A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE UMTRI TIRE/WHEEL UNIFORMITY MACHINE. Luis Balderas Paul Fancher

Similar documents
HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 10: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND DISTANCE DRIVEN, 1984 TO 2016

FUEL-ECONOMY DISTRIBUTIONS OF PURCHASED NEW VEHICLES IN THE U.S.: MODEL YEARS 2008 AND 2014

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 9: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND DISTANCE DRIVEN, 1984 TO 2015

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION

BENEFITS OF RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 5: UPDATE THROUGH 2012

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 214S SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION (STATIC)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 401 INTERIOR TRUNK RELEASE

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

TRANSPORTATION EMISSIONS IN THE CONTEXT

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 401 INTERIOR TRUNK RELEASE

IS THE U.S. ON THE PATH TO THE LOWEST MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITIES IN DECADES?

UMLTRI. Performance Evaluation of the UMTRl Tirewheel Uniformity Test Machine. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

RELATIVE COSTS OF DRIVING ELECTRIC AND GASOLINE VEHICLES

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 225 CHILD RESTRAINT ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS LOWER AND TETHER ANCHORAGES

GENERAL TESTING LABORATORIES, INC LEEDSTOWN ROAD COLONIAL BEACH, VIRGINIA 22443

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 202a Head Restraints

7. Author(s) Shan Bao, Michael J. Flannagan, James R. Sayer, Mitsuhiro Uchida 9. Performing Organization Name and Address

COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 207 SEATING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 104 WINDSHIELD WIPING AND WASHING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 104 WINDSHIELD WIPING AND WASHING SYSTEMS

A dream? Dr. Jürgen Bredenbeck Tire Technology Expo, February 2012 Cologne

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

FMVSS NO. 202a HEAD RESTRAINTS INDICANT TEST

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 202 HEAD RESTRAINTS STATIC REQUIREMENTS

Ultra Series: Crossed Roller Ultra Precision Stages

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 202 HEAD RESTRAINTS STATIC REQUIREMENTS

SWIFT Evo SPINNING WHEEL INTEGRATED FORCE TRANSDUCER

UMTRI FIFTH-WHEEL LOAD TRANSDUCER USERS GUIDE

SHOCK ABSORBER/DAMPER TESTING MACHINE

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 114 THEFT PROTECTION

The Deployable Gage Restraint Measurement System - Description and Operational Performance

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

REPORT NUMBER: 111-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111 SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Modeling tire vibrations in ABS-braking

Remote Combination Adaptive Driving Equipment Investigation Dynamic Science, Inc. (DSI), Case Number G 1990 Ford Bronco Arizona October

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

NEW-VEHICLE MARKET SHARES OF CARS VERSUS LIGHT TRUCKS IN THE U.S.: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

REPORT NUMBER: 111-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111 SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

ENERGY INTENSITIES OF FLYING AND DRIVING

RoaDyn S: Multi-Component Test Stand Hubs

3. DESCRIPTION OF SHAKING TABLE SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Cars, The high measuring accuracy of the precision load cells is retained during transmission, since digitization takes place on the wheel to

FLEC AIR PUMP Operators Manual JULY QUI-1030 VERSION 1.2

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 114 THEFT PROTECTION

ON-ROAD FUEL ECONOMY OF VEHICLES

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 138 TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Cars, Light Trucks Application The RoaDyn P650 is suited for measurements of wheel forces and -moments during all kinds of driving manoeuvres

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

ASSUMED VERSUS ACTUAL WEIGHTS OF VEHICLE PASSENGERS

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

Development of Turning Templates for Various Design Vehicles

Extracting Tire Model Parameters From Test Data

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Prius

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2009 FORD F150 2-DOOR PICKUP

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION 2008 MAZDA CX-9 SUV

Theory of Machines II EngM323 Laboratory User's manual Version I

96

TRUCK DESIGN FACTORS AFFECTING DIRECTIONAL BEHAVIOR IN BRAKING

REPORT NUMBER: 131-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 131 SCHOOL BUS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY DEVICES

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY HONDA MOTOR COMPANY 2007 HONDA ACCORD 4-DOOR SEDAN

REPORT NUMBER: 131SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 131SB SCHOOL BUS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY DEVICES

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

Experimental Study on Torsional Vibration of Transmission System Under Engine Excitation Xin YANG*, Tie-shan ZHANG and Nan-lin LEI

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

KEMKRAFT ENGINEERING, INC. MODEL KEI-234 STEERING WHEEL TORQUE/INCLINOMETER TESTER

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM FROM THE VEHICLE DAMPERS AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE TANK PRESSURE

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

TEST REPORT FOR: Product Design Group Inc. Elevation Manual Wheelchair 115 kg, 253 lb

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Virtual Durability Simulation for Chassis of Commercial vehicle

Steering Module Test Simulator SMTS

Linear Alignment. motion. 2 Flexible combination of XY. 4 High resolution and high responsiveness. accuracy. Optical linear encoder scale head

1291BL Series Technical Specification Single Axis Position and Rate Table System

Screw Driven automation tables

Transcription:

A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE UMTRI TIRE/WHEEL UNIFORMITY MACHINE Luis Balderas Paul Fancher October 1987

1. Report No. UMTRI- 87-48 2. Government Accession No. Technical Report Documentation Page 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE UMTRI TIREjWHEEL UNIFORMITY MACHINE 7. Author(8) Luis Balderas, Paul Fancher 9. Performing Organization Name and Address The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association 300 New Center Building Detroit, Michigan 48202 5. Report Date October 1987 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organization Report No. UMTRI-87-48 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. MVMA Proj. #7 168 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final 711186-10131187 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This document provides a concise description of a laboratory device for measuring nonuniformities and imbalances in truck tires and wheels. With the addition of a dedicated data-acquisition and data-processing system, the device is now ready for performing tests. (The development and evolution of this machine has been supported by the Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association (MVMA).) 17. Key Words truck tire uniformity (nonuniformity) truck tirelwheel imbalance 18. Distribution Statement UNLIMITED 19. Security Classif. (of this report) NONE 20. Security Classif. (of this page) NONE 21. No. of Pages 12 22. Price

Introduction The Tirewheel Uniformity Test Machine described in this report has evolved from experience gained during projects conducted over the last several years at The University of Michigan Transportation Research Lnstitute (UMTRI). The latest improvement to the machine has been the development of a dedicated instrumentation-data reduction system, completed in the fall of 1987. The purpose of this document is to describe the current capabilities of the machine. Results for a low aspect ratio tire are presented to illustrate measurements of forces and moments due to tire nonuniformities and imbalances. Purpose and Capabilities The UMTRI Tirewheel Uniformity Machine is a special device developed to measure tire and/or tire and wheel imbalances and nonuniformities as they affect vertical, longitudinal, and lateral forces and aligning and overturning moments of truck tires. Time histories of tire forces and moments are reduced to harmonics of the wheel rotation rate. The amplitudes and phases of these harmonics are computed, displayed, and tabulated at the end of each test run. (The machine can also be used to measure free radial runout at various locations across the tire, for example, left shoulder, centerline, and right shoulder.) A major challenge in building a machine of this type is to prevent machine resonances from interacting with the tire data. The UMTRI machine is unique with regard to the mounting and load cell arrangements used to provide results that are valid at high frequencies. Resonances in the machine are seen at 48 Hz for the radial force, Fz; 38 Hz for the longitudinal force, F,; 30 to 40 Hz for lateral force, Fy; and 35 Hz for both aligning moment, M,, and overturning moment, M,. In terms of wheel rotation rates, the fundamental (first harmonic) of a typical truck tire traveling at 60 mph is approximately 8.6 Hz. Hence, for example, the machine produces useful results through the fifth harmonic of the radial force nonuniformity at 60 mph. At 30 mph, the validity of the results for the first 10 harmonics of F, is not limited by machine resonances. Description of the UMTRI TirelWheel Test Machine The Tire~Wheel Uniformity Test machine (see Figure 1) consists of a road wheel, a tire carriageltransducer system, a linear variable displacement transformer (LVDT), and computer-based instrumentation. These components are briefly described below. Road WheellDrive System - The road wheel is a drum that is 62.23 inches in diameter. The drum is 24 inches wide so that dual wheel assemblies can be tested. The road wheel is driven by a 75 hp-d.c. electric motor with a closed-loop control system to maintain the desired speed over the range of 0 to 60 mph. CarriageITransducer System - The carriageltransducer system is a fabricated structure built by UMTRI. A lathe bed is installed to provide a rigid guideway for the carriage. To increase its lateral stiffness, outriggers are added to the bed. The carriage holds the tielwheel assembly supported by six load cells and loads the tirelwheel

Figure la. UMTRI ~ire/wheel Uniformity Test Machine. Figure lb. Close-Up of Force and Moment Transducer.

assembly. The carriage is designed to accept both single and dual tireiwheel configurations. Out of the six force transducers (load cells), one is to measure the lateral force (Fy), two for the tractive force (F,), and three for the radial force (FJ. All force transducers are based upon shear strain elements measured by four Kulite semiconductor strain gauges on each cell. A seventh transducer is used to measure the wheel rotational speed. This is an optical photo-detector which produces one pulse per revolution. Linear Variable Displacement Transformer (LVDT) - There is one LVDT that is used to measure the free radial runout prope~ties of tires. The LVDT was constructed at UMTRI. Instrumentation - The signals coming from the six force transducers, the LVDT, and the wheel rotation signal, are connected to a digital data-acquisition system. The signals from the transducers enter UMTRI's signal-conditioning unit where they are processed for offset, gain, and filtering. A Metrabyte 16 single-ended channel or 8 differential-ended channel analog-to-digital converter (DASH 16) is used to feed the signals into an IBM PC- XT with a 10 MB hard drive, single-sided drive, 640 KB of RAM, a MATH coprocessor, and a Hercules graphics card. The differential configuration on the DASH 16 board has been selected to eliminate a.c. noise, thus providing better resolution in the incoming signals. Data is sampled at 250 Hz and written into the computer memory to be analyzed by a built-in computer program. Software - The program for processing the data is written in FORTRAN. The program allows the test operator to control the gathering and processing of data using commands displayed in a menu. These commands provide means for configuring the hardware, editing previous configurations, calibrating transducers, setting gains and offsets, and collecting data. The software also has provisions for troubleshooting the system. The software computes the harmonic content of time histories (FFT's), corrects for tirelwheel imbalance in order to separate uniformity effects from those due to imbalance, and "locates" nonuniformities with respect to a reference mark on the wheel. Example Results Preparations for tire testing are as follows: 1) Install the tire, orient with SN (DOT) at precision wheel position 1. 2) Inflate tire to 100 psi, load to 5,000 lb, and run at 50 mph for 15 minutes. 3) Check tire pressure and reset to 100 psi. A typical test sequence might be as follows: 1) Imbalance test - Run the tire to 60 mph, retract and run an imbalance test. Reduce data to harmonics and save.

2) Force and moment test - Conduct force and moment variation tests at 5 and 60 mph with loads of 5,650 lb (100% load), 4,250 lb (75% load). Reduce to harmonic magnitudes and phases, correct for imbalance, and save. 3) Repeats - Repeat test 1 and 2 with the tire (DOT) oriented to positions 6, 11, and 16 on the precision wheel. (Repeats will be done only for some tires (selected randomly) to verify the performance of the machine.) 4) Free radial runout - Rotate the tire at low speed (1 to 3 mph) and measure the free radial runout on the left and right shoulders and on the centerline of the tread. Reduce to harmonic magnitudes and phases, and save. The forces and moments measured in an imbalance test are listed in Table 1. Only the entries corresponding to the first harmonic are meaningful in this case. These entries were obtained by processing "raw" data such as that displayed in Figure 2. Confidence in the imbalance results can be obtained by noting that the Fx and Fz signals are of equal amplitude and 90 deg out of phase (see Figure 3). The next figure (Figure 4) shows "raw" data for a force and moment test. These data include the influences of both imbalance and nonuniformity. Note that the signal for Fz (the radial force) is superimposed on an average normal load of 5,638 Ib. In this case, the wheel is rotating at 8.62 Hz, corresponding to 60 mph, that is, the period of one wheel revolution is 0.1 16 sec. Table 2 presents the reduced data for all the forces and moments. These data are corrected for imbalance so that they provide uniformity results. The magnitudes of the harmonics for Fz are shown in Figure 5. The data in Figure 5 and Table 2 are not valid for the sixth harmonic and above at 60 mph. (All 10 harmonics are only valid at speeds below 30 mph and below the resonant frequencies of the machine.) Concluding Remarks As indicated by the results presented in this short document, a working tirelwheel uniformity machine is now available for further research on the measurement of truck-tie uniformity. The development of this machine has been made possible through support from the Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association.

Table 1. Imbalance DATE 9-15-1987 14: 26: 50 TYPE OF TEST:Imbalance Test CUSTOMER : OPERATOR: LUIS FILE NAME:MXZAlP-1 C0MMENT:TIRE #3 MICHELIN PILOT XZA-1 RADIAL 275/80R22.5 DOT 1... TIRE AND WHEEL INFORMATION TIRE 1DENTIFICATION:XZA-1 RADIAL WHEEL 1DENTIFICATION:TEST WHEEL HUB IDENTIFICATION: TI RE I NFLAT I ON PRESSURE: 100.00 TIRE ORIENTATION: 1.Or:) WHEEL OR1 ENTAT I ON: 1.00 DIRECTION OF TIRE HOTATION(CW OR CCW FROM OUTS1DE)tCCW SPEED t MPH) : 60.00 LOAD AGAINST TIRE(L5): 5.58 FREQUENCY (HZ : 25(1.00 DATA CORRECTED FOR IMBALANCE: NO RADIUS OF TIRE (IN. : 20.84 ROTAT IONAL FREQUENCY: 8.065 IMBALANCE : 91.801 i n-oz HZ Imbalance Test Harmonic Fx(lb) 1 37.999 ( 63.87) m L.I25 (-1 15.92) 77-I= 3. c134 ( 107.66) 4.202 ( 1.13.981 C 4 1.987 ( 25.11) 6.544 (-196.87) 7.426 ( -263.66) 8.282 (-121.53) 9.I61 ( 174.42) 1 (1).390 ( 135.86) V =6(3. r:) mph Load = 5.58 Lbs Rotation = 8.06 HZ Fy(1b) Fz (lb) Mx (in-lb) My (in-lb) Mz (in-lb). 061 37.488 123.84. 00 129.43 ( 51.83) (-205.25) ( -18.79) ( -60.01 (-1 I(:). (')(I) Tmm., l ~ c l.583 9.60,(:)(:I 5.59 ( 176.44) ( -29.84) ( - 1. 1 ( b(1.01) t 108.58),339.269 14.54. Oc:) 16.12 ( -59. 70) (-157.06) ( -5.00) ( 6C).(31 ( 106.77).253,425 7.76.(:)(:) 1.98. 067,468 22.71. 00 2.98 ( -47.76) ( 3(1.35) ( -23.33) ( 60.01) ( -86.01). 054 1.089 14.83. 00 3.99 (-101.48) ( 99.27) ( -44.88) ( 60.01) t 122.64).I47.787 14.70. (30 2.65 ( 32.08) ( 135.69) ( -85.72) ( 6. 1 (-249.37).I78.990 15.84, (:)(:I 2.63 (-132.32) ( -3.92) ( 194;68) ( 6. 1 ( -72.47).299 1.352 12. 70. 00 3.17 ( 42.78) ( -57.41) ( 145.73) ( 6Q.(31) ( 153.42).398 1.436 27.65. O(3 9. 31:) (-127.121 ( -76.59) ( 22.82) ( 1 ( -67.66) (-187.85) -12.1 ( 282.25) ( 60.01) ( 190.(:)4)

l.lt3lbn 1.38888 1.58888 1.788BB 1.98888 Time, sec. Figure 2. 1,lW 1.38888 1.58888 1.7eeeQ 1.98BBB Time, sec. "Raw" data from the imbalance test.

A Im(Fz) FORCE - Lbs j Real?art of Fz Radial Fofce - Lbs 1:...*-.... Imbalance (First Harmonic) Figure 3. Verification of the imbalance results.

100% Load @ 60 mpt~ Tine, sec. Figure 4. Time, sec. "Raw" data for a force and moment test. 8

Table 2. Forces and Moments DATE 9-15-1987 15: 10: 4 TYPE OF TEST:Force and Moment CUSTOMER: OPERATUR: LUIS FILE NAME:MXZAlP-1 C0MMENT:TXRE #3 MICHELIN PILOT XZA-1 RADIAL 275/80R22.5 DOT 1... TIRE AND WHEEL INFORMATION TIRE 1DENTIFICATION:XZA-1 RADIAL WHEEL 1DENTIFICATION:TEST WHEEL HUE IDENTIFICATION: TI RE I NFLA'T I ON PRESSURE: 1 (XI. 00 TIRE ORIENTATION: 1. (:)(:I WHEEL OR I ENTAT I ON: 1.60 DIRECTION OF TIRE ROTATION(CW OR CCW FROM 0UTSIDE):CCW SPEED ( MF'H : 60. a(:) LOAD AGAINST TIRE(LE):5638.10 FREOUENCY (HZ : 290.00 DATA CORRECTED FOR IMBALANCE: YES RADIUS OF TIRE(1N. ) : 19.50 ROTATIONAL FREQUENCY: 8.621 HZ Force & I4ar mon i c Moment Test V =60.0 mph Load Fx (lb) Fy(1b) Fz (lb) 13.886 13. 5(:1(:) 105.159 31.91) ( 21.16) (-58.19) 6.616 3.653 22.086 45.16) ( 218.81) ( 90.52) 7.527 2.829 17.493 266.13) ( 198.61) ( 314.89) 5.507 4.382 26.769 43.11) ( 6.395 46.00) (,798 84.44) 8.187 27.13) ( 91.52) t 227.66) 16.833.826 33.75C) 58.32) (-2C)5.26) (-106.58) 6.189 5,525 20.90 1 19.18) - 115.68 (-125.30) 1.694 1. 403 10.480-246.14) (-175.82) ( -53.32) 13.668 7.850 16. Jim 52.35) (-156.99) ( -86.64) 51.548 12.744 112.912 3 9 ( 10. 15) ( 180.98) = 5638.10 M>: (in-lb) 170. 09 ( 45.74) 65.20 (-157.10) 50.26 ( 154.04) 46-10 ( 77.20) 67.55 1 236.86) 85.16 ( 266.48) 89.99 (-101. 11) 25.4(I ( 27.01) h(5.33 ( -69.17) 395. 3:) (-171.79) Lbs Rotation = 8.62 HZ My(in-lb) Mz(in-lb). 00 14.16 ( -8.56) (.()(:I 26.16) 1.96 I 8.56) ( 21(:).57).00 71.73 ( 8.56) ( 186.17) (.00 79.47 8.56) ( 139.60). 00 59.66 ( 8.56) ( 135.93).(:)(I 35.06 ( 8.56) ( 114.20). 00 16.71 ( 8.56) (-218.62) (:)(I 27.10 ( 8.56) ( 21.81). 00 22.55 ( 8.56) ( 1.33). OC7 199.52 ( 8.56) ( 15.85)

- C:MXZA1 P-1.F02 Fz, Radial Force, Amplitude - Lbs @ 60 mph Load (%) 100% 7 5% 4 6 HARMONIC Figure 5. Harmonic content from a force and moment test.