Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Needs and Community Characteristics

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

The Green Dividend. Cities facilitate less driving, saving money and stimulating the local economy. Joseph Cortright, Impresa September 2007

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 1,990 1,975 1,950 1,925 1,900 Rank 23 23 23 23 23 Commuters (1000s) 850 834 824 811 798 Freeway 13,874 13,536 13,565 15,084 14,788 Arterial Streets 13,882 13,799 13,880 14,039 13,857 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.51 3.70 3.67 3.56 2.86 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.71 3.92 4.06 3.91 3.10 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 44 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 33 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 5.10 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 39,611 38,878 38,188 36,403 34,112 Rank 17 17 17 18 19 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 29 28 28 26 25 Rank 5 6 6 6 7 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 72,341 71,002 69,742 66,482 62,297 Rank 21 22 21 23 23 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 52 52 52 50 48 Rank 12 11 11 12 15 Travel Time Index 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.32 Rank 7 7 6 8 9 Commuter Stress Index 1.40 1.40 1.39 1.38 1.36 Rank 10 10 11 11 14 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 3.27 -- -- -- -- Rank 7 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,763 1,759 1,753 1,705 1,648 Rank 20 20 20 20 23 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,273 1,270 1,266 1,231 1,190 Rank 11 11 11 11 15

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 1,861 1,830 1,800 1,755 1,730 Rank 23 23 24 25 25 Commuters (1000s) 780 764 750 730 715 Freeway 14,000 13,365 13,625 13,605 13,620 Arterial Streets 13,600 13,540 13,810 13,945 13,850 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.42 3.54 3.14 2.81 2.48 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.63 4.27 3.45 3.03 2.77 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 31,920 31,681 31,387 30,760 30,157 Rank 19 20 21 21 21 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 23 23 23 22 22 Rank 8 12 12 14 11 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 58,295 57,858 57,321 56,177 55,076 Rank 24 25 25 25 26 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 46 46 47 47 47 Rank 20 27 25 25 25 Travel Time Index 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.32 1.32 Rank 9 10 11 11 8 Commuter Stress Index 1.35 1.35 1.36 1.36 1.36 Rank 13 14 15 15 15 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,568 1,551 1,596 1,606 1,627 Rank 24 24 24 24 24 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,132 1,120 1,152 1,160 1,175 Rank 21 27 27 24 22

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 1,700 1,650 1,615 1,590 1,545 Rank 25 26 26 26 26 Commuters (1000s) 700 677 652 632 604 Freeway 13,085 12,945 12,905 12,670 12,595 Arterial Streets 13,555 12,510 11,610 11,440 11,470 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.11 1.65 1.52 1.67 1.64 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.19 1.65 1.47 1.67 1.61 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 29,699 28,218 27,072 25,998 24,156 Rank 20 21 20 20 20 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 21 20 20 19 17 Rank 12 12 11 11 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 54,237 51,534 49,440 47,480 44,115 Rank 25 25 23 23 23 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 47 46 46 45 44 Rank 25 23 18 17 16 Travel Time Index 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.30 Rank 7 8 6 6 6 Commuter Stress Index 1.36 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.34 Rank 14 14 14 12 12 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,657 1,616 1,586 1,547 1,478 Rank 24 23 23 23 22 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,196 1,167 1,145 1,117 1,068 Rank 23 24 24 23 28

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 1,510 1,470 1,440 1,355 1,330 Rank 26 26 26 28 27 Commuters (1000s) 581 557 536 497 480 Freeway 12,350 12,020 11,900 11,610 11,105 Arterial Streets 11,340 11,230 10,970 10,580 10,505 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.47 1.19 1.40 1.37 1.28 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.37 1.27 1.39 1.40 1.31 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 22,497 21,034 19,824 17,644 16,268 Rank 21 21 21 22 23 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 15 14 13 12 Rank 17 17 18 17 20 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 41,085 38,414 36,203 32,223 29,710 Rank 23 24 25 26 27 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 42 41 40 38 36 Rank 18 17 17 18 19 Travel Time Index 1.29 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.25 Rank 6 6 7 7 6 Commuter Stress Index 1.33 1.32 1.31 1.30 1.29 Rank 12 12 12 13 13 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,423 1,360 1,302 1,185 1,125 Rank 22 22 24 25 25 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,028 982 940 856 812 Rank 29 28 29 36 39

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 1,305 1,275 1,245 1,220 1,190 Rank 28 28 27 28 28 Commuters (1000s) 463 445 428 413 396 Freeway 10,630 10,315 9,760 9,000 8,605 Arterial Streets 10,485 10,480 10,225 10,115 9,810 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.24 1.26 1.26 1.48 1.16 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.26 1.29 1.33 1.28 1.01 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 14,914 13,700 12,597 11,851 10,670 Rank 23 22 23 23 23 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 11 10 9 9 8 Rank 20 24 28 22 25 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 27,237 25,021 23,005 21,642 19,487 Rank 25 25 26 26 28 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 33 31 30 28 Rank 19 18 23 22 22 Travel Time Index 1.23 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.19 Rank 7 7 11 13 15 Commuter Stress Index 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.23 Rank 16 19 19 21 21 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,061 999 946 917 860 Rank 27 26 26 26 27 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 766 722 683 662 621 Rank 41 44 43 40 41

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 1,180 1,170 1,160 1,155 1,150 Rank 28 27 27 27 27 Commuters (1000s) 389 383 376 371 366 Freeway 8,385 7,905 7,530 7,060 6,470 Arterial Streets 9,690 9,705 9,670 9,655 9,635 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.32 1.22 1.22 1.19 1.56 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.17 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.38 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 10,177 9,752 9,353 8,800 8,390 Rank 23 22 20 20 20 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 7 7 6 6 Rank 29 21 19 23 17 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 18,586 17,810 17,081 16,071 15,322 Rank 26 25 24 24 24 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 27 27 26 25 24 Rank 22 18 17 17 15 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.16 Rank 11 13 11 11 11 Commuter Stress Index 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.20 Rank 21 21 21 21 21 Total Cost ($ millions) 865 869 868 846 822 Rank 26 25 24 24 23 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 625 627 627 611 593 Rank 40 34 28 27 25

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 1,140 1,130 1,130 Rank 27 26 26 Commuters (1000s) 359 353 350 Freeway 5,955 5,725 5,500 Arterial Streets 9,705 9,865 9,760 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.58 1.61 1.69 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.40 1.43 1.50 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,825 7,216 6,628 Rank 21 20 18 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 5 5 Rank 15 19 16 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 14,291 13,178 12,104 Rank 24 24 24 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 23 21 20 Rank 13 14 15 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.14 1.13 Rank 12 13 14 Commuter Stress Index 1.19 1.18 1.17 Rank 21 21 21 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 794 763 724 Rank 23 21 21 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 573 551 523 Rank 24 24 23