Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 675 675 675 670 670 Rank 62 62 62 62 62 Commuters (1000s) 341 347 347 344 343 Freeway 3,160 3,129 3,820 3,857 3,835 Arterial Streets 7,289 7,217 6,110 6,318 6,281 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.63 3.89 3.89 3.51 3.05 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.85 4.12 4.20 4.02 3.20 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 15 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 14 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 1.40 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 5,682 5,505 5,290 5,267 5,194 Rank 80 82 81 81 81 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 11 11 10 10 10 Rank 92 92 94 94 93 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 11,823 11,454 11,007 10,959 10,806 Rank 83 82 82 82 82 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 23 22 21 22 21 Rank 92 93 94 93 94 Travel Time Index 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Rank 97 97 97 97 97 Commuter Stress Index 1.33 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 Rank 20 22 20 19 19 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 1.72 -- -- -- -- Rank 84 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 251 247 241 245 249 Rank 85 85 85 84 84 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 495 487 475 482 491 Rank 96 97 97 96 95

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 665 660 640 640 615 Rank 61 61 61 61 64 Commuters (1000s) 339 335 323 322 307 Freeway 3,857 3,900 3,740 3,890 3,865 Arterial Streets 6,527 6,600 6,475 6,435 6,470 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.61 3.84 3.24 2.88 2.62 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.71 4.39 3.60 3.17 2.93 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 5,101 5,156 5,372 5,205 5,015 Rank 80 80 79 78 77 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 10 11 10 10 Rank 92 94 91 91 89 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 10,613 10,727 11,177 10,831 10,435 Rank 82 83 83 83 81 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 21 22 23 23 23 Rank 93 93 93 93 93 Travel Time Index 1.10 1.10 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 97 96 96 96 96 Commuter Stress Index 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.32 Rank 19 19 19 23 22 Total Cost ($ millions) 249 250 271 270 268 Rank 84 85 83 83 84 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 490 493 534 531 529 Rank 95 95 95 95 94

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 605 595 585 560 560 Rank 64 63 63 63 63 Commuters (1000s) 300 294 285 270 266 Freeway 3,645 3,280 3,215 2,520 2,550 Arterial Streets 6,440 6,540 6,510 6,400 6,505 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.28 1.78 1.66 1.93 1.72 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.27 1.79 1.58 1.78 1.68 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,895 4,684 4,539 4,212 3,896 Rank 77 77 77 77 77 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 9 9 8 8 Rank 89 90 88 89 87 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 10,185 9,746 9,444 8,763 8,106 Rank 80 78 77 77 77 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 23 22 22 21 20 Rank 92 93 93 92 92 Travel Time Index 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.09 Rank 96 91 91 88 92 Commuter Stress Index 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.31 Rank 20 17 17 16 17 Total Cost ($ millions) 271 266 264 249 237 Rank 82 81 80 79 77 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 534 525 520 490 466 Rank 93 92 92 91 91

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 550 545 540 530 525 Rank 63 63 63 64 64 Commuters (1000s) 258 253 247 240 234 Freeway 2,200 2,025 1,915 1,895 1,885 Arterial Streets 6,250 6,180 5,940 5,700 5,505 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.59 1.27 1.40 1.21 1.27 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.50 1.39 1.51 1.24 1.31 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,793 3,352 3,155 2,979 2,829 Rank 76 76 77 76 76 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 7 6 6 6 Rank 88 85 87 84 81 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 7,892 6,975 6,565 6,198 5,887 Rank 76 76 76 76 76 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 20 18 17 17 16 Rank 92 92 92 91 91 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.07 Rank 87 90 88 87 88 Commuter Stress Index 1.31 1.30 1.29 1.29 1.29 Rank 16 16 16 15 13 Total Cost ($ millions) 238 215 206 199 194 Rank 77 79 79 78 78 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 469 424 405 391 383 Rank 90 90 90 91 90

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 515 500 490 475 460 Rank 64 64 64 66 66 Commuters (1000s) 227 218 211 202 193 Freeway 1,740 1,710 1,690 1,625 1,580 Arterial Streets 5,480 5,440 5,350 5,295 5,250 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.16 1.23 1.28 1.11 1.14 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.19 1.26 1.25 1.25 1.19 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 2,612 2,591 2,490 2,248 2,127 Rank 76 76 75 77 75 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 5 5 4 4 Rank 85 79 77 82 77 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 5,434 5,392 5,182 4,678 4,426 Rank 76 76 75 77 75 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 15 16 15 15 14 Rank 91 89 88 86 86 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Rank 88 83 82 81 76 Commuter Stress Index 1.28 1.29 1.28 1.28 1.28 Rank 13 10 11 10 10 Total Cost ($ millions) 184 188 186 173 170 Rank 79 78 77 77 78 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 363 369 366 340 335 Rank 90 89 87 87 86

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 450 430 410 400 385 Rank 66 67 68 68 68 Commuters (1000s) 187 177 168 162 155 Freeway 1,500 1,395 1,370 1,385 1,335 Arterial Streets 5,220 5,130 1,980 4,800 4,715 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.14 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.35 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.09 1.01 1.01 0.99 1.29 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 1,967 1,925 1,806 1,679 1,388 Rank 74 73 71 70 73 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 4 4 3 3 Rank 72 66 55 71 63 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 4,093 4,005 3,758 3,493 2,888 Rank 75 73 70 69 71 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 14 14 14 13 11 Rank 80 75 64 65 72 Travel Time Index 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.05 Rank 80 74 66 57 64 Commuter Stress Index 1.27 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.26 Rank 10 8 7 9 8 Total Cost ($ millions) 166 170 166 160 135 Rank 77 75 73 71 74 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 327 335 328 316 266 Rank 84 80 79 77 83

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 370 360 345 Rank 68 68 69 Commuters (1000s) 148 143 135 Freeway 1,270 1,150 1,100 Arterial Streets 4,550 4,410 4,245 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.36 1.39 1.46 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.31 1.34 1.40 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 1,210 1,119 1,040 Rank 73 71 71 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 2 2 2 Rank 78 68 62 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 2,518 2,329 2,165 Rank 73 71 71 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 10 10 10 Rank 70 64 58 Travel Time Index 1.05 1.05 1.04 Rank 57 55 61 Commuter Stress Index 1.26 1.25 1.25 Rank 9 10 8 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 122 118 113 Rank 76 73 73 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 240 232 222 Rank 85 83 80