that it is quite difficult for the driver of the fast vehicle to estimate the speed of the slow vehicle, the driver of the fast vehicle should begin slowing down at a distance from the slow vehicle equal to 65 m, if passing is impossible or the situation is indistinct. If the driver exceeds the permissible speed, he must begin slowing down at a longer distance accordingly. 70 65 55 50 0 4 6 8 10 1 va i Speed of slow vehicle, m/s Figure. Dependence of safe separation distance on the speed of a slow vehicle Safe separation distance is significantly affected not only by the speed of a slow vehicle but also by the speed of a fast vehicle. When the slow vehicle goes 0 km/h (5.5 m/s) and the fast vehicle runs also relatively slowly, for example 50 km/h (14 m/s) as it is permissible on urban road, safe separation distance is 5 m (Figure 3). The theory of traffic safety also recommends a separation distance equal to 5 m on urban road. When the fast vehicle runs on the highway at permissible speed (90 km/h or 5 m/s), safe separation distance is already 6 m and if driver exceeds the permissible speed, driving for example at 10 km/h (33.3 m/s), safe separation distance is already 99 m. The above calculations and discussion are valid for dry clean asphalt road surface, having an adhesion factor equal to 0.9. On a more slippery road surface and in case of a smaller adhesion factor, safe separation distance becomes longer. When a slow vehicle runs 0 km/h and fast vehicle approaches it at 90 km/h, safe separation distance is equal to 64 m on dry clean asphalt road surface (adhesion factor φ = 0.9). On wet road surface (φ = 0.7 0.8), safe separation distance is equal to 70 74 m and on muddy or slimy surface (φ = 0.6 or less) safe separation distance is over 80 m in the above-mentioned case (Figure 4). On very slick road surface (φ 0.4), safe separation distance is over 100 m at the given speeds. It must be noted that the reaction time of the driver also has a certain effect on safe separation distance. The reaction time of a mindful driver is considered to be 0.8 s. Depending on various circumstances, the reaction time of the driver may vary in range of 0.5 1. s when braking the vehicle. The safe separation distance in this case is in range of 55 7 m if the slow vehicle goes 0 km/h and the speed of the fast vehicle is 90 km/h (Figure 5). Safe separation distance increases proportionally to the increasing of the driver's reaction time. The slow vehicle is particularly risky for a drunken or drugged driver whose reaction time is 3 s or more. At the mentioned reaction time, the driver must begin to slow down at separation distance equal to 100 10 m.

14 100 80 40 0 10 15 0 5 30 35 vk i Speed of fast vehicle, m/s Figure 3. Dependence of safe separation distance on the speed of a fast vehicle 110 100 90 80 70 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 φk i Adhesion factor of road surface Figure 4. Dependence of safe separation distance on the adhesion factor of road surface Approaching a slow vehicle, the driver of a fast vehicle has to slow down proportionally to the decreasing of the separation distance (Figure 6). Deceleration must be the more intensive the smaller the speed of the slow vehicle. If the slow vehicle goes 40 km/h (11 m/s), the driver of the fast vehicle has to slow down from 90 km/h (5 m/s) to 47 km/h (13 m/s) 48% when getting near the slow vehicle from the separation distance of m to the distance of 0 m. If a slow vehicle goes 7 km/h ( m/s), the driver of a fast vehicle has to slow down from 80 km/h ( m/s) to 5 km/h (7 m/s) 69% when getting near the slow vehicle from the separation distance of m to the distance of 0 m. Traffic regulations require that the driver must indicate at least 3 seconds before manoeuvre. If the driver of the slow vehicle indicates 3 seconds before manoeuvre on highway, he may put the driver of the fast vehicle in a situation, where the latter does not have enough space for safe stopping of vehicle, when the fast vehicle is closer than m to the slow vehicle. The fast vehicle runs 75 m in 3 seconds at the speed of 90 km/h. The braking distance of the fast vehicle is equal to 40 45 m and the reaction distance of the driver is equal to 0 5 m at the speed of 90 km/h. 70 m of free space is necessary for stopping the vehicle at this speed. Late

Traffic safety of a slow vehicle 143 and brief indication is risky, particularly before left turns and changing lanes on the left. The driver of a slow vehicle ought to indicate on the highway, when the fast vehicle is at the distance of 70 80m in the rear. The indication ought to be done 3 4 times longer than required by traffic regulations. 10 100 80 40 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 tj i Reaction time of driver, s Figure 5. Dependence of safe separation distance on the reaction time of driver Safe speed at approaching the slow vehicle, vk, m/s Safe separation distance, S pv, m Speed of slow vehicle, v a, m/s Figure 6. Dependence of safe speed at approaching the slow vehicle on safe separation distance and speed of the slow vehicle Conclusions Slow vehicles (tractor, farm or forest machine, etc.) which go on the roads significantly slower than the traffic flow, obstruct road traffic and become a source of hazard. This fact must be taken into consideration both by the drivers of slow vehicles and drivers of fast vehicles. For ensuring traffic safety, it is essential that the drivers be able to estimate the speed of vehicles and distances, when approaching a slow vehicle. In practice,

144 drivers estimate separation distance and speed of vehicles "by feeling", intuitively. It is necessary for the drivers to cognize safe separation distance and know the influencing factors. The minimal distance from a slow vehicle (safe separation distance), at which the driver, approaching the slow vehicle, has to decide if it is possible to pass the slow vehicle at once or if he should start slowing down, has been studied in this paper. Dependence of safe separation distance upon the speeds of vehicles, on road adhesion factor and on the reaction time of the driver have also been studied. Dependence of safe separation distance on the speeds of vehicles and on road surface adhesion factor is non-linear. Safe separation distance is 66 5 m in case of real speeds of vehicles (5 40 km/h for slow vehicles and 90 km/h for fast vehicles). As it is very difficult for the driver of a fast vehicle to estimate the exact speed of the slow vehicle, the driver of the fast vehicle must become observant with regard to the slow vehicle at the distance of 70 m and estimate the possibility of passing the slow vehicle. The speed of the fast vehicle has greater impact than the speed of the slow vehicle on safe separation distance. In case of varying the speed of the fast vehicle in range 50 10 km/h, safe separation distance varies in range 0 100 m (speed of slow vehicle is equal to 0 km/h). Road surface adhesion factor has as essential influence on safe separation distance as the speed of the fast vehicle. If on clean dry asphalt surface of the highway (speed of fast vehicle is 90 km/h and speed of slow vehicle is 0 km/h) safe separation distance is 64 m, then on wet surface of the highway, safe separation distance is 6 10 m longer, on muddy or slimy surface, safe separation distance is 15 m longer and on slippery road surface (adhesion factor φ 0.4), safe separation distance is over 100 m at the given speeds (Figure 4). Dependence of safe separation distance on the reaction time of the driver is linear. Safe separation distance is equal to 64 m when driving on the highway at given speeds and the reaction time of the driver is 0.8 s. Safe separation distance varies in range 55 7 m, if reaction time of driver varies in range 0.5 1. s. For a drunken or drugged driver whose reaction time is 3 s or more, safe separation distance is 100 10 m or more (Figure 5). Approaching a slow vehicle, the driver of a fast vehicle must decrease the speed proportionally to the decrease of separation distance for ensuring traffic safety (Figure 6). At separation distance of m, the safe speed is equal to 75 90 km/h, at distance of 40 m the safe speed is equal to 55 70 km/h and at the distance of 0 m the safe speed is 5 45 km/h, when the speed of a slow vehicle is 7 40 km/h. The driver of a slow vehicle ought to indicate at least 6 10 s before left turn and changing to the left lanes.