PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

Similar documents
PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

Truck Axle Weight Distributions

Journey into quality for traffic monitoring equipment. Short session monitoring operations

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

Technical Reports Center

A Proposed Modification of the Bridge Gross Weight Formula

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 129

s MEDIAN BARRIERS FOR TEXAS HIGHWAYS

Analyzing Crash Risk Using Automatic Traffic Recorder Speed Data

WIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county.

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Development of Turning Templates for Various Design Vehicles

Oregon DOT Slow-Speed Weigh-in-Motion (SWIM) Project: Analysis of Initial Weight Data

Development of Weight-in-Motion Data Analysis Software

WIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county.

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

8.2 ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOUR:

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

Factors Affecting Vehicle Use in Multiple-Vehicle Households

KANSAS Occupant Protection Observational Survey Supplementary Analyses Summer Study

WIM #40 US 52, MP S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

Effects of Load Distributions and Axle and Tire Configurations on Pavement Fatigue

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

APPENDIX C CATEGORIZATION OF TRAFFIC LOADS

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Act 229 Evaluation Report

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL PLATE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Comparison of Live Load Effects for the Design of Bridges

Using Weigh-in-Motion Data to Calibrate Trade-Derived Estimates of Mexican Trade Truck Volumes in Texas

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR MEDIAN WIDTH

Section 5. Traffic Monitoring Guide May 1, Truck Weight Monitoring

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320. Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran

Establishment of Statewide Axle Load Spectra Data using Cluster Analysis

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

Oklahoma Gas & Electric P.O. Box 321 Oklahoma City, OK, Main Street, Suite 900 Cambridge, MA 02142

LA Design and Rating Vehicle based on WIM (Weigh-in-Motion) Study

U.S. Census Bureau News Joint Release U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

SAN PEDRO BAY PORTS YARD TRACTOR LOAD FACTOR STUDY Addendum

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013

CRASH TEST OF MILE POST MARKER. T. J. Hirsch Research Engineer. and. Eugene Buth Assistant Research Engineer. Research Report Number 146-8

NEW-VEHICLE MARKET SHARES OF CARS VERSUS LIGHT TRUCKS IN THE U.S.: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Recent Transportation Projects

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER

User Manual. Early-Stage Toll Revenue Estimation Model. Curtis Beaty and Henry Lieu. University Transportation Center for Mobility

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

TMH 8. Traffic and Axle Load Monitoring Procedures

American Driving Survey,

opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this

Somatic Cell Count Benchmarks

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E. Deputy Executive Director

TIER 3 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL STANDARDS FOR DENATURED FUEL ETHANOL

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 5: UPDATE THROUGH 2012

sponsoring agencies.)

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

D-25 Speed Advisory System

U.S. GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE FUELS UPDATE - DECEMBER 20, 2017

Product Loss During Retail Motor Fuel Dispenser Inspection

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Heavy Trucks on the Highways: An Important Pavement Issue

The Coalition for Transportation Productivity

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

TRB Workshop Implementation of the 2002 Mechanistic Pavement Design Guide in Arizona

THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

DOT HS September NHTSA Technical Report

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

Benefit Cost Analysis

Performance Based Design for Bridge Piers Impacted by Heavy Trucks

2015 Community Report White Rock

M E M O R A N D U M. Texas Department of Transportation Construction Division

I-95 Corridor Coalition

REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK DISPLAYS EVALUATION:

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Minnesota Speed Management Program

Traffic Data Quality Verification and Sensor Calibration for Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Systems

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.


Transcription:

PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES SUMMARY REPORT of Research Report 131-2F Research Study Number 2-10-68-131 A Cooperative Research Program of the Texas Transportation Institute and The Texas Highway Department In Cooperation With the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration September 1970 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Texas A&M University College Station, Texas

Procedures for Estimating the Total Load Experience of a Highway as Contributed by Cargo Vehicles by JesEe L. Buffington, Dale L. Schafer and W. G. Adkins Introduction In September 1967, the Texas Transportation Institute in cooperation with the Texas Highway Department and the U. S. Bureau of Public Roads began a study entitled "Studies of Truck Characteristics Relating to Highway Use and Taxation in Texas." During the first year of the study, research efforts were directed toward determining fuel tax differentials of Texas cargo vehicles. The results were published during 1968 in Research Report 131-1 and summarized in Summary Report 131-l(S), both entitled "fuel Tax Differentials of Texas Cargo Vehicles." During the last two years of the study, the research efforts have dealt with the development of procedures to estimate the total load experience (measured in 18-kip axle equivalents) generated on a highway by cargo vehicles and to determine the adequacy of the vehicle weight and count samples used in the above calculations. The results were published during 1970 in Research Report 131-2 entitled "Procedures for Estimating the Total Load Experience of a Highway as Contributed by Cargo Vehicles." An accurate estimate of a highway's total load experience for the design period is needed to help determine the design requirements of the roadbed. An underestimate will result in an underdesigned facility, giving it a shorter physical life than planned for. Thus, road replacement and repairs would be needed much sooner than expected. Historical cargo vehicle weight and count data collected at 21 permanent loadometer stations were used in the various analyses. Also, limited data from a weigh-in-motion station were analyzed. Estimating the Total Load Experience of a Highway If accurate base period axle weights and annual average daily traffic (AADT) counts of cargo vehicles are used, then an accurate estimate of the total experience (measured in 18-kip axle equivalents) of an existing or future highway can be made to assist in determining the design requirements of the roadbed.

Procedures developed for making such estimates are summarized belowo Two alternative procedures were developed and tested for making an estimate of the total load experience in 18-kip axle equivalents for a highway" One procedure used multiple regression models in which the "dummy" variables represent various characteristics of the vehicles weighed" The sets of variables entered into the models included vehicle type, body type, fuel type, time of weighing (night, day of week, summer and year) and load status" The other procedure used percentage frequency sets generated from corresponding actual weight frequency distribution composed of one kip weight classes, 40 for single axles and 50 for tandem axles" The percentage frequency TABLE I PERCENTAGE ESTIMATING ERRORS OF TWO ALTERNATIVE PROCE DURES USED TO ESTIMATE THE TOTAL 18-KIP AXLE EQUIVALENTS GENERA TED BY TEXAS CARGO VEHICLES WEIGHED AT EACH LO AD O METER STATION DURING ONE YEAR (1967) VERSUS SEVERAL YEARS (1964-68) Percentage Estimating Errors Loadometer One-Year Data Multi-Year Data Station by Frequency Regression Frequency Regression Highway System Set S Model 2 Set S Model 2 Interstate Rural 10-1 21.3 20.S 14.4 13.7 10-2 20-1 9.1 2.0 0.1 1.8 1.3 1.7 8.4 2.2 20-2 1.4 0.1 3.4 0.2 20-3 4.6 5.7 1.8 4.6 30-1 8.0 7.6 6.6 1.9 35-1 0.4 14.7 1.6 12.7 37-1 10.8 5.8 14.5 3.1 45-2 9.9 8.9 9.8 11.S Other Rural 7 21.7 30.7 27.3 29.0 16 22.1 26.S 19.8 23.4 20-1.6 10.2 5.3 16.S 42-0.8 12.3-8.2-2.0 72-1.5-4.3-1.6 0.7 81-25.4-18.S - 30.1-21.7 88-13.l - 15.0 13.9 IS.I 145 14.4 15.8 10.3 12.S 147 18.6 5.3 0.1 5.2 149 10.6 19.8 9.0 16.3 Urban 3 0.8 30.9 0.1 5.0 4 1.6 38.0 0.1 20.8 All Stations Total' 199.7 292.S 177.6 226.1 Avera.ge' 9.5 13.9 8.5 10.8 'The signs of the errors were ignored.

sets developed were as follows: ( 1) combined stations, (2) combined stations by vehicle type, (3) combined stations by fuel type, (4) combined stations by load status, (5) combined stations by highway and vehicle type, and (6) combined stations by highway systems. Two sets of loadometer data, one-year (1967) and multi-year (1964-68) were applied to the above procedures. Of the regression models developed, Model 2 (which included the loaded vehicle variable) was the most accurate in estimating total station 18-kip axle equivalents for both sets of data. Of the frequency sets, Set 5 was the most accurate for both sets of data. Of the two procedures, Frequency Set 5 was more accurate than Re0re2sion ModG! 2. The station by station results for each procedure are shown in Table 1. It shows that the over-all average percentage errors for Frequency Set 5 are less than those for Regression Model 2. Also, the former has few stations with percentage errors of over 10 percent. The estimates for multiyear data were more accurate than those for single-year data. Determining the Adequacy of Cargo Vehicle Weight and Clas3ification Counl Samples Another purpose of this research study was to determine the adequacy of cargo vehicle weight and classification count samples taken at the loadometer stations. Samples taken during 1964-68 were tested for representativeness of the vehicle traffic and reliableness of statistics generated therefrom. To determine the above, the weighing and counting schedules and sample sizes were evaluated. Also data collected at conventional stations were compared with data collected on a continuous basis at a special weigh-in-motion station. The weight and count sample size requirements were established through the use of a statistical formula which utilizes sample averages and variances with 10 percent error and 95 percent probability level criteria. It was found that a considerable amount of station to station variation in the sample statistics was due to differences in the weighing and counting schedules and sample sizes. Combining stations and/or years made the data more representative and increased the reliability of the sample statistics. Hence, Table 2 shows the weight sample size requirements for the major vehicle types. Table 3 shows the count sample requirements of a major vehicle type at each station using multi-year data. Conclusions A primary use of vehicle (axle) weight and count sample data collected at the various stations over the state is for estimating the total design period load experience of a proposed highway so that its roadbed design requirements can be met.

TABLE 2 NUMBER OF SINGLE AND TANDEM AXLES ACTUALLY WEIGHED AND NECESSARY TO WEIGHT OF EACH MATOR VEHICLE TYPE TO OBTAIN AN AVERAGE AXLE WEIGHT IN 18-KIP AXLE EQUIVALENTS WITHIN 10 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION AVERAGE FOR ALL STATIONS COMBINED 1 Number of Axles Number of Vehicles 18-Kip Axle Equivalents Per Axle Vehicle Actually Necessary Actually Necessary IO Percent Variance Type Weighed to Weigh Weighed' to Weigh' Average of Average from Average Single-Unit 2-Axle 6-Tire 384 192 0.099 0.010 Single Tandem 21,084 10,542 0.100 3-Axle Single 1,791 3,000 1,791 3,000 0.076 0.008 0.050 Tandem i,791 1,260 0.221 0.022 0.160 Multi-Unit 2-Sl Single Tandem 11,213 LllO 3,738 370 0.164 0.016 0.074 2-S2 Single 14.961 1,565 7,480 0.19'9 0.020 0.163 Tandem 888 7.480 888 0.175 0.018 0.071 3-S2 Single 23,603 1,688 0.080 0.008 0.028 23,603 Tandem 47,206 1.688 526 0.261 0.026 0.093 Miscellaneous Single 3,825 2,257 0.207 0.021 2,013 2,049 Tandem 712 725 0.201 0.020 0.259 0.091 All Types Single 76.477 2,279 0.127 0.013 0.096 48,272 Tandem 57,189 1.442 583 0.248 0.025 0.093 'Based on 19 66-68 data from the 21 conventional loadometer stations and using the standard formula shown in the text of the final report. 'Controlled by the axle type requiring the largest number of vehicles of that type. Not applicable.

TABLE 3 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF COUNTS NECESSARY TO MAKE OF FIVE-AXLE SEMITRAILER VEHICLES BASED ON THE AVERAGES AND VARIANCES COMPUTED FROM VARYING NUMBERS OF ACTUAL COUNTS TAKEN AT THE 21 LOADOMETER STATIONS DURING 1965-68 Loadometer Actual Counts' Number of Counts Stations 10 Perby Highway cent of System Avera.ge Variance' Average Actual" Necessary Interstate Rural 10-1 162 518 16 12 10 10-2 477 1.846 48 12 4 20-1 736 1.428 74 12 2 20-2 808 3.868 81 11 3 20-3 679 10.885 68 10 13 30-1 658 1.321 66 12 2 35-1 701 2.183 70 12 3 37-1 288 684 29 12 4 45-2 1.154 12,338 115 12 5 Other Rural 7 150 164 15 12 4 16 280 1.008 28 11 7 20 520 2.212 52 12 4 42 123 338 12 11 12 72 519 4,728 52 12 9 81 259 2.912 26 12 21 88 122 215 12 12 7 145 418 2.067 42 12 6 147 110 773 11 12 31 149 253 1.003 25 11 8 Urban 3 159 2.332 16 8 52 4 51 168 5 8 37 All Stations Total 8.627 52.991 863 238 244 Average 411 2.523 41 12 12 'These counts are adjusted for trend, using the linear equation presented in the text of the final report. 'This is the variance used in the sample size formula shown in the text of the final report. 'All stations have counts for spring, summer, and fall, except the urban stations which have only summer counts. A considerable amount of such data was used to establish the accuracy of two estimating procedures. The procedure employing the multiple regression technique was not as accurate as the procedure using percentage frequencies generated from single and tandem axle weight distribution sets. The most accurate set was one which divided the sample data on a highway system and vehicle type basis. The findings of this research study indicate that as long as the present weighing schedule is followed, the system should

combine data collections from all 21 of the conventional loadometer stations to obtain representative input data. To assure reliable outputs, the minimum quantity of combined station data should be about that collected during one summer. However, if the data are broken down on a station or highway system basis, the quantity of data collections should be increased, especially in the case of the urban system. The same thing could be accomplished by combining enough data collected during previous years or summers. The findings tend to indicate that fewer stations could be used to obtain the necessary input data to produce reliable statistics or estimates of the population parameters. Thus, continuous seven-day weighing periods during each season of the year are recommended to be conducted at several stations. Perhaps two or three stations would be enough. However, a final decision should not be made until more data are generated with the weigh-in-motion scales at several conventional station locations on each highway system. Then, it could be determined whether true station to station differences in vehicle or axle weights actually exist. The findings indicate that several 24-hour volume counts per year for three or four years should be made at each manual count station to estimate the base year AADT for each vehicle type. Also, a more accurate estimate of a cargo vehicle type AADT is obtained if the estimating method uses only the 24-hour volume counts of that vehicle type. Future loadometer data collections should be periodically tested for adequacy, that is, tested for representativeness and reliableness. The procedures used in this study are recommended for such determinations. Also, the same tests should be performed on the manual count data. The continuous need for adequate data to support future research in this area should always be kept in mind. The published version of this report may be obtained by addressing your request as follows: R. L. Lewis, Chairman Research & Development Committee Texas Highway Department-File D-8 11th and Brazos Austin, Texas 78701 (Phone 512-475-2971)