Modelling of NO 2 concentration in the exceedance area in Helsinki - Present state and projections

Similar documents
Vehicles are a major source of atmospheric sub-3-nm particles

TRANSIT BUS EMISSION STUDY COMPARISON OF EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL AND NATURAL GAS BUSES

Some Comments on Air Quality Nitrogen Oxide

Smart, subservient low-carbon public transport. Suvi Rihtniemi

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

Street emission ceilings (SEC) project

Use of odometer readings in defining road traffic volumes and emissions

Euro VI for EU Air Quality

NewcastleGateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of contents. Page ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF TABLES TABLE OF FIGURES

Accommodating freight in Clean Air Zones

RHA NOx Emission Assessment 2018

Curbing emissions and energy consumption in the transport sector how can we deal with it in Warsaw 2012 Annual POLIS Conference

L O W E M I S S I O N CITY

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

Low Emission Zones in Germany

The challenges facing German cities in meeting EU air quality legislation

Newcastle/Gateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

EMISSION FACTORS FROM EMISSION MEASUREMENTS. VERSIT+ methodology Norbert Ligterink

Planning of electric bus systems

Decarbonisation of transportthe Finnish case

Moving Forward On Vehicle Pollution Control In China

Low Emissions Towns and Cities Programme

CIVITAS SMILE Introduction of a Low Emission Zone in Norwich. Andy Watt Head of City Development Services

Green economic taxes in Finland and their impacts

Ultra Low Emission Vehicles: The business case, the technology and best practice

Q&A ON EMISSIONS TESTING

Construction Retrofit in the Context of the LEZ Berlin

Modelling LEZ and Demand Management measures in the City of York using Detailed Traffic-Emission Tools

Improving the air we breathe A Clean Air Zone for Birmingham. Birmingham City Council

THE LOW EMISSION ZONE IN PRACTICE

Pohjoismainen yhteistyö NER-rahoituksella

Vehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Preliminary results from Measurements on A472 Hafod Road

Impact of Delhi s CNG Program on Air Quality

A CO2-fund for the transport industry: The case of Norway

Testeo de Conformidad en Servicio Euro VI

Evaluating opportunities for soot-free, low-carbon bus fleets in Brazil: São Paulo case study

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Riccardo Enei «The coach of the future study : preliminary results» IRU Conference

EVOLUTION OF RDE REGULATION

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

Tyre noise limits of EC/661/2009 and ECE R117: Evaluation based on sold tyres in the Netherlands

Transitioning to low carbon / low fossil fuels and energy sources for road transport

Advanced emergency braking systems for commercial vehicles

The CONOX project: Pooling, sharing and analyzing European remote sensing data

On-road emission measurements with PEMS on a MERCEDES-BENZ ATEGO Euro VI N2 heavy-duty truck

Upgrading City Buses to Reduce NOx Emissions

What has changed after Dieselgate?

Effects of Traffic Emission Resolution on NOx Concentration Obtained by CFD-RANS Modelling Over a Real Urban Area in Madrid (Spain)

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

EFFECTS OF WEATHER-CONTROLLED VARIABLE SPEED LIMITS ON INJURY ACCIDENTS

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

Emission from vehicles with Euro 6/VI technology. Results from the measurement program in EMIROAD 2015

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation August August 2018

Selected insights into road transport trends Ian Kershaw Managing Director, Ricardo Strategic Consulting

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

The effect of particle filters on HDV in Denmark

Environmental Impact of Taxis Is there a Business Case for Hybrids. Dr James Tate, Institute for Transport Studies

PPP: Enhancing the Diffusion of EEV Vehicles, an Italian Experience. Anna Marchisio Institutional Relations & Transport Policy IVECO SpA, Italy

SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Hauliers solutions for sustainable road transport

VEPM 5.3. Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Technical report. Prepared for NZ Transport Agency. April 2017

Introduction to the Ultra Low Emission Zone

AIR QUALITY DETERIORATION IN TEHRAN DUE TO MOTORCYCLES

HEAVY DUTY VEHICLEDS EMISSION POLLUTION CONTROL IN CHINA. Likunsheng Beijing EPB Mar. 2015

A comparison of the impacts of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars and zero-emission vehicles on urban air quality compliance

The Largest Low Emission Zone of Europe: Traffic and Air Quality in London

3.17 Energy Resources

Draft COMMISSION DECISION

Evaluation study on Speed Limitation Devices. Scenarios and methodology Stakeholder conference 10 June 2013

Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT. Remote Sensing Vehicle Emissions

EURO 6d Diesel Performance & Impact on Urban Air Quality

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

FUEL ECONOMY BASELINE AND TRENDS- MALAWI INSTITUTIONS

Capabilities of Emission Control Technologies and their Impact on Air Quality. Expert Meeting of the EU Refining Forum Brussels 1 December 2017

Road transport market, sustainability and digitalization

COMPARISON OF CVS AND PEMS MEASURING DEVICES USED FOR STATING CO 2 EXHAUST EMISSIONS OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES DURING WLTP TESTING PROCEDURE

CompMon Stakeholder Conference

Electric vehicles and urban transport externalities is OSLO a good example?

Evaluation of the effectiveness of measures to improve quality air applied in Northern and Central Europe. Claire Holman, Roy Harrison, Xavier Querol

Paper-Abstract Form. Title: Reduction of exhaust nanoparticles by retrofitted after-treatment systems in diesel passenger cars

FENEBUS POSITION PAPER ON REDUCING CO2 EMISSIONS FROM ROAD VEHICLES

Regional Workshop on Transport Sector Inspection and Maintenance Policy in Asia

Technical Committee Motor Vehicles 15 September RDE 3 discussion

Comparing unit emissions from on-road remote sensing with HBEFA

Particle Emission Reduction in a SI-DI Vehicle by an Open Channel Filter

SPP TENDER MODEL. Electric buses. 20 Electric buses for Stolichen Avtotransport

LINKKER Quality of Life in Cities

Diesel engines on the pathway to low impact on local air quality in Europe

Modélisation de la pollution par le trafic à Bruxelles

Proposals for an Ultra Low Emission Zone

Panorama Normatividad. Stephen Perkins, Head of Research International Transport Forum

Projections of global emissions of air pollutants

In-House paper on Implementation of Telescopic Tariffs in LMV-6 category

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Emerging Technologies

CNG as a Transport Fuel - Economic Benefits 17 th November 2011

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND LESSONS LEARNED - CASE TAMPERE PEKKA STENMAN PROJECT MANAGER RAMBOLL FINLAND LTD.

Volume 8, ISSN (Online), Published at:

Transcription:

Appendix 3 Modelling of NO 2 concentration in the exceedance area in Helsinki - Present state and projections Anu Kousa, Liisa Matilainen, Tarja Koskentalo, Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority HSY Outi Väkevä, City of Helsinki Environment Centre

2 Modelling of NO 2 concentration Dispersion modelling was used to evaluate the development of NO x emissions and NO 2 concentrations in Helsinki in those areas where there is the highest risk of the limit value to be exceeded. Model For modelling NO 2 concentrations a street canyon model OSPM (Operational Street Pollution Model) was used. The model has been developed by the National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Atmospheric Environment, Denmark (Berkowicz, 2000). Emission factors Emission factors from the HBEFA (version 3.1) database for congested traffic have been used for most of the vehicles. Because of lack of sufficient EEV data in the HBEFA database the emission factors for EEV buses are based on the three-year RASTU project (RASTU project, 2009). According to this study the emission factors for EEV buses are 30 % better than for EURO IV buses. Besides research on fuel savings for heavy-duty vehicles the research integrate also included tasks relating to conventional exhaust gas emissions, IT applications and safety issues. During the research period, a total of approximately 140 heavy-duty vehicles were tested using a chassis dynamometer. Background and meteorological data Background concentration data measured at the urban background station (Kallio) is used from year 2010 in all projections assuming that the concentration decreases 1 % per year as a result of emission reductions. Also meteorological data is used from year 2010 in all projections. NO 2 concentration levels were higher in 2010 than earlier years in Helsinki region most probably because of unfavourable weather conditions (Malkki et al 2011). Thus the background and meteorological data that were used in this modelling represent the realistic worst case scenarios. Traffic volumes and vehicle distributions in different vehicle categories The total number of vehicles and their share in different vehicle categories has been provided by the Helsinki City Planning Department. Töölöntulli vehicles/year sum Passanger Car - Gasoline Passagen Car - Diesel Van Truck 16-32 t Truck > 32 t Buses 2005 50 200 34 993 4 999 4 942 1 268 373 3 624 Without measures 2010 51 300 29 834 11 035 5 050 1 296 381 3 704 2010 47 600 27 682 10 239 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 BAU 2011 47 600 27 682 10 239 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 Traffic volume change 2011 46 200 26 868 9 938 4 548 1 167 343 3 336 BAU 2012 47 600 27 303 10 618 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 Traffic volume change 2012 44 800 25 697 9 993 4 410 1 132 333 3 235 BAU 2013 47 600 26 924 10 997 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 Traffic volume change 2013 43 500 24 605 10 050 4 282 1 099 323 3 141 Environmental zone 2013 43 500 24 605 10 050 4 282 1 099 323 3 141 Smoother traffic 2013 43 500 24 605 10 050 4 282 1 099 323 3 141 BAU 2014 47 600 26 545 11 376 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 Traffic volume change 2014 42 200 23 533 10 086 4 154 1 066 314 3 047 Environmental zone 2014 42 200 23 533 10 086 4 154 1 066 314 3 047 Smoother traffic 2014 42 200 23 533 10 086 4 154 1 066 314 3 047 BAU 2015 47 600 26 545 11 376 4 686 1 202 354 3 437 Traffic volume change 2015 41 000 22 864 9 799 4 036 1 036 305 2 960 Environmental zone 2015 41 000 22 864 9 799 4 036 1 036 305 2 960 Smoother traffic 2015 41 000 22 864 9 799 4 036 1 036 305 2 960 The share of primary NO 2 Primary NO 2 is estimated to be 17.5 % (year 2010), 17.5 % (year 2011), 18 % (year 2012), 18.5 % (year 2013), 19.5 % (year 2014) and 20 % (year 2015) of total NO x emissions. This estimation is based on a study by Anttila et al., 2011 and on an expert evaluation by HSY.

Share of diesel passenger cars The share of diesel passenger cars is much lower in Finland than in the Central Europe. However, in the Helsinki Region the share of diesel passenger cars is higher than the average share in the whole country. For example in the Helsinki region the share of diesel passenger cars varied between 19 % and 36 % in the main roads in 2008 when the whole country average was 17 % (Figure 1 and 2). 3 Figure 1. Share of diesel passenger cars in the main roads in Helsinki in 2008 (Kärkinen, 2009). The number of new registrations of diesel cars increased considerably in year 2008 as a consequence of changes in Finnish tax legislation. Vehicle taxes were differentiated according to CO 2 emissions and diesel cars became more attractive than earlier. In 2008 50 % of new registrations were diesel cars but it seems their share has started to decline after the peak in 2008. In 2010 the share of diesel cars in new registrations was 42 % (Figure 2).

4 Figure 2. The share of diesel cars in new registrations and in the car fleet in Finland (Autoalan tiedotuskeskus, 2011). The share of diesel passenger cars in the city centre is estimated to be 27 % (year 2010), 27 % (year 2011), 28 % (year 2012), 29 % (year 2013), 30 % (year 2014) and 30 % (year 2015) in the modelled projections. Average speed Average speed in the street canyons is based on the study conducted by the Helsinki City Planning Department (Hellman, 2009). Emission standard categories The vehicle fleet composition in different emission standard categories for vehicles is based on the LIPASTO database developed by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (LIPASTO, 2011). The more detailed estimation for passenger cars is based on an expert evaluation by VTT. The estimated percentage of urban buses falling into different emission standard categories is based on information from the Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HSL. Exceedance area The estimated exceedance area is 8 km of street canyons in the centre of Helsinki city. According to our measurements and modelling results the street canyon Töölöntulli is the most polluted site in Helsinki and is the most challenging site in terms of achieving the limit value by 2015.The length of the street canyon Töölöntulli is 1.8 km.

5 Projections 1) 2010 The 2010 projection was calculated by using 2010 concentration data from an urban background station (Kallio). Also the meteorological data is from 2010. NO 2 concentration levels were higher in 2010 than earlier years in the Helsinki region because of unfavourable weather conditions (Malkki et al 2011). The total number of vehicles and their amount in different vehicle categories was estimated by the Helsinki City Planning Department. Primary NO 2 is estimated to be 17.5 % year 2010. At the moment the share of diesel passenger cars in Helsinki region is estimated to be 27 %. The vehicle fleet composition in different emission standard categories is based on the LIPASTO database developed by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (LIPASTO, 2011). The more detailed estimation for passenger cars is based on an expert evaluation by VTT. The estimated percentage of urban buses falling into different emission standard categories is based on information from the Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HSL. 2) Business as usual projection (BAU 2011 2015) In the BAU 2011 2015 projections the known improvements in the vehicle technology regulated by the Union law (Euro standards) is taken into account. The vehicle fleet is assumed to be renewed according to the normal rate. The annual NO 2 urban background concentration is expected to decrease 1 % per year. The estimation is based on the study by Anttila and Tuovinen (2010). The total number of vehicles and their share in different vehicle categories are based on the estimation done by the Helsinki City Planning Department. Primary NO 2 is evaluated to be 17.5 % (year 2010), 17.5 % (year 2011), 18 % (year 2012), 18.5 % (year 2013), 19.5 % (year 2014) and 20 % (year 2015) of total NOx emissions. This estimation is based on an article by Anttila et al., 2011 and expert evaluation by HSY. The vehicle fleet composition in different emission standard categories for vehicles is based on LIPASTO database developed by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (LIPASTO, 2011).The more detailed estimation for passenger cars is based on an expert evaluation by VTT. In Finland the average age of vehicles is higher than in the Central Europe. E.g. the average age of passenger cars was 11.9 years in 2010 (Source: Statistics Finland/TraFi). The estimated share of urban buses falling into different emission standard categories is based on information from the Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HSL. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Euro I 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Euro II 31 % 17 % 15 % 10 % 5 % 0 % Euro III 29 % 29 % 27 % 25 % 22 % 15 % Euro IV 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % Euro V 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % EEV 28 % 43 % 47 % 49 % 48 % 53 % Euro VI 5 % 14 % 22 %

6 3) Traffic volume change In the Traffic volume change projection the number of vehicles is expected to decrease at some points (including Töölöntulli) as a consequence of increased attractiveness of public transport and improved public transport connections. The total number of vehicles and their number in different vehicle categories are based on an estimate by the Helsinki City Planning Department. The projection includes also the known improvements in vehicle technology. 4) Environmental zone The City Board of Helsinki decided on 31.5.2010 to implement an environmental zone in the city centre. The zone extends to the south of Hakamäentie Road and covers the areas that are most problematic from the point of view of air quality, including the busiest street canyons (see Figure 3). This zone overlaps with the restriction area where heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) with a length over 12 meters are not allowed. This restriction does not apply to buses nor to HGV`s which have been granted a special permission. HGVs traffic to the city harbours is directed along designated routes that do not pass through the city centre. The environmental zone applies only to the internal and regional bus traffic and waste transport vans. The bus traffic is submitted to competitive tendering by HSL (Helsinki Regional Transport Authority) and waste transport is submitted to competitive tendering by HSY (Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority). HSL and HSY apply stricter emission criteria for buses and waste trucks in the environmental zone. When new contracts are submitted to tendering, buses in the environmental zone must comply with Euro 3 standards and waste transport vans with Euro 5 standards. The impact of waste transport vans on air quality is marginal, but the impact of city buses is significant.

7 Figure 3: The environmental zone of the city of Helsinki (delineated in green) and the restriction area of the heavy goods vehicles (delineated in orange). In the Environmental zone projection the renewal of buses is faster than in the BAU projection. The estimated share of urban buses falling into different emission standard categories is based on information from the Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HSL. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Euro I 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Euro II 31 % 17 % 15 % 10 % 5 % 0 % Euro III 29 % 29 % 27 % 20 % 14 % 0 % Euro IV 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % Euro V 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % EEV 28 % 43 % 47 % 54 % 56 % 67 % Euro VI 5 % 14 % 22 % The projection includes also improvements in vehicle technology and the estimated decrease in the number of vehicles. 5) Smoother traffic In the final projection it is assumed that traffic is smoother because there is less traffic. The average speed is 3 km/h higher than in the BAU projection. The projection includes also improvements in the vehicle technology, the estimated decrease in the number of vehicles and stricter emission criteria applied to urban buses within the environmental zone. 6) Reference cases 2005 and 2010 The emissions of NO x and annual NO 2 concentrations were modelled also for two other situations: a) No measures 2010: It is assumed that there have been no measures to achieve compliance. Traffic volumes are from 2006, which result in a lower average speed (-3 km/h) than in the 2010. b) 2005: In this backward projection concentration data measured at the urban background station (Kallio) is used from year 2005. Also meteorological data is from year 2005. Emission factors from the HBEFA database for year 2005 are used. Primary NO 2 is evaluated to be 15 % year 2005. The share of diesel passenger cars in Helsinki region was 12.5 %.

8 Modelling results Töölöntulli According to the modelling results it is possible to achieve the limit value the street canyon Töölöntulli where the concentrations are the highest in the region (table 1). It is possible to reach the limit value in Helsinki by 2015 but not earlier (see table 1 and figure 4). NO x emissions in Töölöntulli in the different projections between 2005 and 2015 are presented in figure 5. Similar model run results for Mannerheimintie, Kaisaniemenkatu, Mäkelänkatu, Hämeentie, Sturekatu, Unioninkatu, Runeberginkatu and Lönnrotinkatu are presented in Figures 6 21. Table 1 Modelled NO 2 concentrations in the present state in 2010 and in projections for 2015 in the street canyon Töölöntulli. Töölöntulli Vehicles / day Concentration µgno 2 /m 3 2010 47 600 57 BAU 2015 Improvements in vehicle technology (Euro I VI) Traffic volume change 2015 The number of vehicles decreased Environmental zone 2015 Urban busses: faster improvements in different emission standard categories (Euro I VI) Smoother traffic 2015 Average speed +3 km/h 47 600 44 41 000 42*) 41 000 40*) 41 000 39*) *) The result of the projection includes measures already introduced in the BAU and other previous projections.

9 Figure 4. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Töölöntulli. Figure 5. NO x emissions in the different projections in Töölöntulli.

10 Other Figure 6. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Mannerheimintie. Figure 7. NO x emissions in the different projections in Mannerheimintie.

11 Figure 8. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Kaisaniemenkatu. Figure 9. NO x emissions in the different projections in Kaisaniemenkatu.

12 Figure 10. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Mäkelänkatu. Figure 11. NO x emissions in the different projections in Mäkelänkatu.

13 Figure 12. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Hämeentie. Figure 13. NO x emissions in the different projections in Hämeentie.

14 Figure 14. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Sturenkatu. Figure 15. NO x emissions in the different projections in Sturenkatu.

15 Figure 16. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Unioninkatu. Figure 17. NO x emissions in the different projections in Unioninkatu.

16 Figure 18. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Runeberginkatu. Figure 19. NO x emissions in the different projections in Runeberginkatu.

17 Figure 20. Modelled NO 2 concentration in the different projections in Lönnrotinkatu. Figure 21. NO x emissions in the different projections in Lönnrotinkatu.

µg/m3 18 Comparison of modelled results to measured concentrations Töölöntulli was estimated to be the worst case scenario, where the concentrations are the highest so far measured in the area. Because of the precautionary principle we have used HBEFA emission factors. These emission factors seem to slightly overestimate the concentrations in Töölöntulli, whereas VTT emission factors would seem to underestimate them. Figure 22 shows that modelling with HBEFA factors gives an annual concentration of NO 2 which is slightly higher than the concentration measured at the Töölöntulli monitoring site in 2010. Thus the real concentrations are estimated to be slightly lower than those modelled at the Töölöntulli monitoring site. Töölöntulli 2010 70 60 50 53 57 50 40 30 20 10 0 measured modelling (HBEFA) modelling (VTT) Figure 22. Modelled and measured concentrations at the Töölöntulli monitoring site. Modelling was carried out using HBEFA and VTT emission factors.

19 References Anttila, P., Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, Jarkko V. Niemi (2011). Primary NO 2 emissions and their role in the development of NO 2 concentrations in a traffic environment. Atmospheric Environment 45(2011) 986-992 Anttila P. and Tuovinen J.-P, 2010. Trends of primary and secondary pollutant concentrations in Finland in 1994-2007. Atmospheric Environment 44, 38-49 Autoalantiedotuskeskus, 2011. http://www.autoalantiedotuskeskus.fi/tilastot_sivu.asp?kieli=&tiedosto=ywluzwlzdg90lzkyl2rpzxnlbg F1dG9qZW5fb3N1dXNfZW5zaXJla2lzdGVyb2lubmVpc3RhX2phX2thbm5hc3RhXy5odG0&tyyppi=SK&jul _id=19832&ain_id=&suoj=&jul_nimi=dieselautojen+osuus+henkil%f6autojen+ensirekister%f6inneist%e 4+ja+kannasta+%7C+Share+of+diesel+cars Berkowicz, R. (2000) OSPM - A parameterised street pollution model, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Volume 65, Issue 1/2, pp. 323-331 Hellman, 2009. Liikenteen sujuvuus Helsingissä vuonna 2009. Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston julkaisuja 2009:7 http://www.hel.fi/wps/wcm/connect/a7f23e004a1723cfad7fed3d8d1d4668/liikenteen_sujuvuus_helsingiss a+_raportti_2009.pdf?mod=ajperes&cacheid=a7f23e004a1723cfad7fed3d8d1d4668 Kärkinen, T., Virpi Pastinen, Pipsa Eklund, Sakari Nurmela, 2009. Pääkaupunkiseudun työssäkäyntialueen ajoneuvoliikenteen määräpaikkatutkimus 2008. YTV:n julkaisuja 24/2009. http://www.hsl.fi/fi/mikaonhsl/julkaisut/documents/2009/ajoneuvoliikenteenmptutkimus.pdf LIPASTO, 2011. http://lipasto.vtt.fi/liisae/index.htm, Report (in finnish): http://lipasto.vtt.fi/liisa/liisa2009raportti.pdf Malkki, et al., 2011. Ilmanlaatu pääkaupunkiseudulla vuonna 2010. HSY:n julkaisuja 3/2011 RASTU-project, 2009. Heavy-duty vehicles: Safety, environmental impacts and new technology, RASTU. Summary report. Edited by Matti Kytö, Kimmo Erkkilä and Nils-Olof Nylund. VTT-R-04084-09. 2009. http://www.motiva.fi/files/2279/rastu_summary_report_2006-2008.pdf