L.A. Maritime describes the operation of Aquametro Fuel-Switching Devices

Similar documents
The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

LOUISIANA MARITIME ASSOCIATION

Global Greenship, September 2009 Low Sulfur Fuel and Emissions Advances

Case study -MARPOL emission standards ECA Compliance. Your Trusted Partner

White paper. MARPOL Annex VI fuel strategies and their influence on combustion in boilers

INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 84

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

CIMAC Position Paper

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF LOW SULPHUR FUEL OILS IN SHIPS

Royal Belgian Institute of Marine Engineers

2020 Sulphur Cap. Challenges and Opportunities. Delivering Maritime Solutions.

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

Global Sulfur Cap

Alfa Laval s new FCM One is a single answer to today s fuel conditioning challenges

Systems and Arrangement for Meeting Regulations in Emission Control Areas (ECA)

Fuel handling. in Emission Controlled Areas

Commercial Marine Presentation

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

10K98MC-C and 6S35MC on the same Testbed

METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL A SAFE, COST EFFECTIVE, CLEAN-BURNING, WIDELY AVAILABLE MARINE FUEL FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE

Recommendation for petroleum fuel treatment systems for marine diesel engines

GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

Meeting ECA requirements a new challenge & a new opportunity

Residual Fuel Market Issues

RESOLUTION MEPC.181(59) Adopted on 17 July GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE REVISED MARPOL ANNEX VI

Future Marine Fuel Quality Changes: How might terminals prepare?

Marine Fuels & Environment

Module 5 Propulsion and Power Generation of LNG driven Vessels (23 th November to 27 th November University of Piraeus, Greece)

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH

ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

1 COPYRIGHT 2018, LUBES N GREASES MAGAZINE. REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION FROM THE MAY 2018 ISSUE

Emerging Environmental Rules & ECA Compliance

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS THE RATIONAL BEHIND THE PROPOSAL

GUIDANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 0.50% SULPHUR LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

Marine fuels in the low-sulphur era

Internationaler Congress für Schiffstechnik

Bunkering With New Fuels Building on Strong Foundations.

Wärtsilä NO X Reducer. Environmental Efficiency

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

Mitigation measures for air emissions

2018 World Maritime Day Observance. November 14th, 2018 Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

MARTOB Application of low sulphur marine fuels New challenges for the Marine Industry. Kjell Olav Skjølsvik MARINTEK

Tanker Operator Hamburg Conference Cases of increased wear due to Cat Fines avoidable by on-board fuel condition

NORTH AMERICAN ECA AND NEW FUEL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

PureSO x. Exhaust gas cleaning. This document, and more, is available for download from Martin's Marine Engineering Page -

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

NO x FAQ. Disclaimer. Content

A multi-fuel future: the impact of the IMO sulphur cap

A PROPOSAL FOR MARINE FUEL OIL SYSTEM ARRANGED TO BURN HEAVY FUEL OIL AND LOW SULPHUR DISTILLATE GRADE

The Transition to Low Sulfur Bunker Fuel

ABS Notes. Use of Low Sulphur Marine Fuel for Boilers

Changes on the Horizon

Effect of SOx and NOx Regulation Implementation, ECA s and NOx Tier III Current Developments in General

IMO 2020: A Sea Change is Coming

INTERTANKO Documentary Committee Bunker 2020

By Edmund Hughes, Technical Officer, Marine Environment Division, IMO

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Guidelines for onboard sampling and the verification of the sulphur content of the fuel oil used on board ships

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

MARITIME GLOBAL SULPHUR CAP. Know the different choices and challenges for on-time compliance SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

GUIDANCE FOR HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

New Regulatory Environment

MARPOL Annex VI: the Club s perspective

M-22 DUAL FUEL ENGINE

SHIPPING and ENVIRONMENT

The European Fuels Conference

CIRCULAR IMO FAQ on the sulphur limits in Emission Control Areas (ECAs)

DUTCH HARBOR, ALASKA

NOx Reduction Technologies for 2-stroke Diesel Engines to Meet IMO Tier III

Marine Insurance day 2018

AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION SULPHUR REGULATIONS

Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability. Jasper Faber, The Hague, 3 October 2016

NORTH AMERICAN AND US CARIBBEAN SEA ECA UNDERSTANDING COMPLIANCE ISSUES

Marine Fuel Solutions. 5 th European Bunker Fuels Conference Rotterdam May 2014 Chris Turner Group Technical Manager

Marine Heavy Fuel Oils - Problems and Alternatives -

USB 100/5 (100m³/h) USB 18/3 (18m³/h)

Consistent implementation of the 2020 sulphur limit and work to further address GHG emissions from international shipping

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. Application of more than one engine operational profile ("multi-map") under the NOx Technical Code 2008

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA Liberia Maritime Authority

IMPACTS OF THE IMO SULPHUR REGULATIONS ON THE CANADIAN CRUDE OIL MARKET

Your proven route to competitive SOx compliance

Instruction of connection and programming of the VECTOR controller

Fuels Sulphur Cap. Vice President, Marine Sales Americas Daniel Vengel Jensen SEAM Les Gingell. 29 th of June 2018

The low sulphur fuel starting from the bottom of the barrel: EST a novel and industrial proven technology

ECA changes and its impact on distillate demand

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MEPC.182(59) Adopted on 17 July 2009

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FAILURES ON THE EXHAUST GAS CONTENT OF SHIP DIESEL ENGINE WORKING ON HEAVY FUEL OIL

Zero NOx Customised SCR

CHALLENGES IN DESIGNING SYNTHESIS CONVERTERS FOR VERY LARGE METHANOL PRODUCTION CAPACITY

Development future marine fuels: what has been achieved what needs to be done

IMO 2020 Minimizing operational risks due to compliance. Sachin Gupta Business Manager Water & Oil Solutions

BILGE WATER DEOILING SAFE, RELIABLE, ECONOMICAL MULTI-PHASE EMULSION BREAKER MPEB

Standardized Bunker Supplier Accreditation Scheme to Enhance Marine Environmental Protection in SOMS

Trends for Refining Residual Fuel Oil. Prepared for Bunker Asia Forum 2011 Singapore 7 September 2011

Nanoparticle emissions from LNG and other low sulfur marine fuels

Transcription:

L.A. Maritime describes the operation of Aquametro Fuel-Switching Devices L.A. Maritime is pleased to announce a new cooperation with Aquametro AG of Switzerland. As of September 1, 2015, L.A. Maritime is the exclusive agent for both sales and service of Aquametro Fuel- Switching products in North America. Aquametro describes the operation of their devices as follows: Fuel Management - reliable switching of fuels before entering ECA areas Since 1 January 2015, the provisions of IMO MARPOL Annex VI, according to which a seagoing vessel reaching a designated ECA area may only use fuels with a sulfur content of <0.1% apply. This means that a seagoing vessel with heavy fuel oil (HFO) is operating without a scrubber installed must be switched to a low sulfur distillate (MDO / MGO) in time before entering the ECA zone. For the switchover from heavy oil to fuels with <0.1% sulfur content requires special requirements on the fuel system and the fuel preparation according to the different fuel qualities. The ship operators have to realize the timely and technically secure conversion of fuels. The diesel engines are basically designed for one type of fuel and this is out of cost reasons usually for HFO operation. The different fuel qualities and their physical properties make different demands on fuel processing and engine components. From the switchover processes between heavy fuel oil to low-sulfur distillates arise due to the different temperature and viscosity behavior of both fuels, high thermal component stresses acting differently in the fuel supply, the fuel circulation and in injection system. Rapid changes in the fuel temperatures lead to different thermal expansions of significant components particularly in circulation and injection system of the diesel engine, which is causative faults and failures, for example, the injection pump. In addition, high temperatures during switchover lead to a reduction in viscosity of the distillate fuel, which can subsequently lead to increased leakage at fittings and seals to the total pressure drop in the injection system. Depending on the requirements of engine manufacturers a maximum permissible temperature gradient of 2-3 C / minute has to be controlled. With the failure of the fuel system and the total failure of the engine system goes hand in hand, which in turn results in the loss of control of the ship by itself. ECA areas are coastal areas with increased traffic. Failures of the ship propulsion system lead to danger of the ship, crew as well as the regional vessel traffic and the environment. They are thus subject of course to increased scrutiny by the port and coastal states. In fuel supply systems, the low viscosity of the distillate cause leakages, which may have an increased fire hazard in case of proximity to hot components (hot spots). By fuel industry intensive efforts are being made to the MARPOL requirements with cost-effective new fuels to meet. Such hybrid fuel having a higher viscosity than distillates can reduce thermal problems in the fuel system described.

Fuel treatment The basis for the production of heavy oils for shipping incurred in refining residue (bottom product). The application of catalytic and thermal cracking process resulting incompatibility problems when mixing different fuel qualities. The starting point for today's heavy oils are residual oils from the various cracking processes whose characteristics may vary depending on the refinery / oil company and employed crude. Problems in terms of quality and incompatibility of bunkered fuel and the mixture of different fuel batches, also within the same types of fuel, can lead to serious system disorders such as excessive sludge formation in the fuel preparation and ultimately lead to system failures. The fuel preparation is to be tuned according to the fuels used and the engine requirements. To detect possible incompatibilities in the fuel the crew uses as fast-track procedure compatibility tests to compare the different fuels or fuel batches available onboard with each other. Figure 1. Test Kit - Compatibility of Fuels The use of a fuel homogenizer offers the possibility to avoid Sludge - or Aspalthen clustering. The intervals between cleaning the filter can be significantly extended. The inclusion in an exemplary fuel system is shown in FIG. 6. Fuel Monitoring / Management Classification societies as well as engine manufacturers dictate guidelines and recommendations for the switching process between two types of fuel, they have become increasingly no longer with manual intervention of the crew and the resulting operating errors. A safer, more efficient and environmentally friendly operation of the engines requires an automated fuel management on board to monitor the full operational and functional capacity of the fuel system, as it currently does not appear in ship operation. For the switching process the engine manufacturer is recommending (dictate?), a corresponding fuel management. Fig. 3 shows the preset function sequence between distillate - diesel oil (DO) - and heavy fuel oil (HFO) with appropriate parameter limits.

Figure 2. Fuel Homogenizer principal view Figure 3. Default MAN switching processes between HFO and DO/MAN Diesel Fact 1/2015 Fig. 4: Function sequence changeover process from HFO to DO traditional and automated with Aquametro DIESEL SWITCH

Figure 4: Function sequence changeover process from HFO to DO traditional and automated with Aquametro DIESEL SWITCH For example, in existing regulatory processes for switching from HFO specified in DO subsequent measures require some manual intervention. 1. With an increase in the viscosity of the fuel injection, the temperature level is lowered in order to decrease the temperature difference during switching. This reduces potential thermal stress of the components in the fuel system. 2. With the reduction of engine power the fuel volume - or fuel mass flow shall be reduced. This causes a delay of the mixing / switching process in the fuel circulation system, enabling the control systems a slower parameter adjustment. Here, it is assumed that the switching between the two types of fuel in the fuel delivery is performed in one step, that means it is not regulated. 3. Turning off the trace heating and fuel preheating causes a reduction in the heat input into the fuel system while distillate / DO - operation 4. By connecting a fuel cooler in the fuel system excess heat, for example, residual amounts of heat during switching process or the heat input of the circulation and injection pump is removed. The steps 2 and 4 ensures that the minimum permissible injection viscosity of the engine manufacturer can be adhered to. The measures are linked to a fixed time regimes that are created by the ship's operator, together with the classification society and processed by the crew according to a schedule before reaching the ECA zones. The predetermined steps of switching between HFO and low sulfur distillate are geared to predetermined load points and timings, which due to a lack of automated control algorithms are based on timing schedules that ensure timely switching the fuel before reaching the ECA zones. This results in some very long changeover.

The use of a Fuel monitoring / management system, as the Aquametro DIESEL SWITCH system, with automated, secure switching from HFO to distillates, offers the possibility to realize a secure, yet fast switching operation with knowledge and monitoring of system parameters describing the fuel system. A reduction of the engine power is not required. It can in relation to the mixing ratio of the fuel during the changeover and the specific operating state switch fuel coolers and HFO preheater on/off or controlled in time. Even in the event fuel incompatibilities the system can optionally start or stop the homogenizer for sludge reduction. Figure 5. Fuel Management - Aquametro DIESEL Switch system Figure. 5: Fuel Management - Aquametro DIESEL SWITCH system / www.aquametro.com The operational management of the fuel system via a Fuel Monitoring / Management is thus automatically and ensures a safe switching operation in which all Specifications from the engine manufacturers are adhered to. Compliance with time schedules, as they are drawn up by the classification, are not necessary. With a qualified Fuel Management, for example, the Aquametro DIESEL SWITCH, subsequent activities may be fully automated for switching from HFO to low-sulfur distillate fuels or hybrid. Manual intervention in existing regulatory processes are not required, which increases the operational reliability considerably. 1. The automated progressive fuel switching by Aquametro DIESEL SWTICH effected by temperature control of the mixing fuel during the switching process. 2. Knowing the fuel composition at any time of the changeover process allows downstream system components in the fuel system to switch on or off predictively this may be:. On/off switching of the heat tracing or HFO preheating. On/off switching of the fuel cooler. Control of the cooling capacity of the fuel cooler on the cooling water inlet. On/off switching of a homogenizer to reduce sludge formation before injection engine - Aquametro Homogenizer The switching process successfully completed at the DIESEL SWITCH system is documented with the status information "SWITCH OFF". With the status message "FUEL ON ENGINE" the entire switching process is concluded with availability of the second type of fuel to the engine after evaluating the permanently measured temperature profile at the engine inlet. As a complete changeover example of

HFO to distillate resulting from the period between the start of the switching process "CHANGE OVER PROCESS ON" and the status message "FUEL ON ENGINE". In addition to the configurable setting parameters to the specific fuel system, the switching time is therefore solely dependent upon the engine load and thus of the fuel volume flow. Signified alarms and limits can be parameterized and monitored. Moreover, alongside the fuel viscosity and 2 additional freely configurable measurement signals (eg. Fuel consumption, differential pressures).optionally the GPS protocol can be integrated and thus be assigned any status message of the exact ship's position and time. All status information, System Settings and alarm message can be exported as a data file. Figure 6. Integration - Fuel Monitoring / Management & homogenizer into a fuel system www.aquametro.com