Purpose of Presentation

Similar documents
Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Sanitation Services Proposed FY11 Budget. Council Briefing

Municipal Solid Waste Services: Overview & Case Study

Sanitation Services Proposed FY11 Budget. Council Briefing

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING: Arvada s Existing System & Early Research. September 8, 2010 Presentation to Arvada Citizens Task Force

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING ASSESSMENT SERVICES. January 10, 2011 Presentation to Arvada City Council

Executive Summary. Solid Waste Management Program Analysis and Recommendations for Silver City, New Mexico

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

Solid Waste Management

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

CITY OF ARVADA, COLORADO MUNICIPAL SOLID WASET BENCHMARKING - SUMMARY TABLE

Analysis of Waste & Recyclable Materials Collection Arrangements. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Presented by Jeff Schneider

C I T Y O F O A K L A N D City Council Special Meeting July 30, Zero Waste Collection Services RFP

Residential Curbside Recycling

9/1/2011. Trash to Treasure Catherine Chertudi Boise Idaho Public Works September Boise City. Population 206,000 69,300 Households.

Waste Hauling Focus Group Agenda and Topics March 1, :30-8:30 pm

Franchise Agreements for Solid Waste Haulers in Dallas

City/County Yard Waste Issue Paper

Background METRO WASTE AUTHORITY WE KNOW WHERE IT SHOULD GO

Alfred & Plantagenet Multi-Residential Cart Recycling Program CIF Project Number # Final Report October 1, 2016

Benefits and Challenges Associated with Pay-As- You-Throw and Automated Garbage Collection Programs

CIF # City of Barrie. Large Curbside Containers. Final Report. Final Project Report, September City of Barrie. CIF Project # 801.

MANDATORY RECYCLING ORDINANCE SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE NO 4.

WASTE & RECYCLING SERVICES

GREEN RIVER MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS REVIEW

Illegal Dumping at Tribal Churches and Longhouses

Final Report Community Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant (CWRAR) 2015 City of Asheville, NC

RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE RFP DRAFT

New Franchise Agreement: Recyclables, Organics, and Waste. Town of Truckee Town Council Meeting July 25, 2017

Too Good to Throw Away Implementation Strategy

Generator Levy & Commercial Hauler Licensing

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR ORDINANCE NO Revised May 16, 2002

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY (SWA)

Appendix C. Parking Strategies

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Shana Baker and Brian Gaboriau Hazardous Materials & Waste Management Division Solid Waste & Materials Management Program

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

Refuse & Recycling Curbside Collection Program Efficiency Recommendation. Tammy Chastain September 4, 2018

Multi-Family Recycling

Regular Meeting PULASKI COUNTY Monday, November 8, 2004 PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY FOLLOW-UP. 1. Citizen Comments (Mr. Stan Moran presented information)

Town of Hollis Solid Waste Flow Control Ordinance

The Next Collection Contract

2016 Waste and Recycling Program Frequently Asked Questions

Georgetown County Code of Ordinances Chapter 8 ARTICLE II. - SOLID WASTE. Sec Definitions.

EXHIBIT 2A RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

CNG Discussion Senate Energy Policy Issues Committee. Jim Trogdon, COO, N.C. Department of Transportation March 21, 2012

Personalized Solutions. Personalized Service.

Chapter 740, Street Vending One Year Review

ORDINANCE NO

The following gate fees will be applicable at El Sobrante, Badlands, Lamb Canyon, and Blythe Landfills WASTE GROUP DESCRIPTIONS

Overview WHAT IS PAYT? Global Warming & Garbage??? 6. Changing the Way New Mexico Values Trash. New Mexico Waste Characterization

MSRC CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP

Franchise Agreements for Solid Waste Haulers in Dallas

Parking Utility Function: Public Works & Transportation

CHAPTER 22 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE COLLECTION. (with amendments through )

Audit Follow-up. Fleet Fuel Operations (Report #0801, Issued October 18, 2007) As of March 31, Summary. Report #0811 June 20, 2008

SOAH DOCKET NO TCEQ DOCKET NO MSW

Solid Waste Program Assessment

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Residential Solid Waste: Recycling Efforts Are Effective, But Opportunities Exist to Lower Rates

Household Renewable Energy

Strategies for Bulky Waste Collection in the City of Milwaukee

Ketchum Energy Advisory Committee Annual Update and Recommendation for Electric Vehicle Charging Station

Internal Audit Report. Fuel Consumption Oversight and Coordination TxDOT Internal Audit Division

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

Performance and Cost Data. residential refuse collection

Invitation for Bid Y PD

Chapter 740, Street Vending One Year Bylaw Review

The Vehicle Sticker Proposal March 5, Chicago s City Sticker Model. The purpose of this report:

Executive Summary October 2013

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

Utility Rates October 1, 2018

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EAGLE COUNTY RECYCLE DROP-OFF COLLECTION CONTAINER HAULING

Collection Frequency. Cart Sizes 1x/week 2x/week 3x/week 4x/week 5x/week 6x/week Cart Rental

New Trash & Recycling Services. TD HOA Board Meeting April 28, 2018 Erica Mertens Recycling Program Manager

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Refuel: San Diego Regional Alternative Fuel Coordinating Council. Kick-off Meeting October 16, 2014

Vehicle and Equipment Services (4760P)

WASTE COLLECTION RATES FOR FY

HARRISON COUNTY RECYCLING ORDINANCE

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

TRANSFER STATION OPERATING PLAN TOWN OF NORTH KINGSTOWN (Revised June 2016)

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3157

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

CITY OF LOGAN RESOLUTION 18-21

The Hoisington Utility Bill. A Presentation to the Utility Task Force

Residential and Municipal Solid Waste Collections Contract. January 15, 2019

MECKLENBURG COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEE ORDINANCE

CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION (C&D) RECYCLING APPLICATION COMMERCIAL RECYCLING SERVICE PROVIDER

OFFICE OF FLEET MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 7, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Assembly Bill No CHAPTER 572

Rural & Underserved Area Disposal Needs Study

Collection of Mercury Switches and Mercury Switch Assemblies from Vehicles

Transcription:

New Mexico Recycling & Solid Waste Conference Solid Waste Assessment & Management Study for Santa Fe Solid Waste Management Agency, City of Santa Fe and Santa Fe County September 24, 2014 Presented by: Mr. David S. Yanke dyanke@newgenstrategies.net Purpose of Presentation Provide Main Findings and Recommendations on the Solid Waste Assessment & Management Study Santa Fe Solid Waste Management Agency City of Santa Fe Santa Fe County Systemwide 2 1

Project Status Section Status Project Kick-off March 2013 Santa Fe County Completed March 2014 City of Santa Fe Completed August 2014 Agency Tentative Completion October 2014 Systemwide Tentative Completion October 2014 Final Report 1 Tentative Completion October 2014 1. Includes all of the above sections, plus an executive summary 3 Agency 2

Agency Scope of Services Cost of Service Analysis Operational Assessment Caja del Rio Landfill Buckman Road Recycling & Transfer Station (BuRRT) Other Agency Operations Evaluate Alternative Options 5 Cost of Service Analysis Year 1 FY 2015 Year 2 FY 2016 Year 3 FY 2017 Year 4 FY 2018 Total Revenue Requirement $ 7,743,248 $ 7,895,141 $ 8,051,121 $ 8,631,302 Two Types of Costs: Direct: Costs directly allocated to service category (e.g., wages, benefits, equipment purchase, repair, and fuel expenses). Indirect: Administrative (e.g., management personnel, office supplies, professional & legal services) Operation & Maintenance (e.g., water/electric utilities, buildings & grounds maintenance, operation and safety supplies). 6 3

Caja del Rio Landfill Revenue Requirement Year 1 FY 2015 Year 2 FY 2016 Year 3 FY 2017 Year 4 FY 2018 Landfill Total Costs $ 4,158,826 $ 4,231,310 $ 4,305,676 $ 4,801,976 Cost per Ton 1 $ 30.66 $ 31.19 $ 31.74 $ 35.40 1. Excludes tonnage from BuRRT as this is not charged a tipping fee at the Landfill. Over-recovery at the Landfill is used to support the diversion programs at BuRRT. Overall, the Landfill is running well. Do not recommend closing the Landfill and transporting elsewhere (cost prohibitive). 7 Buckman Road Recycling and Transfer Station - BuRRT Green Waste Processing - Mulching Revenue Requirement Year 1 FY 2015 Year 2 FY 2016 Year 3 FY 2017 Year 4 FY 2018 Green Waste Total Costs $ 461,782 $ 472,389 $ 483,299 $ 494,521 Annual Tonnage 7,375 7,375 7,375 7,375 Cost per Ton $ 62.61 $ 64.05 $ 65.53 $ 67.05 The Beast horizontal wood grinder has been proven problematic. The Agency should consider outsourcing this service along with the composting operation (e.g., public-private partnership). 8 4

BuRRT (continued) Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Revenue Requirement Year 1 FY 2015 Year 2 FY 2016 Year 3 FY 2017 Year 4 FY 2018 MRF Total Costs $ 1,045,093 $ 1,071,669 $ 1,098,971 $ 1,127,019 Annual Recycling Tonnage 1 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 Cost per Ton $ 153.50 $ 157.40 $ 161.41 $ 165.53 1. Excludes glass recycling MRF estimated to under-recover in FY 2015. The Agency should solicit proposals for off-site transportation and recycling of the recyclables. 9 Other Agency Operations Agency needs to purchase a larger glass crusher. Agency should take the lead for education and outreach programs because it is responsible for final recycling/ disposal. Agency staff should work closely with County and City staff to assure a consistent message. Use the SWAC to help assure sound messaging. 10 5

Cost Comparison Service Category Tipping Fee Cost of Service Rate Caja del Rio Landfill $40.00/ton $30.66/ton Transfer Station $50.00/ton $82.62/ton Glass Recycling $20.00/ton $91.43/ton Green Waste $20.00/ton $62.61/ton MRF $0.00/ton $153.50/ton HHW $50.00/ton $2.39/pound E-Waste $50.00/ton $298.04/ton White Goods $10.00-15.00/unit $16.13/unit Tires $2.00/tire $2.13/tire 11 City of Santa Fe 6

City Scope of Services Cost of Service Operations Assessment Residential Collection Commercial Collection Done for both assessments: Staffing Equipment Collection efficiency Routing Non-collection Fleet maintenance Container maintenance City ordinance 13 Cost of Service Services provided Residential Refuse Collection Garbage Collection Large Item Collection Commercial Refuse Collection Front Load Garbage Collection Rear Load Garbage Collection Roll-Off Garbage Collection Recycling Collection Residential Recycling Collection Commercial Commingled Recycling Collection Commercial Cardboard Collection Disposal Refuse Recycling Processing Cost Education and outreach Keep Santa Fe Beautiful Sustainable Santa Fe City Activities Other Services Fleet Maintenance Administration Special Events Container Maintenance Revenue Requirement Year 1 FY 2014 Year 2 FY 2015 Year 3 FY 2016 Year 4 FY 2017 Year 5 FY 2018 Total Revenue Requirement $ 12,710,218 $ 13,090,693 $ 13,555,210 $ 13,863,800 $ 14,179,826 14 7

Recommendations Residential and Commercial 1. Transition current recycling operation to automated collection. 2. Invest in industry software and data management. 3. Expand commercial cardboard recycling. 4. Remove glass from current recycling operation and transition to a glass drop-off program. 5. Evaluate residential and commercial customer interest in glass subscription program. 6. Eliminate additional back-up vehicles. 7. Evaluate distribution of drivers and workers for refuse and recycling operations. 8. Monitor the dependability and annual maintenance cost of vehicles over their useful life. 9. Measure recycling program success and refocus efforts on recycling public outreach and education. 15 Santa Fe County 8

County Scope of Services Cost of Service 8 locations Refuse Recyclables Rates and funding sources Operational assessment Facility configuration and condition Equipment Staffing Safety issues Refuse and recyclables hauling Operating efficiency Benchmarking 17 County Scope (continued) Wasteshed Analysis Citizen convenience centers (CCCs) Private haulers Self-haul Solid Waste Management System 18 9

Purpose Determine total cost of refuse and recycling services for FY2014 FY2018 Identify funding options Permit Fees Environmental Gross Receipts Tax General Fund Solid Waste Assessment Provide Recommendations 19 Revenue Projections Based on Current Rates 20 10

Proposed Refuse Permit Rates for Consideration CCCs rarely fully financially self-sufficient Estimated cost of $20.15 per trip Provide more pricing flexibility Standardize senior citizen/low income rate 21 Operational Assessment of CCC s Review and evaluate the County s refuse and recycling operations. Facility configuration and condition Equipment Staffing Safety issues Refuse and recyclables hauling Operating efficiency Benchmarking 22 11

Facility Configuration County Popula on Density and CCC Loca ons 23 Facility Configuration (continued) Level of infrastructure ranges Open-air, open-top Enclosed facilities 24 12

Facility Configuration (continued) 25 Key Findings and Recommendations Overall System Consolidate/close/move some CCCs. Modify the rate structure. Develop and implement operational metrics to measure efficiency. Improve customer accessibility to drop-off areas. Improve CCC signage. Paint all containers. 26 13

Wasteshed Analysis Approach: New Mexico Solid Waste Report (Solid Waste Report) Transaction data for Landfill and BuRRT County citizen convenience center information Interviewed private solid waste haulers 27 Analysis of Refuse and Recycling Data Accounted for 125,560 tons of refuse and recyclables. Projected 138,873 tons at NM generation rates. Difference is 13,313 tons, or about 9.6 percent. Potential cause of difference Residents and businesses actually generate less Refuse being delivered to locations outside of Santa Fe County (in additional to what we identified in our survey of private haulers) Data estimated for haulers. Challenges in data collection and information gaps. 28 14

Wasteshed Observations Citizen convenience centers are an important part of the County s solid waste management system More than 33,000 tons of refuse and recyclables from unincorporated County residents (curbside and CCC) More than 1 ton collected per household (curbside and CCC) More than 32,000 residential units, and haulers serve 6,000 to 6,500. So, 26,000 require services of CCCs CCCs managed 26 percent of refuse and recyclables in unincorporated County 29 Wasteshed Observations (continued) Solid waste haulers manage a significant portion of the residential refuse and recyclables in the unincorporated County Approximately 41 percent of residential refuse and recyclables in unincorporated County are collected curbside Lack of sound, reliable data from solid waste haulers creates challenges in analyzing waste flow 30 15

Solid Waste Management System Solid Waste Management System = licenses, contracts, permits, and franchises A company (or companies) is given the right to provide solid waste services in the County. Based on a local government s solid waste policies and goals, the company may be required to: 1) deliver waste to specific disposal or recycling facilities; 2) report tonnage managed; 3) provide recycling services; and 4) report customer or other operational data to the County. The company may also be required to pay the local government an administration fee as part of the contract arrangement. 31 Residential Solid Waste Collection Service Areas 32 16

Systemwide Systemwide Issues Education and Outreach Programs Funding at $2 - $4 per citizen annually ($290,000 - $580,000 per year). Consistent messaging and signage required. Monthly meetings. Education/outreach manager for all three entities housed in Agency. 34 17

Systemwide Issues (continued) Recycling Goals Transportation is a major impediment to achieving high recycling rates. Currently, the recycling rate is 8% - 9%. 16% - 20% by FY 2018 (with automated City residential; expanded commercial cardboard). 25% - 30% by FY 2020 (food waste; maturing of current programs). 35 Systemwide Issues (continued) Alternative Options The Agency should allow out-of-county waste from surrounding counties at the current rates. Recommend the City of Santa Fe to amend its ordinances requiring all construction and demolition debris to be landfilled at the Caja del Rio Landfill. Note: Flow control is already exercised by the City for residential and commercial wastes. Small selfhaulers already go to the landfill, however, some major private waste haulers do not. 36 18

Questions or Comments? Mr. David S. Yanke dyanke@newgenstr ategies.net Direct: (512) 649-1254 3409 Executive Center Drive Suite 128 Austin, TX 78731 Phone: (512) 479-7900 19