January 13, 2012 AACE Annual Meeting, Wickenburg, AZ. I-15 in Arizona. Its Past, Present, and Future

Similar documents
U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

ARIZONA ALTERNATIVE FUEL CORRIDOR NOMINATION FAST ACT 1423

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. ASCE Conference Wyndham Hotel North Little Rock Thursday, October 16, 2014

RhodeWorks Initiative

Click to edit Master title style

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

HURON COUNTY ENGINEER S OFFICE

P3 PROJECT PIPELINE: STATUS - AUGUST 2016

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

THE PARTNERSHIP OF RAIL & COAL MOVING AHEAD 2014 RMCMI ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2014

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Utah Road Usage Charge Program

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Planning of the HSR Network

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

DART Priorities Overview

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

State Tolling Authority adopts all state Highway and bridge tolls sets fares for Washington State Ferries

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail. IDOT District 8 Crossings. July 29, 2015

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

Precision Station Stopping Progress Update

Yukon Resource Gateway Project

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Federal Funding Opportunities Northeast Drayage Workshop October 13, Reema Loutan Environmental Engineer EPA Region 2

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 1 NOTICE TO HIGHWAY CONTRACTORS

Zach Hartman Anheuser-Busch Companies Director, U.S. National Affairs

DMB Proposed Toll Increase

Guam Transportation Program Project Updates. Joanne M.S. Brown Director Carl Dominguez Deputy Director February 6, 2012

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

TEMPLATE OF THE NATIONAL REPORT

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Needs and Community Characteristics

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES: Street Project Management

Quonset Business Park

TransNet Dollars Keep San Diego Moving

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. August 2017

MDOT Metro Region. Jim Schultz, P.E. Manager of Planning

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

State and Local Implications for Connected and Automated Vehicles. James Pol, PE, PMP. AASHTO SCOHTS Meeting

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Sustainable transport better infrastructure - The Danish Government s vision for green infrastructure

Workshop Agenda. I. Introductions II. III. IV. Load Rating Basics General Equations Load Rating Procedure V. Incorporating Member Distress VI.

Transportation. Background. Transportation Planning Goals. Level of Service Analysis 5-1

MDOT Load Rating Program

Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT

Staff Contact: Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, (650)

MassDOT Highway ROW Solar PV Energy Program. Hongyan (Lily) Oliver Massachusetts Department of Transportation Office of Transportation Planning

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Corridor Sketch Summary

TOLL TRUCKWAYS: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement. By Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Peter Samuel

Draft Results and Open House

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Eagle P3 Project Update FasTracks Monitoring Committee Sept. 3, 2013

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

David Chow, P.E., AICP Director, IBI Group

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

TransWest Express Transmission AC and DC Project Interregional Transmission Project Submittal

Head of Division for Road Traffic Technology; Road Infrastructure Safety; Routine Road Maintenance Management

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Municipal Road and Bridge Revolving Loan Fund Program Summary Rhode Island Department of Transportation

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

Transportation accomplishments

Positive Train Control (PTC)

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

State Efforts to Promote Alternative Fuels. Kristy Hartman November 13, 2014

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Caltrain Modernization & High Speed Train Projects City of Millbrae

Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Transcription:

January 13, 2012 AACE Annual Meeting, Wickenburg, AZ I-15 in Arizona. Its Past, Present, and Future Jean A. Nehme, Ph.D., P.E. State Bridge Engineer, ADOT

Presentation Overview Location, History, and Photographs Condition of the I-15 Virgin River Bridges ADOT s Efforts to Rehabilitate I-15 Various Grant Applications Exploring the P3 Option

Locating I-15 in Arizona

Route Characteristics and History

I-15 in Arizona 29.4 miles 12 miles within the Virgin River Gorge Between 40 and 50 Years Old ADT ~ 24,000 24% Trucks Triple Trailers Are Allowed Separated from the Rest of the State by the Grand Canyon (area population ~ 1,200) Majority of the Land is Owned by the Federal Government

I-15 in Arizona Connects San Diego, California to the Canadian Border in Sweetgrass, Montana CANAMEX Freight Route A Corridor of National Significance Freight Movement from California Ports to Central US Destinations via I-70 and I-80 Was Designated as One of the Six Corridors of the Future Sept. 2007 USDOT

Brief History of the I-15 Corridor in Arizona Arizona segment of I-15 was dedicated in 1973 Utah Loaned Fed Funds to Arizona to Accelerate the Construction One of the most expensive in the interstate system ~ $48 million in 1973 dollars How much would it cost to build it today? The Virgin River was rechanneled 12 times in the gorge Arizona Highways Magazine stated that It enhanced rather than distracted from Nature s handiwork The Virgin River, named the Rio Virgin in 1776 by Padre Silvestre Escalante during his search for a route between Santa Fe and California

Route Characteristics - Pictorial Courtesy of ADOT Bridge Inspection Crews Photographers

I-15 Virgin River Bridges

I-15 Virgin River Bridges # 1 to 7

Bridge Summary Bridge # MP # of spans (max span) Length ft Deck Area ft 2 1 9.55 5 (216) 845 54,925 2 13.19 5 (185) 740 48,470 3 13.27 12 (71) 822 53,635 4 14.3 2 (135) 270 18,711 5 NB 15.38 3 (225) 531 17,311 5 SB 15.38 3 (212) 496 16,170 6 15.58 4 (225) 649 42,380 7 22.55 3 (196) 496 32,240 283,842

History of Bridge Repair Projects* 1998: steel girder repair on # 1, 2, 5 NB, 5 SB, and 6. 1998: deck hydro-demolition and micro-silica overlay on # 3 and 7. 1998: deck joint repl. on #3 (piers 2, 3 & 10) 1999: steel girder repair on # 7. 2002: deck hydro-demolition and micro-silica overlay on # 4, 5 NB, 5 SB and 6. Also, deck joint repl. on # 4 (both abutments). 2004: approach slab repair on # 5 NB. 2007: remove the middle, install two additional girders, and deck repair on # 7. 2007: deck repair including deck sealing on # 2, 3, and 5 NB. 2007: deck joint repl. On # 3 (pier 6) * Does not include: 1. bridge repair projects prior to 1998; 2. bridge rail repair and replacement; 3. bridge repairs performed as part of pavement preservation projects; 4. minor repairs performed by District Maintenance.

I-15 Virgin River Bridges # 1 to 7

Bridge # 1

Bridge # 2

Bridge # 3

Bridge # 4

Bridge # 5 NB & SB

Bridge # 6

Bridge # 7

Examples of Deteriorations (1)

Examples of Deteriorations (3)

Examples of Deteriorations (4)

ADOT s Initiatives Increased the bridge inspection frequency Asked FHWA to conduct a review Meeting of the 3 Directors (July 2011) Invitation to UDOT and NDOT to perform their own review/inspection of the bridges Follow-up meeting of the 3 Directors including FHWA FY12 pavement preservation project which would include minor bridge repairs

Status of Bridge Condition Reviews FHWA Conducted a Review (May 2011) NDOT Conducted an Office Review (August 2011) UDOT Performed an in-depth Inspection (September 2011) ADOT in-depth Bridge Inspection (October 2011)

Why Is It Important to Rehabilitate the I-15 Virgin River Bridges?

Detour Options

Additional Efforts TIGER Grant Application (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) IBRD Application in Progress (Innovative Bridge Research and Development Program) Highways for Life (HfL) Application Interstate Maintenance Discretionary (IMD) Grant Application ADOT Submitted Expression of Interest to FHWA for P3 Opportunities (Public-Private Partnerships)

TIGER Grant ADOT Applied for a $ 27 million Grant Would Have Rehabilitated Bridge # 6 Unsuccessful Late December 2011 Announcement by USDOT 848 Applications from all 50 States ($ 14.29 billion) 46 Projects in 33 States Were Selected ($ 511 million) ADOT with the Help of FHWA AZ Division Is Requesting a Debriefing The Southwest, Safe for CA, Represented a Gaping Hole on the Map of Recipients

IBRD Application Earlier this Month, ADOT Submitted to the FHWA an IBRD Application to Rehabilitate Virgin River Bridge # 6 $ 13.1 million Is Available Nationwide

HfL Application The purpose of Highways for LIFE is to advance Longer lasting highway infrastructure using Innovations to accomplish the Fast construction of Efficient and safe highways and bridges. The three goals of HfL are to: Improve safety during and after construction Reduce congestion caused by construction Improve the quality of the highway infrastructure

IMD Application This discretionary program provides funding for Interstate highway resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, and reconstruction (4R) work $ 47.3 million Is Available Nationwide

Exploring the P3 Option ADOT Is Seeking Provisional Acceptance for a Pilot Toll Project Three Interstate Pilot Projects Interstate Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program Two States Have Been Approved (I-95 in VA, I-70 in MO) Last Pilot Project Has 3 Applications Purpose Is to Fund a Major Rehabilitation Project for I-15 within Arizona

ADOT Proposed Project Will: Rehabilitate 8 Bridges Preserve the 28.6 miles of Asphalt Pavement Replace Traffic Sign Panels Implement Roadway Safety Upgrades (guardrail, concrete barriers, culverts, RofW fencing, rock fall containment )

Timetable Project Scoping Is Underway Environmental Clearance Is Next (Sensitive Areas Include: Virgin River Gorge, Beaver Dam Mountain Wilderness Area, Paiute Wilderness Area) Traffic Study Starts in 2012 and Completes in 2013 Alternative Delivery Procurement - 2014 Construction Starts in 2015 and Completes in 2017

Project Costs Bridge Superstructure Replacement: $ 180 million Rehabilitation of 29 miles of I-15: $ 71 million Constr. of Toll Road Infrastructure: $ 15 million Yearly Operating Costs: $ 1 million Yearly Maintenance Costs: $ 1.5 million Total 30-Year Life Cycle: $ 341 million

Toll Revenue Toll Revenue Potential over a 30-Year Period Scenario 1 Automobile Toll: $3.00 Truck Toll: $6.00 Scenario 2 Automobile Toll: $2.00 Truck Toll: $8.00 Scenario 3 Automobile Toll: $1.00 Truck Toll: $10.00 $ 393.2 million $ 365.7 million $ 333.3 million

Usage of Toll Revenue 100 % of toll collections will be applied to: Rehabilitating, Maintaining, and Operating I-15 in Arizona

Local Commuters Modern tolling technology allows flexibility in toll collection to support policy development. For example, it may be appropriate to exempt the locals who are reliant upon the stretch of I-15 from paying a toll. If an individual who lives in Mesquite commutes for work to St. George, the burden of paying a toll each way daily may not be equitable as there is not a viable alternative toll-free route.

FHWA s Response

In Conclusion While there may be some controversy vis-à-vis the P3 option And there are few individuals and entities who publicly spoke against it ADOT does not have a preference regarding the method to finance the rehabilitation of I-15. Our only desire is to implement our mission which is to provide a safe, efficient, cost-effective transportation system

Questions?