Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

STATE OF THE MTA SYSTEM REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 1,200 1,180 1,165 1,145 1,130 Rank 38 38 39 39 39 Commuters (1000s) 616 618 610 598 589 Freeway 16,339 15,817 15,260 14,974 14,765 Arterial Streets 11,781 11,584 11,450 11,405 11,246 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.05 3.29 3.32 3.21 2.58 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.49 3.78 3.75 3.57 2.84 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 29 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 24 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 3.50 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 19,093 19,017 18,930 17,862 17,023 Rank 39 39 39 41 42 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 22 22 22 21 20 Rank 23 21 18 22 27 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 38,977 38,822 38,643 36,465 34,751 Rank 39 38 37 40 42 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 45 45 45 44 42 Rank 29 25 25 28 34 Travel Time Index 1.21 1.20 1.21 1.20 1.19 Rank 34 36 32 36 39 Commuter Stress Index 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.26 Rank 33 33 33 33 34 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.36 -- -- -- -- Rank 36 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,013 1,025 1,035 997 980 Rank 38 34 34 38 38 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,168 1,183 1,194 1,150 1,131 Rank 18 15 13 21 23

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 1,100 1,050 1,025 1,005 980 Rank 39 39 42 42 43 Commuters (1000s) 571 543 526 512 496 Freeway 14,430 14,665 14,150 13,575 13,300 Arterial Streets 11,300 11,430 11,900 11,915 11,750 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.15 3.32 2.98 2.54 2.24 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.45 4.03 3.26 2.72 2.39 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 16,253 17,254 17,107 16,971 16,646 Rank 42 41 40 39 39 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 19 20 20 20 19 Rank 35 30 26 22 30 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 33,179 35,222 34,922 34,645 33,982 Rank 43 42 42 41 40 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 41 46 47 48 48 Rank 39 27 25 24 24 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.21 1.22 1.22 1.22 Rank 40 37 35 34 32 Commuter Stress Index 1.26 1.28 1.28 1.29 1.29 Rank 34 32 32 31 30 Total Cost ($ millions) 951 1,006 1,036 1,056 1,070 Rank 39 37 37 36 35 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,098 1,161 1,196 1,218 1,235 Rank 25 20 19 19 18

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 960 940 900 850 815 Rank 43 42 45 47 47 Commuters (1000s) 483 471 444 412 389 Freeway 13,100 13,085 12,200 11,600 11,000 Arterial Streets 11,700 11,445 10,140 9,325 8,505 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.86 1.46 1.32 1.45 1.47 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.87 1.44 1.30 1.47 1.42 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 16,033 14,866 13,951 12,707 11,673 Rank 39 41 41 43 43 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 17 16 15 13 Rank 33 36 36 40 53 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 32,731 30,348 28,481 25,940 23,829 Rank 43 43 43 43 44 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 48 45 45 44 43 Rank 21 25 23 21 19 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.20 1.19 Rank 32 32 31 32 34 Commuter Stress Index 1.29 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.26 Rank 30 33 32 30 32 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,066 1,014 974 901 851 Rank 36 38 39 41 42 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,230 1,170 1,124 1,039 982 Rank 17 22 29 35 37

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 780 740 700 665 640 Rank 49 49 51 52 54 Commuters (1000s) 366 342 318 298 282 Freeway 10,250 9,750 9,350 8,880 8,640 Arterial Streets 8,265 8,135 8,030 7,835 7,720 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.07 1.03 1.13 1.24 1.11 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.06 1.11 1.20 1.33 1.21 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 10,599 9,635 8,524 7,644 6,838 Rank 44 45 46 47 48 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 12 11 10 9 8 Rank 56 56 58 60 62 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 21,636 19,669 17,401 15,604 13,958 Rank 45 46 47 49 50 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 41 40 37 36 34 Rank 23 21 22 21 26 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.15 Rank 30 29 32 36 36 Commuter Stress Index 1.25 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.22 Rank 31 31 32 31 33 Total Cost ($ millions) 799 742 667 612 563 Rank 42 43 43 44 44 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 922 856 769 706 650 Rank 45 51 57 61 64

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 615 605 590 575 565 Rank 55 55 55 54 54 Commuters (1000s) 267 258 248 237 230 Freeway 8,450 7,810 7,265 6,600 6,265 Arterial Streets 7,410 6,875 6,705 6,655 6,620 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.03 1.07 1.08 1.11 1.08 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.10 1.14 1.18 1.20 1.07 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 5,971 5,576 5,208 4,848 4,472 Rank 51 49 51 51 51 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 6 6 6 5 Rank 65 73 63 58 64 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 12,190 11,383 10,633 9,896 9,129 Rank 50 50 50 51 52 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 30 29 28 26 Rank 32 29 28 25 27 Travel Time Index 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.13 1.12 Rank 38 35 37 33 34 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 Rank 36 33 34 33 33 Total Cost ($ millions) 506 485 466 447 430 Rank 49 49 49 48 48 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 584 559 538 516 496 Rank 68 67 65 62 62

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 550 540 540 535 530 Rank 55 55 55 54 54 Commuters (1000s) 222 216 214 210 207 Freeway 6,065 5,545 4,975 4,440 4,115 Arterial Streets 6,600 6,605 6,070 5,955 5,470 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.12 1.03 1.04 1.01 1.32 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.02 0.94 0.94 0.92 1.20 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,155 3,959 3,763 3,509 3,364 Rank 51 49 46 46 43 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 5 4 4 4 Rank 57 47 55 48 40 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 8,483 8,083 7,683 7,163 6,867 Rank 50 49 47 46 45 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 25 25 24 22 22 Rank 26 24 20 24 20 Travel Time Index 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 32 32 29 32 26 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.16 Rank 31 30 31 31 30 Total Cost ($ millions) 421 420 416 402 393 Rank 48 45 43 41 41 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 486 485 480 464 453 Rank 60 59 52 51 45

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 530 525 525 Rank 53 52 52 Commuters (1000s) 206 202 200 Freeway 3,965 3,700 3,655 Arterial Streets 5,305 5,250 5,175 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.34 1.37 1.43 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.22 1.24 1.30 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,168 2,988 2,861 Rank 43 41 41 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 3 3 Rank 34 42 36 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 6,467 6,099 5,841 Rank 44 41 41 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 21 20 19 Rank 19 18 17 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.09 1.09 Rank 29 27 25 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.15 1.15 Rank 29 29 28 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 383 377 372 Rank 38 38 37 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 442 435 430 Rank 41 40 39