Traffic Generation and Parking Supply for Today s Canberra Getting it Right

Similar documents
Parking Policy as a counter measure to promote public transport Case Study of Nehru Place, Delhi

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

WAITING FOR THE GREEN LIGHT: Sustainable Transport Solutions for Local Government

Engineering Solutions to Congestion

London 2050 Infrastructure Plan

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Parking Management Element

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

Updates of Land Use Parking and Traffic Generation Surveys

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Denver Car Share Permit Program

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Transportation Demand Management January 25, 2017 Waterfront Plan Transportation Working Group. Date & Location

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Minimum parking requirements create more parking than is needed.

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS MANASSAS PARK STATION PARKING EXPANSION. Site Evaluation & Recommendation. October 18, 2016

Advancing Electric Vehicles in Edmonton SPARK Conference November 8, 2017

Treasure Island Toll Policy, Affordability and Transit Pass Programs. TIMMA Board Meeting December 11, 2018

CHAPTER 9. PARKING SUPPLY

Project : A Prepared by: Jack Wellings / Andrew Hughes. Client: Wembdon Parish Council Approved by: Philip Weatherhead

How to make urban mobility clean and green

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

California Energy Commission. December 7, 2015

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

Impact of Copenhagen s

For personal use only

Oslo - Carbon-neutral by 2030? Sture Portvik Project manager Agency for Urban Environment City of Oslo Nordic EV Summit 2017

Driving a More Sustainable Future of Mobility OCTOBER 19, 2017

Autonomous Vehicle Impacts on Traffic and Transport Planning

Town of Newmarket. Parking Directions Report. Prepared for: Town of Newmarket

GRID CONSTRAINT: OPTIONS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

CNG as a Transport Fuel - Economic Benefits 17 th November 2011

Strategic Plan

THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION DESIGN WITH AV/CV TECHNOLOGY

How to manage large scale infrastructures? Infrastructure planning within Toulouse s SUMP. Alexandre Blaquière. 1st December 2016

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Electro mobility The opportunity

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX (940) voice (940) fax

RURAL ROAD MAINTENANCE POLICY

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Burnaby Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure Technical Bulletin Requirements and Guidelines for EV Charging Bylaw

Driving to Net Zero. County of Santa Clara Office of Sustainability. Submitted to: Santa Clara County Submitted by: ICF

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

The Changing Toll Environment How National Interoperability and All Electronic Toll Collection Are Impacting AAMVA & DMVs

Save-the-date: Workshop on batteries for electric mobility

COMMERCIALISATION OF UGANDA S OIL AND GAS SECTOR: REFINERY AND ATTENDANT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

3.17 Energy Resources

Submission to Select Committee on Electric Vehicles - inquiry into the use and manufacture of electric vehicles in Australia

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

committee report General Permitted Development Order SPT response to consultation

Self-Consumption and Net Balancing: Issues and solutions

Luxury Liverpool Developments

Implementation of Future Transportation Technologies: Getting Beyond the Low Hanging Fruit without Chopping Down the Tree

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards

Jeffrey Busby A/Director, Infrastructure Program Management TransLink Urban Sustainability Accelerator

NATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PROMOTION OF LOW SULPHUR FUELS IN BOTSWANA, MARCH 2016.

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

MVA Lectures of Excellence

AUTOMOTIVE TRANSITIONS: THE CAR TODAY The City View on Automated Driving. EUCAD 2018 Transport Research Arena Vienna 2018

Proposed Zoning Bylaw Text Amendments Pertaining to Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Requirements (Bylaw No. 4905,2018)

Transportation Sustainability Program

Sustainability Strategies

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Energy efficiency policies for transport. John Dulac International Energy Agency Paris, 29 May 2013

Sustainable Fleet Accreditation Claude Masters, NAFA; Bill Van Amburg, CALSTART. October 20, 2016

Electric vehicle charging infrastructure and incentive design best practices

Country Presentation (Singapore)

MYPD3 tariff restructuring plan use-of-system charges. Brochure

Plug-in Electric Vehicle Readiness Initiatives

PG&E s Energy Landscape. Gregg Lemler, vice president, electric transmission i-pcgrid Workshop March 28 30, 2018

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Parking Issues Trenton Downtown Parking Policy and Sidewalk Design Standards E.S. Page 1 Final Report 2008

Transportation Demand Management Element

Princeton University s Student Arts Campus Expansion and Proposal to Relocate the Dinky Station

Emergency Generation Options

Review of Fees for Accident Tows and Tows from Private Property

Demand Response as a Power System Resource

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Ministry of Communication

A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY FUTURE Rethinking Transit Solutions Presented by Jonathan Chai & Elli Papaioannou HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

WP3 Transport and Mobility Analysis. D.3.7. Transport Scenarios Results Report Évora

Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Thoughts on carsharing Robin Chase

ON-STREET AND OFF-STREET PARKING SURVEY: METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

Miami Streetcar Efficient Transportation. A Discussion on Future Transportation Opportunities

CSTM Improvements. AITPM Canberra 11 May 2017

Fleet Sustainability Policy

Re: Amend Sections and File No ZA Marcus Lotson, Development Services Planner

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Stakeholder Meeting #3. August 22, 2018

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Transcription:

AITPM Traffic Generation and Parking Supply for Today s Canberra Getting it Right Chris Coath Director chris.coath@gta.com.au Thursday 11 May 2017

Introduction Traffic Generation and Parking Supply for today s Canberra Getting it right, 1. Today s Canberra 2. Traffic Generation 3. Parking Supply 4. Getting it right

Today s Canberra

Today s Canberra Policy objective of Transport for Canberra to double walking, cycling and public transport mode share from 2006 to 2026 Canberra Light Rail Infrastructure Project to create transport step change in travel options Growth and densification around key town centre areas

Today s Canberra Car Parking Rates Aggressive office rates Appropriate / at times conservative retail rates No rates for residential use in CZ1 and CZ2 zones in City and Town centres Potential for unintended consequences Distinction between zones Source: Parking and Vehicular Access General Code (2014)

Today s Canberra Car Parking Supply Significant provision of at grade car parking Gradual development of at grade parking sites With replacement of displaced supply included back into the development

Today s Canberra Traffic Generation Rates For residential and CZ5 zones Detached Dwelling (Block > 360 sqm) - 8 veh mvmts per day Detached Dwelling (Block < 360 sqm) - 7 veh mvmts per day Multi Unit Developments - 6 veh mvmts per day Commonly also adopted for other areas by Authorities and Developers (or at least as the starting point) Source: Estate Development Code (2014)

Why is it important to get it right?

Why is it important to get it right? Decisions we make in todays Canberra will impact on tomorrows Canberra

Traffic Generation

Traffic Generation Traffic Generation rates (residential) are often applied Canberra wide

Traffic Generation Belconnen Gungahlin City Different areas of Canberra have very different characteristics Tuggeranong Phillip / Woden

Traffic Generation Hall 95% Belconnen 56% Duffy 81% Tuggeranong 66% Gungahlin 75% City 36% Phillip / Woden 57% South Canberra 64% Theodore 82% Car Driver Journey to Work Source: ABS Census Journey to Work 2011 ACT as a whole: 74% car-driver Differing proportions across town, group and local centres

Traffic Generation Recent benchmarking as part of a development application in Belconnen

Traffic Generation We should not be applying the same rate (as even a starting point) across the very differing areas of Canberra.

Car Parking Supply

Car Parking Supply Activity Centre parking is made up of: The rate at which each development generates parking, and The temporal profile or characteristics of development enabling it to potentially share car parking with other uses.

Car Parking Supply In Canberra: The Code considers parking rates by zone and somewhat region / activity centre however More work however needs to be done on considering the temporal nature of uses and the ability to share parking Particularly in the redevelopment of at grade car parking sites. Replace Supply Replace Demand Consider temporal variations of existing demand and ability to share vacancies with new development.

Car Parking Supply In Canberra: Residential car parking rates in CZ1 and CZ2 zones in City and Town Centres specify no minimum or no maximum requirement Hedging bets could result in unintended consequences

Impacts of Getting it Wrong

Impacts of Getting it Wrong Some impacts when we get it wrong Developments and government are required to create road network and car park capacity for a traffic demand that may not exist Capacity further induces demand for motor vehicle trips and car parking Increases the cost to governments and developers and communities Redirects funding from active and sustainable transport projects.

What does Getting it Right look Like?

What does Getting it Right look Like? Parking supply which matches demand and makes use of surrounding shared resources Parking policies which limit parking provisions and contain or manage unintended consequences The adoption of traffic generation rates which reflect the characteristics of the area in which the site sits The consideration of transport generation not traffic generation The adoption of further demand management measures to achieve the goals set in Transport for Canberra

What does Getting it Right look Like? Planning policy instruments which reflect tomorrow s Canberra not today s.

Thank You Chris Coath GTA Consultants chris.coath@gta.com.au