Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Tracker. Operate a reliable and COnvenient transportation system. Becky Allmeroth, Chief Safety and Operations Officer

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Final Report. Refining the Real-Timed Urban Mobility Report. Tim Lomax, Shawn Turner, Bill Eisele, David Schrank, Lauren Geng, and Brian Shollar

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 1,000 980 960 940 925 Rank 45 46 47 47 48 Commuters (1000s) 550 539 528 517 506 Freeway 11,088 10,871 10,500 10,647 10,385 Arterial Streets 13,287 13,116 13,140 13,048 12,849 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.21 3.35 3.33 3.26 2.55 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.43 3.66 3.75 3.53 2.76 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 25 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 23 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.80 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 21,027 19,864 19,149 18,342 17,683 Rank 35 36 38 39 40 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 23 21 21 20 19 Rank 18 27 25 30 39 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 45,652 43,128 41,576 39,824 38,392 Rank 33 36 36 36 36 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 49 47 47 46 45 Rank 19 21 21 21 24 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 42 41 42 43 42 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 Rank 52 56 55 53 58 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.08 -- -- -- -- Rank 55 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,030 989 967 946 940 Rank 34 39 39 39 40 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,110 1,066 1,042 1,019 1,013 Rank 27 28 32 35 37

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 900 875 865 860 855 Rank 49 51 50 50 50 Commuters (1000s) 486 465 451 446 440 Freeway 10,000 9,665 9,770 9,435 9,300 Arterial Streets 12,338 12,590 12,180 11,790 11,500 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.11 3.31 2.87 2.51 2.19 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.32 3.98 3.22 2.73 2.34 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 17,371 17,491 16,803 16,448 16,207 Rank 39 40 41 41 40 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 19 19 18 18 17 Rank 35 41 47 45 46 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 37,716 37,976 36,482 35,712 35,187 Rank 36 36 36 37 35 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 46 48 47 46 46 Rank 20 23 25 28 26 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 42 42 46 45 42 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.20 Rank 52 53 55 54 53 Total Cost ($ millions) 939 942 940 945 962 Rank 40 41 40 40 41 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,012 1,015 1,013 1,019 1,037 Rank 38 42 50 48 46

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 850 830 820 810 800 Rank 50 50 50 50 48 Commuters (1000s) 435 423 413 402 392 Freeway 9,230 9,200 9,100 9,060 8,930 Arterial Streets 11,110 11,000 11,380 11,020 10,715 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.77 1.42 1.27 1.31 1.48 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.77 1.35 1.21 1.39 1.38 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 15,931 14,927 14,587 13,840 12,775 Rank 40 40 40 40 40 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 16 16 15 14 Rank 43 44 36 40 43 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 34,588 32,409 31,670 30,049 27,736 Rank 36 37 37 38 39 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 46 44 44 42 40 Rank 26 27 26 28 30 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.16 Rank 39 46 43 39 46 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 Rank 52 53 54 57 54 Total Cost ($ millions) 978 941 940 906 860 Rank 40 42 41 40 41 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,054 1,014 1,013 977 927 Rank 40 44 38 41 46

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 790 780 770 760 750 Rank 46 46 46 46 46 Commuters (1000s) 383 373 364 354 346 Freeway 8,985 8,730 8,665 8,500 8,245 Arterial Streets 10,455 10,145 9,865 9,595 9,360 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.03 1.00 1.08 1.21 1.06 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.00 1.03 1.13 1.27 1.11 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 11,644 10,623 10,035 9,202 8,110 Rank 40 41 41 41 43 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 13 11 11 10 9 Rank 44 56 49 50 53 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 25,281 23,065 21,787 19,979 17,608 Rank 40 41 40 40 42 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 37 35 33 31 28 Rank 36 39 45 45 53 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 Rank 52 56 62 67 68 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.13 Rank 66 68 63 68 71 Total Cost ($ millions) 811 756 725 680 617 Rank 41 42 42 42 43 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 874 815 781 733 665 Rank 52 55 56 57 59

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 740 725 720 705 690 Rank 45 45 45 46 46 Commuters (1000s) 337 326 319 309 298 Freeway 7,740 7,725 7,300 7,125 6,935 Arterial Streets 9,065 9,150 8,040 7,860 7,350 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 0.97 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.11 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.01 1.09 1.08 1.10 1.09 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,505 7,142 5,965 5,229 4,904 Rank 43 44 47 47 46 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 8 8 6 6 5 Rank 56 50 63 58 64 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 16,294 15,506 12,951 11,354 10,648 Rank 42 42 45 48 47 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 27 26 22 20 19 Rank 52 49 63 65 64 Travel Time Index 1.10 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.08 Rank 72 67 70 71 63 Commuter Stress Index 1.12 1.12 1.10 1.09 1.09 Rank 74 68 76 78 75 Total Cost ($ millions) 587 573 493 445 435 Rank 43 43 46 49 47 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 633 618 531 480 469 Rank 61 57 66 69 69

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 680 675 670 665 655 Rank 45 45 44 44 44 Commuters (1000s) 291 287 283 279 273 Freeway 6,830 6,850 6,425 6,075 5,975 Arterial Streets 7,505 7,155 7,100 7,030 7,020 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.06 0.98 0.98 0.96 1.25 Diesel ($/gallon) 0.98 0.90 0.90 0.88 1.15 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,562 4,378 4,114 3,568 3,439 Rank 46 45 43 45 42 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 5 4 4 4 Rank 57 47 55 48 40 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 9,905 9,506 8,932 7,746 7,468 Rank 47 43 41 43 42 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 18 18 17 15 15 Rank 59 52 51 55 50 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.06 Rank 66 60 55 57 54 Commuter Stress Index 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.07 1.07 Rank 69 66 67 72 66 Total Cost ($ millions) 427 429 420 378 371 Rank 47 43 42 45 43 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 460 463 453 407 400 Rank 67 62 60 63 58

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 650 645 640 Rank 43 43 43 Commuters (1000s) 268 264 259 Freeway 5,850 5,155 4,885 Arterial Streets 6,820 6,400 6,085 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.27 1.30 1.35 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.16 1.19 1.25 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,261 2,791 2,620 Rank 42 43 42 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 3 3 Rank 34 42 36 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 7,080 6,059 5,688 Rank 40 42 42 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 14 12 12 Rank 50 52 49 Travel Time Index 1.06 1.05 1.05 Rank 51 55 51 Commuter Stress Index 1.07 1.06 1.06 Rank 62 67 66 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 364 325 315 Rank 43 43 42 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 392 350 339 Rank 52 59 54