RiskTopics. Motor vehicle record (MVR) criteria October 2017

Similar documents
MVR Evaluation. MVR Evaluation. When to Order MVRs. MVR Evaluation Tools. Loss Control Bulletin. MVR Point System

Policies and Procedures Handbook Procedure No.: T.2 Illinois Institute of Technology Date of Issue: 7/11

Risk Control at United Fire Group

TRANSPORTATION POLICY Motor Vehicle Reports - MVR s & EPN (Non-School Bus Drivers)

Town of Guilford 223 Marble Road Guilford, NY POLICY AND PROCEDURE. Vehicle Safety Policy & Procedure

WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY POLICY

Exhibit III-4.2 Company Driver Handbook.doc 1

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SYSTEM VEHICLE SAFETY PROGRAM

711. USE OF VEHICLES ON SCHOOL BUSINESS

IDENTIFYING HIGH RISK DRIVERS

Student Transportation Governance Council Policy

Loss Prevention Reference Note. Motor Vehicle Reports (MVRs)

THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON VEHICLE OPERATOR POLICY

The Road to Safety and Compliance Starts with You! ISRI DOT Self-Audit Checklist

Policy 1411: Vehicle Use Procedures

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SYSTEM VEHICLE SAFETY PROGRAM

KING S COLLEGE TRANSPORTATION POLICY

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

Auto Safety Policy. And. Vehicle Handbook

Sample Vehicle Fleet Safety Policy

ANS Vehicle Fleet Safety Policy

Chapter 8: Driver s License Revocation, Suspension, Denial, Cancellation

City University of New York Automobile Use Policy

Drivers History State Information

SPEARFISH FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to all Ogeechee Technical College employees who drive on State of Georgia business regardless of frequency.

Pacific April 2010 VEHICLE SAFETY MANUAL. Office of Budget & Risk Management

A GUIDE TO SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES IN NEW YORK STATE

Using Fleet Safety Programs to Impact Crash Frequency and Severity Session # S772

Policy on Use of Vehicles for University Purposes

APPLICATION FOR CLASS A CDL DRIVER

IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Transportation Services Vehicle Use ISUPP 2310

Independent Contractor Driver Application

PLAINFIELD TRUCKING,Inc.

Safe Driving Policy. 1. Objectives of the policy. 2. Code of conduct. 3. Responsibilities as an employee. Rev. Number 4 Page: Page 1 of 5

East Lake Tarpon Special Fire Control District

DRIVER APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

GENERAL EDUCATION EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS DRIVING POSITIONS LIST ALL DRIVER'S LICENSES YOU HA VE HELD IN THE PAST THREE (3) YEARS

Motor Vehicle Use Regulation

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

Driver Qualification Handbook

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Collision Investigation, Preventability Determination, and Corrective Action

CSA Compliance, Safety & Accountability. Training By Patti Gillette, Director of Safety Colorado Motor Carriers Association

AARMAC TRANSPORT, INC nd Ave SW MINOT, ND 58701

Tillman Insurance Agency, Inc. Driver Safety Manual

How to Prepare for a DOT Audit

EPS Fleet Safety Manual

Policy & Procedure for driving a vehicle for Colorado College activities

1. Guidelines for Fleet Risk Management 2-4

USC Upstate Policy For The Safe Operation of Golf Carts, Accessibility Carts, Low Speed and Utility Vehicles on Campus

Transporation Policies and Procedures CO 400.7:

GENERAL STAFF REQUIREMENTS & RESPONSIBILITIES

DRIVER'S APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

Ontario s Large Truck Studies A s t r o n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u t u r e t o g e t h e r

DRIVER S APPLICATION

used only in conjunction with university sponsored activities. Talking on cell phone or texting while driving are prohibited.

New Entrants Safety Education Seminar for Georgia Motor Carriers CHAPTER 3

DCTC Procedure Vehicle Use

Massachusetts Private Passenger Automobile Statistical Plan Appendix C Traffic Law Violations

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Public Meeting of February 9, 2016 (Information subject to editing)

R U A GOOD DRIVER? TOPICS 10/24/2012 OR LIKE THIS? DO YOUR VEHICLES LOOK LIKE THIS? REQUIREMENTS FOR A FLEET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

DATE ISSUED: 9/13/ of 5 LDU DBA(REGULATION)-X

PROCEDURE Commissioning and Decommissioning of Fleet Vehicles and Parts. Number: G 2104 Date Published: 8 August 2013

A. Travel between the place where the Authority vehicle is dispatched and the area where official Authority business is performed.

Business and Noninstructional Operations

DOT Regulation and Compliance

VEHICLE SAFETY TRAINING WORKSHOP

Table of Contents. 1. Summary of Driver Qualifications. 2. College Approved Driver s List. 3. College-owned and Rental Vehicles

Use of College-Owned and Leased Vehicles

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Fleet Safety Program

4.0 Carrier Profile System (CPS)

This application must be filled out completely and accurately to be considered. EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION FOR CONTRACTOR DRIVERS

Bevill State Community College Transportation Policy

EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION

Kids Central, Inc. System of Care Policy & Procedure

Pennsylvania s Ignition Interlock Limited License Expanded and Remodeled

DRIVING & CITY VEHICLES January To identify some rules relevant to use of vehicles; and,

CRIME STATISTICS New Mexico State University

BASIC 5: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

FLEET SAFETY POLICY (FSP)

Local Law 23: Criminal Summons Data for all City Agencies Other than NYPD January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018

PACKAGE / UMBRELLA FORMS

Best Practices to Reducing Suspended and Revoked Drivers 2013 Region IV Conference Broomfield, CO

Fleet Data Organization and Compliance are Keys to CSA 2010 Preparedness

DRIVING POLICY. Page 1

Name: phone: ( ) Current address: Previous address: Names of relatives employed by Arizona Jobsite Concrete: Last school attended: degree:

HODGE & LANGLEY LAW FIRM Parent/Teen Safe Driving Agreement

2505 Industrial Park Rd Van Buren, AR Current Address: (Street) (City) (State) (Zip)

Authorized Driver Policy and Procedures

HUMAN RESOURCE FLEET SAFETY. I. Responsibility

Driving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6

Fertile-Beltrami Fleet Safety Policy

IN THE EAST LIVERPOOL MUNICIPAL COURT COLUMBIANA COUNTY

Revision April 2011 MVSubcommittee MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY POLICY AND GUIDELINES

Changes to Chapter , Florida Administrative Code Underground Storage Tank Systems (USTs) Effective 1/11/2017

Driving Registration Procedures

Driver Safety. The First Step to a Safer Fleet

John M. Seidl - (262) DOT Consultant & Insurance Agent

Transcription:

RiskTopics Motor vehicle record (MVR) criteria October 2017 Studies show a correlation between past driving performance and future vehicle crash involvement. Drivers who have experienced moving violations and crashes are more likely to be involved in future vehicle crashes. 1,2 Introduction Obtaining and reviewing a current motor vehicle record (MVR) for the driver can help determine if they are qualified to operate a vehicle for your organization. This assessment process may apply to those operating company vehicles, as well as those operating their personal vehicles for business use. MVR information is maintained by each state and can often be obtained either directly from the state or from MVR vendor companies. (Please see Zurich s Risktopic on Obtaining motor vehicle records for more detailed information.) For all new drivers, consider ordering MVRs for each state in which the applicant has held an operator's license in the previous three years. MVR checks should go back at least five years in total and be used as part of the overall driver selection program. In addition to new driver checks, MVRs should also be ordered and reviewed at least annually for all drivers. Drivers that have been identified as having driving violations may be flagged for more frequent MVR reviews and other interventions. Studies have shown a correlation between past driving performance and future vehicle crash involvement. Drivers who have experienced moving violations and crashes are more likely to be involved in future vehicle crashes. 1,2 An important function in any organization is to determine what constitutes an acceptable driving record. Once acceptable driver criteria have been established, all drivers should be informed of the policy, acknowledge their understanding of it, and management should follow the criteria fairly and consistently. Discussion Developing an evaluation criteria There are many considerations when developing the criteria for evaluating motor vehicle records and these may vary depending on the type of vehicle being driven, location and other factors. Some of these include:

Department of Transportation regulations Other jurisdictional requirements (e.g., applicable state-specific guidance) Union/labor agreements Contractual obligations Industry best practices Advice from insurance representatives Organizations should work with their own legal counsel to address these considerations and to help ensure that the evaluation criteria meets their needs. Zurich Risk Engineering developed this Risktopic to help organizations in establishing their basic MVR criteria. While the majority of drivers may not have any violations or crashes on their driving record, the guidance provided here may help your organization assess MVRs for those that do. Guidance Reviewing the motor vehicle record Please note that the definitions of minor, major and serious incidents are provided as examples of some of the more common violations. There are many more violation types that are not included here that an organization may need to consider based on severity. Vehicle crashes How many vehicle crashes / collisions occurred within the past 3 years? Vehicle crash any crash that appears on the MVR; consider both at-fault and not-at-fault crashes Minor incidents How many "minor incidents" occurred within the past 3 years?. Minor incidents include minor moving violations, such as minimal speeding (<15 mph over the speed limit), failure to stop at a stop sign, improper passing, improper backing, failure to pay toll, etc. Major incidents How many "major incidents" occurred within the past 3 years?. Major incidents include major moving violations, such as excessive speeding (between 15 mph to 25 mph over speed limit), improper lane change, failure to yield, running red lights, careless driving, texting while driving, etc. Serious incidents How many "serious incidents" occurred within the past 5 years? Serious incidents include severe moving violations, such as driving while intoxicated (DUI, DWI), refusing substance abuse testing, homicide or assault with a vehicle, leaving the scene of an accident (hit and run), eluding a police officer, any vehicle-related felony, drag racing, reckless driving, speeding 25 mph or greater over the speed limit, license suspension due to moving violations, driving while license suspended, etc. 2

Evaluating the motor vehicle record - Acceptable driver guideline Consider the guidelines that your organization should apply to determine whether an MVR demonstrates an acceptable driving history. For example, a driver may be deemed acceptable if: 3 or fewer minor incidents and no other violations of any type OR 1 vehicle crash and no other violations of any type OR 1 major incident plus 1 minor incident and no other violations of any type Note: If the driver has any serious violations, their record may be deemed unacceptable. See 'Action Steps' section below for suggested actions to help address drivers who do not meet the acceptable criteria. The sample Motor Vehicle Record Evaluation Worksheet included in this Risktopic may be useful in reviewing driver records. Review examples Example 1: If a driver had two minor incidents in the past three years, no major incidents in the past three years, no serious incidents in the past five years, and no crashes in the past three years, he/she would be an acceptable driver according to the driver MVR criteria shown above. Example 2: A driver could have no minors, majors or crashes in the past three years, but if they had one serious event in the past five years, then they would not be in the acceptable driver category according to the acceptable driver MVR criteria. Additional considerations In addition to minor incidents, major incidents, serious incidents and crashes, organizations may consider nonmoving violations (e.g., illegal parking, vehicle defects, driving without insurance, unregistered vehicle, administrative suspensions) as a part of the overall driver evaluation criteria. Such violations may indicate a driver's tendency to disobey company policies and rules. Organizations selecting employees who may drive should also consider other information available beyond the motor vehicle record such as interview results, road tests and the Pre-Employment Screening Program abstract (for commercial drivers). See Zurich s Risktopics on Driver Selection and the Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) for additional details. Action steps An organization should have written policies to address any drivers who do not meet the acceptable criteria. These policies may include retraining and progressive discipline, up to and including rescinding of driving privileges. A driver who has their driving privileges revoked by an organization may continue to work in a nondriving capacity for that organization if business needs and policies allow for this. Keep in mind that additional training and coaching may also be appropriate for drivers who are considered acceptable, but have a pattern of violations on their motor vehicle record. Conclusion Motor Vehicle Records are an important part of any fleet safety program. The information they provide is a critical component in driver selection and evaluation. Organizations that review and consider the driving 3

record of the individuals who will drive on behalf of the company can help take a first step towards improved road safety and fleet risk management. References 1. Predicting Truck Crash Involvement: Developing a Commercial Driver Behavior-Based Model and Recommended Countermeasures. American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI). 2011. Web. 20 June 2016. <http://www.atri-online.org/research/results/one-pager%20cmve.pdf> 2. Gebers, Michael A. Strategies for Estimating Driver Accident Risk in Relation to California s Negligent Operator Point System. California Department of Motor Vehicles Research and Development Branch. Technical Monograph 183. California Department of Motor Vehicles. July 1999. 4

Motor Vehicle Record Evaluation Worksheet* Driver Name Date of MVR Review Reviewer Name Violation Points # of Violations Violations within previous 5 years (Serious) Driving while intoxicated (DUI, DWI) 4 Refuse drug/alcohol test 4 Homicide or assault with a vehicle 4 Leaving the scene of a crash (hit and run) 4 Eluding a police officer 4 Any vehicle related felony 4 Drag racing 4 Reckless driving 4 Speeding 25 MPH or greater over the limit 4 License suspension due to moving violations 4 Driving while license suspended 4 Other serious violation 4 Major violations within previous 3 years Speeding 15 MPH to 25 MPH over the limit 2 Improper lane change 2 Failure to yield 2 Running red light 2 Careless driving 2 Texting while driving 2 Other major violation 2 Minor violations within previous 3 years Speeding <15 MPH over limit 1 Failure to stop at stop sign 1 Improper passing 1 Improper backing 1 Distracted driving (other than texting) 1 Failure to pay toll 1 Other minor violation 1 Vehicle collisions within previous 3 years Vehicle collision 3 Total Points Notes TOTAL VIOLATION POINTS 4 points or more High Risk 2 3 points Medium Risk 0 1 points Low Risk *Sample provided for illustration purposes only. 5

The Zurich Services Corporation Risk Engineering 1299 Zurich Way, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196-1056 800 982 5964 www.zurichna.com motor_vehicle_record_criteria_rt The information in this publication was compiled from sources believed to be reliable for informational purposes only. All sample policies and procedures herein should serve as a guideline, which you can use to create your own policies and procedures. We trust that you will customize these samples to reflect your own operations and believe that these samples may serve as a helpful platform for this endeavor. Any and all information contained herein is not intended to constitute advice (particularly not legal advice). Accordingly, persons requiring advice should consult independent advisors when developing programs and policies. We do not guarantee the accuracy of this information or any results and further assume no liability in connection with this publication and sample policies and procedures, including any information, methods or safety suggestions contained herein. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of this information, whether to reflect new information, future developments, events or circumstances or otherwise. Moreover, Zurich reminds you that this cannot be assumed to contain every acceptable safety and compliance procedure or that additional procedures might not be appropriate under the circumstances. The subject matter of this publication is not tied to any specific insurance product nor will adopting these policies and procedures ensure coverage under any insurance policy. 2017 The Zurich Services Corporation. All rights reserved.