V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Similar documents
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Draft US Corridor Study Traffic Analysis Report

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Traffic Engineering Study

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Feasibility Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Creditview Road Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Traffic Operations Analysis Final Report

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Peachtree Streetscape Atlanta, Georgia

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

One Harbor Point Residential

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. STERLING FIFTH STREET APARTMENTS PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For:

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development


3.0 Future (2040) Transportation

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Mineola Village Green

Shoppes at Pine Meadow BPUD DeBary, Florida. Traffic Impact Analysis

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

144&176 John St. and 200 John St. & 588 Charlotte St. Hotel and Residential Subdivision Development

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Lakeside Terrace Development

Letter of Transmittal

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Transcription:

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion amongst Steering Committee Members suggested six (6) corridor alternatives: 1A Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension to Northwest Boulevard 1B Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension to Northwest Boulevard with closure on Reynolda Road (southeast leg of intersection) 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension to West End Boulevard 3A Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street roundabout w/ one way pair roads 3B Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street roundabout w/ two way pair roads 4 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street t intersection w/ intersection improvements at key intersections Traffic analysis was performed for each of the six (6) preliminary alternative alignments. After evaluation and discussion by the Steering Committee Members, it was determined that three (3) alternatives would be further examined and presented to the public for review and comment: Alternative A (1A) Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension to Northwest Boulevard Alternative B (3B) Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street roundabout w/ twoway pair roads Alternative C (4) Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street T intersection w/ intersection improvements at key intersections. VI. PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES / LEVELS OF SERVICE A. Traffic Projections Morning (7 9 am) and afternoon (4 6 pm) peak hour traffic counts were counted by WSA at the following locations: Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / W. 8 th Street / Trade Street (02/18/08) W. 8 th Street / N. Cherry Street (02/13/08) W. 8 th Street / N. Marshall Street (02/13/08) W. 8 th Street / Buxton Street (02/12/08) N. Broad Street / 7 th Street (02/29/08) W. Northwest Boulevard / Thurmond Street / N. Broad Street (02/21/08) W. Northwest Boulevard / Reynolda Road (02/20/08) Reynolda Road / West End Boulevard (06/12/08) Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 10 Based on historic traffic trends in the area and feedback from the City of Winston Salem, a 1.5% growth rate was used to estimate future 2015 and 2035 background traffic volumes. The following is a list of the study scenarios: 2008 Existing 2015 Opening Year No Build 2035 No Build 2015 Opening Year Build Out (Alternatives A, B, & C) 2035 Build Out (Alternatives A, B, & C) The corridor alternatives, which were eliminated early in the study process (Alternatives 1B, 2, and 3A), were also evaluated for the 2035 Build Out conditions. The traffic volumes and capacity analysis results are included in Appendix B. Below are the intersections that were included in the study area for each alternative: Alternative A Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / W. 8 th Street / Trade Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Cherry Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Marshall Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Buxton Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Thurmond Street / N. Broad Street N. Broad Street / 7 th Street W. Northwest Boulevard / Reynolda Road Reynolda Road / West End Boulevard Alternative B Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / W. 8 th Street / Trade Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Cherry Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Marshall Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Buxton Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Broad Street W. Northwest Boulevard / Thurmond Street / N. Broad Street N. Broad Street / 7 th Street W. Northwest Boulevard / Reynolda Road Reynolda Road / West End Boulevard Alternative C Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / W. 8 th Street / Trade Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Cherry Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / N. Marshall Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / Buxton Street Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension / N. Broad Street W. Northwest Boulevard / Thurmond Street / N. Broad Street N. Broad Street / 7 th Street W. Northwest Boulevard / Reynolda Road Reynolda Road / West End Boulevard Morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes for the 2015 and 2035 conditions are shown in Figures 5 8.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 16 B. Level of Service Calculations The study area intersections were analyzed using the methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 3 and Synchro Version 7.0 Software. The Highway Capacity Manual 3 defines capacity as the maximum rate of flow at which persons or vehicles can be reasonably expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a specified time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions, usually expressed as vehicles per hour or persons per hour. Level of service (LOS) is a term used to represent different traffic conditions, and is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorist/or passengers. Level of Service varies from Level A, representing free flow, to Level F where traffic breakdown conditions are evident. Level B represents good progression with minimal congestion. At Level C, the number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level D represents more congestion, but the overall operations are acceptable. At Level E, freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely difficult with driver frustration being generally high. For signalized intersections, service levels pertain to each approach as well as an overall value. The unsignalized intersection analysis method in the Highway Capacity Manual 3 assigns LOS values for each movement that yields the right of way, but not to the overall intersection. This movement is generally a secondary movement from a minor street. At an unsignalized intersection, the primary traffic on the main roadway is virtually uninterrupted. Therefore, the overall level of service is usually much greater than what is represented by the results of the minor street movements. Synchro Version 7.0 will calculate an amount of delay for the overall intersection, but will not assign a LOS value. Generally, Level of Service D is considered acceptable for signalized intersections in suburban areas during peak periods. With the current method of reporting levels of service for unsignalized intersections, it is not uncommon for some of the minor street movements to be operating at a LOS F during the peak hours. Table 1 presents criteria of each level of service as indicated in the Highway Capacity Manual 3.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 17 TABLE 1: LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Stopped Delay Per Vehicle (sec) A <10.0 B >10.0 and <20.0 C >20.0 and <35.0 D >35.0 and <55.0 E >55.0 and <80.0 F >80.0 Level of Service Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <10 B >10 and <15 C >15 and <25 D >25 and <35 E >35 and <50 F >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 3 Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998 Synchro Version 7.0 calculates the level of service and delay for each intersection using methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 3. Table 2 summarizes the capacity analyses. Capacity Analyses Results 2008 Existing Condition Using the existing lane configurations and signal timings, levels of service for the existing 2008 scenario were calculated for the study area intersections. Overall, no capacity problems were identified in the study area with the exception of the Broad Street / Northwest Boulevard intersection which is currently operating at LOS E during the afternoon peak hour. The minor northbound movement of the West End Boulevard and Reynolda Road intersection is also experiencing some delays however it is not uncommon for the minor movement of an unsignalized intersection to experience delays. All other intersections in the study area are currently operating at acceptable levels of service. The 2008 Existing Conditions capacity analyses results for the AM and PM peak hours for the study area intersections are included in Table 2.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 18 Table 2: Existing Conditions LOS Summary Intersection 2008 Existing AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Reynolda Rd. / Northwest Blvd. D (36.0) D (37.7) Broad St. / Northwest Blvd. C (31.7) E (75.6) MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Marshall St. A (3.6) A (4.0) MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Cherry St. C (31.2) C (25.0) MLK Jr. Dr. / Trade St. A (5.3) A (5.9) MLK Jr. Dr. / Buxton St # (3.8) # (3.7) A (8.5) WB A (8.6) WB 7 th Street / Broad St. # (1.5) B (10.5) EB B (10.1) WB # (2.4) B (10.9) EB B (10.6) WB West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd # (1.7) # (5.7) C (24.3) NB E (47.6) NB West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd / Parking Lot # (0.8) B (13.1) NB A (0.0) SB Note: # No letter value assigned by Synchro, only overall intersection delay # (1.5) B (11.2) NB C (17.3) SB 2015 Opening Year No Build Condition The 2015 no build analysis assumes that no improvements have been constructed. Using the existing signal timings, the 2015 No Build levels of service were calculated for the study area intersections. The Broad Street / Northwest Boulevard intersection is predicted to continue to operate at unacceptable levels of service during the PM peak hour. The minor northbound movement of the West End Boulevard and Reynolda Road intersection is also expected to continue to experience elevated delays. All other intersections in the study area are predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service. The 2015 No Build Condition capacity analyses results for the AM and PM peak hours for the study area intersections are included in Table 3. 2015 Opening Year Build Out Condition Under the 2015 Opening Year Build Out scenario, all intersections under Alternatives A, B, and C are expected to operate with acceptable levels of service. However the minor northbound movement of the West End Boulevard / Reynolda Road intersection will continue to experience delays. Unlike the 2015 Opening Year No Build scenario, the LOS for the Broad Street / Northwest Boulevard intersection is expected to improve from LOS D and F to LOS B and C during the PM peak hour under all three (3) alternatives. Adjusting the signal timing at this intersection improved the level of service. The 2015 Buildout Condition capacity analyses results for the AM and PM peak hours for the study area intersections are included in Table 3.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 19 Table 3: 2015 Opening Year LOS Summary Intersection Reynolda Rd. / Northwest Blvd. Broad St. / Northwest Blvd. MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Marshall St. MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Cherry St. 2015 No Build 2015 Build Alt A 2015 Build Alt B 2015 Build Alt C AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak D (41.1) D (36.1) D (47.7) D (40.6) C (31.6) D (41.4) C (31.3) C (29.9) D (47.1) F (114.7) B (15.0) B (13.5) B (13.1) B (15.3) C (26.0) C (26.0) A (4.0) A (4.5) B (15.3) B (16.8) B (17.0) B (17.7) B (14.9) B (16.8) C (31.7) C (28.1) B (19.0) C (21.0) B (19.2) C (21.0) B (18.7) C (21.0) MLK Jr. Dr. / Trade St. A (5.4) A (6.1) A (4.9) A (6.1) A (5.3) A (6.7) A (5.3) A (6.7) MLK Jr. Dr. / Broad St. (proposed) MLK Jr. Dr. / Buxton St 7 th Street / Broad St. West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd / Parking Lot N/A N/A N/A N/A A (9.8) 1 B (12.2) 1 C (28.6) C (31.9) # (3.8) A (8.5) WB # (1.6) B (10.7) EB B (10.3) WB # (2.4) D(34.0) NB # (0.9) B (13.9) NB A (0.0) SB # (3.6) A (8.6) WB # (2.4) B (11.3) EB B (10.8) WB # (12.0) F (99.3) NB # (1.6) B (11.6) NB C (19.0) SB 1 Single lane roundabout # No letter value assigned by Synchro, only overall intersection delay # (0.6) C (15.2) NB B (12.7) SB # (1.7) B (12.1) EB B (11.3) WB # (2.4) D (34.0) NB # (0.9) B (13.8) NB A (0.0) SB # (1.0) B (11.7) NB B (14.2) SB # (2.8) B (13.5) EB B(12.0) WB # (12.1) F(100.4) NB # (1.6) B (11.6) NB C (20.8) SB # (0.6) C (15.2) NB B (12.7) SB # (1.3) C (18.8) EB C (15.6) WB # (1.9) C (23.1) NB # (0.9) B (12.9) NB A (0.0) SB # (1.0) B (11.7) NB B (14.2) SB # (2.6) C (21.0) EB C (16.2) WB # (6.8) F(50.5) NB # (1.6) B (11.4) NB C (17.5) SB # (0.6) C (15.2) NB B (12.7) SB # (1.3) C (18.6) EB C (15.6) WB # (1.9) C (23.1) NB # (0.9) B (12.9) NB A (0.0) SB # (1.0) B (11.7) NB B (14.2) SB # (2.4) C (18.7) EB C (16.1) WB # (10.6) F(86.9) NB # (1.6) B (11.8) NB C (20.4) SB

Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 20 2035 No Build Condition The 2035 No Build analysis assumes that no improvements have been constructed. Using the existing signal timings, the 2035 No Build levels of service were calculated for the study area intersections. The signalized intersections of Reynolda Road / Northwest Boulevard and Broad Street / Northwest Boulevard are projected to operate at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours. The signalized intersection of Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive / Cherry Street is expected to operate at LOS E and the minor movement of the unsignalized intersection of Reynolda Road and West End Boulevard will operate with heavy delays. All others are predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service. The 2035 No Build Condition capacity analyses results for the AM and PM peak hours for the study area intersections are included in Table 4. 2035 Build Out Condition The signalized intersection of Reynolda Road and Northwest Boulevard will operate at LOS E and F during the peak hours for all three (3) build alternatives. Additionally, the Northwest Boulevard / Broad Street will also operate at LOS E for Alternative C. The Cherry Street Marshall Street section had major delays and was predicted to operate at unacceptable level of service. This is due to the westbound left turning movement at Cherry Street and the eastbound left turning movement at Marshall Street. In order for these intersections to operate at acceptable levels of service, it is recommended that the left turn movements at these intersections be prohibited. The intersection of Reynolda Road and West End Boulevard will continue to operate with major delays during the 2035 Build Out scenario for all three (3) alternatives. It is recommended that this intersection be converted to a single lane roundabout. All other intersections for the three (3) build alternatives are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service. The 2035 Buildout Condition capacity analyses results for the AM and PM peak hours for the study area intersections are included in Table 4. The recommended lane configurations and traffic control for the three (3) conceptual alternatives are shown in Figures 9 11. Capacity analyses for all studied intersections are included in Appendix B.

Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 21 Intersection Reynolda Rd. / Northwest Blvd. Broad St. / Northwest Blvd. Table 4: 2035 LOS Summary 2035 No Build 2035 Build Alt A 2035 Build Alt B 2035 Build Alt C AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak F (104.6) F (97.1) F (114.0) E (63.6) E (79.8) F (113.0) E (79.8) E (75.3) F (145.9) F (309.2) B (18.0) B (15.7) B (13.9) B (16.3) E (66.3) E (78.0) MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Marshall St. MLK Jr. Dr. / N. Cherry St. A (5.9) A (6.3) C (20.5) C (24.3) C (21.7) C (25.3) C (20.1) C (24.2) E (80.0) D (44.2) C (24.2) C (30.8) C (24.2) C (30.9) C (24.3) C (30.8) MLK Jr. Dr. / Trade St. A (5.8) A (6.7) A (6.6) A (8.4) A (7.3) A (9.7) A (7.3) A (9.7) MLK Jr. Dr. / Broad St. (proposed) MLK Jr. Dr. / Buxton St 7 th Street / Broad St. West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd West End Blvd / Reynolda Rd / Parking Lot N/A N/A N/A N/A D (37.7) 1 C (24.4) 1 D (48.3) C (23.8) # (3.8) A (8.6) WB # (1.7) B (11.7) EB B (11.0) WB # (33.2) F (**) NB A (9.1) 1 # (1.5) C (23.8) NB A (0.0) SB # (3.7) A (8.7) WB # (2.7) B (12.7) EB B (11.7) WB # (**) F (**) NB # (0.9) C (20.4) NB C (15.7) SB # (2.0) B (14.3) EB B (12.7) WB # (28.6) B (15.6) 1 F(**) NB # (2.5) # (1.5) B (14.3) NB C (24.3) NB D (33.8) SB A (0.0) SB # (1.4) B (13.1) NB C (19.3) SB # (3.5) C (17.5) EB B (14.1) WB # (**) F (**) NB # (2.5) B (14.3) NB D (33.8) SB # (0.9) C (20.4) NB C (15.7) SB # (2.1) D (30.8) EB C (21.6) WB # (9.3) F(114.0) NB # (1.2) C (17.3) NB A (0.0) SB # (1.4) B (13.1) NB C (19.3) SB # (4.6) E (43.7) EB C (23.4) WB # (67.9) F (**)NB # (2.2) B (13.9) NB D (27.8) SB Note: 1 Single lane roundabout ** Exceeds the limits of Synchro # No letter value assigned by Synchro, only overall intersection delay # (0.9) C (20.4) NB C (15.7) SB # (2.3) D (33.4) EB C (22.9) WB # (9.3) F(114.0) NB # (1.2) C (17.3) NB A (0.0) SB # (1.4) B (13.1) NB C (19.3) SB # (3.6) D (27.5) EB C (20.5) WB # (103.7) F (**) NB # (2.5) B (14.9) NB D (36.9) SB