Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Similar documents
GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Critical Design Review

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Presentation Outline. # Title

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Flight Readiness Review

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

NASA SL Critical Design Review

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Project NOVA

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

University of Notre Dame

The University of Toledo

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements

University Student Launch Initiative

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Critical Design Review Report

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Innovating the future of disaster relief

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

USLI Critical Design Report

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

University Student Launch Initiative

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

Preliminary Design Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

The University of Toledo

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

Post Launch Assessment Review

USLI Flight Readiness Review

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPORT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH 2015

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

Pre-Launch Procedures

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Madison West High School Green Team

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 5, 2014

Post Launch Assessment Review

Design and Navigation Control of an Advanced Level CANSAT

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM. Preliminary Design Review Presentation Maxi-Mav Participant

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

Flight and Terminal Ballistic Performance Demonstration of a Gun-Launched Medium Caliber Ramjet Propelled Air Defense Projectile

Rocket Activity Advanced High- Power Paper Rockets

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

Transcription:

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES 1

Agenda 1. Team Overview (1 Min) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Changes Since Proposal (1 Min) Educational Outreach (1 Min) Safety (2 Min) Project Budget (2 Min) Launch Vehicle (10 min) AGSE& Flight Systems (13 Min) 8. Questions (15 Min) 2

Project Hermes - CDR TEAM OVERVIEW 3

Georgia Tech Team Overview 19 person team composed of both undergraduate and graduate students Graduate Students: 2 Undergraduates: 17 Highly Integrated team across several disciplines 4

Work Breakdown Structure 5

Project Hermes - CDR CHANGES SINCE PDR 6

Changes since PDR Launch Vehicle ATS now actuates with DC motors and a lead screw design. Payload Bay, GPS, and ATS Power supply now relocated. Slight overall dimensions changes to each segment. L990 set as the new booster Autonomous Ground Support Equipment Added servo motor to robotic arm (now 5) Wider base Added pulley to raising mechanism Redesigned ignition system Flight Systems: No Changes Project Plan: No Changes 7

Project Hermes - CDR EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH 8

Educational Outreach Atlanta Maker s Faire FIRST Lego League CEISMC GT 9

Project Hermes - CDR SAFETY 10

Risk Assessment & Launch Vehicle Hazard Identification What has the potential to become a safety hazard? Risk and Hazard Assessment What are the potential consequences of the hazard? Risk Control and Mitigation What can be done to mitigate the risk? Reviewing Assessments Are the mitigations working? 11

Project Hermes - CDR PROJECT BUDGET 12

Project Budget Summary 13

Project Hermes - CDR LAUNCH VEHICLE 14

Launch Vehicle Summary Predicted apogee: 5803 ft Stability margin: 2.6 calibers Motor: Cesaroni L990 Rail Exit Velocity: 53.9 ft/s Max Mach: 0.74 Total weight: 20.25 lbs Dual deployment with 15 and 50 15

Fins Tip Chord 7 cm or 2.75591 in Root Chord 19.3 cm or 7.598 in Thickness 0.318 cm or 0.1252 in Fin Area 55.23 in^2 Span 13.4 cm or 5.275591 in Aspect Ratio 0.50392 16

Booster Section 17

Apogee Targeting System (ATS) 18

Motor Selection Cesaroni L990 MOTOR NAME Cesaroni L990 DIAMETER 54mm LENGTH 64.9cm PROP WEIGHT 1.369kg TOTAL WEIGHT 2.236kg AVG THRUST 991.0N MAX THRUST 1702.7N TOTAL IMPULSE 2771.6 BURN TIME 2.8s 19

Avionics Bay 20

Payload Bay 21

Payload Bay Dimension 22

FEA Thrust Plate 23

Mass Breakdown 24

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio * Thrust/Weight Avg. Thrust = 991 N Weight = 9.7 kg * 9.81 m/s2 Thrust-to-Weight Ratio = 10.414 25

Rocket Flight Stability 26

Stability Calculation 27

Parachutes - Specifications * Sizes Main: 50 Drogue: 15, composed of tubular nylon Recovery Harness Type Main: Angel Parachute, Drogue: Eliptical Costuem Length Main: 30, Drogue 15 Descent Rates Explain sizes, recovery harness type, size, length, And descent rates * 28

Mission Performance Flight Profile 29

Mission Performance - Drift Profile 30

Launch Vehicle Kinetic Energy Sections Mass (lbs) KE ( ft-lbf) Nosecone 0.47 8.83 Avionics Bay 2.2 35.437 Booster Section 1.5 28.18 Our total Kinetic Energy at landing is approximately 72.447 ft lbf. 31

Test Plan Overview Component Test Verification Method Lead Screw with DC motor actuation Extension force of flaps test. Quantitative Analysis ATS Wind tunnel testing to confirm Cd simulations. Quantitative Analysis Thrust Plate Bend test and pressure test to verify rigidity until breaking point. Quantitative Analysis Payload Bay Payload retention force measurement test. Quantitative Analysis Avionics Bay Altimeter accuracy and accelerometer performance test. Quantitative Analysis Recovery System Recovery system ground test fire. Inspection Fins Fin attachment robustness test along two axis. Quantitative Analysis Launch Vehicle Assembly Vehicle will be completely assembled under a time constraint to verify efficiency and effectiveness. Inspection 32

Final Launch Vehicle Product 33

Project Hermes - PDR FLIGHT SYSTEMS 34

Flight System Responsibilities Outline of Success Criteria Requirement Design Feature to Satisfy Requirement Requirement Verification Success Criteria The vehicle shall not exceed an apogee of 5,280 feet Drag from the ATS system Full-scale flight test Apogee within 1% of target The vehicle will be tracked in real- GPS module will be used in the time to locate and recover it vehicle and base station Full-scale flight test The vehicle will be located on a map after it lands for recovery The data of the vehicle s flight will Sensors will save data be recorded Full-scale flight test The data will be recovered and readable after flight 35

Flight Systems: Avionics Avionics Components Part Function Stratologger SL100 Altimeter - used to receive and record altitude MMA8452Q Accelerometer - used to receive and record acceleration mbed LPC 1768 Microcontroller - used to receive sensor data to compute and control the ATS Eggfinder TX/RX Module GPS module - used to track the rocket in real time 9V Alkaline Batteries Used to power all Avionics components and ATS 36

Flight Systems: Avionics General connection of main components 37

Flight Systems: Avionics Eagle CAD schematic of main components 38

Flight Systems: Ground Station Equipment: Eggfinder TX (Transmitter) Eggfinder RX (Receiver) 39

Flight Systems: ATS Science Dynamic drag adjustment by changing the geometry exposed to the flow to increase the vehicle s aerodynamic properties. 40

Flight Systems: ATS Power 9-volt alkaline batteries will be used to power the ATS DC motors will be used to create torque on the air-brake flaps 41

Flight Systems: Testing Overview Wind Tunnel: Test Cd of flaps against simulation, and ability for solenoids to withstand the given pressures Flight Simulation: Forged flight data will be fed to the sensors and the response efficacy will be analyzed. Power Consumption: Full charged power supply will be connected to flight systems to see its maximum lifespan. 42

Project Hermes - CDR AUTONOMOUS GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 43

AGSE: Initial Design 10 ft. by 4 ft. base 1.5 ft. height Weight 60 lbs. 3 subsystems RPDS: Robotic Payload Delivery System RES: Rocket Erection System MIS: Motor Ignition System 44

AGSE: RPDS Will locate payload using IR sensors Grab payload using gripping claw Arms constructed from plywood Motor mounts 3-D printed (ABS plastic) 5 servo motors 45

AGSE: RPDS Arm will move payload into payload bay Payload secured by plastic clips Arm will close the magnetically locking hatch 46

AGSE: RES Launch vehicle will be raised by a cable and spool system Spool will pull in steel cable that runs through the pulley and eye hook 1 unipolar Stepper motor 47

AGSE: MIS Rack and pinion system inserts electronic match 12 inches into the motor cavity Fixed to the bottom of the guide rail Constructed from 1/8 in steel 1 bipolar stepper motor 48

AGSE: Safety 49

AGSE: Safety 50

AGSE: Electronics 5 servo motors for RPDS 1 unipolar stepper motor for RES 1 bipolar stepper motor for MIS 1 IR sensor 2 roller switches 2 LEDS as indicators 1 button to start and stop the program Controlled by Arduino Uno-R3 51

AGSE: Power System will be powered by 12V- 10.5 Ah lead acid battery System can run continuously for 6.37 hours Batter can power 47 runs 52

AGSE: Test Plan Overview RES lifting test Ensure that individual components are durable enough to withstand various forces during operation Hold at various positions to simulate pausing RPDS payload insertion test Determine the strength of the robotic arm Determine the precision 53

Questions Questions? 54