Crash Reconstruction: A Complete Step-by-Step Procedure. Terry D. Day, P.E. Engineering Dynamics Corporation

Similar documents
HVE CASE STUDY EXAMPLE REPORT

Using HVE to Simulate a Nine Vehicle Accident Involving a Heavy Truck

INVESTIGATION OF THE MOTORCYCLIST/Car Driver COLLISION. RECONSTRUCTION REPORT July 31, 2010

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Accident Reconstruction Tech and Heavy Trucks

Accident Reconstruction & Vehicle Data Recovery Systems and Uses

FRONTAL OFF SET COLLISION

EDR Analyst Guide EACH Yes No (says not) Doesn t Say check DL for other criteria How much Longitudinal Lateral Graph Graph important

1.3 Research Objective

ACCIDENT REVIEW FORM

Accident Countermeasures

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

EDR Case Studies Intersection Crash

Vehicle Types and Dynamics Milos N. Mladenovic Assistant Professor Department of Built Environment

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances

Extracting Tire Model Parameters From Test Data

Triple Fatal Motorcycle Crash On Wellington Road And Ferguson Line South of London, Ontario

TECHNICAL NOTE. NADS Vehicle Dynamics Typical Modeling Data. Document ID: N Author(s): Chris Schwarz Date: August 2006

Unit 1 - Driving, Mobility and Laws. Chapter 1 - Driving and Mobility

School Bus Driver Trainer Inservice

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Car Control Exercises Accident Avoidance Exercise - Setup Diagram

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

At the Curb or in the Driveway. Side Street Driving

VEHICLE NO.1- Your Vehicle. Began From. License Plate # (Street, Highway, Mile Marker, Terminal or Other Landmark) Near At VEHICLE NO.2.

3.9 Accident Investigation Data (5.9).notebook February 28, 2018


2014 Traffic and Safety Conference

S.A.C. Students Against Crashes Instructor s Guide - Session One

Modeling a Pothole Impact of an Agricultural Tractor Using HVE and SIMON

Single Vehicle Loss of Control

After-accident vehicle inspection

Remote Combination Adaptive Driving Equipment Investigation Dynamic Science, Inc. (DSI), Case Number G 1990 Ford Bronco Arizona October

Crash Contributing Factors 2016

Crash Contributing Factors 2015

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Annex D DRIVING COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE NUMBER

SHORT PAPER PCB IN-LINE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance.

ADTSEA 3.0 Driver Education Curriculum Outline

P5 STOPPING DISTANCES

Developing a Portable and Reliable Data Collection System for Evaluating Driver Behavior around Law Enforcement TRAVIS TERRY DR.

Locating Ground Mounted Equipment

Request for Collision Evaluation

PROBLEM SOLVING COACHES IN PHYSICS TUTORING PART 2: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION. Qing Xu 4/24/2010 MAAPT

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

TREAD and TRACTION. Tread- The grooved surface of a tire that grips the road.

Recommendations for AASHTO Superelevation Design

Technical Report TR

Remote, Redesigned Air Bag Special Study Dynamic Science, Inc., Case Number ( C) 1998 Nissan Altima Texas August/1998

Rural Speed and Crash Risk. Kloeden CN, McLean AJ Road Accident Research Unit, Adelaide University 5005 ABSTRACT

Motorcycle Accident Causation and Identification of Countermeasures in Thailand Summary of Findings - Bangkok

Vehicle Safety Technologies 22 January Mr Bernard Tay President, AA Singapore & Chairman, Singapore Road Safety Council

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

Unit 6 Basic Maneuvers in a Low-Risk Environment

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Chapter 12 Vehicle Movement

Introduction. 3. The sample calculations used throughout this paper are based on a roadway posted at 35 mph.

GARWIN, IOWA CHAPTER 62 CHAPTER 62 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Defensive Driving. Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention

Physics 2048 Test 2 Dr. Jeff Saul Fall 2001

Gary Modi, PE(Stolen from Tim Peiples)

Commercial general knowledge

Defensive and Safe Driving Accidents. Why must we maintain defensive and safe driving practices?

Median Barriers in North Carolina

AUMA AMSC MUNIX AMSCIS. Alberta Urban Municipalities Association. Alberta Municipal Services Corporation. Alberta Municipal Insurance Exchange

Emergency driving and its procedures

Analysis of Tire Rub Rail Interaction

Question Papers on Momentum

The graph shows how far the car travelled and how long it took. (i) Between which points was the car travelling fastest? Tick ( ) your answer.

THE FUTURE OF SAFETY IS HERE

1. What data might a car leave behind at the scene of an accident?

Analyzing Numerical Data: Using Ratios I.B Student Activity Sheet 5: Changing Tires

The final test of a person's defensive driving ability is whether or not he or she can avoid hazardous situations and prevent accident..

Conventional Cruise Control

Validation of the SIMON Model for Vehicle Handling and Collision Simulation Comparison of Results with Experiments and Other Models

Jaroslav Maly & team CAE departament. AV ENGINEERING, a.s.

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

Practical Evidence Interpretation, Keeping It Simple

EVALUATION RESULT OF THE ALERT-2 RURAL INTERSECTION CONFLICT WARNING SYSTEM

COLLISION CONSULTANTS AND INVESTIGATIONS

Establishing a Standard List of Hazards for Automatic Driving

CART SAFETY and LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM MAY 2018

VR-Design Studio Car Physics Engine

FLEET SAFETY. Drive to the conditions

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

PR V2. Submitted by. Professor MIDWEST Vine Street (402) Submitted to

AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs

Figure 1. What is the difference between distance and displacement?

EPS Fleet Safety Manual

Golf Car Ejection. Golf Car Ejection

Acceleration Behavior of Drivers in a Platoon

SECTION: 1503 Use of Lights & Sirens SUPERCEDES/RESCINDS: All Prior EFFECTIVE DATE:

Danger Zones. Correct Mirror Adjustment. Outside Left and Right Side Flat Mirrors

Session Objectives. You will be able to: Understand defensive driving techniques. accidents and injuries on the road

Beau A. Biller P.E. Personal: Born July 2, 1980, Clearwater, Florida

b. take a motorcycle-riding course taught by a certified instructor.

Transcription:

Crash Reconstruction: A Complete Step-by-Step Procedure Terry D. Day, P.E. Engineering Dynamics Corporation

Intersection Crash Reconstruction from Cradle to Grave Instructor: Terry D. Day, P.E. Engineering Dynamics Corporation

Outline Description of Crash Required Physical Data Police Accident Report Data Development Data Reduction Analysis Conclusions Discussion

Description of Crash Not a Real Crash MSU GOAL: Present a Procedure Not to Present a Case Study

Description of Crash Small, Rural Town 90-degree Intersection Relatively Level 4 Lanes (2 in each direction) 2 Vehicles (Passenger Cars) Stop Signs

Questions to Address Cause Vehicle Speeds? Inattention? Failing to Stop? Avoidability What If?

Required Physical Data Impact Speed Position at Impact Position at Rest Path between Impact and Rest Wheel Lockups (Drag Factor) Damage Profile Required for Collinear Collision Optional for Oblique Collision

Required Physical Data Begin Braking Speed Impact Speed (previous slide) Position at Begin Braking 13 ft of faint tire marks (ABS) Pre-impact Wheel Lockups (drag factor)

Police Accident Report Basic Scene Information General Location Rest Positions Crash-related Artifacts Skidmarks Gouge marks Glass Basic Vehicle Information Make/Model/Year Witness Statements Limited Emphasis

Vehicle Inspection Make/Model/Year/Body Style Dimensions/Inertias Wheel Damage/Lockups Damage Profiles Documentation Photographs Other Notes/Observations

Site Inspection Location/Direction Street Dimensions Skid/Scuff/Gouge Locations Surface Irregularities Survey Documentation Origin Photographs Other Notes/Observations

Data Reduction Vehicle Models Environment Model Crash-related Artifacts

Vehicle Model Dimensions Exterior Wheel Locations wrt CG Weight/Rotational Inertia Tires Friction Cornering Stiffness

Environment Model To Scale! Driving Surfaces with Skids/Scuffs/Gouges Sidewalks Buildings (vision obstructions) Stop Signs

Analysis Reconstruction Speed Estimates Simulation Confirm Speed Estimates Time-Distance Study Perception/Reaction Time Cause/Avoidability

Reconstruction Damage Analysis Crown Victoria Only Result: Speed Estimate Impact with Brick Building

Reconstruction Position at Begin Braking Crown Victoria Only Positions at Impact Positions at Rest Wheel Lockups Results: Speed Estimates Begin Braking Impact Separation

Simulation Initial Positions Driver Controls Steering Braking Throttle Wheel Impact Damage Results: Confirmation of Initial Speeds Time-Distance Study

Perception/Reaction Time Initial Visibility Position Time Begin Braking Position Time Difference is Maximum Perception/Reaction Time T P/R (max) = T Begin Braking T Initial Visibility

Result

Result Initial Visibility Time = 1.32 sec Position (to be used later) Crown Vic X = -73.2, Y = 20.0 Impala X = 18.0, Y = 97.4 Begin Braking Time = 2.52 sec So: T P/R (max) = 2.52 1.32 = 1.20 sec

Observations Typical Perception/Reaction times 0.75 sec for Reaction Time Test 1.25 sec, min (lots of sources) 2.50 sec, max (AASHTO)

Conclusion Inattention Not a Factor Also Time at Begin Steering = 1.52 Driver began steering almost instantly (0.20 sec after initial vis) Driver was probably watching for cross traffic

Was Speed a Factor? Crown Victoria Speed = 40 mph Speed Limit = 25 mph To Find Answer: Position vehicles at initial visibility (from earlier result) Crown Vic X = -73.2, Y = 20.0 Impala X = 18.0, Y = 97.4 Reduce speed from 40 to 25 No steering/braking Re-execute

Result

Result At 25 mph, Crown Victoria passes behind Impala Misses by 25 ft Speed was a factor

Additional Information Did Impala Stop? To Find Answer: Position vehicle at stop line Accelerate at WOT to impact point Compare speed with impact speed

Result

Result Speed = 24 mph (less than impact speed, 35 mph) Impala did not stop at stop sign

Conclusions 1. Crown Victoria was exceeding the speed limit 2. Collision does not occur if Crown Victoria obeys the speed limit 3. Although collision is avoided, it is a near-miss 4. Impala did not have sufficient room to pull out safely 5. Impala did not stop

Discussion/Questions

Intersection Crash Reconstruction from Cradle to Grave Thank You Engineering Dynamics Corporation