Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance of 2012 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles

Similar documents
Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance of 2016 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles

Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance of 2005 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles

Fleet Average NOx Emission Performance of 2004 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles

San Diego Auto Outlook

2015 WEGMANN automotive GmbH & Co. KG

PRESS RELEASE 04:30 EDT, 12 th October 2017 Troy, MI, USA

PRESS RELEASE 04:30 EDT, 7 th April 2017 Troy, MI, USA

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PERFORMANCE MODEL YEAR 2011 TO 2016 LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLE FLEET

IIHS head restraints & seats geometric ratings for older model vehicles

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS

Consumer Automotive Financial Services in the USA

2018 SKN New Product Listing

Renewable Fuels Regulations. Performance Report: December December 2012

BLOOMBERG INDUSTRIES OUTLOOK 2014

Press-release 10 November 2015

Good for the USA. Buyer s Guide Thomas J Johnson. Helping Americans choose the global products that support American jobs.

APPLICATION GUIDE 2014

Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators. Marine pollution spills

NADA Winter 2018 Dealer Attitude Survey Aid

X500 USER MANUAL 1. RUNNING EVIRONMENT SOFTWARE INSTALLATION SOFTWARE ACTIVATION AND DOWNLOAD SOFTWARE INTRODUCTION...

H LEASE MARKET REPORT

Press-release 9 June 2014

Maryland Auto Outlook

Check for the most up to date information

MOTOR VEHICLE STATISTICS OF JAPAN

Press-release 9 October 2017

Winners & Losers by Market - April 2017 vs April 2016

Winners & Losers by Market - June 2017 vs June 2016

Press-release 10 April 2017

Winners & Losers by Market - May 2015 vs May 2014

Newly Registered Number of Imported Vehicles as of May 2018 (Quick Report)

Press-release 15 January 2015

Toyota motor payoff phone number

Press-release 8 September 2017

Press-release 8 June 2017

Press-release 12 January 2018

Press-release 8 August 2017

revised BMW BACK Contact Cut Off Address Fax Knauz BMW/M.B./Mini (847) :30 PM 409 Skokie Highway, Lake Bluff (847)

Press-release 12 January 2017

Automotive Industry Overview

Toyota motor payoff number

REAR COMPARTMENT LOCKS

Press-release 8 December 2017

BrandWatch 2014Q4 Topline Report

PROFILE FOR AUTOMOBILE LIFTERS

Check for the most up to date information

New Vehicle Registrations Remained Above 2 million Units in

Press-release 9 November 2016

Press-release 8 July 2014

Press-release 8 June 2015

20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 13.6% % chgange vs. year earlier 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 1Q '15 vs. 1Q '14. Source: IHS Markit

Drive Market Share Gains - Automotive Industry Insights: Q3, 2009

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS Markit

Safety in Steering and Suspension

Sales of new passenger cars and LCVs in Russia dropped by 4% in November 2013 Among the top ten bestselling models so far, ten are locally produced

REAR COMPARTMENT LOCKS

San Diego Auto Outlook

Winners & Losers by Market - Feb 2014 vs Feb 2013

Automotive Fuel Economy Program. Annual Update Calendar Year National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS September 2002

PRESS RELEASE 14:00 GMT, 19 th January 2017 London, UK

Maryland Auto Outlook

MOVE IN - MOVE OUT SCHEDULE

Verify Your Color Code. (Finding the Color For Your Vehicle)

Released: December 2018 Covering data thru November YTD 18 thru November % Change In New Retail Market vs. Year Earlier

BLUE BOOK MARKET REPORT April 2009

Involvement-Index 2017 Which automobile brands are most talked about?

Press-release 06 March 2018

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS Markit

California Auto Outlook Comprehensive information on the California vehicle market Volume 14, Number 2 Released May 2018 Covering First Quarter 2018

ALL NEW TECNA FULLY AUTOMATIC SPOT WELDER FEATURING SMART PLUS

Released: January 2019 Covering data thru December % Change In New Retail Market: 2018* vs Annual Trends in Area New Vehicle Market

PRESS RELEASE 9:30 BST, 25 th October 2017 London, UK

MARKET. contents AMERICAN SALES

2018 SUV & Truck Buyer s Guide

Utah Dealerships. Avis Car Sales Bluff Street Auto Brokers. Cedar City Motor Company Central Auto Inc

Key Indicators on the competitiveness of the EU S automotive Industry 1

2015 J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

BrandWatch 2015 Q2 Topline Report

MOVE IN - MOVE OUT SCHEDULE

Use tumbler series P /105 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

Newly Registered Number of Imported Vehicles as of February 2019 (Quick Report)

Greater Cleveland Auto Outlook

Press-release 04 October 2018

DENTO ATF Multi-Vehicle HV

Model Year 2017: Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicles (updated: 4/4/2017) Biodiesel (B20)

INNOVATION. HIGH PERFORMANCE. SAFETY. YESTERDAY. TODAY. TOMORROW.

Fuelling the growth of Electric Vehicles

New Passenger Car Registrations European Union

PRIME SITE AT PRESTIGIOUS SCOTTSDALE RD INTERSECTION

New Passenger Car Registrations European Union

NEW PASSENGER CAR REGISTRATIONS EUROPEAN UNION 1

Consumer Satisfaction with New Vehicles Subject to Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards

Press-release 06 September 2018

COMPLETE LIST OF TUMBLER SERIES

Press-release 06 December 2018

Press-release 05 July 2018

NEW YORK January 2019

MOVE IN - MOVE OUT SCHEDULE

REAR COMPARTMENT LOCKS

Transcription:

Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance of 2012 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles In relation to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Transportation Division Environment and Climate Change Canada May 2016

Disclaimer This document provides a summary of data collected pursuant to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations. It does not in any way supersede or modify the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 or the Regulations made under that Act. In the event of an inconsistency between this document and the Act and/or the Regulations, the Act and the Regulations prevail. Cat. No.: En81-10E-PDF ISSN: 1927-2456 Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials in this publication, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada's copyright administrator. To obtain permission to reproduce Government of Canada materials for commercial purposes, apply for Crown Copyright Clearance by contacting: Environment and Climate Change Canada Public Inquiries Centre 7th Floor, Fontaine Building 200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard Gatineau QC K1A 0H3 Telephone: 819-997-2800 Toll Free: 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) Email: ec.enviroinfo.ec@canada.ca Photos: Environment and Climate Change Canada Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2016 Aussi disponible en français

Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 1 2 Purpose... 2 3 Introduction... 2 4 Company Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance for the 2012 Model Year... 3 4.1 Scope of Company Reports... 3 4.2 Distribution of Bins and Total Canada NO x Fleet Average Value... 5 4.3 Fleet Average NO x Values Trend... 6 5 Conclusions... 7 i

List of Tables Table 1: Summary of Company Reports... 4 Table 2: Distribution of Vehicles by the NOx Standard of Each Bin... 5 List of Figures Figure 1: Fleet Average NO x Values and Standards... 6 ii

1 Executive Summary Under the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations (hereafter referred to as the Regulations ), each new light-duty vehicle, light-duty truck and medium-duty passenger vehicle is required to be certified by its manufacturer to one of the bins corresponding to those of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for which there are specific emission standards for oxides of nitrogen (NO x ) and other pollutants. Manufacturers and importers of these vehicles are required to report on their fleet average NO x emission performance for each model year. This ninth annual performance report summarizes the fleet average NO x emission performance of the Canadian 2012 model year fleet of vehicles. A total of 22 companies submitted end of model year reports comprising a total of 1,522,441 vehicles manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale. This report includes the fleet average NO x value for each company as well as their number of emission credits or deficits. It also provides a comparison of the distribution of vehicles certified to the various emissions bins and compares the overall NO x performance with that of previous model years. The average NO x value for the Canadian 2012 model year combined fleet of light-duty vehicles, light light-duty trucks, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles is 0.06215957 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.07 grams/mile. Of those companies that submitted, each had a fleet average NO x value that was at or below the standard and based on their reports, all complied with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations. The average NO x value continued to decrease for the 2012 model year. This result is consistent with the environmental performance objectives of the Regulations. 1

2 Purpose The purpose of this report is to summarize the fleet average NO x emission performance of individual companies and the overall Canadian fleet for the 2012 model year (MY) and is based on data submitted by companies in their end of model year reports and any subsequent revisions; it is also to report on the effectiveness of the Canadian fleet average NO x emission program in achieving the environmental performance objectives. 3 Introduction On January 1, 2004, the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations came into effect under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999). These Regulations introduced more stringent national emission standards for on-road vehicles and engines. The Regulations align Canada s emission standards for light-duty vehicles 1 (LDVs), light light-duty trucks 2 (LLDTs), heavy light-duty trucks 3 (HLDTs), mediumduty passenger vehicles 4 (MDPVs), heavy-duty vehicles, heavy-duty engines and on-road motorcycles with those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through incorporation by reference to the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Each new LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV is required to be certified to a bin for which there are specific emission standards for NO x and other pollutants. A company s choice of bin to which individual vehicle models are certified in a given model year is limited by the obligation to comply with the fleet average NO x standards associated with that model year. The current NO x standard is 0.07 grams/mile, which was introduced in the 2009 model year. A company s fleet average NO x value is the weighted average based on the number of vehicles certified to each bin. Though the emission bins, fleet average NO x standards, and methods of calculating fleet average NO x values are aligned with those of the U.S. EPA, there are differences in the structure of the NO x averaging program in Canada, which is designed to recognize vehicles that are sold concurrently in Canada and the U.S. The regulatory requirements are structured to deliver fleet average emissions comparable to those of the U.S. while minimizing the regulatory burden on companies and enabling the marketing of vehicles in Canada independently from the U.S. 1 Light-duty vehicles are generally passenger cars. 2 Light light-duty trucks are generally vans, sport utility vehicles and pick-up trucks having GVWR of 2,722 kg (6,000 pounds) or less. 3 Heavy light-duty trucks are generally vans, sport utility vehicles and pick-up trucks having a GVWR of more than 2,722 kg (6,000 pounds) and up to 3,856 kg (8,500 pounds). 4 Medium-duty passenger vehicles are generally heavier passenger-type vehicles, such as vans and sport utility vehicles having a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 3,856 kg (8,500 pounds) and less than 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds). 2

The Regulations require that all companies submit a report to the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change no later than May 1 after the end of each model year. The end of model year report must contain detailed information concerning the company s fleet(s) and/or groups of vehicles. For more information regarding the calculation of fleet average NO x values and NO x emission credits or deficits, please refer to the Regulations, which can be found on the Environment and Climate Change Canada CEPA Registry at www.ec.gc.ca/ceparegistry/regulations. Reports for the 2004 to the 2011 model years can also be found on the CEPA Registry. 4 Company Fleet Average NO x Emission Performance for the 2012 Model Year 4.1 Scope of Company Reports Table 1 presents a list of the companies that submitted an end of model year report for the 2012 model year in accordance with the requirements of the Regulations, including the vehicle makes and a summary of the data received. 3

Company Makes Table 1: Summary of Company Reports Number of Test Groups 5 Total Number of Vehicles Average NO x Value (grams/mile) 6 Initial Credit Balance 7 2012 Balance7 Aston Martin Lagonda Limited Aston Martin 2 110 0.0700 0 0 BMW Group BMW, Mini, Canada Rolls-Royce 21 32,059 0.070000 913 913 Chrysler Canada Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Fiat 22 230,683 0.0561753 47,756 50,945 Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited Ford, Lincoln 33 205,987 0.0531194 44,748 48,225 General Motors Buick, Cadillac, of Canada Chevrolet, GMC Limited 27 201,349 0.0490740 82,007 86,220 Honda Canada Acura, Honda 17 171,975 0.0698509 20,180 20,206 Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. Hyundai 17 116,849 0.0694792 3,206 3,267 Jaguar (Jaguar Land Rover Jaguar 1 716 0.0700 126 126 Canada ULC) Kia Canada Kia 16 64,991 0.068686 4,741 4,826 Land Rover (Jaguar Land Rover Canada Land Rover 3 3,904 0.07000 953 953 ULC) Lotus Cars Limited Lotus 1 19 0.070 0 0 Maserati North America, Maserati 1 152 0.0700 0 0 Mazda Canada Mazda 12 67,967 0.070000 15,090 15,090 Mercedes-Benz Maybach, Canada Mercedes, Smart 18 30,671 0.069996 78 78 Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada, Mitsubishi 8 18,024 0.068524 76 103 Nissan Canada Infiniti, Nissan 25 94,649 0.069605 18,864 18,901 Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. Porsche 13 2,344 See note 8 See note 8 See note 8 Subaru Canada, Subaru 4 20,364 0.067967 2,709 2,750 Suzuki Canada Suzuki 4 4,155 0.07000 1,281 1,281 Toyota Canada Lexus, Scion, Toyota 40 169,934 0.0655033 27,016 27,780 Volkswagen Group Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. Audi, Bentley, Lamborghini, Volkswagen 24 78,049 See note 8 See note 8 See note 8 Volvo 3 7,490 0.07000 3,538 3,538 5 A test group is the basic classification unit that comprises LDV, LLDT, HLDT or MDPV having similar exhaust emission performances and that share all of the features described in section 1827, subchapter C, part 86 of the CFR. 6 Fleet average NO x values are rounded to the same number of significant figures that are contained in the total number of vehicles in a company s fleet. 7 NO x emission credits/deficits are rounded to the nearest whole number. A negative sign (-) indicates a deficit. 8 The average NO x value and credit balance for Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. and Volkswagen Group are not included in this table due to an ongoing investigation regarding certain of their diesel vehicles. However, no adjustments were made to the total number of vehicles, the number of test groups, the distribution of vehicles by the NO x standard of each bin and the average NOx value for the Canadian fleet (Table 2). 4

A total of 22 companies submitted a report for the 2012 model year covering a total of 312 distinct test groups. It should be noted that certain test groups were common between companies that shared vehicle platforms or powertrains. The company average NO x values ranged from 0.0490740 grams/mile to 0.0700000 grams/mile for the fleet of LDVs, LLDTs, HLDTs, and MDPVs, and no companies reported a fleet average NO x value that was above the standard of 0.07 grams/mile. A total of 11,920 credits were generated by companies for the 2012 model year. No company incurred a deficit with respect to their fleet, and no company reported a deficit at the end of this model year. In addition, there were no credit transfers to or from companies for the 2012 model year. 4.2 Distribution of Bins and Total Canada NO x Fleet Average Value Table 2 summarizes the distribution of vehicles by the NO x standard of each bin. It also provides the calculated fleet average NO x value of the entire Canadian fleet for the 2012 model year. Table 2: Distribution of Vehicles by the NOx Standard of Each Bin Bin Number NOx Standard (grams/mile) Total Number of Vehicles in "Bin" Percentage of Vehicles in "Bin" 8 0.20 33,476 2.20 7 0.15 0 0.00 6 0.10 0 0.00 5 0.07 1,012,327 66.49 4 0.04 452,426 29.72 3 0.03 20,178 1.32 2 0.02 3,018 0.20 1 0.00 1,016 0.07 Total Number of Vehicles in 2012MY Fleet 1,522,441 Total Canada NOx Fleet Average (grams/mile) 0.06215957 Fleet Average NOx Standard (grams/mile) 0.07 Note: Beginning in the 2009 model year, applicable standards are limited to bins 1 to 8 for all categories. For the 2012 model year, almost all vehicles (97.8 % of the fleet) were certified to a bin at or below the fleet average NO x standard of 0.07 grams/mile. The average NO x value for the Canadian fleet was 0.06215957 grams/mile. 5

4.3 Fleet Average NO x Values Trend Figure 1 presents the average NO x values trend relative to the applicable standards since 2004 for both the LDV/LLDT and HLDT/MDPV fleets. Beginning in 2009, LDVs, LLDTs, HLDTs, and MDPVs all conform to one NO x fleet average standard. Figure 1: Fleet Average NO x Values and Standards Overall, the fleet average NO x value for the combined fleet of LDVs, LLDTs, HLDTs, and MDPVs decreased from 2004 to 2012. More specifically, the fleet average NO x value for the 2012 model year continues to decrease and is 11.2% below the standard of 0.07 grams/mile. 6

5 Conclusions This is the ninth year that companies were subject to the fleet average NO x requirements under the Regulations. A total of 22 companies submitted reports for a total of 312 distinct test groups comprising 1,522,441 vehicles that were either manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale. The average NO x value for the Canadian 2012 model year combined fleet of LDVs, LLDTs, HLDTs and MDPVs is 0.06215957 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.07 grams/mile. Each individual company had a fleet average NO x value that was at or below the standard, and all companies complied with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations based on their reports. The average NO x value continued to decrease for the 2012 model year. This result is consistent with the environmental performance objectives of the Regulations. 7