Table of Contents SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i

Similar documents
SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Metro Highway Program

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Technical Feasibility Report

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Project Application. General Information ODOT PID. Primary County (3 char abrv) ODOT District

Expansion Projects Description

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Traffic Engineering Study

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

Agenda. Utility Undergrounding Strategies & Laguna Canyon Road Master Plan

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

State Route 1 Auxiliary Lane Bus-on-Shoulder Concept of Operations DRAFT. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Project Working Group Meeting #5

City of Pacific Grove

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

2016 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Countdown to the Closure Extended 53-Hour Closure of I-405 Freeway Between U.S. 101 and I-10 Planned in Mid-July for Mulholland Bridge Demolition

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GOLETA RAMP METERING STUDY MAY 8, 2018 FINAL REPORT

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Southern California Association of Governments ADOPTED APRIL 2012

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Thursday, August 18, 2011 Frank Quon, PE Lan Saadatnejadi, PE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

NEWS RELEASE November 8, 2017

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

Key Project Elements Status Report

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

W&OD TRAIL BRIDGE OVER LEE HIGHWAY I-66 EASTBOUND WIDENING INSIDE THE BELTWAY FROM THE DULLES CONNECTOR ROAD (ROUTE 267) TO FAIRFAX DRIVE (ROUTE 237)

Southern California - CHSRA

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

The Jack A. Markell Trail Delaware s Bicycle Highway New England Bike- Walk Summit

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

I-405 Sepulveda Pass Improvements Project

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Needs and Community Characteristics

Transcription:

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS...I SECTION 1: 2009 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE...1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN...7 BY YEAR 2011...8 BY YEAR 2015...13 BY YEAR 2022...19 BY YEAR POST-2025/2030...23 SECTION 3: REFERENCES...28 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i

SECTION 1: 2009 Status Report and Update INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four-lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County Line and the Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users over 32 million hours of commuting time. While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the State Route 91 (SR-91) corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor from the Ontario Freeway (Interstate 15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border through the year 2030. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non-compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much-needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity-enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed in January 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of the non-compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by the OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) was signed into law in August 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to annually issue a plan and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to Interstate 15 (I-15). The previous SR-91 Implementation Plan included a westerly project limit of State Route 55 (SR-55). This plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds. This 2009 SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2008 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year s update includes projects identified in the Riverside County Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County Line to I-15, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2009 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1

lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2009 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the plan. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and I-15 in the City of Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: Heavy traffic volumes from I-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the close proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off-ramp. High demand from several on-ramps within the eastern segment exacerbates traffic conditions during rush hours. An eastbound (EB) general purpose (GP) lane is dropped just east of the Corona Expressway (State Route 71). The second EB High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane becomes a GP lane. Heavy downstream congestion forces traffic to exit at the Green River off-ramp. The backup caused by the off-ramp blocks the right lane of the mainline freeway. High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. The Foothill Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) merges with SR-91 causing additional congestion in the EB direction. Both EB lanes from State Route 241 (SR-241) are dropped prior to State Route 71 (SR-71). Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped at Imperial Highway creating a severe merge condition. WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue. WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue weaving through three lanes from WB SR-91 to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the projects identified in this 2009 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the various projects in the 2009 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation schedule (see Section 2 for detailed project summaries): The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2011 and includes four improvements at a total cost of approximately $145 million. The projects include construction of a Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station, Metrolink service improvements, Express Bus improvements, and the EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71. These projects are in the process of preliminary engineering, final design, construction, 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2

or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. The 2015 improvements include five projects, with a total cost up to approximately $1.9 billion. The projects include new travel lanes between SR-55 and SR-241; interchange improvements at SR- 71/SR-91; the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) from SR-241 to Pierce Street that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of SR-241, add collector-distributor (CD) roads and direct connectors at I-15/SR-91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to I-15, and add system interchange improvements; a new WB lane at Tustin Avenue; and a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard. Three projects for implementation by 2022 include the SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT direct connector, a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements, and SR-91 improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans will be initiating preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2022 would cost approximately $900 million to $1.2 billion. Some of these projects may become components of post-2025/2030 projects. Projects for post-2025/2030 implementation focus on longer-lead time projects and include: SR- 55/SR-91 Interchange Improvements, an Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to I-15, a 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor B) from SR-241/Laguna Freeway (State Route 133) to I-15/Cajalco Road, and the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail. The $200 million dollar interchange project and the other three, multi-billion dollar potential projects require a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. In some cases, these projects may include previous projects as project components, Project No. Table 1 SR-91 Implementation Plan Projects Project Summary By Year 2011 such that all projects may not be implemented within this project summary. Traffic Analysis Cost ($M) 1 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking 25.0 Structure 2 Metrolink Short-Term Expansion Plan 35.4 3 Express Bus Improvements Orange County to Riverside 9.5 County 4 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 74.5 SUBTOTAL 144.4 By Year 2015 5 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5 th 104.2 GP lane in Each Direction 6 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements 117.5 7 Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of 1,542 SR-241, CD Roads and Direct Connectors at I-15/SR-91, Extension of Express Lanes to I-15, and System Interchange Improvements 8 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue 94.8 9 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements 44-76 SUBTOTAL 1,903-1,935 By Year 2022 10 SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT Connector 150-440 11 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements 335 12 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 417 SUBTOTAL 902 1,192 By Post-2025/2030 13 SR-55/SR-91 Interchange Improvements 200 14 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 2,720 I-15 15 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor B) from SR-241/SR-133 to 5,960 I-15/Cajalco Road 16 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail TBD SUBTOTAL 8,880+ For the 2009 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2008 Plan and the westerly project study limit has been revised to include SR-57. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from UC Berkeley and 2008 traffic data. This freeway operations model 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3

provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: Eastbound lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 by 2011 (Project 4). New lanes in both directions from SR-55 to SR-241 by 2014 (Project 5). New lanes in both directions from SR-241 to I-15 by 2015 (Project 7). Eastbound lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2022 (Project 12). New capacity provided by Corridor A and Corridor B by post-2025/2030 as recommended by the 2006 MIS (Projects 14 and 15). The results indicate that the WB morning travel times increase for 2011 as there are no planned WB improvements, but by 2015 and 2022 there are significant travel time improvements compared with the 2011 results. Results for 2030 illustrate travel time increases without Corridors A and B, whereas the inclusion of Corridors A and B results in greatly reduced travel times. The afternoon travel times are slightly decreased for the EB SR-91 project planned for 2011, whereas 2015 and 2022 improvements will significantly decrease EB travel speeds. These improvements will help manage the future growth for the SR-91 corridor. The current design of the SR-55/SR-91 interchange limits the ability to move traffic into north and central Orange County via SR-55, and significant future vehicle delays may result without major interchange improvements and downstream capacity increases or diversion to other corridors. The introduction of Corridors A and B by post-2025/2030 offers the potential capacity to manage future SR-91 traffic demand in both directions. While both of these corridors are still concepts, they provide substantial relief to EB and WB traffic congestion in the future. Further feasibility studies will determine if one or both concepts move forward in the project development process. The charts below describe the travel time benefits by year including these various project concepts. The 2030 scenario shows travel time without the Corridor A and B improvements. Figure 1-1 Mainline Westbound SR-91 from I-15 to SR-57 A.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline Westbound SR-91 From I-15 to SR-57 AM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Existing (2009) 2011 2015 2022 2030 2030 A&B Orange County Riverside County 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4

Figure 1-2 Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to I-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to I-15 PM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Existing (2009) 2011 2015 2022 2030 2030 A&B Orange County Riverside County PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. Recently Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of May 2009, the following physical improvements have been constructed/implemented: Repaved and sealed pavement surfaces, replaced raised channelizers, and restriped lanes on the 91 Express Lanes. EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off-ramp. Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route. WB auxiliary lane extension between the County Line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County Line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County Line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re-striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. Green River Road overcrossing replacement. These projects provided enhanced freeway capacity and improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of the freeway. In addition, there are two projects that are currently in the project development phase that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cfs compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segment of the Santa Ana River to be improved is Reach 9, which includes areas along SR-91 from the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the Corps; Caltrans; and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 by relocating the Santa Ana River while it would have been otherwise disturbed by the original Corps project to protect-in-place the riverbank protection for SR-91. This will greatly enhance the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps currently has 95% design plans completed for the improvements and are awaiting federal stimulus package funding allocation and disbursement prior to construction. 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5

The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $100 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and is in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, highway R/W needs to be relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD; Caltrans; and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project initiated the preliminary engineering phase in early 2009 and is scheduled to complete construction by summer 2012. Recently Completed PSR s and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are several reports and PSR s that are completed, in draft form, or anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. The reports and PSR s include: Project Study Report On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County (April 2004). MIS Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). Project Study Report On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County (October 2006). Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). Project Study Report for SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007. SR-91 from SR-57 to SR-55 Feasibility Study (anticipated by May 2009). 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study (March 2009). SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study (anticipated by June 2009). Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (2009). Renewed Measure M Strategic Plan (anticipated by June 2009). Updates from the 2008 SR-91 Implementation Plan In addition, to the improvements and progress noted above, the following projects that were included in the 2008 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified or dropped for the 2009 Plan: The Green River Road interchange improvements have been completed and the project is deleted from the 2009 Plan. The Fairmont Boulevard improvements (Project 9) alternative for drop ramps into the 91 Express Lanes has been deleted. A traditional interchange or overcrossing alternative are still included as viable options. An eastbound SR-91 widening project from SR-57 to SR-55 (Project 12) has been added for 2009. The SR-55/SR-91 interchange improvements (Project 13) schedule has been changed from 2020 completion to post-2025/2030. The 2020 horizon year has been updated to 2022 to capture projects that will be implemented before 2025. Various project costs and schedules have been updated from the 2008 Plan based on continued project development. 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6

SECTION 2: OVERVIEW The 2009 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules, key consideration, benefits, and costs (in 2009 dollars, or as noted) for major projects through post- 2025/2030. Most of the projects identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS. The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects include 2011, 2015, 2022, and post-2025/2030. The 2011 and 2015 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints. Some of the longer-range projects for 2022 and post-2025/2030 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design. Each of the project improvements includes an estimate of project schedules. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures, such as design-build or contractor incentives for early completion, may potentially reduce project schedules. The implementation phases are defined as follows: Implementation Plan Conceptual Engineering = Pre-Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) Conceptual planning and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. Environmental = Project Report/Environmental Documentation (PR/ED) The detailed concept design that provides environmental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation. Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists. The intent of these implementation plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA, RCTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1 SR-91 Project Study Area from SR-57 to I-15 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7

By Year 2011 The first set of projects will be completed by 2011 and includes four improvements at a total cost of approximately $144 million (in 2009 dollars). The projects include a new parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station, Metrolink service improvements, Express Bus improvements, and the EB SR-91 lane addition from near SR-241 to SR-71. Most of these projects are in the process of preliminary engineering, final design, construction, or procurement and implementation. These projects are recommended for the first few years of the Plan and will provide mobility improvements to the corridor when implemented. Most of these near term projects provide immediate operational benefits with a minimum of effort required relative to environmental documentation and Right-of-Way constraints. Project No. Project Summary Cost ($M) 1 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure 25.0 2 Metrolink Short-Term Expansion Plan 35.4 3 Express Bus Improvements Orange County to Riverside County 9.5 4 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 74.5 SUBTOTAL 144.4 Figure 2-2 Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2011 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 11

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12

By Year 2015 The next set of improvements includes five projects, which would be implemented by 2015 at a total cost of approximately $1.9 billion (in 2009 dollars, or as noted). One of the projects includes SR-91 widening by one general purpose (GP) lane in each direction between SR-55 and SR-241. Another project is the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91. The third project is the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) from SR-241 to Pierce Street that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of SR-241, add CD Roads and Direct Connectors at I-15/SR-91, extend 91 Express Lanes to I-15, and add system interchange improvements. The other two projects that will be completed in this time frame include the WB lane at Tustin Avenue, and a potential new interchange at Fairmont Boulevard. Project No. Project Summary Cost ($M) 5 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5 th GP lane in Each Direction 104.2 6 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements 117.5 7 Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of SR-241, CD Roads and Direct Connectors at I-15/SR- 1,542 91, Extension of Express Lanes to I-15, and System Interchange Improvements 8 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue 94.8 9 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements 44-76 SUBTOTAL 1,903-1,935 Figure 2-3 Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2015 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18

By Year 2022 Projects for implementation by 2022 include the SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT connector improvements, a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements, and SR-91 improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans will be initiating preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2022 are expected to cost approximately $900 million to $1.2 billion (in 2009 dollars, or as noted). Some of these projects may become components of post-2025/2030 projects. Project No. Project Summary Cost ($M) 10 SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT Connector 150-440 11 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements 335 12 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 417 SUBTOTAL 902 1,192 Figure 2-4 Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2022 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 19

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 20

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 21

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22

By Year Post-2025/2030 Projects for implementation by post-2025/2030 focus on longer-lead time projects. This multi-billion dollar program includes: SR-55/SR-91 Interchange Improvements, an Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to I-15, a 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor B) from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road, and the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail. The $200 million dollar SR-55/SR-91 interchange project and the other three, multi-billion dollar potential projects include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The Corridor A project may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as project components, such that all projects may not be implemented within this project summary in addition to Corridor A. Project No. Project Summary Cost ($M) 13 SR-55/SR-91 Interchange Improvements 200 14 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to I-15 2,720 15 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor B) from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road 5,960 16 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail TBD SUBTOTAL 8,880+ Figure 2-5 Summary of Projects for Implementation by Post-2025/2030 2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 23

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 24

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 25

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 26

2009 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 27

SECTION 3: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2009 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, RCTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), and other agencies. Draft Project Study Report/Project Report Adjacent to Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing, SARI line R/W relinquishment, April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 Project Study Report/Project Report On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Westbound Off- Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On-Ramp (PM 16.4), June 2008 California Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), February 2007 Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates for Green River Road Overcrossing, 2006 Project Study Report On Route 91 from Green River Road to Serfas Club Drive in the City of Corona in Riverside County, December 2006 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Project Study Report On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County, October 2006 Riverside County-Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 Preliminary design plans for Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, 2006 SR-91 Choke Point Elimination - City of Corona, Prepared by Parsons, November 19, 2005 Project Study Report Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, July 2004 Project Study Report On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County, April 2004 California Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim-Ontario Segment; California-Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 SR-91 Congestion Relief Alternatives Analysis, Caltrans, January 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 2009 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28